Connect with us

News

HUD is bracing as DOGE seeks to cut waste, fraud. Union leaders have a suggestion

Published

on

HUD is bracing as DOGE seeks to cut waste, fraud. Union leaders have a suggestion

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development building is seen in Washington, D.C.

Alastair Pike/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Alastair Pike/AFP via Getty Images

The Trump administration is asking employees at the Department of Housing and Urban Development to justify hundreds of contracts across the agency. One email sent Monday afternoon included a spreadsheet to fill out asking whether a contract was “critical,” whether it had a DEI component and if the contractor was competent.

The email also asked for a name on each form, a “contract champion within the bureau who will personally vouch for the answers.” It was sent by Scott Langmack, senior adviser to Government Efficiency, and said it was “urgent” that answers be sent by end of day Tuesday, Feb. 11.

The request has added to worries among workers that HUD might be the next target for major downsizing by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a unit in the Trump administration led by Elon Musk.

Advertisement

During his first term, President Trump repeatedly proposed dramatic cuts to HUD’s budget, though they did not pass Congress. The conservative policy agenda Project 2025 calls for reigning in HUD’s “bureaucratic overreach” and transferring its functions to other agencies, states and localities.

The agency manages rental assistance for millions, provides funding to house homeless people, helps lower-income families buy homes, and builds and repairs affordable housing.

HUD contracts include services such as property management, inspections and appraisals on housing it oversees, credit analysis for its mortgage insurance arm, and research on how its programs perform and ways to improve them.

One department staffer also said future funding grants are now effectively on pause, and that permission is needed to move ahead with anything. “It’s impossible to plan in this totally chaotic environment,” this person said.

Another worker said the idea that entire parts of HUD might be wound down was “devastating.” A third said leadership was reminding people that the agency’s work is important and bipartisan, but the erosion of support for government aid has been demoralizing.

Advertisement

All three employees asked that their names not be used because they feared for their jobs.

Two HUD union leaders with the American Federation of Government Employees expressed similar concerns. But mixed with that was also hope that DOGE scrutiny could lead to much-needed change in the agency.

“If we really want to get to the bulk of fraud, waste and abuse, let’s take a close look at a federal procurement system, because this has been broken for years,” said Antonio Gaines, president of AFGE National Council 222.

HUD’s union has been alleging fraud, waste and abuse since last year

Gaines knows the stereotype that federal workers are lazy and said front-line employees take the blame for a slow bureaucracy. But often, he said, they are hamstrung by decisions made higher up.

One such decision, he said, was implementing a new tool for inspecting public housing that has been disastrously slow and clunky to use. “The app is woefully dysfunctional, but we spent $40 million on it already,” Gaines said.

Advertisement

Last year, AFGE Council 222 filed a complaint with HUD’s Inspector General and members of Congress. It said the app made it impossible for HUD to inspect nearly all of its five million housing units across the country every five years, as required by law.

There hasn’t been much response so far. But Gaines hopes that will change now that DOGE has asked for a review of all contracts.

“This is something that really will shed light on the lack of oversight.” said Erik Jetmir, the legislative and political chair for Council 222.

On the other hand, both officials said, it’s too early to know which way things will go. The Trump administration “can just as easily take a look at the contracts and replace them with loyalists and cronies,” Jetmir said.

Gaines was surprised that Trump and Musk, who “consider themselves to be elite business people,” had not made a business case for dramatic downsizing. “They’re making a political case for it, and I think that’s very dangerous,” he said.

Advertisement

HUD staff feel stressed and left in the dark

Several HUD employees said they’ve been given almost no information on what changes to expect. One called the situation a “nightmare.” A union survey this month found 80% of respondents reported very high stress levels.

Gaines said the Trump administration’s repeated digs at federal employees — like saying public sector jobs are “lower productivity” — are offensive. And the offer to pay people for months to sit home and do nothing? “It seems to me that is the epitome of fraud, waste and abuse of taxpayer dollars,” he said.

Several people expressed a visceral fear of getting fired. There is also worry about how many people might choose to retire or leave if the Trump administration’s offer is upheld in court. One source was concerned that losing many people in the same department could make it tough to “carry out our mission.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Published

on

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Former U.S. Olympian David Hearn (left) walks with his attorney Norman Eisen to speak to reporters and protesters gathered after his arraignment at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in Washington, D.C. on Thursday.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Former U.S. Olympic canoeist David Hearn pleaded not guilty to damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in D.C. Superior Court Thursday morning.

Federal prosecutors charged Hearn with a single count of destruction of property causing more than $1,000 in damage to the pool.

