Connect with us

News

China accuses foreign consultant of spying for MI6

Published

on

China accuses foreign consultant of spying for MI6

Stay informed with free updates

China’s security agency has accused British intelligence services of using a foreign national to spy on the country, highlighting rising tensions between Beijing and western countries over espionage.

The Ministry of State Security said on Monday that the UK’s Secret Intelligence Service, known as MI6, instructed the head of a foreign consultancy to enter China multiple times since 2015, gather information and help recruit people.

The alleged spy, surnamed Huang, was from a “third country”, the statement said.

Advertisement

The Financial Times was not able to independently verify the ministry’s claims. The British embassy in Beijing did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The MSS has levelled a series of accusations against western intelligence services amid rising geopolitical tensions. In the past the powerful Chinese spy agency rarely discussed such cases publicly, but it has increasingly publicised them since setting up a presence on social media platform WeChat last year.

Beijing has also cracked down on foreign consultancies and due diligence firms operating in China over the past year amid concerns that international businesses sharing sensitive information to clients could pose a national security threat.

Companies including Bain & Company, Mintz Group and Capvision have been targeted by raids and investigations, which have sparked fears among investors and business figures about their personal security while operating in China.

The FBI and US justice department have also publicised recent cases of alleged Chinese espionage by Chinese nationals and American citizens, among them military personnel and former intelligence officers.

Advertisement

The Financial Times reported last month that an MSS office ran a far-right Belgian politician as an intelligence asset for more than three years.

The case demonstrated how Beijing conducts influence operations abroad in an effort to shape politics in its favour, including on issues such as its crackdown on democracy in Hong Kong and persecution of Muslim Uyghurs in Xinjiang.

It also underscored concerns over the EU’s vulnerability to Chinese espionage efforts as ties between Brussels and Beijing have become more fraught.

Last year the chair of the UK’s intelligence and security committee raised the alarm over “increasingly sophisticated” Chinese spying operations, calling Britain’s response “completely inadequate”.

A parliamentary researcher was arrested last year on suspicion of spying for Beijing, an issue Prime Minister Rishi Sunak raised with Chinese premier Li Qiang at the G20 summit in New Delhi in September.

Advertisement

However, western authorities have also been accused of exercising undue suspicion of people of Chinese background or with personal connections to China.

Separately on Sunday the MSS released a cartoon series promoting its counter-espionage efforts. The series, state media said, tells the “magical story” of Chinese security officers outsmarting overseas spies.

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

Published

on

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

new video loaded: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

By Devon Lum, Haley Willis, Alexander Cardia, Dmitriy Khavin and Ainara Tiefenthäler

January 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending