Connect with us

News

Bayer turns to state lobbying in battle over Roundup weedkiller

Published

on

Bayer turns to state lobbying in battle over Roundup weedkiller

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Bayer has embarked on a lobbying effort to persuade US states to pass legislation that would cut billions of dollars in liabilities and reduce the legal threat the German company faces from an allegedly carcinogenic weedkiller.

Since 2018, Bayer has been ensnared in a complex and costly US legal battle over the weedkiller Roundup, whose active ingredient glyphosate has been blamed by tens of thousands of Americans for giving them cancer.

The German conglomerate maintains that the product is safe and says scientific research supports that view. Despite that, the company has taken steps to end the protracted crisis over Roundup, which Bayer acquired as part of its ill-fated $63bn acquisition of US crop sciences business Monsanto in 2016.

Advertisement

In 2020, Bayer reached a $10.9bn settlement over claims and set aside another $4.5bn a year later. The strategy Bayer embarked on this year has targeted Idaho, Iowa and Missouri, states where it has significant business operations.

Bayer lobbyists are pushing for local legislatures to pass bills that would affirm the primacy of federal laws on the labelling of Roundup, a key point of contention in the cases that have been fought across the US.

In a series of courtroom victories, lawyers for plaintiffs have argued that Roundup’s warning labels failed to meet state requirements and these are not pre-empted by federal law, helping them win billions of dollars.

Bayer has previously pointed to the fact that the US Environmental Protection Agency, which regulates weedkillers and their labelling, has ruled that Roundup is safe and approved its labelling.

The legal quagmire is one of multiple challenges facing Bayer chief executive Bill Anderson, who joined from Swiss drugmaker Roche last year and has vowed to restore the fortunes of one of Germany’s best-known companies.

Advertisement

Last month, Bayer said it would slash its dividend by 95 per cent this year and pay a minimal amount for the next two in bid to conserve cash. Anderson has also raised the prospect of splitting up the group to reverse the 50 per cent drop in Bayer shares over the past 12 months.

Anderson is likely to be quizzed on a potential overhaul of the company, as well its legal strategy on Roundup, when he delivers a long-awaited strategy update alongside the group’s results on March 5.

Although Bayer has won many of the Roundup cases, including one in Arkansas last week, it has also lost several.

In January, a jury in Philadelphia awarded damages of $2.2bn to a plaintiff, and while the size of awards are typically reduced by a judge, the scale of the ongoing legal fight Bayer faces in the US has worried investors. About 50,000 cases filed over Roundup remain unresolved.

Nora Freeman Engstrom, a professor at Stanford Law School, said that the chief failing of Bayer’s legal strategy was “quite simply, it didn’t reach a global [comprehensive] settlement”, referring to the 2020 settlement. “It left some cases outstanding.”

Advertisement

US trial attorneys are eager to keep fighting Bayer in court. They have spent more than $1mn between November and January on Roundup television ads, according to X Ante, a firm that tracks spending on legal advertising.

Compared with all other consumer products — such as drugs and medical devices — Roundup has been the most targeted TV advertising since August, the firm said.

According to a person familiar with Bayer’s strategy, its lobbying was not making radical demands as the federal legislation that regulates pesticide “was always taken to be the law of the land for 50 states” for decades.

That principle had been attacked by “the litigation industry” in recent years, that person claimed, adding that Bayer was calling on state lawmakers to “reconfirm that the EPA [rather than an individual state] has authority over the label of pesticides”.

Lawmakers in Iowa say the lobbying effort could be broadened across the country. This state-by-state strategy had previously been attempted by tobacco and asbestos companies when facing a wave of lawsuits, said Daniel Hinkle, senior state affairs counsel for the American Association for Justice, which represents trial lawyers.

Advertisement

“They [companies] go state-by-state to carve out and eliminate as many cases as they can that way,” he said.

But as Bayer’s fight over Roundup goes on, it is unclear whether its lobbying of state legislatures will pay off. In Idaho, for example, Republicans joined with Democrats to torpedo the legislation that Bayer was seeking.

Bayer said that proposed legislation at state level “would ensure any pesticide evaluated and registered with the Environmental Protection Agency — and sold under a label consistent with the EPA’s own scientific determinations — is sufficient to satisfy any requirements for health and safety warnings”.

.

Advertisement

News

Takeaways from an eventful 2025 election cycle

Published

on

Takeaways from an eventful 2025 election cycle

Is there such a thing as an “off year” for U.S. elections? The elections in 2025 were not nearly as all-encompassing as last year’s presidential race, nor as chaotic as what is expected from next year’s midterms. But hundreds of elections were held in dozens of states, including local contests, mayoral races, special congressional elections and two highly anticipated governor’s races.

