Connect with us

News

Brothers, Wrongfully Convicted of Murder, Are Freed After 25 Years in Prison

Published

on

Brothers, Wrongfully Convicted of Murder, Are Freed After 25 Years in Prison

After 25 years in jail, George DeJesus stated the belief that he had been freed started to sink in solely when he was lastly capable of change out of his jail uniform and placed on his personal garments — together with a sweatshirt with a photograph of him and his brother beneath the phrase “harmless.”

“Once I took off them blues and began placing on these, each sew of clothes that I placed on, my smile received greater and larger,” he stated. “That was in regards to the second — once I put these garments on, it was actual for me.”

Mr. DeJesus, 44, was talking on Tuesday after a choose freed him and his brother, Melvin DeJesus, 48, overturning their convictions within the 1995 homicide of their neighbor Margaret Midkiff, who was discovered nude in her basement in Pontiac, Mich., with a pillowcase over her head and wires binding her neck, wrists and ankles.

The brothers had at all times maintained that they have been at a celebration when Ms. Midkiff was murdered, however they have been convicted and sentenced to life with out parole in 1997 based mostly on the testimony of Brandon Gohagen, who claimed that the brothers had compelled him to rape Ms. Midkiff and had then killed her by stomping on her.

Robyn B. Frankel, director of the Michigan lawyer common’s Conviction Integrity Unit, stated that an intensive assessment of proof within the case confirmed that Mr. Gohagen had blamed the brothers in trade for a cope with prosecutors that allowed him to plead responsible to lesser prices and keep away from a compulsory life sentence.

Advertisement

“He ended up throwing George and Melvin beneath the bus and stated they really participated and compelled him,” stated Lori Montgomery, one other prosecutor within the Conviction Integrity Unit, which was created in 2019 and commenced reviewing the case in 2020. “However in actuality, what we discovered is that he, Brandon Gohagen, did this crime alone.”

Each brothers credited their mom, Elizabeth DeJesus, with serving to them preserve their struggle to be exonerated alive, 12 months after 12 months and decade after decade.

“It was exhausting since you might lose religion,” George DeJesus stated at a information convention the place the brothers embraced one another, their dad and mom and different kin. “However we at all times fought exhausting and, simply once we felt that momentum happening, my mom made us promise we’d by no means quit — it doesn’t matter what occurs.”

Ms. DeJesus put her arms round her sons and stated: “One wrongful conviction is just too many. So I received my boys right here and I’ve to thank God for it. We’re blessed.”

The brothers have been helped by the Cooley Innocence Challenge at Western Michigan College and the College of Michigan Innocence Clinic, which labored on their circumstances for years earlier than the Conviction Integrity Unit agreed to assessment the matter.

Advertisement

Ms. Frankel stated the assessment uncovered that solely Mr. Gohagen’s DNA had been discovered on the crime scene, even on the pillowcase and ligatures that he claimed the brothers had touched.

Witnesses additionally corroborated the brothers’ alibi that they have been at a celebration on the evening when Mr. Gohagen stated that they’d killed Ms. Midkiff, Ms. Frankel stated.

In 2016, the case additional unraveled when a DNA search linked Mr. Gohagen to the sexual assault and homicide of one other lady in Pontiac, Rosalia Brantley, in 1994, about 11 months earlier than Ms. Midkiff was sexually assaulted and killed in a strikingly comparable crime, Ms. Frankel stated.

Ms. Brantley, whose physique was additionally discovered nude and certain three miles from Ms. Midkiff’s house, had been stabbed and crushed to dying, Ms. Frankel stated.

In 2017, Mr. Gohagen, who was serving 35 to 80 years in jail for second-degree homicide and first-degree prison sexual conduct within the killing of Ms. Midkiff, was convicted of murdering and sexually assaulting Ms. Brantley and sentenced to life in jail with out parole.

Advertisement

Ms. Frankel stated the Conviction Integrity Unit recognized 12 different girls who have been emotionally, bodily, and sexually abused by Mr. Gohagen within the Nineties, undercutting his declare that the DeJesus brothers had compelled him to sexually assault Ms. Midkiff in opposition to his will.

Mr. Gohagen was a “serial rapist” who was “simply operating rampant within the neighborhood,” Ms. Frankel stated.

