The textual content of the invoice defines 9 “divisive ideas” that will not be allowed to be taught if it turns into legislation. Amongst them are the concepts that one race or ethnicity is inherently superior to a different; the idea that the USA and Georgia are “essentially or systemically racist”; and the observe of lecturers making college students really feel demeaned or responsible due to their races, pores and skin colours or ethnicities.
Whereas the invoice would ban these ideas in curriculums and coaching packages, the language within the invoice doesn’t “prohibit the dialogue of divisive ideas, as half of a bigger course of instruction, in an goal method and with out endorsement.”
Based on the textual content of the invoice, it additionally doesn’t “prohibit using curriculum that addresses matters of slavery, racial or ethnic oppression, racial or ethnic segregation, or racial or ethnic discrimination, together with matters referring to the enactment and enforcement of legal guidelines leading to such oppression, segregation, and discrimination.”