Many of the elections were seen as early tests of how lasting President Trump’s 2024 gains might be and as a preview of what might happen in 2026.

Advertisement

Here are five takeaways from the 2025 election cycle.

In Elections Seen as Referendums on Trump, Democrats Won Big

Advertisement

Democrats did well in nearly all of this year’s elections, continuing a pattern that has played out across off-year elections for the last two decades: The party that wins the White House routinely loses ground in the next round of elections.

Advertisement

Virginia and New Jersey have historically swung away from the president’s party in governor’s races

The change in the final margin from the presidential election to the next election for governor

Sources: Virginia Department of Elections, N.J. Division of Elections, Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Elections. The New York Times

Advertisement

Elections in these years are often viewed as referendums on the president’s performance. And Mr. Trump’s approval ratings, after months of holding steady, took a dip in November.

A notable shift came in New Jersey, where the majority-Hispanic townships that swung toward Mr. Trump in 2024 swung back to Democrats in the 2025 governor’s race. That contributed significantly to the victory of Representative Mikie Sherrill, the Democratic candidate, over Jack Ciattarelli, the Trump-backed Republican.

Advertisement

New Jersey’s majority-Hispanic towns snapped back left in 2025

Each line is a township whose width is sized to the number of votes cast in 2025

Advertisement

Note: Includes townships where more than 500 votes were cast in 2025. Sources: N.J. county clerks, N.J. Division of Elections, U.S. Census Bureau. The New York Times

The leftward swing was viewed by many political commentators as a reaction to Mr. Trump. If that is the case, it remains to be seen how much of it will carry over into 2026.

Advertisement

Progressive and Moderate Democrats Are Both Claiming Victories

Democratic strategists continue to debate whether the party should embrace progressive candidates or more moderate ones. And in 2025, the election results had both sides feeling emboldened.

Advertisement

In New York City, Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist who struggled to garner support from the Democratic Party, defeated former Gov. Andrew Cuomo by nine points. A similar story played out in Jersey City, where James Solomon, a progressive, crushed former Gov. James McGreevey of New Jersey in a mayoral runoff. Progressives also prevailed in cities like Detroit and Seattle.

Centrist Democrats, meanwhile, came away with arguably the two biggest wins of the year against Trump-endorsed Republicans. Abigail Spanberger and Ms. Sherrill, both Democrats, outperformed their polling estimates and decisively won the high-profile governor’s races in Virginia and New Jersey.

The debate will continue among Democrats as several 2026 primaries have prominent progressive and moderate candidates going head to head.

Advertisement

In Texas, Representative Jasmine Crockett, a progressive, entered the primary race for a U.S. Senate seat against the more moderate James Talarico. A similar situation has developed in Maine, where Graham Platner has pitched himself as a more progressive alternative to Janet Mills in the party’s attempt to unseat Senator Susan Collins, a Republican. Other progressives, like Julie Gonzales in Colorado and Brad Lander in New York, are challenging incumbent Democrats in primary races.

A Record 14 Women Will Serve as Governors in 2026

Advertisement

Virginians elected Ms. Spanberger as their first female governor. In New Jersey, Ms. Sherrill became the second woman to secure the position. Both women significantly outperformed Vice President Kamala Harris’s margins from the 2024 presidential race, improving on her results by almost 10 points.

Female candidates also did well down the ballot. Eileen Higgins will be the first female mayor in Miami after defeating Emilio González, who had the support of Mr. Trump. And, in Seattle, Katie Wilson defeated the incumbent mayor, Bruce Harrell.

Advertisement

States that will have female governors in 2026

Advertisement

Source: Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University. The New York Times

Come 2026, a record 14 women — 10 Democrats and four Republicans — will serve as governors, with six of them expected to run for re-election next year. (More than a dozen states have yet to elect a female governor.)

In New York, it is likely that both candidates will be women: Representative Elise Stefanik, a Republican, began a campaign last month against the incumbent, Kathy Hochul.

Advertisement

Special Elections Are Still Very Special (for Democrats)

Despite not flipping any House seats, Democrats outperformed Ms. Harris’s 2024 results in every House special election this cycle. Their wins, however, offer limited insight into what might happen in 2026.

Advertisement

Special elections, which happen outside of regular election cycles to fill vacated seats, draw fewer voters than those in midterm or presidential years. Special election voters tend to be older and highly engaged politically, and they are more likely to be college educated. That has given Democrats a distinct advantage in recent years, and 2025 was no exception.

