Wisconsin
Wisconsin mailbag: Is football staff turnover worrisome? Biggest basketball targets?
MADISON, Wis. — Wisconsin football’s offseason workouts are in full swing, while the men’s basketball team has reached the halfway mark of the Big Ten season with a massive home game against Purdue up next. You had questions for the Badgers mailbag. Here are the answers:
Note: Submitted questions have been lightly edited for length and clarity.
What should fans take away from the coaching staff turnover this offseason? The O-line play was not up to par, so we get that one. However, Mike Brown and Colin Hitschler are more concerning due to their recruiting prowess. (Yes, I get they’re going to blue-blood programs.) Are these assistants just rock stars? It seems like a lot of turnover after just one season. — David N.
I understand why fans are anxious about the offseason staff turnover because of the importance of continuity and the perception that Luke Fickell or Wisconsin can’t retain its best coaches. But having in-demand assistants shows that Fickell is hiring quality coaches, and every situation is different. While it would be nice for the program to have all of its assistant coaches stick around to build something — and certainly for longer than one season — that isn’t always realistic.
Of the three assistant coaching moves, reassigning offensive line coach Jack Bicknell Jr. is the one that stands out most because it means Bicknell didn’t perform at the level necessary. Fickell can’t afford to get hires wrong if he wants to elevate Wisconsin, but his willingness to make a change also shows he isn’t stubborn enough to continue with something that isn’t working.
Wide receivers coach Mike Brown left for Notre Dame, even though he made $550,000 at Wisconsin, which is believed to be at least $200,000 more than Notre Dame’s last receivers coach, Chansi Stuckey, made in South Bend. While Brown’s salary situation at Notre Dame, a private school, is unknown, his relationship with head coach Marcus Freeman was very important in his decision-making process. Brown worked with Freeman at Cincinnati and said Freeman was the one person “in the entire country that could have picked up the phone and called me and I would have been the least bit interested in.”
Safeties coach Colin Hitschler leaving for Alabama hurts Wisconsin because of his recruiting prowess and ability to keep pipelines running to Madison from the East Coast. He was the primary recruiter for six of Wisconsin’s 22 signees in the 2024 recruiting class. But it’s hard to fault someone for going to a place like Alabama, which qualified for the College Football Playoff in eight of the last 10 years. Hitschler has a connection to Alabama’s new coaching staff, having worked with new defensive coordinator Kane Wommack at South Alabama for two years, first as the director of football operations (2016) and then as safeties coach (2017). Hitschler is the co-defensive coordinator and defensive backs coach at Alabama now.
These aren’t the first Wisconsin assistant coaches to leave for other jobs, and they won’t be the last. It’s not ideal for the players, who will have their fourth offensive line coach in four seasons and their third wide receivers and safeties coaches in as many years. But Fickell has made what appear to be strong hires to replace all three assistants: AJ Blazek (offensive line), Kenny Guiton (wide receivers) and Alex Grinch (safeties).
GO DEEPER
Wisconsin hiring ex-USC DC Alex Grinch: Sources
Grinch’s tenure as defensive coordinator at USC clearly didn’t end well, but it’s a coup for Wisconsin to land a coach with his knowledge and past successes (including being a four-time Broyles Award nominee) as a position coach. Guiton is considered an excellent recruiter and was named to 247Sports’ “30 Under 30” as one of the nation’s top young assistant coaches in 2020 while at Colorado State.
Here’s an anecdote that highlights what Wisconsin is getting in Blazek from a conversation I had with Erik Dougherty, the stepfather of four-star Badgers offensive tackle signee Kevin Heywood. Dougherty and Heywood visited Vanderbilt during Heywood’s recruitment when Blazek was the offensive line coach there.
“We all left there, and the family spoke about it,” Dougherty said. “If this guy was in a different situation, this might be the guy that we would gravitate towards just because of his high energy, his family disposition, everything about the guy and his coaching methods and the way he broke down Kevin’s film, we thought that was a great positive.
“Kevin is a big dude and a strong dude and he got away with a lot of stuff in high school. But he also said, ‘In this situation, even though you won this battle, these are the technical things that you need to do to correct that moving forward to the next level.’ He ended it with all positives. It’s just his total high energy on everything. And he demands the best out of everybody. He’s heavily involved and even just starting at Wisconsin, he’s digging right in.”
Alex Grinch will return to the Big Ten after being a co-DC/safeties coach at Ohio State in 2018. (Kirby Lee / USA Today)
Is the 2025 schedule the hardest the Badgers have had to play? Are there other years that were comparable? I doubt there is one that is harder. — Jordan H.
I think it’s safe to say that Wisconsin’s schedules in the 2024 and 2025 seasons will be among the most challenging the Badgers have had. It’s possible 2025 ends up being the toughest to date, but there is some competition for that distinction.
First, let’s look at 2024: My colleague at The Athletic, Stewart Mandel, just released his latest early Top 25 for next season. Four Wisconsin opponents made the list: Alabama (No. 8), Penn State (No. 16), Iowa (No. 22) and Oregon (No. 4), with USC just missing the cut. Wisconsin avoids playing No. 2 Ohio State and No. 6 Michigan during the regular season.
In 2025, Wisconsin has to play at Alabama, at Michigan and at Oregon, with home games against Iowa, Ohio State and Washington. While it’s impossible — particularly in the transfer portal era — to predict where those teams will be ranked in two seasons, you can bet most of them will be pretty darn good. If all six of those teams are ranked, or one of the other teams Wisconsin plays that season cracks the Top 25 when the programs play, it will represent rarified territory in terms of schedule difficulty.
Wisconsin has played five ranked opponents during the regular season — excluding a conference championship game and bowl game appearance — on nine occasions: in 1955 (2-3), 1956 (0-3-2), 1958 (3-1-1), 1979 (1-4), 1990 (0-5), 1999 (4-1), 2003 (2-3), 2016 (3-2) and 2021 (2-3). Never before has Wisconsin played six regular season games against opponents ranked in the AP Top 25.
The most ranked teams total that Wisconsin played in one season occurred under Paul Chryst in 2016, when Wisconsin played five ranked opponents during the regular season and then No. 8 Penn State in the Big Ten championship and No. 12 Western Michigan in the Cotton Bowl. Chryst’s 2019 team played six ranked teams, including No. 2 Ohio State in the league title game and No. 7 Oregon in the Rose Bowl. Barry Alvarez’s 1999 team also played six ranked teams, which included a victory against No. 22 Stanford in the Rose Bowl.
GO DEEPER
Which transfers will most impact Wisconsin? Ranking the 12 additions
Which player from 2019 or earlier would make the biggest difference for the current team? — Will H.
Well, this is a fun hypothetical question. The answer that immediately came to my mind was quarterback Russell Wilson because no player at that position has been as good in the history of the program. While it was thought that Tanner Mordecai might be able to put up similar numbers last season based on what he accomplished at SMU and how his talent could translate in Phil Longo’s offense, he didn’t come anywhere close. It helped that Wilson played with eight other starters on that 2011 team who became NFL Draft picks. But Wilson also could make everyone around him better, make all the right throws on the field and create plays with his legs.
Running backs Melvin Gordon and Jonathan Taylor come to mind as well. I know Ron Dayne won the Heisman Trophy and Montee Ball was a Doak Walker Award winner just like Gordon and Taylor. But Gordon put together the single greatest season I’ve ever seen in 2014 when he ran for 2,587 yards on a team with a mediocre passing game (15 touchdowns, 16 interceptions). And Taylor was the first player in FBS history to rush for more than 6,000 yards in just three seasons. Plus, he developed into a pretty good pass catcher by his junior season. Watching how either of those two operated against lighter boxes and with more space would have been fun.
Who is one player you’re looking out for during spring practice to show that they are ready to take a step up from their performance or role last year? — Thad N.
The obvious answer to me is wide receiver Trech Kekahuna. His true freshman season stalled because he suffered a fifth metatarsal fracture in his right foot where the bone connects the ankle to the little toe during summer workouts. He made his first appearance on the travel squad for Wisconsin’s game at Illinois on Oct. 21, contributed on special teams and then caught four passes for 64 yards against LSU in the ReliaQuest Bowl while playing 22 snaps from the slot. Kekahuna’s game speed and shiftiness is special, and he can add a bunch to complement Will Pauling as a slot receiver.
“My next step is just keep using this and doing my thing and just try to show coach Longo that I can play at this level,” Kekahuna said after the bowl game. “This offseason is going to be a big thing for me to work hard, get bigger, faster and work on my mental, knowing how to cut or react to coverages pre-snap and post-snap.”
GO DEEPER
Trech Kekahuna’s path from Hawaii to the playing field has been littered with roadblocks
Who are the top three targets in the 2025 cycle for Wisconsin basketball? — Tony T.
The 2025 recruiting class is an interesting one because the state of Wisconsin has so much talent, and the Badgers are heavily involved with those players. Combo guard Davion Hannah from Milwaukee is a four-star prospect who is rated as the No. 1 player from Wisconsin in the 247Sports Composite and the No. 20 player nationally. He is understandably one of Wisconsin’s top targets and is one of five uncommitted players in the state with a Badgers scholarship offer. The others are centers Kai Rogers and Will Garlock and forwards Xzavion Mitchell and LaTrevion Fenderson. Wisconsin’s lone commitment in the class is from in-state shooting guard Zach Kinziger.
GO DEEPER
Jim Snider’s unique approach to strength and conditioning has the Badgers in great shape
Wisconsin’s 2025 recruiting class is going to be extremely important in setting up the future of the program because, as of now, there will be seven seniors on the 2024-25 roster: point guards Chucky Hepburn and Kamari McGee, shooting guards Max Klesmit and Isaac Lindsey, forwards Markus Ilver and Carter Gilmore and center Steven Crowl. Klesmit, Gilmore and Crowl already have announced they will use the extra year of eligibility the NCAA granted players during the pandemic to return for next season. Guard AJ Storr, with another outstanding season, could rise up NBA Draft boards and be a candidate to leave then as well (if he doesn’t pursue that option after this season).
It’s likely that the Badgers will reconfigure the roster through the transfer portal because they’ll be in need of more veteran help. But how Wisconsin recruits at the high school level will go a long way toward determining what the program looks like.
Wisconsin men’s basketball hosts No. 2 Purdue on Sunday. (Kayla Wolf / USA Today)
In the last couple of years, UW basketball has struck out on the big-name in-state recruits. How much has the offensive breakout, including showcasing an athletic wing like Storr, helped appeal to the big names in the next cycle, and how likely are the Badgers to land someone like Hannah, Mitchell or Rogers from in the state? — Jacob B.
Whenever Wisconsin’s basketball program performs well — either as a team or led by a specific individual — questions quickly roll in about how such positive developments will impact recruiting. Two examples come to mind with the 2014-15 national runner-up team and the play of first-team All-American and eventual NBA lottery pick Johnny Davis in 2021-22.
I think what happens over the course of a specific season doesn’t necessarily impact top high school recruits — at least based on what we’ve seen in previous recruiting cycles. But I do think Storr is the perfect example for what Wisconsin can sell to players coming out of the transfer portal who might have a better sense of what they need to succeed after already being in another college program. Coaches shared with Storr how much they needed him to help the team. But they also helped him realize how much he needed them to become the player he wanted to be. He is more disciplined defensively and a more complete player offensively. That has to appeal to a transfer who has been a good player and sees the way his style can fit at Wisconsin.
As for the chances of landing Hannah, Rogers or Mitchell, it’s tough to say at this point. Hannah has 12 offers and Rogers 17. But Wisconsin is going to take its best shot. Greg Gard showed up to watch Rogers’ Wauwatosa West team play Edgerton earlier this week.
(Top photo: Nathan Ray Seebeck / USA Today)
Wisconsin
Add massive transmission towers to list of invasive species | Opinion
We are managing the land to preserve native vegetation and reduce invasive species. Perhaps the greatest invasive will now be the MariBell project’s huge metal stanchions.
How reliable is the US power grid right now?
The U.S. power grid is under strain. Aging infrastructure, rising demand and extreme weather are testing reliability.
How much power do we really need and where should it come from?
Across the state people are being asked to sacrifice precious land for the construction of massive 765kV transmission lines that are mounted on erector set-like structures that soar 200 feet into the air and cut a swath 250 feet wide across the landscape of both western and eastern Wisconsin. Land and resources that cannot be replaced.
One of these lines is the MariBell transmission line that will cut through the heart of the Driftless region. This line, if it were to go through the Driftless area as proposed, will cross miles of land that avoided the assault of glaciers eons ago to now be destroyed by bulldozers to erect gigantic metal towers for the worship of greed.
This line would replace existing 161 kV lines with 765 kV lines that are more than double the width of existing lines. This means taking out trees, prairies, farms and homes for not only people but endangered wildlife.
Wisconsin wants more power, but at what cost?
The metal towers that soar 200 feet up in the air will be seen for miles away, some on ridgetops may need lights at night. Lights that could harm nocturnal animals and bring diffuse light for all of us who would prefer to see stars at night and occasionally the Northern Lights.
