Connect with us

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Democrats reintroduce gun regulations after Republicans pull them from budget

Published

on

Wisconsin Democrats reintroduce gun regulations after Republicans pull them from budget


Wisconsin Democrats are reintroducing gun regulations after Republicans stripped those measures from the state budget.

Sponsors say they hope to prevent gun violence, which typically spikes during the summer months. The proposals now circulating for cosponsors include expanded background check requirements, a mandatory waiting period for handgun purchases and a red flag law designed to remove weapons from people deemed to be high risk.

The bills mirror measures included by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers in his latest budget request — before GOP lawmakers on the Joint Committee on Finance removed them.

Stay connected to Wisconsin news — your way

Get trustworthy reporting and unique local stories from WPR delivered directly to your inbox.

Advertisement

Now, Democratic lawmakers are reintroducing the measures as standalone legislation.

Although the Republican-controlled Legislature has repeatedly blocked similar bills in years past, state Sen. LaTonya Johnson, D-Milwaukee, said she’s urging her GOP colleagues to advance at least some of the bills in the package to public hearings this session.

“Year after year, I’ve watched Republicans cut every single gun safety proposal from the state budget. And year after year, we see more victims and families burying their babies,” Johnson said, while flanked by gun safety advocates and Wisconsin’s Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul at a news conference on Tuesday.

Advertisement

But in a written statement, Wisconsin’s top Republican lawmaker was critical of the proposals.

“People should be concerned about those who don’t want to lock up criminals committing serious crimes,” said Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester. “Passing more restrictions on law-abiding gun owners is typical overreach by the Democrats that doesn’t solve the problem.”

One of the proposals would reinstate a 48-hour waiting period before someone could buy a handgun from a federally-licensed firearms dealer.

That waiting period had been on the books in Wisconsin for decades — until former Gov. Scott Walker, a Republican, signed a law repealing it in 2015.

State Sen. Chris Larson, D-Milwaukee, said in addition to preventing homicides that result from impulsive decisions, a waiting period would help stop suicides. Suicides make up a majority of firearm-related deaths in Wisconsin and across the country.

Advertisement

“Every suicide is preventable, and adding a waiting period … puts a barrier between somebody making an irrational decision and an irreversible harm,” Larson said.

Larson was a friend and colleague of Jonathon Brostoff, a former Democratic state representative who died by suicide using a firearm last year.

Another bill circulating this week would allow family members, household members and law enforcement agencies to petition a court for what’s known as an “extreme risk protection order,” against someone who’s deemed to be “substantially likely” to harm themselves or another person. If the order’s granted, that person would have to surrender their firearms.

Those laws, often referred to as red flag laws, are in effect in 21 states.

That includes California, where a judge recently ordered a man to surrender his guns after law enforcement said he was messaging about mass attacks with a 15-year-old student from Wisconsin. That student used her father’s legally purchased handgun to kill two other people and herself at the Abundant Life Christian School in Madison in December, prosecutors say.

Advertisement

Also included in the package is a proposal to ban manufacturing, transporting, selling, possessing and carrying what are known as “ghost guns,” which are guns that can be assembled at home from parts purchased online. Those guns often lack serial numbers, making it difficult for law enforcement to trace them. And they’re often made from polymers that aren’t picked up by metal detectors.

Additionally, one of the re-introduced bills would expand background check requirements to more types of gun sales. Currently, background checks are required for anyone who buys a gun from a federally licensed firearms dealer.

But Wisconsin Democrats say background checks should also be mandatory for private party transactions, including guns bought at gun shows, flea markets or from pick-ups scheduled in response to classified ads. That bill includes some exceptions to background check requirements, including weapons classified as antiques or guns given as gifts or bequests by a family member.

If you or someone you know is considering suicide, call the suicide prevention lifeline at 988 or text “Hopeline” to 741741.



Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

Wisconsin DHS reaffirms childhood vaccine recommendations after CDC changes

Published

on

Wisconsin DHS reaffirms childhood vaccine recommendations after CDC changes


The Wisconsin Department of Health Services on Thursday reaffirmed its recommended childhood vaccine schedule after recent changes at the federal level.

Wisconsin vaccine guidance

Local perspective:

Advertisement

On Monday, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control announced changes to its childhood vaccine schedule. The DHS said those modifications further stray “from alignment with America’s leading medical associations and organizations.”

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android

Advertisement

At this time, the DHS said it is not making changes to its vaccine recommendations – including no changes to Wisconsin’s school or child care vaccine recommendations.

The DHS said it continues to endorse the American Academy of Pediatrics schedule and has issued guidance to Wisconsin health care providers reaffirming that recommendation.

What they’re saying:

Advertisement

“The CDC’s new recommendations were based on a brief review of other countries’ practices and not based on data or evidence regarding disease risks to children in the United States,” DHS Secretary Kirsten Johnson said in a statement. “This upends our longstanding, evidence-based approach of protecting our children from the viruses that pose a risk in our country.

“Copying another country’s schedule without its health and social infrastructure will not produce the same health outcomes. It creates chaos and confusion and risks the health of Wisconsin’s youngest and most vulnerable citizens.”

Advertisement

Big picture view:

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said the CDC will continue to recommend that all children are immunized against 10 diseases for which there is international consensus, as well as chickenpox.

The updated schedule is in contrast to the CDC child and adolescent schedule at the end of 2024, which recommended 17 immunizations for all children. On the new schedule, vaccines – such as those for hepatitis A and B, meningitis, rotavirus and seasonal flu – are now more restricted. They are recommended only for those at high risk or after consultation with a health care provider. 

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

“President Trump directed us to examine how other developed nations protect their children and to take action if they are doing better,” Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. “After an exhaustive review of the evidence, we are aligning the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule with international consensus while strengthening transparency and informed consent. This decision protects children, respects families, and rebuilds trust in public health.”

Advertisement

The Source: The Wisconsin DHS released information about its childhood vaccine recommendations. Information about the CDC changes is from LiveNOW from FOX with contributions from The Associated Press.

HealthWisconsinNews



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin man accused of killing parents to fund Trump assassination plot set to enter plea deal

Published

on

Wisconsin man accused of killing parents to fund Trump assassination plot set to enter plea deal


MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin man accused of killing his parents and stealing their money to fund a plan to assassinate President Donald Trump is set to enter a plea deal resolving the case Thursday.

Nikita Casap, 18, is expected to agree to the deal during a morning hearing in Waukesha County Circuit Court in suburban Milwaukee. He goes into the hearing facing multiple charges, including two homicide counts, two counts of hiding a corpse and theft, with a trial scheduled to begin March 2.

Online court records did not list the terms of the plea agreement. Harm Venhuizen, a spokesperson for the state public defender’s office, which is representing Casap, said state Supreme Court ethics rules prevent the office from commenting on cases. The Waukesha County District Attorney’s Office did not respond to questions about the deal.

According to a criminal complaint, investigators believe Casap shot his mother, Tatiana Casap, and his stepfather, Donald Mayer, at their home in the village of Waukesha on or around Feb. 11.

Advertisement

He lived with the decomposing bodies for weeks before fleeing across the country in his stepfather’s SUV with $14,000 in cash, jewelry, passports, his stepfather’s gun and the family dog, according to the complaint. He was eventually arrested during a traffic stop in Kansas on Feb. 28.

Federal authorities have accused Casap of planning his parents’ murders, buying a drone and explosives and sharing his plans with others, including a Russian speaker. They said in a federal search warrant that he wrote a manifest calling for Trump’s assassination and was in touch with others about his plan to kill Trump and overthrow the U.S. government.

Stay up to date with the news and the best of AP by following our WhatsApp channel.