Advertisement

Democrats did well in the 2025 special elections

Democratic candidates in this year’s special congressional elections outperformed Kamala Harris’s 2024 margins.

Sources: Special election results are from The Associated Press, and 2024 presidential margins by congressional district are estimates from The New York Times. The New York Times

Advertisement

Democratic strength in special elections extended to lower-profile races held this year. In Virginia, Democrats secured 64 out of 100 seats in the House of Delegates. In Georgia, Democrats won two seats on the Georgia Public Service Commission, the first time the party won a non-federal statewide office since 2006. Pennsylvania Democrats swept the major Bucks County contests, electing a Democratic district attorney for the first time. And, in Mississippi, Democrats broke the Republican supermajority in the State Senate.

Odd-Numbered Years Are Still Very Odd (for Election Polls)

Advertisement

Polling in off-year election cycles is challenging because it’s hard to know who will turn out to vote. This year, the polls significantly overestimated the Republicans in the Virginia and New Jersey governor’s races, which both had particularly high turnout for an off year. In 2021, polls had the opposite problem, as they overestimated Democrats.

Advertisement

Polls missed in opposite directions in 2021 and 2025

Each dot is a poll from the relevant governor’s election, positioned according to its polling error in the election.

Notes: Chart includes polls fielded in October or November of the election cycle. Polling error refers to the difference between the actual result margin and the poll margin. Sources: Polls from 2025 were collected by The New York Times, and polls from 2021 were collected by the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research and 538. The New York Times

Advertisement

Polling misses don’t necessarily carry over from cycle to cycle: Despite the leftward bias of the polls in 2021, they performed very well in 2022. After each election, pollsters look at the result and evaluate their performance, and then note where they went wrong. Analysis from groups like the American Association for Public Opinion Research frequently indicates that errors come from an incorrect sense of who shows up to vote. Pollsters then try to adjust for this error in the next election cycle.

The errors of 2025 may prove largely irrelevant, however, as the midterm elections will feature a larger, very different pool of voters with a new set of races, and a new host of lessons for pollsters to learn.

Advertisement

Off years are weird, and the polling errors they produce often are as well.

Continue Reading

News

Putin tells news conference that Kremlin’s military goals will be achieved in Ukraine

Published

on

Putin tells news conference that Kremlin’s military goals will be achieved in Ukraine

MOSCOW — Russian President Vladimir Putin said Friday that Moscow’s troops were advancing across the battlefield in Ukraine, voicing confidence that the Kremlin’s military goals would be achieved.

Speaking at his highly orchestrated year-end news conference, Putin declared that Russian forces have “fully seized strategic initiative” and would make more gains by the year’s end.

Russia’s larger, better-equipped army has made slow but steady progress in Ukraine in recent months.

The annual live news conference is combined with a nationwide call-in show that offers Russians across the country the opportunity to ask questions of Putin, who has led the country for 25 years. Putin has used it to cement his power and air his views on domestic and global affairs.

This year, observers are watching for Putin’s remarks on Ukraine and the U.S.-backed peace plan there.

Advertisement

U.S. President Donald Trump has unleashed an extensive diplomatic push to end nearly four years of fighting after Russia sent troops into Ukraine in February 2022, but Washington’s efforts have run into sharply conflicting demands by Moscow and Kyiv.

Putin reaffirmed that Moscow was ready for a peaceful settlement that would address the “root causes” of the conflict, a reference to the Kremlin’s tough conditions for a deal.

Earlier this week, Putin warned this week that Moscow would seek to extend its gains in Ukraine if Kyiv and its Western allies reject the Kremlin’s demands.

The Russian leader wants all the areas in four key regions captured by his forces, as well as the Crimean Peninsula, which was illegally annexed in 2014, to be recognized as Russian territory. He also has insisted that Ukraine withdraw from some areas in eastern Ukraine that Moscow’s forces haven’t captured yet — demands Kyiv has rejected.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: Trump Mocks Obama, Biden in His Presidential ‘Walk of Fame’

Published

on

Video: Trump Mocks Obama, Biden in His Presidential ‘Walk of Fame’

new video loaded: Trump Mocks Obama, Biden in His Presidential ‘Walk of Fame’

The White House unveiled new plaques near the Oval Office mocking some of President Trump’s predecessors. The new display distorts history and aligns with Mr. Trump’s worldview.

By Chris Cameron and Jackeline Luna

December 18, 2025

Continue Reading

Trending