Hearn has previously claimed, which his attorneys repeated during a short press conference outside the court, that he simply touched the water in the pool out of curiosity.

Advertisement

The Trump administration had just completed a $14 million renovation of the pool.

But shortly after the work finished, peeling paint and algae gathered in the water. The remodel has been largely criticized as a massive failure and waste of taxpayer dollars.

Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean released Hearn on his own recognizance. His next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 5.

Norm Eisen, one of Hearn’s attorneys, spoke to reporters outside of court following the hearing. He said the administration is using Hearn as a “scapegoat … for their own failures.”

“It is not a crime to touch the reflecting pool, to touch water in the United States of America,” he said.

Advertisement

Prosecutors say there is a host of evidence against Hearn.

This is a developing story.

Continue Reading

News

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Published

on

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Three more people have been criminally charged with destruction of property at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Officers say they detained Cameron Thiers, Sophie Dennison-Gibby and Justin Carreno one Saturday afternoon in June and described in court documents witnessing them peeling and removing pieces of blue paint from the Reflecting Pool.

One officer “witnessed Carreno reach down into the reflecting pool and pull up a piece of the blue paint,” according to the court documents.

The officer who detained Dennison-Gibby “found 1 additional piece of the reflecting pool liner” in her purse, the documents said.

All three incidents were recorded on the officers’ body worn cameras, they said in the court documents.

Advertisement

Several “partnering law enforcement agencies assigned to the Reflecting Pool” working with US Park Police were involved in detaining the two men and one woman — including officers from Texas, Oklahoma, Montana and California.

One of the officers said in court documents that Thiers “admitted to removing a piece of blue sealant from the Reflecting Pool and still had it in his hand when I made contact with him.”

The three defendants were arraigned in court Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to the misdemeanor charges of destruction of property with a value less than $1,000. The judge ordered them to stay away from the Reflecting Pool.

Lawyers for Thiers and Dennison-Gibby declined to comment. CNN has reached out to Carreno’s attorney.

If found guilty of destruction of property, the defendants could be fined up to $1,000 and face a maximum of 180 days behind bars.

Advertisement

The New York Times first reported that three additional people had been charged with damaging the Reflecting Pool.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that vandals caused major damage to the pool by gashing the lining after his administration spent more than $14 million on renovations, though he has not provided evidence to support that claim. The officers who charged Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby did not accuse them of gashing the lining.

Former Olympic canoeist David Hearn was indicted by a grand jury in Washington, DC, last week for allegedly damaging the Reflecting Pool. Hearn — unlike Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby – was charged with destruction of property with a value of more than $1,000 which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, if convicted. He is set to be arraigned in court Thursday.

Crews began draining the Reflecting Pool over the weekend to make repairs, according to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, for the second time in three months.

The move comes after weeks of problems – algae blooms, green-hued water, a chipping bottom and the administration’s allegations of vandalism – that have plagued the iconic landmark, making its woes the subject of national interest.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Published

on

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett speaks at the Reagan Library on Sept. 9, 2025, in Simi Valley, Calif. Barrett discussed and signed copies of her new book, Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution.

Mario Tama/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Even as the Supreme Court was handing down one legal thunderbolt after another last week, the justices were quietly releasing their annual financial reports. Justice Samuel Alito was the only sitting justice to request an extension, which he has done for 15 years. The disclosures do not give a complete account of the justices’ total income and wealth, but they give insights into their concertgoing, guest professorships and even their involvement in youth sports.

In addition to their salaries, much of the justices’ reported income came from their book deals. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson led the pack earning more than $1.1 million last year for a total of roughly $4 million since her memoir, Lovely One, was published in 2024.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and retired Justice Anthony Kennedy also reported income from published books. Earnings from their books ranged from $849,000 for Barrett, to $300,000 for Gorsuch and $88,000 for Sotomayor, whose books include her 2013 autobiography and five children’s books. Justice Clarence Thomas, who previously earned $1.5 million for his 2007 memoir, listed no publisher payments last year, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of 13 co-authors of a 2016 legal treatise, also received no payments last year. Kavanaugh is said to be working on a memoir but he listed no payments for the anticipated book. Alito does have a book coming out in the fall, but with his financial report still outstanding, there is no data on how much he was paid for the work in 2025.

Advertisement

The only two sitting justices who have not written books are Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan.

Many justices also earned income from teaching at law schools. Roberts reported income from New England Law, located in Boston, and Gorsuch reported teaching income from George Mason University in Virginia. Thomas taught classes at Catholic University in Washington, D.C., and Barrett and Kavanaugh taught at Notre Dame Law School. Barrett graduated from the school and began teaching there 23 years ago; Kavanaugh has family connections to Notre Dame.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending