Connect with us

News

Here’s how Fox and Newsmax tried to spin the January 6 committee’s first prime-time hearing | CNN Business

Published

on

Here’s how Fox and Newsmax tried to spin the January 6 committee’s first prime-time hearing | CNN Business


New York
CNN Enterprise
 — 

This column is in regards to the media, and this second exemplifies America’s two parallel tracks of media. So in case you watched Thursday night time’s listening to by the Home’s 1/6 committee, proven reside by a lot of the main TV networks in the US, let me let you know what I watched on right-wing TV on the similar time.

The prime-time listening to started at 8 p.m. Japanese time. When Rep. Bennie Thompson gaveled the listening to to order, Fox Information host Tucker Carlson ignored him. Carlson declared that the “ruling class” was giving “yet one more lecture about January 6.” He known as the listening to “propaganda” and reveled in his refusal to air it. “They’re mendacity,” he stated, “and we’re not going to assist them do it.”

Carlson then lied himself: He stated “if one thing noteworthy occurs” on the listening to, “clearly we are going to convey it to you instantly.” However his present didn’t try this.

Advertisement

When Thompson stated January 6 was “the fruits of an tried coup,” Carlson requested why the information media cared in any respect. He barely talked about Donald Trump, though the previous president’s plot to undermine American democracy was the point of interest of the listening to. As an alternative, he talked loads about Democrats and questioned why different networks have been committing “collusion” with the Home by televising the listening to. “As a result of the Democrats and the left are determined,” his visitor Jason Whitlock stated.

When Rep. Liz Cheney revealed lots of the committee’s findings for the primary time, Carlson stated everybody is aware of that America “might face some actual issues actual quickly;” implied that Congress shouldn’t be losing its time on the 1/6 investigation; and known as Thompson and Cheney “lunatics.”

Carlson seemed like an beginner magician who tries to distract youngsters when a efficiency falls aside: “Look over right here, not over there.” He stated, “Gasoline is over 5 bucks. Inflation is greater than it’s been within the lifetime of most Individuals. Violent crime is making cities inconceivable to reside in, and a couple of hundred thousand Individuals ODed on medicine final yr. Why isn’t there a chief time listening to about any of that?”

All night lengthy, Fox downplayed the violence of January 6 and dismissed the revelations about Trump’s conduct. The community additionally ignored its personal function in selling false claims in regards to the election earlier than the riot and the committee’s publication of personal messages between a few of its hosts.

When Cheney learn a textual content trade between Fox stars Sean Hannity and Kayleigh McEnany from the day after the riot, with Hannity urging “no extra loopy individuals” and “no extra stolen election discuss,” Carlson confirmed the reside protection on different networks and made enjoyable of these networks. He didn’t point out something in regards to the texts.

Advertisement

Newsmax, Fox’s right-wing rival, truly confirmed most of Cheney’s remarks, however reduce away for evaluation from pro-Trump commentators. The community’s banners additionally promoted Trump’s speaking factors and, at occasions, Newsmax’s personal app.

Again on Fox, when the committee confirmed a never-before-seen video of the Capitol being attacked, with terrifying pictures from surveillance cameras and different sources, Carlson’s producers confirmed sterile reside pictures of the listening to room, however not the video. Considered one of his banners stated “TODAY’S HEARING IS POLITICAL THEATER.”

When the video concluded, Newsmax’s Rob Schmitt stated, “we noticed loads worse in the summertime of 2020, spurred on by feedback from the opposite facet of the aisle, that burned main cities on this nation down. The place’s the listening to on that? Effectively they don’t have that listening to, as a result of they don’t care about your life, the place you reside.”

When Sean Hannity started his Fox program at 9 p.m., he did the identical factor Carlson did: He confirmed silent reside video of the listening to and talked over it your complete time. Hannity stated the listening to – nonetheless in progress – was “the dullest, probably the most boring” Democratic “fund-raiser.” He didn’t play a phrase of what Cheney stated. He targeted as a substitute on safety lapses and laid the blame immediately at Home speaker Nancy Pelosi’s ft.

When the committee swore in its witnesses, Fox’s banners known as the listening to a “SHAM” and an “ANTI-TRUMP SHOW TRIAL.”

Advertisement

When injured police officer Caroline Edwards described how she was tear gassed outdoors the Capitol, The Federalist editor in chief MZ Hemingway tweeted, “Is the Soviet-style present trial nonetheless occurring?”

When Edwards described “carnage” and stated she was “slipping in peoples’ blood” outdoors the Capitol, Hannity stated the listening to was a failure: “They overpromised, they underdelivered.” In some way he claimed to know that already, though he was on reside TV throughout half two of the listening to. And no, he by no means acknowledged his personal texts or his personal function as an adviser to Trump.

When the listening to concluded, and analysts on the opposite networks absorbed the enormity of what was introduced, the pro-Trump media narrative was already baked. On Newsmax, Schmitt dismissed it as a “fully one-sided listening to about one thing that occurred a yr and a half in the past.” On Fox, the banner on Laura Ingraham’s 10pm present stated “JAN 6TH COMMITTEE FLOPS IN PRIMETIME.”

Why does the right-wing media opposition matter? As a result of it ensures that the nation stays on two wildly completely different tracks of knowledge.

“Don’t get me unsuitable: These hearings are essential and each American needs to be watching them,” The Atlantic contributing author Tom Nichols wrote Thursday. “However the alternate actuality that about forty p.c of us reside in won’t ever be breached by precise information.” The Dispatch senior editor David French estimated that “tens of thousands and thousands” of individuals nonetheless don’t perceive “the fact of January 6 largely as a result of the information shops and personalities they belief are intentionally mendacity and/or withholding the plain fact about Trump and that dreadful day.”

Advertisement

After all, Fox Information stated days prematurely that it might not present the prime time listening to on its flagship community, but it surely was nonetheless extraordinary to see the community observe by on its ignore-the-news plan. Mediaite’s editor in chief Aidan McLaughlin didn’t maintain again: “The footage of horrific violence being aired proper now could be why this listening to isn’t airing on Fox Information. To allow them to lie about it,” he tweeted.

Fox’s precise listening to protection was relegated to the Fox Enterprise Community, which has a tiny fraction of the primary channel’s viewership. The protection additionally streamed on Fox Nation and was out there to Fox broadcast stations. Notably, nonetheless, Carlson and Hannity’s reveals didn’t level to these shops or promote these choices. They didn’t put a field within the nook of the display pushing to the information. As an alternative, Bret Baier tweeted a reminder that he was on Fox Enterprise, and critical replies piled up.

“All of us heard that this was going to be a made-for-TV listening to, a presentation designed to seize the eye of the general public in a means that standard Capitol Hill occasions merely don’t,” Oliver Darcy wrote. “Particularly, we heard that the 1/6 committee was consulting with former ABC Information president James Goldston to assist with the manufacturing. The New York Instances teased that Goldston had been employed ‘to supply the hearings as in the event that they have been a docudrama or a must-watch mini-series.’”

“However in actuality, the listening to didn’t really feel like a ‘docudrama’ or ‘must-watch mini-series.’ Not even shut,” Darcy wrote. “As an alternative, it largely employed the fashion of a typical, run-of-the mill Capitol Hill listening to. Sure, there was additionally a haunting video package deal displaying the uncooked violence of that day. However that video, the one actual detour from the everyday listening to format, solely comprised a sliver of the two-hour affair.”

The listening to “was not the shock and awe it wanted to be,” Deadline senior editor Dominic Patten wrote proper afterward. “Regardless of the reward from TV speaking heads, this was NPR when it ought to have been UFC.”

Advertisement

The Hollywood Reporter critic Frank Scheck disagreed: “It stays to be seen whether or not what’s to observe within the coming weeks will do something to maneuver the needle amongst a citizenry that appears to have settled into their respective stances. However judging from the opening installment, there shall be loads of highly effective materials for these with open minds to digest.”

A model of this text first appeared within the “Dependable Sources” e-newsletter. You possibly can join free proper right here.

Advertisement

News

Gantz threatens to quit Israeli government if no new war plan by June 8

Published

on

Gantz threatens to quit Israeli government if no new war plan by June 8

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Benny Gantz has threatened to leave Israel’s emergency government if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not commit to a new plan for the war with Hamas in Gaza and its aftermath.

In a televised statement on Saturday evening, Gantz, an opposition figure and former general who joined Netanyahu’s coalition in the aftermath of Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel, said that his centrist National Unity party would leave the government if his demands were not met by June 8.

Gantz’s ultimatum brings to a head months of tensions within Netanyahu’s government over the handling of the war, and comes just days after defence minister Yoav Gallant slammed Netanyahu for the lack of a postwar plan for Gaza, the enclave Hamas has ruled since 2007.

Advertisement

This is a developing story . . .

Continue Reading

News

Six-month-old baby shot repeatedly during Arizona standoff with child’s father

Published

on

Six-month-old baby shot repeatedly during Arizona standoff with child’s father

A six-month-old baby is currently hospitalized after a man allegedly shot the infant several times during an armed home standoff in Surprise, Arizona, about 30 miles north-west of Phoenix.

At about 3am on Friday, the father of the child allegedly broke into the home where the child and mother lived, according to Surprise police. The child’s father did not live in the house, police said, adding that the man held the mother and child hostage for several hours before the mother managed to escape.

According to police, the mother contacted a construction crew and requested that they call 911. They added that she had minor injuries and it remains unclear how she managed to escape.

In a press conference on Friday, Surprise police spokesperson Rick Hernandez said: “She believed the baby was in danger … Officers responded to the residence and, upon arrival, they heard multiple rounds of gunfire coming from inside the residence.”

Hernandez continued: “That was when the officers forced entry. Upon forced entry, our understanding is that officers almost immediately located the injured child, took that injured child and got the child to care.”

Advertisement

“That baby sustained multiple gunshot wounds and was airlifted to a nearby hospital with serious injuries,” he said, adding that the child’s injuries, which were in its lower extremities, were believed to be non-life-threatening.

While police, including multiple Swat teams, were at the scene, the house caught fire as the child’s father was still inside.

Describing the scene to Arizona’s Family, the news outlet’s drone operator, Hector Holguin, said: “Next thing you know, there was smoke. And after the smoke, there’s a huge ball of fire coming from the back of the house and it just spread from the back all the way to the front … It just progressed. It collapsed the roof.”

As the house burned, a number of nearby residents self-evacuated when they were contacted by police while others chose to shelter in place, said Hernandez, adding: “As the incident progressed, many were asked to leave.”

skip past newsletter promotion
Advertisement

Firefighters were able to control the flames by using two ladder trucks to hose down the house as well as the house next door, and were largely able to put out the fire by 4:30pm, Arizona’s Family reports.

It remains unclear how the fire started or what condition the father is in. According to police, an investigation remains under way and the father is not in custody.

“Once the [tactical units] get the clearance to go into that residence, we might have an update on him,” Hernandez said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Pietro Beccari: ‘There is no household in the world that doesn’t have [contact with] Louis Vuitton’

Published

on

Pietro Beccari: ‘There is no household in the world that doesn’t have [contact with] Louis Vuitton’

It was the image that launched a social media sensation: football superstars Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi hunched over a chess game set atop Louis Vuitton’s signature luggage. 

That 2022 campaign image broke the record at the time for most likes on Instagram. Now the world’s biggest luxury house, with more than €20bn in annual sales, is looking to capitalise once again on one of the sporting world’s biggest duos in a new campaign featuring rival tennis virtuosos Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer. 

The pairing is a coup for Vuitton chief executive Pietro Beccari. It has been just over a year since he took on one of the luxury sector’s biggest jobs with a mandate to further grow the LVMH-owned brand — which had its origins as a 19th-century luggage-maker — by transforming it into a cultural juggernaut.

“There is no household in the world that doesn’t have [contact with] Louis Vuitton products,” Beccari tells the FT in a video interview from Paris. “There are not a lot of brands that can say they enter the lives of people like we do.”

Beccari is not just talking about sales of handbags and ready-to-wear fashion — though those more than doubled between 2018 and 2022, according to estimates from HSBC. Now, under the guidance of LVMH chief executive Bernard Arnault and Beccari’s leadership, Louis Vuitton is further pushing back luxury’s boundaries in a bid to reach an ever-wider audience.  

Advertisement

“We are in books, in writing, in editing. We are in music,” the 56-year-old Italian executive says. “We are very much in sports . . . so we are very much covering a spectrum of life that interests people. It is like a magnet for them to become attracted to the brand.”

Beccari’s popular approach to the luxury brand was epitomised by his appointment last year of musician and producer Pharrell Williams to design menswear. What Williams lacked in technical design knowledge he made up for in cultural cachet, transforming catwalk shows into entertainment events featuring elaborate stagings and musical guests such as Jay-Z. The appointment has divided the fashion world, however, with critics lamenting what they saw as the triumph of spectacle over craft at LVMH’s flagship brand. 

Pharrell Williams at Louis Vuitton’s autumn/winter 2024 menswear show in Paris © WireImage

For Beccari, however, weaving a deepening web of overlaps between popular culture, entertainment and brand identity is strategic and key to the megabrand’s future: “For every show Pharrell has done so far, we have always had new songs coming out” — the latest of which was produced for Miley Cyrus and played for the first time at Louis Vuitton’s latest autumn/winter 2024 menswear show. 

Within the same season, “Pharrell also launched the cowboy hat and now you’re seeing that in the US just about everywhere. Even Beyoncé has an album supporting cowboy culture [for which Pharrell has also written a few songs]”, says Beccari. “These are examples of our brand in luxury, not just in selling bags, but having an influence on culture.”

However, the increasing ubiquity of Louis Vuitton presents its own challenge as the brand attempts to balance accessibility against losing the veneer of exclusivity that is essential to commanding the prestige and price points of luxury. “We’ll see if I’m good at it or not in two to three years . . . but this is an eternal dilemma,” says Beccari.

Advertisement

One of his bets is on creating limited distribution of entry-level products, such as sunglasses and fragrance, in order to create scarcity. This has seen “incredible success”, he notes. “Normally a successful perfume would be in 80,000 or 90,000 stores. We limit it to around 400.” (Louis Vuitton’s store network is much larger than luxury peers such as Hermès and Chanel).

A classic black-and-white photo portrait of a man in a dark jacket and dark buttoned-up shirt
Louis Vuitton’s CEO Pietro Beccari © Nathaniel Goldberg

Louis Vuitton’s control of its distribution network and policy of never discounting its products are another advantage, according to Beccari. He also points to its care system, which allows customers to bring back products purchased from the brand to be repaired. 

“We need to preserve our desirability despite our visibility and that’s the biggest challenge that we have,” Beccari says. “We are making sure that the levers we put in place will pay off in the long term, and I believe that this campaign [with Nadal and Federer] will help increase the desirability of the brand in the long run.”

Still, taking Louis Vuitton to the next level is being made more challenging due to a sector-wide slowdown in luxury sales following a multi-year boom during the pandemic. Brands with a broader, more aspirational client base such as Louis Vuitton have been hit harder by the slowdown than competitors like Hermès, which cater to the top tier of wealthy clients. 

The darkening outlook in the key Chinese market, which fuelled growth for much of the past decade, also presents a challenge to the sector as a whole. “Beccari comes at a pretty difficult time because the industry is going through quite a bit of a slowdown, and notably the rebound in Chinese consumption is not at the level most industry managers would have hoped for a few months ago,” says Erwan Rambourg, global head of consumer and retail research at HSBC. 

Beccari, however, has a naturally competitive nature, having previously been a professional footballer in Italy’s second division in his early life, as well as a coach. Born in a small town in Italy’s Parma region, Beccari was recruited to LVMH from mass market shampoo-maker Henkel in 2006.

Advertisement

He quickly rose through the ranks at the luxury group, first leading fashion brand Fendi before being appointed CEO of Dior, the group’s second-biggest brand by sales, in 2018. Under his leadership, Dior’s sales quadrupled, according to HSBC estimates, by expanding its market share across women’s and men’s fashion, leather goods, jewellery and homewares. He also oversaw the renovation of Dior’s flagship at 30 Avenue Montaigne in Paris, which includes a museum, restaurant and private suite. 

Beccari has similar ambitions to leverage Louis Vuitton’s pedigree to expand its offering in hospitality. It already operates an airport lounge in Doha and restaurants in Osaka, Chengdu and Seoul. A large-scale project on Paris’s Champs Elysées, still currently under construction, is widely expected to include a Louis Vuitton-branded hotel.

“We have plans in the Champs-Elysées — it is not a secret,” says Beccari. “We are already active in lifestyle and believe that we need to be about much more than just buying bags.”

Two men holding tennis racquets against a snowy mountain backdrop
A behind-the-scenes photo of Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal © Annie Leibovitz

With Federer and Nadal, Beccari is making good on a project he first conceived back in 2007, when he was executive vice-president of marketing and communications at Louis Vuitton, with Antoine Arnault, Bernard Arnault’s eldest son and then-director of communications at Louis Vuitton.

It is a revival of the Core Values campaign that first began in 2007 and ran into the 2010s. The latest iteration shows Federer and Nadal, photographed by Annie Leibovitz, trekking through the jagged peaks of Italy’s Dolomites mountain range, both sporting branded backpacks (Federer in a classic monogram Christopher style and Nadal in a monogram Eclipse version).

Was it difficult getting the two superstars together? “Not at all,” insists Beccari. “They are good friends and see each other privately. It was a rivalry that became a friendship. They are proud of it and I think they set an incredible example.”

Advertisement

“We sell excellence, quality, success and optimism. In a way, the notion of travel and adventure in life is a mirror of that,” Beccari continues, and the driving force behind LVMH’s sponsorship of this summer’s Paris Olympics. 

For the executive, Nadal and Federer epitomise the Olympic spirit. “I think nobody more than them represents this extreme, ferocious competition that becomes friendship, which is exactly what sports should be.”

Find out about our latest stories first — follow @financialtimesfashion on Instagram — and subscribe to our podcast Life & Art wherever you listen

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending