Connect with us

Wisconsin

 Trapped on Wisconsin farms: The hidden plight of trafficked workers • Wisconsin Examiner

Published

on

 Trapped on Wisconsin farms: The hidden plight of trafficked workers • Wisconsin Examiner


Photo by Gregory Conniff for Wisconsin Examiner

Coming to Wisconsin was “a dream” for M. Paredes, a stocky 48-year-old with a warm smile, who grew up in a rural village in the Mexican state of Veracruz. In early 2000 he crossed the border and journeyed north to work on a dairy farm.

Paredes came seeking a way to support his family. At home he barely earned enough to feed his wife and young son harvesting corn and cutting sugar cane with a machete.

“You come here and you say, ‘Wow!’” he said in a recent interview. “And the pay! Although the pay isn’t much, with the difference between dollars and pesos — it’s huge!”

Advertisement
Cows walk from a barn after being milked on a farm near Cambridge, Wisconsin. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Paredes loved his first job, for a veterinarian in Hillsboro who owned his own dairy farm and who taught Paredes to diagnose and treat sick animals. “He was a great teacher and treated me essentially as a veterinarian’s apprentice,” Paredes said. 

But a few years after he arrived, Paredes’ dream turned into a nightmare. 

Lured to work for a new employer by false promises that Paredes could gain legal immigration status and become a homeowner if he switched jobs, he found himself trapped. Instead of the opportunities he’d been promised, Paredes encountered physical and verbal abuse and threats that he would be deported if he didn’t work around the clock. After a bad accident, his employer’s insistence that he work through the injury left him permanently disabled.

Details of his story are gathered here from interviews with Paredes and his lawyer and the documents they submitted to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in his successful application for protected status as a victim of labor trafficking. While his immigration status is now protected, the Examiner agreed to withhold Paredes’ full name because he fears retribution from the farmer who abused him.

In Wisconsin, and around the country, immigrant rights advocates and law enforcement agencies have been stepping up efforts to bring labor trafficking cases to light, forcing the issue into public consciousness. 

Advertisement

A year ago, a coalition of Wisconsin advocates and state law enforcement officials announced a joint effort to investigate and prosecute these cases, in which employers and contractors use force, fraud and coercion to make workers stay in jobs they are desperate to escape.

‘We’ve just scratched the surface’

Mariana Rodriguez, Director of UMOS Latina Resource Center

“There’s a lot of money being gained from these cheap workers. … and they can be easily disposed of,” said Mariana Rodriguez, director of the United Migrant Opportunity Services (UMOS) Latina Resource Center. UMOS has provided services to immigrant workers in Wisconsin for more than 50 years. In February 2023, the group, together with the Wisconsin Department of Justice, won a $5.1 million grant from the Howard G. Buffett Foundation for a collaborative effort to eradicate labor trafficking — “this most heinous crime.” The grant funds two labor trafficking agents at DOJ as well as community education and outreach by UMOS, the Department of Workforce Development and the Women’s Community Center in Wausau. 

Rodriguez has tried for years to get law enforcement to focus on labor trafficking. But ever since 2005, when then-President George W. Bush promoted an initiative to combat human trafficking, which the administration called “a new form of slavery,” the focus has been on women and children who are victims of sex trafficking — not the immigrant laborers working in the shadows on Wisconsin farms, restaurants and factories. As a result of this federal focus, human trafficking became synonymous with prostitution — a top concern for faith-based groups and many lawmakers. A bipartisan task force on human trafficking in the Wisconsin Legislature recently wrapped up its work by releasing a slate of bills that focus primarily on combating sex trafficking. 

Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul at a press conference announcing a $5.1 million grant to fight labor trafficking | Wisconsin Examiner photo
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul at a press conference announcing a $5.1 million grant to fight labor trafficking | Wisconsin Examiner photo

But labor trafficking may actually account for a larger share of human trafficking. 

“I think it’s big. I really do,” said Rodriguez of the amount of labor trafficking in Wisconsin. “I think we’ve just scratched the surface.”

While Rodriguez said UMOS has helped more than 100 victims including workers on farms, in restaurants and in meat processing plants, neither her organization nor the Department of Justice could provide an estimate of the total number of victims of labor trafficking in Wisconsin. Nor could they talk about open cases, which take many years to investigate and work their way through the court system. Part of the grant from the Buffet foundation is funding the development of a system for  tracking tips and cases in the state. 

Lured by an employer’s false promises

A few years after he arrived in Wisconsin, Paredes was happily working with the veterinarian in Hillsboro and had brought up his wife and son to join him. In 2006, his employer brought him to the World Dairy Expo in Madison, where he was introduced to a farmer from a different part of the state by an acquaintance who praised Paredes’ skill and work ethic. “That same day [the farmer] asked me to work for him. I said, ‘no thanks,’ and that I was happy with my job.”  

Advertisement

But the farmer kept calling and promising to protect him so he “would not have any trouble with immigration or the police,” Paredes said.

“The way that he talked about my immigration status, honestly, gave me more fear than I had before,” Paredes said. Over a period of a few months, the farmer continued to call, promising he would get Paredes documents so he could live and work legally in the U.S., and that he and his family could live in their own house on the farm and eventually own it. 

Finally, Paredes agreed. “I fell for the lie that I would be safer,” he said. In 2007, Paredes and his family moved into a house on the farm, which the farmer promised they’d own after Paredes had worked there for 20 years. 

The couple had two more children, but Paredes said he barely got to see them. He was working  12 to 15 hour shifts six or seven days a week, and if he asked for a day offy, he said the farmer “would remind me that I was working towards immigration papers and homeownership.” He was on call 24 hours a day, and often told to cover other workers’ shifts when they couldn’t work. Slowly, the promises to protect Paredes turned into threats if he didn’t work around the clock.

He said the farmer told him, “You and your wife can be deported and the government will come take your kids and put them in an orphanage.”

Advertisement

 “I felt trapped,” Paredes said. He lived like that for a decade.

“That’s how the years passed,” Paredes said. “He went from being nice to being mean to being a monster. And that’s when I had the accident.”

Black and white dilapidated barn and silo
Photo by Gregory Conniff for Wisconsin Examiner

A fall, and brain damage

At 5 p.m. on a Friday in mid-November 2016, Paredes had been working since 2 a.m. and was finishing his 15-hour shift when the farmer called him and told him to shut the curtains on the barn. Paredes was scheduled to help with a fish fry at his church at 6 and wanted to leave, but, he said, the farmer told him, “You’ve gotta do what you’ve gotta do and get it done.”

A co-worker helped Paredes by driving a skid steer — a sort of compact bulldozer — to the barn and used it to lift Paredes in a basket attached to the front of the machine so he could reach the curtains. As he was leaning out to close one of the curtains, Paredes lost his balance and fell to the ground, landing on his head. When he came to, a co-worker was standing over him asking if he was OK. Confused, Paredes got up and hurried to his church. Another member of the congregation, a doctor, noticed that he was acting strange and called Paredes’ wife to pick him up and get him to the hospital. 

Before the accident, he wanted to keep me working for him with false promises, but after the accident he told me, ‘Now you are worthless. You are three-legged’ — because I walked with a cane — ‘and dumb.’

Advertisement

Paredes was diagnosed with a severe concussion and traumatic brain injury. The injury caused confusion, severe headaches and trouble concentrating. He had difficulty recognizing people and forming new memories. His balance was so bad that he needed a cane to walk.

Paredes’ doctor put him on bed rest and told him if he didn’t refrain from working for several weeks and restrict his hours to part-time for several months after that he risked permanent brain damage. 

But a couple of weeks after he came home from the hospital, Paredes said the farmer came round yelling at him to get up and get back to work. “He said I was exaggerating,” Paredes said. Despite his doctor’s orders, Paredes went back to work, afraid of his boss’s threats to have him deported.

“Before the accident, he wanted to keep me working for him with false promises, but after the accident he told me, ‘Now you are worthless. You are three-legged — because I walked with a cane — and dumb.”

Advertisement

Recounting what the farmer told him, Paredes’ eyes filled with tears.

“I know my wife said I shouldn’t talk like this, but it’s almost like he was right. Because now I’m not the same,” he said. 

When the farmer found out that Paredes had talked to a lawyer and was pursuing a workers compensation claim he threw Paredes and his family out of their house on the farm.

“He called the sheriff and had us all thrown out in the street — my wife and children. We had to leave running, and our stuff was left behind in the garbage. We had to ask for charity from the church. It was horrible to see my kids like that,” Paredes said.

With help from Legal Action of Wisconsin, Paredes submitted a sworn statement and medical records to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which granted him a T visa. The “T” stands for trafficking and the visa is a form of nonimmigrant status that enables human trafficking victims to remain in the U.S. for four years while pursuing credible claims against their employers, and eventually adjust their status to become lawful permanent residents.

Advertisement

Because his T visa was granted, Paredes can work legally. He got a series of jobs in landscaping and construction, but has not been able to keep steady work because of his forgetfulness and difficulty concentrating.

The first big bust on a Wisconsin farm

A lot of the labor trafficking cases UMOS has encountered involve workers who came to the U.S. on a legitimate work visa, but then were moved out of state by a trafficker so they lost their legal status. “A lot of how we uncover it starts with a complaint about not being paid,” said Rodriguez. “Debt bondage is a strong sign of trafficking,” she added. “A worker has to work off his food and housing. But he doesn’t understand how much he owes.”

UMOS also works with sex trafficking victims and victims of domestic violence, and advocates have used this experience to help train law enforcement officers in trauma-informed techniques for interviewing victims of labor trafficking. “Having an advocate in the room, things always go better,” Rodriguez said.

The workers were very controlled. They wouldn’t talk to us. Wouldn’t look at us. We thought, ‘Something is wrong.’

Advertisement

– Mariana Rodriguez, director of UMOS Latina Resource Center

Rodriguez was involved in the first big labor trafficking bust in Wisconsin, on the Borzynski Farm near Racine. Law enforcement officers raided the farm in 2017. A year ago, after a lengthy legal process, members of Saul Garcia & Sons, the contractors who ran the labor trafficking operation on the farm, were sentenced in federal court.

Saul Garcia and his family members were convicted of illegally transporting 22 men from Georgia to Wisconsin. All had come into the country legally on the H2A visa program, but the Garcias, who recruited them in Mexico, took away their visas and passports and gave them fake documents when they moved them out of state. Leaving Georgia made the workers’ visas void and rendered them vulnerable to deportation.

Advertisement
Immigrant farm workers harvest broccoli on March 16, 2006, near the border town of near San Luis, south of Yuma, Arizona. The U.S. Senate rejected an immigration bill Wednesday after months of bipartisan negotiations. (Photo by David McNew/Getty Images)
Immigrant farm workers harvest broccoli near the border town of near San Luis, south of Yuma, Arizona. (Photo by David McNew/Getty Images)

Rodriguez and two staff members from the U.S. Department of Labor’s farmworkers program first encountered the men when they went on an outreach visit to offer the farmworkers vouchers for food. Rodriguez noticed that the motel where they were staying was stocked like a grocery store, with food, soap and toilet paper, “so workers didn’t have to go out. It was strange.”

“The workers were very controlled,” she recalled. “They wouldn’t talk to us. Wouldn’t look at us. We thought, ‘Something is wrong.’”

As seasonal agricultural workers, the men were supposed to have an H2A visa.

“One man was shaking, scared. When we asked to see his visa, he gave a fake document,” Rodriguez said. “Why would an H2A worker have a fake anything?”

“I asked him if maybe he had another document. The contractor got up and said, ‘I treat my workers well. I pay them well. This is over. Go to your rooms.’ And the guys had their heads down. They all got up and left.”

Rodriguez and her colleagues reported the incident to the Labor Department’s law enforcement staff, who pulled over a bus carrying all 22 men. UMOS helped find them temporary housing in Milwaukee, away from the traffickers. 

Advertisement

Eleven of the workers opted to stay in the U.S. to help with the prosecution of the Garcias. The rest chose to go home to Mexico.

One of the workers who stayed was Miguel Antonio López, from Puebla. 

“I was lost because I didn’t speak the language,” López said in an interview at the UMOS office. “We were there like little sheep. … We worked each day for 10 hours, Monday to Saturday.”

López said he and the men he worked with were told to speak to no one, forced to work without water in the heat, cursed out for not working faster and threatened with deportation.

“The demands were more and more,” López said. Saul Garcia Jr., who was their overseer, “scolded us and treated us with no respect. He was crude.” 

Advertisement

Serious crime, light punishment

Morelia Blanco Rincón, lead anti-human trafficking advocate, UMOS Latina Resource Center, with Miguel Antonio López Gonzalez | Photo by Ruth Conniff
Morelia Blanco Rincón, lead anti-human trafficking advocate, UMOS Latina Resource Center, with Miguel Antonio López | Photo by Ruth Conniff

On Dec. 28 2022, after a years-long court process, Saul Garcia, Sr., Saul Garcia, Jr., Daniel Garcia and Consuelo Garcia were sentenced in federal court for the crime of human trafficking. The workers who stayed to see the process through were in the courtroom.

At the sentencing hearing, Judge Pamela Pepper, the chief U.S. district court judge for the eastern district of Wisconsin, praised the Garcias as pillars of their community, noting that she had received letters of support from their priest and the mayor of their town in Georgia, and describing them as successful business people who had pulled themselves up from poverty. They had written letters of apology, and promised to return to their main business, running their own farm, instead of illegally transporting agricultural workers.

“In many, many ways, the four people who sit in front of me represent the embodiment of the American dream,” Pepper said. “If you work hard and you value family and you value education, you can become anything. And I commend everyone for that.”

Saul Garcia Jr. and his father, Saul Garcia Sr. received sentences of 90 days in custody followed by two years of supervised release. Daniel and Consuelo Garcia got time served and one year of supervised release. When the defendants asked for a modification to the terms of their supervised release, so they could travel out of state for business, the judge granted it.

To López and the advocates who worked on the case, the judge’s words and the light punishment felt like a slap in the face. They’d waited years to get justice, but the Garcias were still in control.

“Saul Garcia Jr. that day in court, I remember his expression, his attitude — a person with authority. Power,” López recalled.

Advertisement

Neal Lofy, one of the Wisconsin Department of Justice’s two labor trafficking agents, worked on the case against the Garcias for six years, starting when he was an investigator with the Racine police department. He acknowledged that, for the victims, the result was disappointing.

“Keep in mind [that] . . . when we look at the penalties we were receiving in our early sex trafficking cases, they were minimal,” Lofy said. “Now, when we look at them, we see these rather lengthy sentences. We see people being held accountable by the criminal justice system. And all you can hope for is that the same push we made in awareness and education and training to get us to where we are in those investigations happens with labor trafficking. And the penalties, hopefully, will get to a point where they match the crime at hand.”

“The biggest problem is the lack of knowledge, the lack of understanding, the lack of awareness,” said Lofy, who used to work on sex trafficking cases. “And then just the isolation that’s involved in forced labor.”

“It’s more hidden, just by the nature of the work,” he said of farm workers who are in remote, rural areas, and restaurant workers who work behind the scenes in kitchens. As a result, he said, it’s hard to know how widespread the problem is. 

Of the labor trafficking victims he has worked with, Lofy said, “They’re here because they want to better their families, they want to better their home life — wherever home is.” That drive to earn money to help their families is the very thing that makes them vulnerable to exploitation. For Lofy, it’s gratifying to see formerly exploited workers like López, who now drives an Uber, working and achieving their goals.

Advertisement

Paredes, the injured dairy worker, hasn’t pursued a criminal case against his former employer because, he said, he doesn’t want to “poke the bear.” His boss often warned him that he knew all the local police, Paredes said, and police began pulling him over frequently after he filed his workers comp claim. The family was also intimidated when police came to ask questions about them at the church shelter after they were evicted from the farm. 

While he has received workers comp coverage for some of his medical treatments, as well as temporary disability payments, those payments have ended and Paredes is worried about how he and his wife will get by. 

“We just don’t want to believe it happens here. And it does,” said Lofy. “I think it’s hard for people to understand that. People are bought and sold for sex, and people are bought and sold to produce goods that are used throughout our daily lives.”

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site.

Advertisement



Source link

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Legislature sued over spending millions on private attorneys

Published

on

Wisconsin Legislature sued over spending millions on private attorneys


play

  • The lawsuit comes after a 2025 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel investigation.
  • The investigation found the state Legislature had spent about $26 million in taxpayer money on legal fees to private attorneys since 2017.

