Connect with us

News

Cities Move to Sever ‘Sister City’ Ties With Russian Governments

Published

on

Cities Move to Sever ‘Sister City’ Ties With Russian Governments

On the peak of the Chilly Conflict, because the deep chill in diplomatic relations between the US and the Soviet Union continued, pairs of cities throughout each international locations embraced an idealistic mission: to kind cultural and political bonds as “sister cities.” Now, with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in its fourth bloody week, these ties look like fraying as by no means earlier than.

Throughout the US, governments in cities together with Chicago, Dallas and Des Moines have moved to droop decades-long relationships with Russian sister cities as a press release of condemnation of Russia’s assault.

The invasion is “maybe the best problem between our two international locations in additional than a half century,” Mayor Franklin Cownie of Des Moines wrote in a letter to the top of administration of the Russian metropolis of Stavropol final week after the Metropolis Council unanimously determined to droop the sister metropolis relationship. “That is an act of unprecedented aggression that we, as two longtime pals, can not ignore or disregard,” he wrote.

Plans in Iowa to ship a delegation to Stavropol to have a good time the 30-year anniversary of the connection in July have been known as off.

Whereas many sister metropolis partnerships are largely symbolic, the choices to finish or droop them factors to a broader unraveling of ties between the US and Russia, by which even relationships between personal residents have gotten strained.

Advertisement

The collapse of those ties comes as many firms and organizations are halting operations in Russia. Main multinational firms like McDonald’s and Starbucks have quickly closed areas throughout the nation. Worldwide sports activities leagues have barred Russian groups from occasions. A world oncology community announced that it might pull out of all collaborations in Russia.

“All of us activate the TV and see pregnant moms being murdered and civilians dropping lives and cities being destroyed,” stated Sean Spiller, mayor of Montclair, N.J., who despatched a letter to his Russian counterpart in Montclair’s sister metropolis Cherepovets threatening to interrupt the cities’ ties final week.

“There may be at all times a price to exchanging concepts — however there’s additionally a time and a spot for that,” Mr. Spiller stated. “And I believe the time and place just isn’t when your nation’s dictator is in a warfare of aggression towards an harmless neighbor.”

There are 68 official sister metropolis relationships between U.S. and Russian cities, in response to Sister Cities Worldwide, a citizen diplomacy nonprofit. In some cities, the relationships have existed largely on paper, with leaders exchanging intermittent letters of help. In others, the partnerships have been extra substantive, with metropolis leaders making common visits, and college students, enterprise leaders and docs taking part in alternate applications.

Some sister metropolis partnerships are standing agency.

Advertisement

In a March 7 letter to the mayor of Tallahassee, Fla., Mayor Lauren Poe of Gainesville, Fla., emphasised his dedication to sustaining a sister metropolis relationship with the town of Novorossiysk in Russia, and urged the town of Tallahassee, “within the strongest phrases potential,” to do the identical with its sister metropolis of Krasnodar.

“We should not maintain the households of our sister cities answerable for the actions of a nationalist tyrant,” Mr. Poe wrote. “Fairly, we have to strengthen our resolve to construct on person-to-person management and have a good time citizen diplomacy.” The Metropolis Council of Tallahassee voted unanimously two days later to sever its ties with Krasnodar.

Gainesville’s ties to Novorossiysk date to 1982, when Gainesville grew to become among the many first cities to launch a sister metropolis relationship with a metropolis within the Soviet Union. Almost each Gainesville mayor has visited at the very least as soon as in the course of the chief’s time period ever since.

Advertisement

“I sort of liken it to getting married,” stated Steve Kalishman, government director for the Sister Metropolis Program of Gainesville, of the dedication made by the 2 cities. And he would know: He met his spouse in Novorossiysk in 1976 whereas engaged on a industrial ship transporting grain to the Soviet Union. After getting married and shifting to Gainesville, the couple pushed the town to go a decision making Novorossiysk its sister metropolis. The 2 hand-delivered the decision to the town authorities in Novorossiysk together with a symbolic massive golden skeleton key.

The connection grew to become one of many few channels of communication between the Soviet Union and the US on the time.

“Unusual American and Soviet folks couldn’t talk with one another — you needed to e book a cellphone name 24 hours prematurely and sit by the cellphone till it rang,” Mr. Kalishman stated. As the specter of nuclear warfare loomed, he based a company known as Citizen Diplomacy Initiatives and commenced fielding calls from metropolis officers throughout the US hoping to create channels for communication between the 2 nations.

In a letter to its members in late February, Sister Cities Worldwide pleaded with metropolis leaders to keep up ties to their Russian counterparts.

“Whereas suspending or ending a sister metropolis relationship to register disapproval of a overseas authorities’s actions could appear, on the floor, like a constructive coverage protest motion, it has the exact opposite impact — closing an important and, ofttimes, final channel of communication with weak or remoted populations,” wrote Leroy Allala, president of Sister Cities Worldwide.

Advertisement

Reducing off enterprise ties can ship a persuasive message, however severing ties amongst unbiased residents doesn’t, he stated.

Particularly now, as Russians are struggling to beat digital barricades erected by President Vladimir V. Putin in latest weeks, sister metropolis advocates say these traces of communication are extra vital than ever.

“Sadly, it’s the identical purpose that it’s vital now because it was within the early ’80s,” stated Mr. Kalishman, including, “We’ve form of reverted again to the Chilly Conflict now.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Special Counsel Report Says Trump Would Have Been Convicted in Election Case

Published

on

Special Counsel Report Says Trump Would Have Been Convicted in Election Case

Jack Smith, the special counsel who indicted President-elect Donald J. Trump on charges of seeking to cling to power after losing the 2020 election, said in a final report released early Tuesday morning that he believed the evidence was sufficient to convict Mr. Trump in a trial if his success in the 2024 election had not made it impossible for the prosecution to continue.

“The department’s view that the Constitution prohibits the continued indictment and prosecution of a president is categorical and does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the government’s proof or the merits of the prosecution, which the office stands fully behind,” Mr. Smith wrote.

He continued: “Indeed, but for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the presidency, the office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.”

The Justice Department delivered the 137-page volume — representing half of Mr. Smith’s overall final report, with the volume about the classified documents case still confidential — to Congress just after midnight Tuesday morning.

The report, obtained by The New York Times, amounted to an extraordinary rebuke of a president-elect, capping a momentous legal saga that saw the man now poised to regain the powers of the nation’s highest office charged with crimes that struck at the heart of American democracy. And although Mr. Smith resigned as special counsel late last week, his recounting of the case also served as a reminder of the vast array of evidence and detailed accounting of Mr. Trump’s actions that he had marshaled.

Advertisement

The partial release came only a day after the judge in Florida who oversaw Mr. Trump’s other federal case — the one accusing him of mishandling classified documents — issued a ruling allowing a portion of the material to be made public. But the judge, Aileen M. Cannon, who was appointed by Mr. Trump himself, also barred the Justice Department from immediately releasing — even to Congress — a second volume of the report concerning the documents case.

For more than a week, Mr. Trump’s lawyers — who were shown a draft copy of Mr. Smith’s report in advance of its release — denounced it as little more than an “attempted political hit job which sole purpose is to disrupt the presidential transition.” At least one Trump ally, the former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark, has come forward to complain that he, too, might be implicated in the report as an unindicted co-conspirator in the election interference case.

In August 2023, Mr. Smith charged Mr. Trump in Federal District Court in Washington with three intersecting conspiracy counts accusing him of plotting to overturn his loss in the 2020 election. Mr. Smith also filed a separate indictment in Florida, charging Mr. Trump with illegally holding on to classified documents after he left office and conspiring with two co-defendants to obstruct the government’s repeated effort to retrieve them.

But after Mr. Trump won the 2024 election, Mr. Smith dropped the cases because of a Justice Department policy that prohibits prosecuting sitting presidents. Under a separate department regulation, he turned in a final report about both cases — one volume on each — to Attorney General Merrick B. Garland.

Last week, the Justice Department said Mr. Garland planned to hold off on issuing the volume about the classified documents case until all legal proceedings related to Mr. Trump’s two co-defendants were completed.

Advertisement

Lawyers for the co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, fought the release by obtaining an initial injunction last week from Judge Cannon, who had dismissed the classified documents case last summer.

In her order on Monday, Judge Cannon told the defense and prosecution to appear before her on Friday in Federal District Court in Fort Pierce, Fla., to argue over the department’s plan to release the classified-documents volume to Congress.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

Continue Reading

News

Los Angeles braces for ‘explosive fire growth’ as high winds near

Published

on

Los Angeles braces for ‘explosive fire growth’ as high winds near

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Los Angeles was braced for near “hurricane force” winds on Monday that weather forecasters said could fan the devastating wildfires that have swept across southern California as damage estimates mounted.

As firefighters struggled to contain the deadly blazes that continued to rage in the suburbs of the US’s second-largest city, the National Weather Service issued a “red flag alert” warning amid deteriorating conditions.

Winds of up to 75 miles an hour were expected to hit the region from Monday night until Wednesday morning, according to the NWS, combining with extremely dry conditions to create “critical fire weather”.

Advertisement

“The National Weather Service is predicting close to hurricane-force level winds, and so we’re making urgent preparations,” LA mayor Karen Bass said on Monday. “My top priority, and the priority of everyone else, is to do everything we can to protect lives as these winds approach.”

Authorities have since last Tuesday battled blazes that have burnt more than 40,000 acres of land. California governor Gavin Newsom warned the fires could become the costliest disaster in US history as he clashed with president-elect Donald Trump over the state’s response.

The cause of the fires has not yet been determined, but several lawsuits were filed against utility Southern California Edison on Monday alleging it had failed to properly shut off power lines despite warnings, leading to the outbreak of the Eaton fire.

Shares in its parent Edison International fell 11.9 per cent on Monday.

A Southern California Edison spokesperson said: “SCE understands that a lawsuit related to the Eaton fire has been filed but has not yet been served with the complaint,” adding that the company “will review the complaint when it is received. The cause of the fire continues to be under investigation.”

Advertisement

Insurance stocks were also hit as anticipated damages mounted. Wells Fargo analysts estimated insurance losses could top $30bn and potentially reach as much as $40bn. On Friday, JPMorgan analysts had pencilled in an industry-wide hit of $20bn, a level that would already have been the largest in the state’s history.

On Monday, Newsom said he was proposing $2.5bn in additional emergency funding to aid LA in the recovery, clean-up and reopening of schools. “California is organising a Marshall Plan to help Los Angeles rebuild faster and stronger,” he said in a statement. The funding will need to be approved by the state legislature.

The largest of the outbreaks, the Pacific Palisades fire, was just 14 per cent contained late on Monday, prompting fears that strong gusts in the coming days would reverse progress in combating the blazes.

The weather service warned that “extreme fire danger” would continue until Wednesday and said that the category of alert in place — a “particularly dangerous situation red flag warning” — was reserved for “extreme of the extreme fire weather scenarios”.

“In other words, this set-up is about as bad as it gets,” the NWS warned as it cautioned powerful winds could create “explosive fire growth”.

Advertisement

The death toll hit 24 on Monday, officials said, and was expected to climb as authorities combed through the wreckage in search of missing people.

Firefighters work to clear a firebreak on a hillside covered with retardant in an attempt to contain the Palisades fire © Ringo Chiu/Reuters

The disaster has spilled over into the political arena, with Trump on Sunday attacking the state’s authorities for failing to halt the destruction. “The fires are still raging in L.A. The incompetent pols have no idea how to put them out,” he posted on his Truth Social network.

The incoming Republican president has accused California’s governor, a Democrat, of depleting water reserves to protect an endangered species of fish, and of refusing to sign a “water restoration declaration”. Newsom’s office said no such declaration exists.

“That mis- and disinformation I don’t think advantages or aids any of us,” Newsom told NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday, noting he had invited the president-elect to visit affected areas but had yet to receive a response. “Responding to Donald Trump’s insults, we would spend another month.”

Meanwhile, city officials warned against price gougers who have increased prices for rental properties as thousands of people fled their homes.

Advertisement

LAist, a local news site, found a Zillow listing for a furnished home in Bel Air going for $29,500 a month — 86 per cent higher than in September.

Cartography by Steven Bernard

Continue Reading

News

What Causes California Fires? Power Lines Can Be a Contributor.

Published

on

What Causes California Fires? Power Lines Can Be a Contributor.

Investigators are still working to identify what caused the spate of fires that ignited around Los Angeles last week, but residents are concerned that electrical infrastructure may have sparked at least one of them.

Since 1992, more than 3,600 wildfires in California have been related to power generation, transmission and distribution, according to data from the U.S. Forest Service. Some of the most destructive fires have been traced back to problems with utility poles and power lines.

Extent of power line fires near Los Angeles

Roughly a dozen power line fires have burned more than 200,000 acres in areas northwest of the city since 1970.

Source: CalFire

Extents of recent fires, as of Jan. 13, are outlined in black.

Advertisement

By The New York Times

CalFire releases data on past large wildfires and determines their causes in different natural and human-related categories, such as lightning or arson. The agency lists more than 12,500 fires since the late 1800s, though the causes of more than half are unknown or unidentified.

Lightning and use of equipment are among the most common known causes, but over the past few decades, the share of fires known to be caused by power infrastructure has grown across the state.

The 20 most destructive California wildfires

At least eight of California’s most destructive wildfires had power-related causes. Those fires are shown in bold.

Advertisement

Source: CalFire

By The New York Times

Residents of Altadena, Calif., sued Southern California Edison on Monday, saying the utility’s electrical equipment set off the Eaton fire, which has burned more than 13,000 acres and 5,000 structures in the city and neighboring areas. The company has said it is investigating the fire’s origin.

Advertisement

Power distribution lines were found to have caused some of California’s largest-ever fires in recent years.

The Thomas fire in 2017 was started when high winds forced Southern California Edison’s power lines to collide, a situation known as “line slap.” Burning material fell to the ground in the Upper Anlauf Canyon, about 35 miles from the current Palisades fire, and the resulting fire burned for almost 40 days.

The 2018 Camp fire, in Northern California, started when an electrical arc between one of Pacific Gas & Electric’s power lines and a steel tower sent molten metal onto the underlying vegetation. That fire claimed more than 80 lives and destroyed over 18,000 structures.

In the summer of 2021, California’s largest single-source wildfire, the Dixie fire, started when a tree made contact with several of PG&E’s distribution lines near the Cresta Dam in Northern California. Electricity continued flowing in one of the lines, which started the fire, and nearly a million acres across four counties burned.

California isn’t the only state dealing with power-related wildfires in recent years. Texas’ largest wildfire, the Smokehouse Creek fire, burned over a million acres in 2024. Xcel Energy accepted responsibility for the fire after investigators found that high winds had broken a utility pole, causing a power line to fall and ignite the dried grasses below.

Advertisement

Similar situations have caused wildfires in Oregon as well. The 2020 Labor Day fires destroyed thousands of homes and killed at least nine people, in part, after power wasn’t shut down during high winds.

Continue Reading

Trending