There has not been an established need for this massive line nor is the Driftless region a location worth destroying. This project will place an ever increasing financial burden on utility users who do not even benefit from the line and adversely affect property values in Crawford and Vernon counties. It will cause irreparable damage to the land, air and water as well as the beauty of the Wisconsin landscape that we all love.
It is past time for all Wisconsinites and all those we elect to take a step back and really identify what it is we value and what we want our future to look like. Then act to protect those values! Do electric power utilities, and the regulatory Public Service Commission, only have a responsibility to provide power and not the responsibility to do no harm to the people and native landscape?
Stewardship of Driftless landscape becoming more difficult
We are landowners in Crawford County, Wis., that currently has a 161kV power line going over it and will most likely be right on the route of this new 765kV powerline. We have a cabin that is not connected to electricity, as we are trying to have as small of a footprint on the land as possible.
We are managing the land to preserve native vegetation and reduce invasive species. Perhaps the greatest invasive will now be the huge metal stanchions. The challenge of being responsible, sustainable stewards of the land has just become harder.
Tim Eisele and Linda Eisele have a cabin on 100 acres of land in the Town of Seneca.
Wisconsin
No Kings protests draw crowds in Oshkosh, Appleton and across Northeast Wisconsin Saturday
OSHKOSH (WLUK) — ‘No Kings’ protests took place across Northeast Wisconsin Saturday in opposition to President Donald Trump.
These protests align with the national ‘No Kings’ protests occurring across the country Saturday.
People showed up with signs and flags at Rainbow Park in Oshkosh Saturday beginning at 10 a.m., protesting against the president to voice their concerns.
Protesters expressed their concerns over Trump’s decisions surrounding the war in Iran, as well as his immigration policies– which the protesters believe reflect an expansion of presidential power they oppose.
“This is also an open invitation to anyone who feels disappointed or even betrayed– those who promised greater affordability, fewer global conflicts/wars and transparency on issues such as the Epstein files, and are still waiting,” protester Deb Martin said.
Similar ‘No Kings’ protests and marches took place in Appleton, Green Bay, De Pere and Sturgeon Bay.
Beginning at 3 p.m. in Appleton, protesters marched from Houdini plaza down College Ave. for two blocks in a loop. Several organizations collaborated for the march including Appleton Area NOW, Wisconsin Resist, Hate Free Outagamie, ESTHER, Forward Fox Valley, Democratic Socialists of America and Citizen Action of Wisconsin.
Protesters say the Trump Administration’s actions are an attack on democracy.
Organizers planned more than 3,000 events nationwide, with turnout expected to reach into upwards of nine million people.
A flagship rally in St. Paul, Minnesota, drew thousands and featured high-profile speakers and performers, underscoring the scale and national reach of the movement.
Headlining the observance will be Bruce Springsteen, performing “Streets of Minneapolis,” which he wrote in response to the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, and in tribute to the thousands of Minnesotans who took to the streets over the winter.
The White House dismissed the planned protests as the product of “leftist funding networks” with little real public support.
“The only people who care about these Trump Derangement Therapy Sessions are the reporters who are paid to cover them,” White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement.
Trump reacted to previous “No Kings” rallies by insisting “I’m not a king” and saying attendees were “not representative of the people of our country.”
Wisconsin
In battleground Wisconsin, the 2026 elections are poised to bring a ‘changing of the guard’
A year and a half after Donald Trump’s victory in Wisconsin, Democrats are sensing a vibe shift that could reshape the balance of power in the critical battleground state.
In the last three months, seven state Republican lawmakers have announced their retirements — including the party leaders in the Assembly and the Senate — providing a boost to Democrats’ hopes they could win control of at least one legislative chamber for the first time in 16 years.
A massive fundraising advantage in next month’s open Wisconsin Supreme Court race has liberals feeling confident about further expanding their majority on a bench that up until a few years ago was long dominated by conservatives. Liberals are already even eyeing another seat next year, after a conservative justice said she wouldn’t run for re-election.
And Democrats are hoping another state Supreme Court victory would provide a jolt of momentum heading into a governor’s contest that will bring significant change no matter the result. A crowded field of Democratic candidates is vying to succeed Gov. Tony Evers and likely take on GOP front-runner Rep. Tom Tiffany in November.
“These retirements have largely confirmed what we had already thought, which is that we have an extraordinary opportunity this year in Wisconsin,” Wisconsin Democratic Party Chairman Devin Remiker said in an interview, referring to the GOP lawmakers who declined to run for re-election. “I think that a very potent disaster is brewing for Republicans, and it is my desire to capitalize on it by winning the Democratic trifecta.”
Recent polling underscores that the political winds are currently blowing in Democrats’ direction. A Marquette University Law School poll conducted in mid-March found that about half of Wisconsin Democrats said they were very enthusiastic about voting in the technically nonpartisan Supreme Court election in April, compared to a third of Republicans. And the survey showed that 56% of registered voters disapproved of Trump’s job performance. That’s the highest share from any of Marquette’s Wisconsin polls during the president’s two terms in office, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel noted.
The 2026 elections mark a continuation of Democrats’ efforts to unravel Republicans’ hold on state power that began in 2010, when the GOP had a trifecta. Over two terms in office, Republican Gov. Scott Walker, with majorities in the Legislature and on the Supreme Court, enacted a sweeping conservative agenda.
Since then, Democrats have gained control of the governorship and the Supreme Court, and now have their sights on maintaining their advantages there while making inroads in the Legislature this year, with more competitive maps in place. Most notable among the recent string of retirements was Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, who had held the position since Walker first took office.
“There is certainly a changing of the guard. The top three people in the Capitol today are all not going to be there a year from now. It’s going to be a significant turnover in terms of who’s making decisions in that building come next year,” said Mark Graul, a Republican strategist in Wisconsin.
In addition to Vos, Wisconsin Senate President Devin LeMahieu, who has held the job since 2021, announced last week he would not seek another term. Of the seven retiring Republican lawmakers, all but one has served in the Legislature for at least a decade, and in many cases far longer.
The Republican lawmaker exodus is also inextricably linked with the liberals’ ascent on the state Supreme Court. Armed with their first majority on the high court in 15 years after an expensive and high-profile election in 2023, liberals quickly struck down the state’s legislative maps that heavily favored the GOP. Democrats then made substantial gains in both legislative chambers in the 2024 elections. This year, they would need to net two seats to control the state Senate and five seats to have a majority in the Assembly.
After retaining their majority in an even more expensive state Supreme Court race last year, liberals could put control of the bench out of reach for conservatives for at least the rest of the decade in less than two weeks.
The Democratic-backed Chris Taylor holds a clear fundraising and ad spending advantage over Republican-backed Maria Lazar in the race to fill a seat held by retiring conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley. The election has been much quieter than the last two court races in Wisconsin, with 46% of voters saying they were undecided in the new Marquette poll. But Taylor held a slight lead with 30% support, compared to 22% for Lazar.
Democrats have said they’re encouraged by early voting data in the race, even as turnout is down so far from last year’s election.
Meanwhile, the governor’s race is still taking shape. Of the eight Democratic candidates included in Marquette’s poll, only one, former lieutenant governor and Senate candidate Mandela Barnes had name identification above 50%. The primary will mark a generational shift for the party, as the leading candidates are all much younger than Evers, 74.
Wisconsin Republican Party spokesperson Anika Rickard rejected that the raft of GOP lawmaker retirements would fuel Democratic gains and expressed optimism around her party’s prospects in the Supreme Court and governor races, too.
“I don’t think their departures indicate anything when it comes to flipping the Senate or the Assembly. We’re very confident we’ll hold both of those,” she said. “The energy is still on our side, not with Democrats.”
Democrats and Democratic-backed candidates have won 18 of the last 23 statewide races in Wisconsin. But that hasn’t affected its swing state status. The last three presidential elections in Wisconsin, two of which Trump won, were decided by less than 1 point. Regardless of what happens in the state this year over the next seven months, it will once again be at the center of the 2028 map.
To that point, Graul said Democrats’ recent string of success is less about what they have accomplished and more about their ability to seize on anti-Trump sentiment, particularly when the president isn’t on the ballot.
“What’s shaping Wisconsin, in 2026, to be a good year for Democrats is what’s happening in Washington, not what is happening in Wisconsin,” he said.
-
Sports1 week agoIOC addresses execution of 19-year-old Iranian wrestler Saleh Mohammadi
-
New Mexico7 days agoClovis shooting leaves one dead, four injured
-
Tennessee6 days agoTennessee Police Investigating Alleged Assault Involving ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson
-
Technology7 days agoYouTube job scam text: How to spot it fast
-
Minneapolis, MN3 days agoBoy who shielded classmate during school shooting receives Medal of Honor
-
Science1 week agoRecord Heat Meets a Major Snow Drought Across the West
-
Politics1 week agoSchumer gambit fails as DHS shutdown hits 36 days and airport lines grow
-
Texas1 week agoHow to buy Houston vs. Texas A&M 2026 March Madness tickets