Dana Nessel, the Michigan lawyer common, stated the case offered a “notably tenuous state of affairs” through which the brothers had been convicted based totally on the testimony of a perpetrator who sexually assaulted the sufferer.

“That’s a scary set of circumstances to know that an individual can spend the remainder of their life behind bars with no different proof than that,” she stated. “We actually must be cautious and we actually must be suspect to make sure that folks aren’t going to jail on flimsy proof like this.”

Turning to George DeJesus, Ms. Nessel stated: “I’m so sorry that this occurred to you and to your loved ones. No one deserves this. And it’s a complete miscarriage of justice.”

Advertisement

Exonerated prisoners in Michigan are eligible for as much as a 12 months of housing and two years of different companies, comparable to assist discovering a job, work garments and instruments, prosecutors stated.

The brothers stated they deliberate to carry a household assembly as they started to plan their lives after jail.

“I waited so lengthy for this,” Melvin DeJesus stated. “And you understand the phrases that I heard probably the most? ‘Be affected person.’ How lengthy are you able to be affected person? Yearly I’ve been affected person. Lastly, lastly, we’re free.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Joe Biden says ‘oligarchy’ emerging in US in final White House address

Published

on

Joe Biden says ‘oligarchy’ emerging in US in final White House address

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

US President Joe Biden has warned that an “oligarchy is taking shape in America” that risks damaging democracy, as he blasted an emerging “tech industrial complex” for delivering a dangerous concentration of wealth and power in the country.

Biden’s comments during a farewell address to Americans from the Oval Office on Wednesday night amount to a veiled attack on Donald Trump’s closest allies in corporate America, including tech billionaire Elon Musk, just five days before he transfers power to the Republican.

Biden said he wanted to warn the country of the “dangerous concentration of power in the hands of a very few ultra-wealthy people” and the danger that their “abuse of power is left unchecked”.

Advertisement

He cited late president Dwight Eisenhower’s warning in his 1961 farewell address of a military-industrial complex and said the interaction between government and technology risked being similarly pernicious.

“I’m equally concerned about the potential rise of a tech-industrial complex that could pose real dangers for our country as well. Americans are being buried under an avalanche of misinformation and disinformation, enabling the abuse of power. The free press is crumbling. Editors are disappearing. Social media is giving up on fact checking,” Biden said.

Biden’s words were a reference to the world’s richest man, Musk, the owner of social media platform X and the founder of electric-vehicle maker Tesla, who gave massive financial backing to Trump’s campaign and has become one of his closest allies during the transition to Trump’s new administration.

Some of Silicon Valley’s top executives, from Jeff Bezos of Amazon to Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, have also embraced Trump since his electoral victory and are expected to have prime spots at the inauguration ceremony in Washington on Monday.

Biden also used his remarks to cast a positive light on his one-term presidency, which ended with the big political failure of him dropping his re-election bid belatedly in late July, passing the torch of the campaign against Trump to vice-president Kamala Harris — an effort that ended in a bitter defeat.

Advertisement

Biden’s approval ratings have hit new lows as he bows out from the presidency and a political career in Washington that has spanned more than five decades. Just 36.7 per cent of Americans approve of his performance on the job, and 55.8 per cent disapprove, according to the FiveThirtyEight polling average.

Biden said he hoped his accomplishments would be judged more favourably in the future.

“It will take time to feel the full impact of all we’ve done together, but the seeds are planted, and they’ll grow and they’ll bloom for decades to come,” he said.

Biden has not only faced seething criticism from Republicans, but also rebukes from Democrats who blame him for seeking re-election despite his advanced age. He is now 82.

Biden’s presidency was defined by a record-breaking jobs market and a robust recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as a series of legislative accomplishments on the economy. But the pain of high inflation became a massive political vulnerability for him.

Advertisement

In foreign affairs, he took credit for western support for Ukraine after Russia’s full-scale invasion of the country in 2022, but his response to conflict in the Middle East, including staunch support for Israel’s war in Gaza, drew a strong backlash from progressive Democrats, undermining the unity of his political coalition.

It was not until Wednesday, with five days to go before he left office, that Biden — with help from Trump aides — was able to broker a ceasefire deal to free hostages held by Hamas. 