Follow on

Advertisement

“The killing of his parents appeared to be an effort to obtain the financial means and autonomy necessary to carrying out his plan,” that warrant said.

Detectives found several messages on Casap’s cellphone from January 2025 in which Casap asks how long he will have to hide before he is moved to Ukraine. An unknown individual responded in Russian, the complaint said, but the document doesn’t say what that person told Casap. In another message Casap asks: “So while in Ukraine, I’ll be able to live a normal life? Even if it’s found out I did it?”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin bill stirs issue of parental voice, trans youth autonomy

Published

on

Wisconsin bill stirs issue of parental voice, trans youth autonomy


A Republican-authored bill would require Wisconsin school boards to adopt a policy that would inform a parent or guardian if a student requests to be called by names and pronouns not aligned with their gender assigned at birth.

The bill would require legal documentation, parental approval and a principal to approve changes to a student’s name and pronouns. The bill makes exceptions for nicknames or students going by their middle names.

Although the bill has no chance of being signed into law by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, it reflects the continuing political energy of two issues: parental authority in schools, and the treatment of trans youths.

Notably, hundreds of trans-related bills were introduced at multiple levels of government across the country in the last year.

Advertisement

The lawmakers who introduced the bill, Rep. Barbara Dittrich (R-Oconomowoc) and state Sen. Andre Jacque (R-Franken), said it is about parental rights and transparency. At a Capitol public hearing Jan. 6, Jacque cited a ruling from October 2023 in which a Waukesha judge sided with parents who sued the Kettle Moraine School District after staff at the middle school used a child’s chosen name and pronouns. The parents did not support their child’s transition.

But the Senate Committee on Education hearing grew heated as LGBTQ+ youth, parents of transgender children, Democratic lawmakers and other advocates called the bill unnecessary and potentially violence-inducing. They said it makes life worse for a vulnerable population that makes up less than 1% of Wisconsin pupils.

Jacque argued that without the bill, educators can make decisions about children’s health and well-being in secrecy.

Advertisement

“Hiding from us important things that are going on in their lives is not only disrespectful to parents, it is harmful to our children and deliberately sabotaging the ability for vital communication to take place,” Jacque said.

Sen. Sarah Keyeski (D-Lodi) questioned why the Legislature should be involved when school boards already have the ability to approve such policies.

“I think it’s interesting how much you lean on local control for certain things, but then all of a sudden, you want government control,” she said.

Abigail Swetz, executive director of Fair Wisconsin, said such a bill would prevent educators from “engaging in the best practice” for using names and pronouns. Swetz, a former middle school teacher who advised a Gender and Sexuality Alliance club, said she’s seen firsthand the positive impact of affirming trans and nonbinary students.

Advertisement

“The mental health struggles that trans youth face are not a self-fulfilling prophecy. They’re entirely pressured outcomes, and bills like SB120 add to that pressure,” Swetz said.

Jenna Gormal, the public policy director at End Abuse Wisconsin, said forcing students to come out to parents before they’re ready reinforces power and control while stripping students of their autonomy.

Alison Selje, who uses they/them pronouns, spoke of the seismic shift in their well-being and academic performance when someone used their correct pronouns. Selje was a student at Madison West High School at the time. The Madison Metropolitan School District has a policy – which has survived a court challenge – protecting the use of names and pronouns of trans students.

“I remember the first time I heard someone use the right pronoun for me. This was during the pandemic so I was still wearing a mask, but underneath it, I was smiling ear to ear,” Selje said. “The use of my pronouns was a confidence boost, but it was also a lifesaver.”

Advertisement

Support for the bill came from two women representing Moms for Liberty. Laura Ackman and Amber Infusimo shared stories of parents finding out about their children’s new gender identity through school playbills and yearbooks.

“This bill rightly affirms schools shouldn’t be making significant decisions without parental knowledge or involvement,” Ackman said. “It does not prevent kindness, respect or compassion.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending