Connect with us

News

A group of Republicans has united to defend the legitimacy of US elections and those who run them

Published

on

A group of Republicans has united to defend the legitimacy of US elections and those who run them

ATLANTA (AP) — It was Election Day last November, and one of Georgia’s top election officials saw that reports of a voting machine problem in an eastern Pennsylvania county were gaining traction online.

So Gabriel Sterling, a Republican who had defended the 2020 election in Georgia amid an onslaught of threats, posted a message to his nearly 71,000 followers on the social platform X explaining what had happened and saying that all votes would be counted correctly.

He faced immediate criticism from one commenter about why he was weighing in on another state’s election while other responses reiterated false claims about widespread fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

“It’s still the right thing to do,” Sterling told a gathering the following day, stressing the importance of Republican officials speaking up to defend elections. “We have to be prepared to say over and over again — other states are doing it different than us, but they are not cheating.”

Sterling, the chief operating officer for the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, is part of an effort begun after the last presidential election that seeks to bring together Republican officials who are willing to defend the country’s election systems and the people who run them. They want officials to reinforce the message that elections are secure and accurate, an approach they say is especially important as the country heads toward another divisive presidential contest.

Advertisement

The group has held meetings in several states, with more planned before the Nov. 5 election.

With six months to go before the likely rematch between Democratic President Joe Biden and former Republican President Donald Trump, concerns are running high among election officials that public distrust of voting and ballot counting persists, particularly among Republicans. Trump, the presumptive GOP nominee, continues to sow doubts about the last presidential election and is warning his followers — without citing any evidence — that Democrats will try to cheat in the upcoming one.

This past week, during a campaign rally in Michigan, Trump repeated his false claim that Democrats rigged the 2020 election. “But we’re not going to allow them to rig the presidential election,” he said.

Just 22% of Republicans expressed high confidence that votes will be counted accurately in November, according to an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll last year.

“It’s an obligation on Republicans’ part to stand up for the defense of our system because our party — there’s some blame for where we stand right now,” said Kentucky’s secretary of state, Michael Adams, who is part of the group and won reelection last year. “But it’s also strategically wise for Republicans to say, ‘Hey Republicans, you can trust this. Don’t stay at home.’”

Advertisement

The effort, which began about 18 months ago, is coordinated by the SNF Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins University and the center-right think tank R Street Institute. The goal has been to start conversations about trust in elections, primarily among conservative officials, and to develop a set of principles to accomplish that.

“This has never been and will never be about Trump specifically,” said Matt Germer, director of governance for the R Street Institute and a lead organizer of the effort. “It’s about democratic principles at a higher level –- what does it mean to be a conservative who believes in democracy, the rule of law?”

He said an aim is to have a structure in place to support election officials who might find themselves in situations like that of Georgia’ secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger in 2020, when he supported Trump but rejected false claims that the election was stolen. Prosecutors in Georgia have since charged Trump and others, alleging a plot to overturn the results. Trump has pleaded not guilty.

“You can be a Republican and you can believe in all the Republican ideas without having to say the election was stolen,” Germer said.

A guiding principle for the group is that Republican officials should “publicly affirm the security and integrity of elections across the U.S. and avoid actively fueling doubt about elections in other jurisdictions.”

Advertisement

Kim Wyman, a Republican who previously served as Washington state’s top election official, said it’s imperative when officials are confronted with questions about an election somewhere else that they don’t avoid the question by promoting election procedures in their own state.

It’s OK to say you don’t know the various laws and procedures in another state, Wyman said, but she urged fellow Republicans to emphasize what states do have in common — “the security measures, the control measures to make sure the election is being conducted with integrity.”

Kansas’ secretary of state, Scott Schwab, a Republican who has participated in meetings organized by the group, said he believes there are certain aspects of elections that officials should feel comfortable talking about. But he said he would remain cautious of speaking directly about something specific happening in another state.

“If I start going beyond my realm and my role, then they don’t trust me. And if they don’t trust me, then they don’t trust the elections in Kansas, and that’s pretty important,” Schwab said in an interview.

Some election officials who have questioned election procedures outside their state have a different perspective.

Advertisement

Secretary of State Mac Warner of West Virginia, a Republican who has questioned the legitimacy of the 2020 election, said the focus should be on improving policies, such as putting in place voter ID requirements across the country, not silencing those who have questions.

“Our primary job as election officials is to build confidence, and that comes from strengthening protocols and not weakening them,” he said.

Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, a Republican who has raised questions about the way elections are run in other states, criticized what he called “activist lawsuits” and state officials who seek to change voting rules previously set by legislators.

“The things that happen in other states that go wrong are not the result of some cloak and dagger, secretive cabal conspiracy,” he said in an interview. “That’s the far-fetched stuff that makes for great YouTube videos and what have you. But the real things that go wrong in other states, are out in the open, are in full public view.”

Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson, a Republican who is the state’s top election official and has been participating in the group’s discussions, said avoiding criticism of other states and vouching for the legitimacy of election procedures is important for another reason: It can help reduce the threats and harassment directed toward election workers.

Advertisement

A recent survey by the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University’s Law School found that nearly 40% of local election officials had experienced such abuse. It’s caused many to leave their jobs. Of 29 clerks in Utah, Henderson said 20 are new since 2020 and nine have never overseen an election.

“It’s one thing to suggest that someone could do something better. It’s another thing to impugn their integrity, their character, accuse them of cheating, accuse them of nefarious things that don’t happen,” Henderson said. “It’s exhausting.”

___

Associated Press writer Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus, Ohio, contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Video: Harvard Commencement Speaker Congratulates and Thanks Graduates

Published

on

Video: Harvard Commencement Speaker Congratulates and Thanks Graduates

new video loaded: Harvard Commencement Speaker Congratulates and Thanks Graduates

transcript

transcript

Harvard Commencement Speaker Congratulates and Thanks Graduates

The university’s commencement speaker, Dr. Abraham Verghese, acknowledged the current conflict with the Trump administration.

So first, I bring you my felicitations to the graduates. No recent events can diminish what each of you has accomplished here. Graduates, I also want you to know you have the admiration and the good wishes of so many beyond Harvard. More people than you realize, more people than you realize are grateful. More people than you realize are grateful to Harvard for the example it has set by your willingness to look inward, to make painful and necessary changes, but then ultimately by your clarity in affirming and courageously defending the essential values of this university and indeed of this nation.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in U.S. & Politics

Continue Reading

News

White House moves to overturn ruling that Trump’s tariffs are illegal

Published

on

White House moves to overturn ruling that Trump’s tariffs are illegal

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

The White House has vowed to fight a court ruling that Donald Trump’s “liberation day” tariff scheme is illegal, with top trade adviser Peter Navarro saying “nothing has changed” in the president’s drive to strike deals with other countries.

The US Court of International Trade ruled late on Wednesday that Trump did not have the authority to use the emergency economic powers legislation that he cited when he imposed sweeping global tariffs last month.

The administration moved quickly to appeal against the ruling, threatening to go to the Supreme Court if necessary to try and overturn the decision.

Advertisement

The Department of Justice on Thursday asked the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington to intervene and said it would turn to the Supreme Court as soon as Friday if it did not step in.

“Absent at least interim relief from this court, the United States plans
to seek emergency relief from the Supreme Court tomorrow to avoid the irreparable national security and economic harms at stake,” the administration said.

The administration immediately asked the trade court for a stay, or a hold, on its initial ruling, which gave the White House 10 days to comply with its order.

The White House said it was “confident” the trade court’s ruling would be overturned on appeal.

But Trump’s top trade and economic advisers insisted there were other ways for the president to pursue his global trade war — and that negotiations for deals with other nations would carry on.

Advertisement

“We think we have a strong case. Yes, we will immediately appeal and try to stay the ruling,” Navarro, the chief architect of Trump’s trade wars, told Bloomberg on Thursday morning.

Navarro said the trade court ruling showed the administration could also use different legal bases to impose a baseline 10 per cent tariff and higher “reciprocal” duties on many countries.

“So nothing has really changed here in that sense . . . We are still, as we speak, having countries call us and tell us they want a deal,” he added. “These deals are going to happen.”

The ruling by the Court of International Trade comes as the Trump administration is pushing to make trade deals with dozens of countries.

Wall Street analysts suggested the court ruling would slow down, but not derail, the White House’s plans. US stocks rose after the decision but the rally moderated, with the S&P 500 index up 0.3 per cent and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite rising 0.6 per cent in early-afternoon trading.

Advertisement

“The administration is likely to either successfully appeal the ruling or to use other authority . . . to keep tariff rates high and revenue substantial,” Citi analysts wrote in a note on Thursday. “For now, the ruling will complicate and potentially delay trade negotiations.”

Goldman Sachs president John Waldron told a conference in New York on Thursday that he still expected the US government to increase tariffs on most countries.

“I think we’re going to go towards a 10 per cent universal baseline tariff with individualised, targeted tariffs on top with individual countries,” he said.

Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, also insisted that the Trump administration would be able to press ahead with its plans.

“Trump does always win these negotiations because we are right. We are right that America has been mishandled by other governments, that our tariffs are taking them to the table, and they are coming in with massive concessions, opening up their markets to our products and lowering their tariffs on us,” he told Fox Business.

Advertisement

“These activist judges are trying to slow down something right in the middle of really important negotiations.”

Hassett said there were “different approaches” that the administration could take to impose tariffs if required, but added: “We’re not planning to pursue those right now because we’re very, very confident that this really is incorrect.”

Additional reporting by Joe Miller in Washington and Martin Arnold in New York

Continue Reading

News

President Trump pardons rapper NBA YoungBoy in flurry of clemency actions

Published

on

President Trump pardons rapper NBA YoungBoy in flurry of clemency actions
play

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump pardoned rapper NBA YoungBoy as part of a spree of reprieves this week, including one for a couple known on reality television and a commuted federal sentence for a former Chicago gang leader convicted of murder.

A White House official confirmed the May 28 pardon of Louisiana-based NBA YoungBoy, 25, whose real name is Kentrell Gaulden.

He was serving a 23-month sentence for federal gun charges as part of a plea deal reached with federal prosecutors in December. The previous month, Gaulden pleaded guilty to his involvement in a Utah pharmacy drug ring, but he avoided incarceration and paid a $25,000 fine.

Advertisement

“I want to thank President Trump for granting me a pardon and for giving me the opportunity to keep building ‒ as a man, as a father, and as an artist,” Gaulden, whose rap name stands for “Never Broke Again,” wrote on his Instagram account. “This moment means a lot.” 

He added that the pardon “opens the door to a future I’ve worked hard for and I’m fully prepared to step into this.”

The pardon means Gaulden will no longer have travel restrictions, allowing him to embark on a 32-date national tour set to kick off in September that he’s dubbed the “MASA tour” ‒ “Make America Slime Again.” It’s a riff on Trump’s “Make America Great Again” slogan. Slime refers to a close friend or homie in hip-hop lingo.

Advertisement

Trump has issued a slew of pardons that coincided with the first full week of Ed Martin serving as the Justice Department’s pardon attorney. Trump had previously nominated Martin to serve as U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, but he withdrew in the face of Republican opposition on Capitol Hill over Martin’s support for Jan. 6 rioters.

Pardons fully wipe out a recipient’s guilt of a criminal act and any penalties tied to a conviction. Typically, a wave of pardons comes at the end of a president’s term. But Trump has smashed all norms, beginning with his day one pardons of more than 1,600 individuals charged in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Trump on May 27 pardoned Todd and Julie Chrisley of the USA Network television show “Chrisley Knows Best” fame, in which they portrayed themselves as real estate tycoons in the South. The couple was found guilty of conspiring to defraud community banks in Atlanta out of more than $36 million in fraudulent loans.

Advertisement

The next day, Trump commuted the sentence of Larry Hoover, 74, a notorious former Chicago gang leader who co-founded the Gangster Disciples and was convicted in 1973 for the murder of a drug dealer. Hoover, who was serving six life terms for his federal charges, still must serve a 200-year sentence for his Illinois state charges.

Trump also pardoned former Connecticut Gov. John Rowland, who resigned from his office after pleading guilty in late 2004 to one count of conspiring to commit tax fraud and depriving the public of honest service over $107,000 in gifts he accepted from companies doing business with the state.

Rowland, a former New York congressman, was later convicted of obstructing justice, conspiracy, falsifying government documents, and other violations of campaign finance laws. He was sentenced to nearly three years in prison.

Advertisement

Trump pardoned former New York Rep. Michael Grimm, a Republican congressman from 2011 to 2015, who resigned after being convicted of tax fraud and sentenced to eight months in prison.

And as first reported by USA TODAY, Trump also pardoned former 1st Lt. Mark Bashaw, a former U.S. Army officer who was found guilty by a special court martial during the Biden administration for refusing to follow COVID-19 safety measures.

The White House has not provided a full list of Trump’s pardons, deferring to the Department of Justice, which updates clemency actions on its website.

Contributing: Taijuan Moorman and Zac Anderson

Advertisement

Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.

Continue Reading

Trending