“This plan was developed and negotiated by my team and will be largely implemented by the incoming administration. That’s why I told my team to keep the incoming administration fully informed, because that’s how it should be, working together as Americans,” he said at the start of his address.

Continue Reading

News

Biden touts major wins in farewell address

Published

on

Biden touts major wins in farewell address
Biden touts major wins in farewell address – CBS Texas

Watch CBS News


In his farewell address, President Biden warned an “oligarch” of “ultrarich” threatens America’s future.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Takeaways From Marco Rubio’s Senate Hearing

Published

on

Takeaways From Marco Rubio’s Senate Hearing

Marco Rubio, the Republican senator from Florida named by Donald J. Trump to be the next secretary of state, was warmly welcomed by senators from both parties at his confirmation hearing on Wednesday. He has served for years on the Foreign Relations and Intelligence Committees in the Senate, and is known as a lawmaker devoted to the details of foreign policy.

“I believe you have the skills and are well qualified to serve as secretary of state,” Senator Jeanne Shaheen, Democrat of Hampshire, said in her opening remarks.

The notable lack of tension at the hearing indicated that Mr. Rubio would almost certainly be confirmed quickly.

From the lines of questioning, it was clear what senators want Mr. Rubio and the Trump administration to focus on: China, Russia, North Korea and Iran. Mr. Rubio himself pointed to those four powers — what some call an “axis” — in his opening remarks.

They “sow chaos and instability and align with and fund radical terror groups, then hide behind their veto power at the United Nations and the threat of nuclear war,” he said. As permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, China and Russia have veto power over U.N. resolutions.

Advertisement

Mr. Rubio repeatedly singled out the Chinese Communist Party for criticism, and, unlike Mr. Trump, he had no praise for any of the autocrats running those nations.

He did say the administration’s official policy on Ukraine would be to try to end the war that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia started, and that leaders in both Kyiv and Moscow would need to make concessions. U.S. officials say Russia has drawn its allies and partners into the war, relying on North Korea for troops and arms, Iran for weapons and training, and China for a rebuilding of the Russian defense industrial base.

Mr. Rubio defended Israel’s conduct in the war in Gaza, blaming Hamas for using civilians as human shields and calling the deaths of tens of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza, most of them non-combatants, “one of the terrible things about war.”

He expressed concern about threats to Israel’s security. “You cannot coexist with armed elements at your border who seek your destruction and evisceration, as a state. You just can’t,” he said.

When asked whether he believed Israel’s annexing Palestinian territory would be contrary to peace and security in the Middle East, Mr. Rubio did not give a direct answer, calling it “a very complex issue.”

Advertisement

Mr. Rubio’s hearing was about two hours in when the committee’s chairman announced that Israel and Hamas had sealed an agreement to begin a temporary cease-fire and partial hostage release in Gaza. An initial hostage and cease-fire agreement, reached in November 2023, fell apart after a week.

Mr. Rubio called the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which Mr. Trump has repeatedly criticized, “a very important alliance” and insisted that Mr. Trump was a NATO supporter. But he also backed Mr. Trump’s argument that a strong NATO requires Europe to spend more money on its collective defense.

The United States, he said, must choose whether it will serve “a primary defense role or a backstop” to a self-reliant Europe.

Some prominent Trump supporters remain distrustful of Mr. Rubio. They recall his vote to certify the 2020 election results despite Mr. Trump’s false claims of election fraud. And they consider Mr. Rubio’s foreign policy record dangerously interventionist.

Mr. Rubio has long been a hawkish voice on national security issues, often in ways that clash with Mr. Trump’s views, even if the ideas are conventional ones among centrist Republican and Democratic politicians.

Advertisement

In the past, Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, has criticized Mr. Rubio for advocating aggressive American intervention overseas. Mr. Paul has been outspoken in pushing for less use of U.S. troops abroad and is skeptical about whether economic sanctions can lead to positive outcomes.

On Wednesday, Mr. Paul pointedly asked Mr. Rubio whether he saw any way to work with China rather then persisting in attacks on Beijing, and he also questioned the wisdom of many American and European policymakers who insisted that Ukraine must be admitted to NATO.

Continue Reading

Trending