Connect with us

News

China’s start-ups take on big global beauty brands

Published

on

China’s start-ups take on big global beauty brands

When Chinese student Yeva Zhang first started to dabble in make-up, she only had eyes for “Japanese and South Korean brands” but now the 18-year-old student has stocked her “vanity case with Chinese ones”.

Tempted to buy by social media advertisements and livestreamers, she says she can “hardly tell the difference” between cheaper local brands and some of the biggest names in global beauty.

Local companies are nipping at the heels of global names such as L’Oréal, Estée Lauder and Shiseido in China, the world’s second-biggest beauty market by sales. Their savvy use of social media and concentration on less affluent cities overlooked by foreign firms has helped them gain ground.

Domestic labels’ share of 40 top beauty brands’ online sales in China rose to 47.9 per cent in the first 10 months of 2023 from 43.6 per cent a year earlier, according to data from Euromonitor. It forecasts that China’s colour cosmetics market, which includes products such as foundations, lipsticks and nail polishes, will hit Rmb111.3bn ($15.6bn) in 2028, up from Rmb71.6bn in 2022. 

“It is the best of times for Chinese brands, as consumers’ level of openness for them has never been higher,” said Miro Li, founder of Shenzhen-based marketing consultancy Double V Consulting.  

Advertisement

TikTok’s Chinese app “Douyin has successfully approached a wider range of consumers, particularly younger people in lower-tier cities, who are out of reach of traditional ecommerce sites such as Tmall”, said Stefan Huang, head of strategy at Shanghai-based Joy Group, which is backed by General Atlantic and owns two local cosmetics brands — Judydoll and Joocyee.

“A number of foreign companies didn’t catch up with the trend, but Chinese brands did,” he said. L’Oréal, for example, only started ramping up its marketing on Douyin in 2023. 

Sales on social media are set to become even more important, with Goldman Sachs calculating that a combined 37.5 per cent of China’s total ecommerce cosmetics transactions will take place on Douyin and its rival Kuaishou in 2025, up from 25 per cent in 2021. 

“Many foreign brands, including [those in] cosmetics, took a hit during the zero-Covid years as many decision makers based outside of China became increasingly disconnected to a fast-changing China,” said Mark Tanner, managing director of Shanghai-based branding agency China Skinny.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

The other advantage local companies have on foreign brands is domestic marketing teams and close access to factories, said Huang.

“If I spot a lipstick shade that is losing momentum or a new trend that is about to take off, I can get to the factory within two hours and adjust the production within a month,” said Huang. “It normally takes a foreign brand four to six months to respond [to consumer preferences change].”

There is still room for foreign brands to grow. Shiseido, which made 26.4 per cent of its sales in China in the first half of 2023, said in a written reply that it would increase its investments in both “promotional activities” and “brand value building” in China. Estée Lauder and L’Oréal did not respond to a request for comment. 

L’Oréal’s sales in North Asia, which is dominated by China, totalled €11.3bn in 2022, about a third of its sales that year, and up 6.6 per cent year-on-year despite harsh zero Covid lockdowns denting sales in the last quarter. Their premium luxury division in China in particular has been steadily gaining market share. Though sales in their most recent quarter in North Asia declined 4.8 per cent compared with the previous year due to changes to China’s rules about offshore daigou shopping, in the mainland they grew 7.7 per cent over the period.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

“We’ve gained very strong market share for luxury in China. The anecdote is that right now we have a market share for L’Oréal luxury in mainland China, which is above 30 per cent which is equal to the sum of its two next contenders — which is not bad,” L’Oréal chief executive Nicolas Hieronimus told the Financial Times in an interview last year.

Even as Chinese cosmetic companies gain ground, they risk becoming trapped in a “vicious cycle” of being a cheap substitute for foreign brands, said Li from Double V Consulting.

Florasis, a Hangzhou-based cosmetics start-up and the country’s largest local beauty brand with a 6.8 per cent market share, has made some inroads into the premium market. It has been helped in part by influencers such as Li Jiaqi, known as the “lipstick king”. But it suffered a backlash last year after livestreamer Li criticised a viewer for not earning enough to buy Florasis’s eyebrow pencil worth Rmb79. He later apologised.

The company says its prices are justified by its more than Rmb10bn investment into R&D infrastructure and high-cost packaging. “There’s no copycat of us in the market because it’s too expensive to make [our products],” said Gabby Chen, president of global expansion at Florasis.

Florasis hopes to replicate its formula of vast social media presence and traditional Chinese motifs in overseas markets including the US, Japan and south-east Asia. Joy Group has also set up operations in countries including Japan, Malaysia and Canada. 

“They have been raised in China’s hyper-competitive marketplace” so they may have an advantage in a “slower moving marketplace abroad”, said Tanner from China Skinny. “We saw this with [fast fashion brand] Shein, which didn’t do anything special by Chinese standards . . . There is no reason Chinese beauty brands couldn’t do this too.” 

Advertisement

Additional reporting by Adrienne Klasa in Paris

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

Published

on

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

new video loaded: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

By Devon Lum, Haley Willis, Alexander Cardia, Dmitriy Khavin and Ainara Tiefenthäler

January 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending