Connect with us

News

Biggest brokers say insurers must ditch ‘arbitrary’ Ukraine exclusions

Published

on

Biggest brokers say insurers must ditch ‘arbitrary’ Ukraine exclusions

Stay informed with free updates

Insurers and reinsurers must ditch “arbitrary” exclusions that cut Ukraine from policies and resume cover to support the war-torn country’s economic recovery, the world’s two biggest insurance brokers have said.

New York-listed rivals Aon and Marsh McLennan said blanket exclusions of Ukraine from policies covering everything from soured loans to property damage, which were put in place after Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022, “ignore the diversity of risk throughout the country”.

In a rare joint call, they pushed for a reversal of the insurance and reinsurance industry’s moves to lump Ukraine alongside Belarus and Russia in exclusions from broad reinsurance contracts, limiting the supply of primary insurance and “impeding” Kyiv’s economic recovery. 

Advertisement

The exclusions were part of a market pullback as insurers and reinsurers braced for billions of dollars of losses from destroyed buildings, stranded planes and other damage caused by Russia’s invasion. But Kyiv’s leaders and western allies have repeatedly highlighted the importance of the insurance sector to underpin its economy and enable the huge investment that will be needed for its post-war reconstruction.  

John Doyle, chief executive at Marsh McLennan, said the groups were calling on the global insurance sector — which is gathering in Monaco for its annual Rendez-Vous conference — to “end blanket exclusions for Ukraine” and support the country to attract global investment.

Aon chief executive Greg Case said insurers must “work to strengthen” insurance initiatives already being developed, adding: “Insurance capital is essential for the reconstruction of Ukraine’s healthcare, energy and agricultural sectors.” 

Insurance brokers negotiate with insurers to cover their clients’ assets, from supertankers to credit facilities, against potential losses, with a group of individual insurers typically providing a slice of the cover. Aon and Marsh also have big reinsurance broking operations that help primary insurers share their risks with reinsurers.

With almost all of Ukraine’s revenue allocated to its armed forces and its deficit continuing to rise, its leaders have sought insurance schemes as a way to increase trade and investment.

Advertisement

Both firms have been involved in projects seeking to draw some global insurers back into certain areas of Ukraine’s economy.

Last year, Marsh McLennan reached agreement with Kyiv to provide affordable cover to ships carrying grain from its Black Sea ports. This year, Aon unveiled a scheme with a US development agency that was intended to cover Ukrainian businesses against war risks. 

Broader appetite among insurers to underwrite Ukraine risks remains minimal, however.

Ukraine’s economy recovered from a 29 per cent drop in its GDP in 2022, to grow just under 5 per cent in 2023. But GDP growth is expected to slow to 3.2 per cent this year, according to the World Bank.

In the joint statement, Aon and Marsh said that “arbitrary exclusions for Ukraine contribute to confusion about the vastly different levels of risk in the country”, highlighting central and western areas where there is much less war damage.

Advertisement

Additional reporting by Isobel Koshiw in Kyiv

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Roger, Jane Goodell donate $10,000 to family of football coach killed in recent school shooting

Published

on

Roger, Jane Goodell donate ,000 to family of football coach killed in recent school shooting

The NFL’s Commissioner and his wife have made a significant contribution to the family of a football coach in a recent school shooting.

Via WSB-TV in Atlanta, Roger and Jane Goodell contributed $10,000 to an online fundraiser for the wife and daughters of Richard Aspinwall.

Aspinwall, 39, was one of four people killed during the shooting at Apalachee High School. He was a math teacher and served on the school’s football coaching staff.

The GoFundMe page can be found here. To date, it has raised nearly $400,000.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

News

Brazilians rally to protest supreme court judge’s decision to ban X

Published

on

Brazilians rally to protest supreme court judge’s decision to ban X

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Tens of thousands of Brazilians joined an independence day rally called by members of the rightwing opposition in protest against a supreme court judge who banned Elon Musk’s social media platform X in the country. 

Dressed in the national colours of yellow and green, attendees at Saturday’s demonstration in São Paulo held posters demanding the removal of justice Alexandre de Moraes, who has attracted controversy for a wide-ranging crackdown on digital disinformation. 

“I came here today in favour of freedom of expression. The constitution is being violated,” said 25 year-old radiologist Mayara Ribeira, wearing the shirt of the Brazilian football team. “The judge should be impeached”. 

Advertisement

X went offline in Latin America’s most populous nation just over a week ago after it ignored court orders to block certain accounts suspected of spreading falsehoods, many belonging to supporters of former hard-right president Jair Bolsonaro. 

It affected some 20mn users and marked an escalation of a months-long row over takedown decrees between Musk and Moraes, whom the tech entrepreneur has accused of censorship. 

“I don’t want anybody to be silenced, if they are leftwing or rightwing,” said retiree Elayne Nunes, 58, who travelled from the neighbouring state of Minas Gerais. “I’m happy that Elon Musk has brought to international attention what is happening in Brazil”.

The case has turned into a cause célèbre in the global debate about online free speech and energised Brazil’s populist conservative movement, which claims to be unfairly targeted by the judge. 

Allies of Moraes frame his actions as necessary to safeguard democracy against fake news, but opponents accuse him of eroding liberties. 

Advertisement

The blackout of X has divided opinion in Brazil. A survey by AtlasIntel found nearly 51 per cent of respondents disagreed with the ban, versus just over 48 per cent in favour.

Speakers at the event on Avenida Paulista urged senators to launch an impeachment of the judge, who has also become a target for wider criticisms that Brazil’s supreme court is overreaching its legal limits. 

They also appealed for an amnesty for people arrested in connection with the storming of government buildings in Brasília on January 8, 2023 by radical Bolsonaro supporters. 

Many of the rioters called for a military coup against leftwing president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who defeated Bolsonaro in the previous year’s election. 

“I hope that the federal senate puts a stop to this dictator Alexandre de Moraes, who does more harm to Brazil than Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva himself,” Bolsonaro said on stage. 

Advertisement

The ex-president faces a number of supreme court investigations from his time in office, including over an alleged coup plot — that was never implemented — to stay in power.

Researchers at the University of São Paulo estimated there were 45,400 people at Saturday’s event in Brazil’s largest city.

The trigger for X’s suspension was its failure to meet a deadline set by Moraes to appoint a new legal representative in the country, as required by domestic law. Musk had closed the company’s local office last month in protest at the judge’s orders. 

In his decision to block access to the platform, Moraes said X was seeking to create an environment of “total impunity” and a “lawless land” on Brazilian social media ahead of municipal elections next month.

Creomar de Souza at consultancy Dharma Political Risk said impeachment of the justice was unlikely for now: “It looks like we’re in for a long battle between Moraes and political forces in Brazil and abroad”.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Aryna Sabalenka beats Jessica Pegula to win her first US Open

Published

on

Aryna Sabalenka beats Jessica Pegula to win her first US Open

Aryna Sabalenka, of Belarus, reacts against Jessica Pegula, of the United States, during the women’s singles final of the U.S. Open tennis championships on Saturday in New York.

Frank Franklin II/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Frank Franklin II/AP

NEW YORK — Aryna Sabalenka got past Jessica Pegula 7-5, 7-5 in a rollicking U.S. Open women’s final Saturday to win her first championship at Flushing Meadows and third Grand Slam title of her career.

Sabalenka, a 26-year-old from Belarus, adds this trophy to the two she earned at the Australian Open each of the past two seasons, also on hard courts. And the victory allowed her to leave Arthur Ashe Stadium in a far better mood than when she was the runner-up to Coco Gauff at the 2023 U.S. Open.

Pegula, a native New Yorker whose parents own the NFL’s Buffalo Bills and NHL’s Buffalo Sabres, was participating in a major final for the first time. She’s won 15 of her past 17 matches over the past month but both losses came against Sabalenka in tournament finals.

Advertisement

The No. 2-seeded Sabalenka appeared in full control when she reeled off five consecutive games to grab the opening set and move ahead 3-0 in the second, before the No. 6 Pegula made things more interesting. In the next game, Pegula dropped a point and showed her frustration by whacking a ball off the video wall behind the baseline, dislodging a little square panel.

Maybe that released some tension for the 30-year-old American, because suddenly Pegula asserted herself, using her own five-game run. But when she served at 5-4 with a chance to force a third set, Pegula let Sabalenka level the second with a break.

That was part of a three-game, match-ending surge for Sabalenka, who soon was collapsing to the court, dropping her racket and covering her face with both arms while lying on her back.

Sabalenka is as demonstrative as anyone in the sport, her body language usually a spot-on barometer of whether things are going well — or not — for her.

As she sputtered a tad at the start Saturday, it was tough to read what she was thinking against Pegula, who eliminated No. 1 Iga Swiatek in the quarterfinals.

Advertisement

Even while falling behind 2-0, then being a point from trailing 3-1, Sabalenka reacted to her own mistakes — or winners off Pegula’s racket — by simply turning her back to the court and breathing the picture of calm, as star athletes from other sports such as Stephen Curry, Lewis Hamilton and Noah Lyles looked on from the stands.

Once Sabalenka got going, once her booming strokes — her forehands are the fastest these past two weeks, speedier than any woman’s or man’s — were calibrated just so, it quickly became apparent the outcome would be determined by what she did.

By the close, the statistics made that obvious: Sabalenka finished with far more winners than Pegula, 40-17, and also more unforced errors, 34-22. Sabalenka controlled most exchanges, with Pegula mainly stuck responding as best she could.

There was one moment of clear anger from Sabalenka. It came at 5-all in the first set, when she double-faulted to face a break point, then leaned forward and cracked her racket against the court four times while holding the handle with both hands.

She saved that break point, wound up holding in that game, then breaking Pegula to own the opening set.

Advertisement

A year ago, Sabalenka blew a lead against Gauff. Didn’t let that happen again this time.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending