Wisconsin
Wisconsin’s 2024 climate review: A year of unprecedented weather, and record highs and lows
Video captures tornado taking shape near Evansville, Wisconsin
Video captures possible tornado take shape near Evansville, Wisconsin on Thursday, February 8, 2024.
Angel Johnson
Record low ice on the Great Lakes. Tornadoes in February. A soggy spring that morphed into deepening drought in the fall.
2024 marked an unprecedented series of extreme weather events, and historic highs and lows in Wisconsin. In some way, every season was record-breaking.
These extremes are expected to get more frequent and dramatic because of climate change. And although some may like to think of Wisconsin as a “climate haven,” the effects are already being seen here, and last year offered just the latest evidence.
Wisconsin’s climate is becoming warmer and wetter. Across the state, temperatures have warmed about three degrees and rainfall has increased about five inches, or 17%, since 1950, according to the Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts’ most recent report.
The impacts aren’t just on the environment. They’re economic, too. According to a recent analysis by the Center for Public Integrity, extreme weather events will cost Wisconsin up to $16 billion over the next 15 years.
The science is clear that climate change is driven by human activity, largely the use of fossil fuels, like coal, oil and gas. These fuels are responsible for 75% of greenhouse gas emissions, which capture heat and warm the planet.
Steve Vavrus, Wisconsin’s state climatologist, said looking at historical data it’s particularly striking how much warmer the state has become — a trend people may overlook because of year-to-year variability. Based on available data through the end of November, Vavrus said, last year could be Wisconsin’s warmest yet on record.
“It’s like we’re gradually warming up the stove, and we don’t really notice it’s happening,” he said.
Here’s a look back on the unprecedented year of record-breaking highs and lows.
Wisconsin recorded its warmest winter on record
Last winter was Wisconsin’s warmest-ever on record.
According to the Wisconsin State Climatology Office, December 2023 to February 2024 was the warmest winter in the state since it began keeping records in 1895.
The average temperature across the state was 28.3 degrees — close to 10 degrees warmer than the typical average. The previous record was 26.1 degrees set in 2001 to 2002.
Wisconsin was not an outlier. The contiguous United States as a whole experienced its warmest winter on record.
Vavrus previously explained that the balmy temperatures were due to the longer-term warming trend with climate change as well as an El Niño event.
Wisconsin’s first February tornado
Feb. 8 began sunny and unseasonably warm, with Milwaukee setting a record-high temperature for that date of 56 degrees.
But that afternoon, storm clouds rolled in, setting the state up for a bizarre bout of severe weather. In the evening, the first-ever February tornadoes in recorded state history ripped across south-central Wisconsin, causing damage upwards of $2.4 million.
One tornado touched down in rural Green County. The other struck Evansville, in Rock County.
It isn’t fully understood how climate change is affecting tornadoes, Vavrus said. But one expected outcome is a longer tornado season. They form when warm, humid air combines with wind shear — a change in wind speed or direction over a short distance. Warmer winter temperatures in Wisconsin mean those conditions could occur outside of the typical tornado season, May through August.
Evansville Mayor Dianne Duggan said there was “a lot of talk and head-shaking” about the timing of the tornado, which she said “is a climate change issue.”
“I guess we just need to be on our toes all the time now,” she said.
In total, Wisconsin experienced 45 tornadoes in 2024, the third-highest annual amount in state history.
Record-breaking ice season seen in Lakes Michigan, Superior
Average ice cover across all five Great Lakes from January to March was 4.3% — the lowest on record since scientists began recording it 50-plus years ago.
Across the region, it was only the second time that the average ice cover did not reach 5%, with the first occurrence in 2012 of 4.8%, according to ice data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Individually, Lakes Michigan and Superior hit historic lows as well, with average daily ice cover at 4.4% and 2.6%, respectively.
December is an especially important month when Arctic air should start to cool the lakes down, setting the stage for how much ice there will be, said Bryan Mroczka, a physical scientist with the Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory. December 2023 was Wisconsin’s warmest last month of the year on record, and the first time the state’s average temperature for the month was above freezing.
Last year’s mid-January cold snap allowed some ice to build, which is when Lakes Michigan and Superior maxed out at about 18% and 12% ice cover, respectively.
Overall, ice cover in the Great Lakes has been declining for the past five decades due to climate change, while also swinging from near record highs to near record lows within a few years.
“We will still have those days where you bundle the kids up to go to the bus stop, but it’s the duration of these Arctic outbreaks — they’re in and out in a matter of days,” Mroczka said. “That keeps the ice from forming.”
The impacts of low ice cover are far-reaching, impacting ecosystem health, fisheries, recreation and infrastructure. For instance, ice tempers waves during storms, protecting the eggs of Great Lakes fish, like lake whitefish, which overwinter in nearshore areas. Ice can also protect coastal infrastructure and prevent shoreline flooding and erosion.
In Madison, iconic lakes Mendota and Monona also had far fewer ice-covered days. Lake Monona froze over Jan. 15 and thawed Feb. 28, its shortest duration of ice cover in recorded history. Lake Mendota had ice cover for its second-shortest period in history.
Soggy spring, drought reversal, third wettest June on record
Wetter-than-normal spring conditions led to a dramatic reversal of the state’s yearlong drought that began in June 2023.
In fact, it was Wisconsin’s third wettest June since scientists began keeping rainfall records in 1895, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. On average, the state saw 7.22 inches of rainfall, more than 2.5 inches higher than normal.
The heavy rainfall led to significant flooding and storm damage, especially in the northwestern and south-central parts of the state where communities received upwards of six inches of rain above normal.
More local records were set across the state. For instance, Bayfield County had its wettest June on record, and La Crosse saw 24 days of rain that month, breaking the previous record of 22 days set in 1935 and 2013. As river levels rose, the Mississippi River in La Crosse set a flood stage record for the month of June at about 14.2 feet June 28.
And while Milwaukeeans got to dry off in June — at least compared to the rest of the state — the city had its third wettest spring on record, according to Vavrus.
Algae blooms crop up along Lake Superior’s shore
In a state beloved for its water resources, many wonder how algae blooms — particularly those that release harmful toxins — will proliferate in a warmer, wetter climate.
In general, warming water temperatures are expected to increase the frequency of harmful algal blooms and their size, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Wisconsin experts say the impact of climate change is not entirely clear, and that the behavior of each lake may differ. Still, there were atypical bloom events last year that may bear climate fingerprints.
Across the state’s inland lakes in 2024, 253 blooms were reported as of early December, according to Gina LaLiberte, the DNR’s statewide harmful algal bloom coordinator. About three-fourths of the reported blooms contained cyanobacteria, which can release toxins.
Both the total number of reported blooms and the fraction that contained cyanobacteria are up from 2023, which saw 174 blooms with two-thirds containing the potentially harmful bacteria. That may be because people are more aware of how to report blooms, LaLiberte said.
Last year, though, there were “definitely some reports from lakes where people say they’ve never seen the lake like this before,” she said, particularly in northern Wisconsin.
In those instances, she believes climate change may be at play.
Blue-green algae blooms are an emerging problem in Lake Superior, since the first sizable bloom was observed in 2012.
Scientists attribute Lake Superior blooms to climate change, as the undeveloped lake lacks the usual ingredients for algae blooms, such as farm runoff. Lake Superior is the second fastest warming lake in the world.
There were 11 reports of blooms last year along the shores of Lake Superior and within the St. Louis River Estuary wedged between Duluth, Minnesota and Superior, Wisconsin, according to Kait Reinl, a freshwater scientist at the Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve.
Reinl said that some of the blooms last summer had toxins, but most were under the limits for drinking water and recreation. One bloom neared that limit.
While algae blooms are not uncommon in the other Great Lakes, Reinl said Lake Superior should be held to a different standard.
“If we hold Lake Superior to the lowest common denominator, we have nowhere to go but down,” she said.
A burst of heavy rains in June, and then long, hot, dry days
June’s heavy rains drove Wisconsin to its sixth-wettest summer on record. But that didn’t last long.
Summer vibes stretched on through September, with multiple cities setting records for the number of consecutive 80-degree days. Throughout the month, daily high temperatures were more than six degrees above normal.
It was also exceedingly dry, aside from a powerful burst of rain Sept. 21. Less than 1.5 inches of rain fell across the state throughout the month.
It went down as the third-warmest and sixth-driest September on record in Wisconsin — a “really unusual” combination of extremes, Vavrus said. Since 1895, only 2% of months in Wisconsin have experienced a temperature extreme and a precipitation extreme.
Unseasonably warm and dry conditions persisted in October. Madison and Green Bay both recorded 80-plus degree days Oct. 29, setting or breaking records for the latest 80-degree day of the year. At the end of the month, a third of the state was in severe drought and two-thirds was in moderate drought — the first time in the history of the U.S. Drought Monitor that Wisconsin was completely in drought. (That drought eased in the weeks since.)
More wildfires hit Wisconsin, and they started earlier
More than 1,100 wildfires burned roughly 2,500 acres in Wisconsin last year, about 260 more than the 10-year average.
And wildfire season started early, because much of the state was snow-free by February.
Typically, fire season starts in the spring and goes south to north as different regions of the state warm up, said Catherine Koele, wildfire prevention specialist for the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Last year, fires started in early February.
“It feels like nothing is cookie-cutter anymore,” she said.
The warm and dry fall raised wildfire risk again. Further, fires that happen under drought conditions take longer for crews to put out because they tend to smolder, Koele said.
An Oct. 18 fire in Green Lake County was the state’s largest, Koele said, burning 646 acres.
“We do have fires in the fall, but to have that size of fire, that’s a little unusual,” she said.
By early December, the state had spent $1.1 million on fire suppression, compared to an annual average of $600,000.
How can you do your part on climate change?
Scientists agree that the ultimate way to slow the impact of climate change is to limit fossil fuel emissions, which requires drastic steps taken by the worlds’ largest emitters, like the U.S.
Climate anxiety — or feeling distressed about climate change — has become an ever-growing phenomenon, especially among young people. And taking steps as an individual can feel daunting.
Here are a few steps that experts say people can take to help:
- Talk to friends and family members about climate change. Climate concern is more common than people think, and sharing it with others can build bridges.
- Reach out to local, state and federal lawmakers.
- Use less energy in your home by reducing heating and cooling use; weatherizing; washing laundry with cold water; hanging clothes and linens to dry.
- Change energy sources where you can, like switching to LED light bulbs or electric appliances and vehicles.
- Talk to health providers about the ways climate change and extreme weather may impact health. Create a climate-health plan with your provider, including how to get to appointments or safeguard medications during extreme weather events that may cause power outages.
Caitlin Looby and Madeline Heim are Report for America corps member who writes about the environment. Caitlin Looby can be reached at clooby@gannett.com. Madeline Heim can be contacted at 920-996-7266 or mheim@gannett.com.
Please consider supporting journalism that informs our democracy with a tax-deductible gift to this reporting effort at jsonline.com/RFA or by check made out to The GroundTruth Project with subject line Report for America Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Campaign. Address: The GroundTruth Project, Lockbox Services, 9450 SW Gemini Dr, PMB 46837, Beaverton, Oregon 97008-7105.
Wisconsin
Add massive transmission towers to list of invasive species | Opinion
We are managing the land to preserve native vegetation and reduce invasive species. Perhaps the greatest invasive will now be the MariBell project’s huge metal stanchions.
How reliable is the US power grid right now?
The U.S. power grid is under strain. Aging infrastructure, rising demand and extreme weather are testing reliability.
How much power do we really need and where should it come from?
Across the state people are being asked to sacrifice precious land for the construction of massive 765kV transmission lines that are mounted on erector set-like structures that soar 200 feet into the air and cut a swath 250 feet wide across the landscape of both western and eastern Wisconsin. Land and resources that cannot be replaced.
One of these lines is the MariBell transmission line that will cut through the heart of the Driftless region. This line, if it were to go through the Driftless area as proposed, will cross miles of land that avoided the assault of glaciers eons ago to now be destroyed by bulldozers to erect gigantic metal towers for the worship of greed.
This line would replace existing 161 kV lines with 765 kV lines that are more than double the width of existing lines. This means taking out trees, prairies, farms and homes for not only people but endangered wildlife.
Wisconsin wants more power, but at what cost?
The metal towers that soar 200 feet up in the air will be seen for miles away, some on ridgetops may need lights at night. Lights that could harm nocturnal animals and bring diffuse light for all of us who would prefer to see stars at night and occasionally the Northern Lights.
There has not been an established need for this massive line nor is the Driftless region a location worth destroying. This project will place an ever increasing financial burden on utility users who do not even benefit from the line and adversely affect property values in Crawford and Vernon counties. It will cause irreparable damage to the land, air and water as well as the beauty of the Wisconsin landscape that we all love.
It is past time for all Wisconsinites and all those we elect to take a step back and really identify what it is we value and what we want our future to look like. Then act to protect those values! Do electric power utilities, and the regulatory Public Service Commission, only have a responsibility to provide power and not the responsibility to do no harm to the people and native landscape?
Stewardship of Driftless landscape becoming more difficult
We are landowners in Crawford County, Wis., that currently has a 161kV power line going over it and will most likely be right on the route of this new 765kV powerline. We have a cabin that is not connected to electricity, as we are trying to have as small of a footprint on the land as possible.
We are managing the land to preserve native vegetation and reduce invasive species. Perhaps the greatest invasive will now be the huge metal stanchions. The challenge of being responsible, sustainable stewards of the land has just become harder.
Tim Eisele and Linda Eisele have a cabin on 100 acres of land in the Town of Seneca.
Wisconsin
No Kings protests draw crowds in Oshkosh, Appleton and across Northeast Wisconsin Saturday
OSHKOSH (WLUK) — ‘No Kings’ protests took place across Northeast Wisconsin Saturday in opposition to President Donald Trump.
These protests align with the national ‘No Kings’ protests occurring across the country Saturday.
People showed up with signs and flags at Rainbow Park in Oshkosh Saturday beginning at 10 a.m., protesting against the president to voice their concerns.
Protesters expressed their concerns over Trump’s decisions surrounding the war in Iran, as well as his immigration policies– which the protesters believe reflect an expansion of presidential power they oppose.
“This is also an open invitation to anyone who feels disappointed or even betrayed– those who promised greater affordability, fewer global conflicts/wars and transparency on issues such as the Epstein files, and are still waiting,” protester Deb Martin said.
Similar ‘No Kings’ protests and marches took place in Appleton, Green Bay, De Pere and Sturgeon Bay.
Beginning at 3 p.m. in Appleton, protesters marched from Houdini plaza down College Ave. for two blocks in a loop. Several organizations collaborated for the march including Appleton Area NOW, Wisconsin Resist, Hate Free Outagamie, ESTHER, Forward Fox Valley, Democratic Socialists of America and Citizen Action of Wisconsin.
Protesters say the Trump Administration’s actions are an attack on democracy.
Organizers planned more than 3,000 events nationwide, with turnout expected to reach into upwards of nine million people.
A flagship rally in St. Paul, Minnesota, drew thousands and featured high-profile speakers and performers, underscoring the scale and national reach of the movement.
Headlining the observance will be Bruce Springsteen, performing “Streets of Minneapolis,” which he wrote in response to the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, and in tribute to the thousands of Minnesotans who took to the streets over the winter.
The White House dismissed the planned protests as the product of “leftist funding networks” with little real public support.
“The only people who care about these Trump Derangement Therapy Sessions are the reporters who are paid to cover them,” White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement.
Trump reacted to previous “No Kings” rallies by insisting “I’m not a king” and saying attendees were “not representative of the people of our country.”
Wisconsin
In battleground Wisconsin, the 2026 elections are poised to bring a ‘changing of the guard’
A year and a half after Donald Trump’s victory in Wisconsin, Democrats are sensing a vibe shift that could reshape the balance of power in the critical battleground state.
In the last three months, seven state Republican lawmakers have announced their retirements — including the party leaders in the Assembly and the Senate — providing a boost to Democrats’ hopes they could win control of at least one legislative chamber for the first time in 16 years.
A massive fundraising advantage in next month’s open Wisconsin Supreme Court race has liberals feeling confident about further expanding their majority on a bench that up until a few years ago was long dominated by conservatives. Liberals are already even eyeing another seat next year, after a conservative justice said she wouldn’t run for re-election.
And Democrats are hoping another state Supreme Court victory would provide a jolt of momentum heading into a governor’s contest that will bring significant change no matter the result. A crowded field of Democratic candidates is vying to succeed Gov. Tony Evers and likely take on GOP front-runner Rep. Tom Tiffany in November.
“These retirements have largely confirmed what we had already thought, which is that we have an extraordinary opportunity this year in Wisconsin,” Wisconsin Democratic Party Chairman Devin Remiker said in an interview, referring to the GOP lawmakers who declined to run for re-election. “I think that a very potent disaster is brewing for Republicans, and it is my desire to capitalize on it by winning the Democratic trifecta.”
Recent polling underscores that the political winds are currently blowing in Democrats’ direction. A Marquette University Law School poll conducted in mid-March found that about half of Wisconsin Democrats said they were very enthusiastic about voting in the technically nonpartisan Supreme Court election in April, compared to a third of Republicans. And the survey showed that 56% of registered voters disapproved of Trump’s job performance. That’s the highest share from any of Marquette’s Wisconsin polls during the president’s two terms in office, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel noted.
The 2026 elections mark a continuation of Democrats’ efforts to unravel Republicans’ hold on state power that began in 2010, when the GOP had a trifecta. Over two terms in office, Republican Gov. Scott Walker, with majorities in the Legislature and on the Supreme Court, enacted a sweeping conservative agenda.
Since then, Democrats have gained control of the governorship and the Supreme Court, and now have their sights on maintaining their advantages there while making inroads in the Legislature this year, with more competitive maps in place. Most notable among the recent string of retirements was Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, who had held the position since Walker first took office.
“There is certainly a changing of the guard. The top three people in the Capitol today are all not going to be there a year from now. It’s going to be a significant turnover in terms of who’s making decisions in that building come next year,” said Mark Graul, a Republican strategist in Wisconsin.
In addition to Vos, Wisconsin Senate President Devin LeMahieu, who has held the job since 2021, announced last week he would not seek another term. Of the seven retiring Republican lawmakers, all but one has served in the Legislature for at least a decade, and in many cases far longer.
The Republican lawmaker exodus is also inextricably linked with the liberals’ ascent on the state Supreme Court. Armed with their first majority on the high court in 15 years after an expensive and high-profile election in 2023, liberals quickly struck down the state’s legislative maps that heavily favored the GOP. Democrats then made substantial gains in both legislative chambers in the 2024 elections. This year, they would need to net two seats to control the state Senate and five seats to have a majority in the Assembly.
After retaining their majority in an even more expensive state Supreme Court race last year, liberals could put control of the bench out of reach for conservatives for at least the rest of the decade in less than two weeks.
The Democratic-backed Chris Taylor holds a clear fundraising and ad spending advantage over Republican-backed Maria Lazar in the race to fill a seat held by retiring conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley. The election has been much quieter than the last two court races in Wisconsin, with 46% of voters saying they were undecided in the new Marquette poll. But Taylor held a slight lead with 30% support, compared to 22% for Lazar.
Democrats have said they’re encouraged by early voting data in the race, even as turnout is down so far from last year’s election.
Meanwhile, the governor’s race is still taking shape. Of the eight Democratic candidates included in Marquette’s poll, only one, former lieutenant governor and Senate candidate Mandela Barnes had name identification above 50%. The primary will mark a generational shift for the party, as the leading candidates are all much younger than Evers, 74.
Wisconsin Republican Party spokesperson Anika Rickard rejected that the raft of GOP lawmaker retirements would fuel Democratic gains and expressed optimism around her party’s prospects in the Supreme Court and governor races, too.
“I don’t think their departures indicate anything when it comes to flipping the Senate or the Assembly. We’re very confident we’ll hold both of those,” she said. “The energy is still on our side, not with Democrats.”
Democrats and Democratic-backed candidates have won 18 of the last 23 statewide races in Wisconsin. But that hasn’t affected its swing state status. The last three presidential elections in Wisconsin, two of which Trump won, were decided by less than 1 point. Regardless of what happens in the state this year over the next seven months, it will once again be at the center of the 2028 map.
To that point, Graul said Democrats’ recent string of success is less about what they have accomplished and more about their ability to seize on anti-Trump sentiment, particularly when the president isn’t on the ballot.
“What’s shaping Wisconsin, in 2026, to be a good year for Democrats is what’s happening in Washington, not what is happening in Wisconsin,” he said.
-
Sports1 week agoIOC addresses execution of 19-year-old Iranian wrestler Saleh Mohammadi
-
New Mexico7 days agoClovis shooting leaves one dead, four injured
-
Tennessee6 days agoTennessee Police Investigating Alleged Assault Involving ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson
-
Technology7 days agoYouTube job scam text: How to spot it fast
-
Minneapolis, MN3 days agoBoy who shielded classmate during school shooting receives Medal of Honor
-
Science1 week agoRecord Heat Meets a Major Snow Drought Across the West
-
Politics1 week agoSchumer gambit fails as DHS shutdown hits 36 days and airport lines grow
-
Politics1 week agoTrump gives Iran 48-hour ultimatum to reopen Strait of Hormuz or face strikes on power plants