Law Forward, a Madison-based liberal law firm, is suing the Republican-controlled Legislature over its use of taxpayer money to hire private attorneys.

The lawsuit, which was filed last month, comes after a 2025 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel investigation found the state Legislature had spent about $26 million in taxpayer money on legal fees to private law firms since 2017.

Advertisement

The investigation found the vast majority of the spending came after Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Attorney General Josh Kaul won the November 2018 election, defeating Republican former Gov. Scott Walker and Attorney General Brad Schimel.

The sharp increase in spending also followed a law passed by Republican legislators in the December 2018 lame-duck session that authorized the Assembly speaker and Senate majority leader to hire private lawyers with taxpayer money.

“Wisconsin taxpayers deserve to know their money is being spent lawfully to advance a valid public purpose,” Law Forward President and General Counsel Jeff Mandell said in a statement. “This lawsuit challenges the tens of millions in taxpayer funds, most of which is wasted by the Republican-controlled Legislature on private legal counsel in pursuit of private interests.”

He called the practice a “clear violation of the Wisconsin Constitution’s public purpose doctrine and Wisconsin’s system of divided government.”

Advertisement

The lawsuit names as defendants the Assembly, Senate, Department of Administration and legislative leaders, including Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu.

Vos and LeMahieu could not be reached immediately for comment about the lawsuit.

The lawsuit cited a 2023 dispute in which the Senate continued to pay private counsel after it had been removed as a party in a case involving the use of surveillance cameras in Green Bay City Hall. The case cost the Senate more than $1 million in fees, according to records reviewed by the Journal Sentinel.

Assembly leaders also spent $1.8 million on fees related to former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman’s 2020 election probe, which found no evidence of fraud. The probe ended when Vos fired Gableman in August 2022. The legal fees did not include other investigation-related expenses, like Gableman’s salary. 

Much of the spending at issue stems from the 2018 lame-duck session, in which Republicans passed a series of laws stripping Evers and Kaul of various powers a month before they took office. One of those laws allowed legislative leaders to pay for outside counsel with taxpayer money and circumvent the attorney general to intervene in lawsuits that challenge state law.

Advertisement

Since then, the Legislature has spent more than $8 million defending challenges to the lame-duck laws.

In a July 2025 interview, Vos told the Journal Sentinel the laws ensured the governor did not consolidate too much power.

“The norm is for one person to try to take more authority, because they can make an easier, quicker decision,” Vos said.

“I think that’s really unhealthy for democracy, which is why we have so rigorously defended the right of the Legislature and the court to maintain its own independence,” he added.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

‘Not a hiding place’: Ogden police lauded for role in catching Nevada, Wisconsin murder suspects

Published

on

‘Not a hiding place’: Ogden police lauded for role in catching Nevada, Wisconsin murder suspects


OGDEN — In the last week, Ogden police have helped track down two suspects wanted outside of Utah in connection with separate homicides, which has Chief Jake Sube lauding the efforts of local law enforcement.

“Ogden is not a place where violent criminals come to run, hide or blend in. If you victimize people and come here to hide, we will find you,” he said in a social media post Tuesday.

In the most recent case, Ogden officials on Sunday arrested Randy Darius Jenks, 36, wanted in Mount Morris, Wisconsin, in connection with the death of his grandmother. The woman’s body had been discovered that same day at her Wisconsin home, according to court papers filed in 2nd District Court in Ogden as part of Jenks’ arrest accusing him of being a fugitive from justice.

On March 3, police arrested Ziaire Jacob Ham, 22, who is charged in Las Vegas with murder in the killing of a woman and a toddler, according to court papers and Sube’s statement. Ham had been spotted in Ogden by an Ogden officer and subsequently fled to Roy, where he was arrested.

Advertisement

“The arrest of these two individuals reflects exactly how we protect Ogden every day. We use technology, relentless police work and coordinated action with our regional partners to find violent offenders, take them into custody and deliver them to justice,” Sube said.

Ogden Mayor Ben Nadolski echoed Sube’s comments. “Ogden is not a hiding place,” he said.

The image shows Ziaire Ham, arrested in Roy on March 3, after an Ogden officer spotted him in Ogden. He’s suspected in the killings of two people in Nevada. (Photo: Ogden police)

Waushara County, Wisconsin, law enforcement officials found a dead woman on Sunday at a Mount Morris home. Jenks “admitted to multiple family members” that he had stabbed the woman in the neck and killed her, and then drove to Ogden, according to court papers filed in Ogden. Wisconsin authorities alerted Ogden officials, who were also alerted on Sunday by the man’s family here that he was in their home.

“Randy Jenks was located and taken into custody and officers noted the presence of blood on Randy’s person and clothing,” court documents state. Police body camera footage posted to the Ogden Police Department Facebook page shows Jenks surrendering to officers.

According to WLUK, a Green Bay, Wisconsin TV station, Jenks faces a count in Wisconsin of first-degree intentional homicide. The court papers filed in Ogden say Jenks confessed to killing his grandma, complaining that the woman “pushed him too far.” A bloody folding knife found in the Ogden home where Jenks had fled to is the weapon he used to kill the woman, with whom he lived, the charges allege.

Advertisement

In the Ham case, an Ogden officer on March 3 spotted a car that had been reported stolen out of Phoenix, Arizona, with Ham inside, driving. The officer attempted to pull him over, but Ham fled, eventually making it to Roy and abandoning his car. Authorities arrested him nearby.

Ham is charged in 2nd District Court with theft by receiving stolen property, a second-degree felony; failure to respond to an officer’s signal to stop, a third-degree felony; and reckless driving, a class B misdemeanor. According to court papers filed Tuesday, he has waived extradition to Las Vegas. Sube’s statement on Tuesday said Ham confessed to the killings in Nevada when interviewed by Ogden detectives.

Authorities said they thought Ham had discarded a gun somewhere between Ogden and Roy. Ogden police said Saturday that the gun had been located.

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Lawmakers Propose Ranked Choice Voting for All Elections

Published

on

Wisconsin Lawmakers Propose Ranked Choice Voting for All Elections


BELOIT, Wis. — State Senator Mark Spreitzer (D-Beloit) and Representative Clinton Anderson (D-Beloit) introduced LRB-5709 on March 5, legislation that would implement ranked choice voting for state, federal, and local elections in Wisconsin.

The Wisconsin legislation would also eliminate the need for February primaries in nonpartisan elections.

Today, voters in Wisconsin almost never elect independent candidates, because the state’s elections are decided by first-past-the-post plurality voting (FPPV). In this system, a voter’s expression of preference is restricted to a single candidate. Each voter has just one choice, and if there are more than two candidates in the race, winning by plurality rather than majority is quite possible. 

Consequently, no matter how attractive an independent candidate may seem in the spring, summer, and early fall of an election year, he or she will be tarnished as a “spoiler” on Election Day and will almost certainly lose. 

Advertisement

This unfortunate situation reduces the supply of independent candidates willing to compete and perpetually forces Americans into one of two warring factions.

In contrast, ranked-choice voting (RCV) allows voters to express their true preference for each candidate by ranking them in order of preference. 

If no candidate wins an outright majority, the candidate with the lowest number of first-place votes is eliminated, and the second-preference votes of his or her supporters are redistributed to the remaining candidates. 

This “instant runoff” process continues until a majority winner is determined. Not only does RCV give voters “more voice” in elections, but it also has the potential to stop our political system from tearing us apart into two camps.

Senator Spreitzer called the bill an improvement over a system that forces strategic voting. 

Advertisement

“Under ranked choice voting, voters can vote for the candidate they like the most instead of having to strategically vote against the candidate they like the least,” he said.

“It is a system that encourages positive campaigns, ensures that winners have the support of a majority of voters, and allows more candidates to run without being seen as a waste of a vote or a spoiler.”

Representative Anderson pointed to existing models as evidence that the system works. 

“Ranked choice voting is not a new idea. It’s already working in states like Maine and Alaska, and in cities like New York City,” he said.

“Our current system rewards candidates for tearing each other down instead of building broad support. Ranked choice voting changes that. It encourages campaigns focused on issues and coalition-building, ensures nominees win with a true majority, and creates space for more voices beyond the two-party system.”

For the best analysis of the pernicious effects of a lack of competition in our political system, please read The Politics Industry by Wisconsinite Katherine M. Gehl and her co-author, Harvard Business School professor Michael E. Porter.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending