Connect with us

Wisconsin

‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’ Episode 13 recap: The chefs set sail in Curaçao in first finale episode

Published

on

‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’ Episode 13 recap: The chefs set sail in Curaçao in first finale episode


play

Warning: Spoilers ahead for “Top Chef” Season 21, Episode 13, which aired June 12, 2024.      

Ahoy, “Top Chef” fans! It’s come down to this: Tonight, we learned who will be the top three contestants vying for the title of Top Chef. 

Advertisement

It was the first of two finale episodes filmed aboard the Holland America Eurodam cruise ship, which set sail from beautiful Curaçao.  

While I missed seeing Wisconsin shine on the small screen, it’s been a brutal season for the chefs, and they’ve more than earned a Caribbean getaway. But it’s not all fruity cocktails and beach excursions. The top four chefs had one final, frazzled Elimination Challenge before the last episode. 

It wasn’t pretty. We know how talented Dan, Danny, Laura and Savannah are, and the first cruise-line cook showed some cracks. But there were a couple standout dishes, and three of the chefs will have time to rebound in the final episode of “Top Chef: Wisconsin,” which airs next week. 

What in MKE did we see?: Nothing! “Top Chef” wrapped its time in Wisconsin with Episode 12. The finals are set aboard Holland America’s Eurodam cruise ship. 

Celebrity sightings: Chef/author Helmi Smeulders, Holland America Line President Gus Antorcha, Holland America Line Captain Mark Trembling, superstar Iron Chef Masaharu Morimoto, Holland America Line Fleet Executive Chef Sinu Pillai, “Top Chef: Texas” contestant Ed Lee, Holland America Line Director of Dining and Beverage Operations Marisa Christenson. 

Advertisement

Where was the challenge set? Holland America’s Eurodam cruise ship 

How did Dan do? Major spoiler! It was a bit of an up-down-up episode, but … he did good enough to make it to the “Top Chef” finale! After a middling first course, he redeemed himself with a beautiful blackened snapper that impressed the judges and punched his ticket to the finale. He also won the Quickfire Challenge this week — his first Quickfire win of the season. 

Best Milwaukee-related quote: “I’m on the cusp of being the next Top Chef. I’m happy to represent my city of Milwaukee, I’m happy to represent the state of Wisconsin. Let’s go.” —Dan Jacobs 

Advertisement

Sure, Milwaukee has some pretty spectacular water views of its own, but when the episode opened to punchy-colored buildings nestled by glimmering cerulean waters, it was clear “Top Chef” had bid adieu to the Midwest for the season. 

“We’re not in Milwaukee anymore,” Dan said as he arrived at the marina in Curaçao. 

Weeks after the final episode filmed in Milwaukee, the top four chefs (Dan, Danny, Laura and Savannah) reconvened with host Kristen Kish and judges Tom Colicchio and Gail Simmons in sunny Curaçao, an island just north of Venezuela. 

We learned that Danny had just run the New York City Marathon (We saw him running around Milwaukee a lot this season, but how did he manage to train during the competition?!) And Savannah had big news of her own: she got engaged during her time at home (like, right when she got home. “I got off the plane and it happened,” she said.) 

But even from 2,000 miles away, chef Dan hadn’t forgotten about his hometown. 

Advertisement

“Winning ‘Top Chef’ changes everybody’s life. Beyond what it’s gonna do for my business, I think about what it could do for the state of Wisconsin or the city of Milwaukee,” he said. 

He’s not there yet, but the first of his cooks to determine whether he’ll claim the title was just ahead. 

The Quickfire Challenge: Lionfish and cheese are a gouda pairing 

Kish, Colicchio and Simmons were waiting for the chefs by the marina and welcomed them to Curaçao with an azure-hued cocktail featuring, of course, blue Curaçao liqueur. 

“OK, chefs, are you ready to take a stab at your final Quickfire Challenge?” Kish asked. 

Advertisement

She pointed toward the display of spiney lionfish just to her left, an easy tip-off to the main ingredient of this week’s challenge, which none of the chefs had cooked with before. 

But local chef, cookbook author and lionfish hunter Helmi Smeulders was there to help. She explained that lionfish are an invasive species, and chefs in the area are encouraged to hunt and cook the fish to cut down on the population. 

With 18 venomous spines, lionfish are intimidating little suckers, but although the chefs would be cooking them, they wouldn’t have to break them down themselves. Phew! 

“Well, I mean, that’d be a great way to eliminate one of us, too,” Dan said, joking (but at this point in the competition, there could have been a kernel of truth there). 

The chefs wouldn’t only be cooking with lionfish. A second ingredient, gouda, is prevalent in Curaçao, brought to the island by the Dutch in the 17th century. 

Advertisement

“Just because we left Wisconsin doesn’t mean we’re gonna leave all the cheese behind,” Kish said. (Smart woman!) 

The chefs would have the “sacrilegious” task of incorporating the lionfish and gouda in one dish, attempting to balance the mildness of the fish with the gouda’s strong flavor. 

They’d have just 30 minutes to figure out how. 

It was like the reverse of the infamous cheese festival challenge: Three of the chefs made some sort of light tartare or crudo while Danny opted for a fried croquette. 

Dan’s tartare was tossed in a little Kewpie mayo and served with orange and fresno aguachile and gouda frico. Laura’s crudo came with guava sauce and gouda crunch. Savannah’s crudo had chili oil and a sauce inspired by Curaçao’s national dish (keshi yena). Danny’s croquette had gouda sauce and red cabbage slaw. 

Advertisement

After the quick cook, Dan’s lionfish tartare was the winning dish. Simmons said the Kewpie mayo he used in the dish was a smart bridge between the light fish and gouda. 

It was the first-ever Quickfire win for Dan, a last-minute victory for a known hater of the speedy mini challenges. He took home $10,000, his first cash prize since winning Restaurant Wars. 

The Elimination Challenge reveal: There’s plenty of fish in the sea 

We saw a lot of heartland-favorite ingredients pop up in the Wisconsin challenges this season, but when you’re surrounded by the sea, one ingredient comes to mind: fresh fish. 

For the Elimination Challenge, the chefs would work together to present an eight-course meal featuring eight different fish with eight different preparations: raw, steamed, mousse, poached, fried, roasted, smoked and blackened. 

Each chef would present two dishes to the judges’ table aboard the Holland America Eurodam line. 

Advertisement

The ship would provide a pantry of ingredients, but the chefs could supplement it at the floating market nearby, where they’d have 10 minutes and $100 to shop for fresh produce.  

Without knowing what type of fish they’d be working with yet, the chefs navigated the market selecting ingredients that could be used broadly or those that showed off the region’s local flavor. 

On cook day, they’d have two-and-a-half hours to prep and cook their dishes to serve to a table of eight judges aboard the ship. 

The chefs unwind with a special dinner and stingray excursion 

But the chefs would have a little time to unwind before one of the most stressful cooks of the season. 

Advertisement

Once aboard the Eurodam, they met at restaurant Tamarind, where an iconic celebrity chef was working behind the sushi bar. 

It was Masaharo Morimoto, star of long-running cooking competition show “Iron Chef,” and a restaurateur who owns more than 20 restaurants around the world, including one aboard one of Holland America’s fleet. He also happens to be the fresh fish ambassador to Holland America. 

He prepared a multi-course menu for the contestants, who sat slack-jawed in awe of the superstar chef the whole time. 

“Chef Morimoto’s just going to cook for me and these three goons? This is crazy,” said a wide-eyed Dan. 

“I feel so honored to be here in this moment,” Savannah said.

Advertisement

Before leaving, Morimoto presented a list of the fish the chefs could choose from for the next day’s cook. But before he went, he left a poignant autograph for each chef, inscribing the words ichigo ichie on their menus, which means “the one-time chance” in Japanese. 

Because Savannah won last week’s Elimination Challenge, she had first pick of the fish and preparation (raw Atlantic salmon and fried striped bass). The divvying up went pretty smoothly for the rest of the chefs, too, aside from a brief moment where Dan and Laura both aimed to claim snapper. 

It seemed like the long-squashed beef between them had returned, but Laura offered the snapper to Dan and settled for grouper.  

She also chose steamed black bass. Danny chose sea bream mousse and smoked rainbow trout. 

Dan ended up with poached dorade and blackened snapper. 

Advertisement

The next day, the chefs unwound with a beach-day getaway to Half Moon Cay, where they relaxed on a beachfront deck, sipped drinks and swam with stingrays (much to nature-averse Danny’s chagrin). 

“The stingrays, they come and give you warm hugs, but also they can also sting,” Laura said. “Like the chefs in the competition almost.” 

And making it this far, whoever got the chop this week would feel the sting extra hard. 

The Elimination Challenge: Rough waters in the kitchen at sea 

The chill beach-day vibes screeched to a halt when the chefs entered the Tamarind kitchen the following day. 

Advertisement

They’d cooly selected their fish and courses, but their confidence was shaken as their dishes took shape. 

Dan’s yucca fritters came out from the frier mushy — another dunk in the oil helped crisp them up, but added an extra layer of grease. Danny’s steamed mousse didn’t souffle as he intended. And Savannah scrambled throughout her time in the kitchen, her vision for both dishes getting completely lost in the shuffle. 

It seemed like nerves were getting to the chefs, and with good reason. This was one of the most important cooks of their lives to that point, with just one service between them and the finale. 

They would serve a table of eight: Kish, Collichio, Simmons, Antorcha and Trembling, Pillai, Lee and Christenson.

Savannah was up first. She presented a sake-cured salmon roll with salmon tartare, twice-fried plantain and ginger dressing. A fine dish, but a very simple way to show off salmon, the judges said. 

Advertisement

Next was Laura, who made a black bass recado negro with squash and fried plantain wrapped in a banana leaf. A fun idea, given the tropical locale, but Kish didn’t think the banana leaves were properly cleaned, creating a dirty musk that overwhelmed the dish. 

Danny was never able to revive his sea bream mousse, which he served with a fines herbes salad and scotch bonnet and green garlic spheres. 

In true Danny fashion, it was technical and stunning on the plate, but the mousse was so off it detracted from creativity of the spheres. 

“Something went wrong,” Collichio said. 

Advertisement

Something was wrong with Dan’s poached dorade, too. He told the judges he hadn’t cooked dorade in almost 20 years. He walked away feeling pretty confident that the judges loved his dish, but Tom swooped in with a real zinger after he’d left the room. 

“Dan said he hasn’t cooked dorade since 2005. He still hasn’t cooked it,” he said. OUCH. His fish was raw. 

Manny went home last week for serving raw fish, saving Dan from being eliminated just before the finals. 

Although Dan’s fish wasn’t poached correctly, the judges did like the flavor of the coconut-turmeric sauce along with the grilled pumpkin and chili-garlic crisp. But Simmons mentioned those twice-fried fritters felt heavy and clunky alongside the rest of the dish’s bright Caribbean flavors. 

Savannah’s second dish was a bit of a flop, too. Her fried striped bass with pepper kosho and aji amarillo aioli was executed beautifully, but her choice to serve it on a too-large baguette made the dish feel dry. She should’ve cut the fish larger to fit, the judges said. 

Advertisement

It was a big whiff for Laura’s grouper. It, too, was undercooked, and when she explained how she prepared it, she described baking the fish, not roasting, which was the preparation she was assigned.  

And the guajillo pepper glaze, guajillo-xo emulsion and pineapple broth seemed to curdle in the bowl, an off-putting sight for any dish. 

By that point, the judges were feeling a little awkward about their final four chefs. 

“They’ve all cooked so much better,” Kish assured the guest judges. It was clear to everyone that the lackluster showing across the board meant the intensity of the competition was getting to them. 

“They feel like they’re afraid,” Colicchio said. 

Advertisement

Those fears were assuaged when Danny presented his second dish, a smoked rainbow trout with plantain pumpkin puree and a hazelnut lemon relish.  

Smoked fish will always be dry, Lee said, but Danny’s smart decision to top his with a smoked rainbow trout foam infused it with moisture.  

And the judges were wild about his hazelnut lemon relish, the lemon adding brightness and the hazelnut acting as a natural through line for the smokiness of the fish. 

You could sense the relief in the room as the judges discussed his dish. 

That relief lingered as Dan “brought up the caboose,” as he said, with the final course: blackened snapper, a preparation he’d never done but a dish his dad always enjoyed. He served it with butter-poached potatoes, a mandarin butter sauce and dill oil. 

Advertisement

“This is my favorite dish of the whole meal,” Lee said. “Just comforting, it just made me feel good.” 

With a big smile, Kish said Dan’s snapper was the juiciest piece of fish served all day. 

After dinner, as the chefs debriefed, Dan was quiet as the rest of the chefs shared where they thought they had failed. He thought he nailed both dishes, but ending on that bright note gave him an extra boost of confidence going in to the judges’ critiques. 

Who won ‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’ Episode 13? 

Dan was half right. When Colicchio revealed that his poached fish, among others’, was served raw, Dan’s face fell. 

Advertisement

“It flaked!” he said, uncredulous. He was shocked he’d misjudged the doneness of his dish. 

But his smile returned when the judges praised his moist and flavorful blackened snapper. 

“If everyone made blackened fish the way you did, that fish would not have died in the ‘90s,” Lee said. 

Everyone got pretty high-low critiques for the day, for the most part. The judges said they could tell Savannah’s creativity just wasn’t there, and Laura had some major mishaps, including the dirty banana leaves and undercooked grouper. 

They were totally turned off by Danny’s failed mousse, but he managed to save himself with his final dish, his unexpected smoked rainbow trout brightened beautifully by the lemon hazelnut relish. 

Advertisement

“That dish, for me, was nearly perfect,” Kish said. 

And that dish is what ultimately secured the win — and the first spot in the finale — for Danny. 

Aside from advancing to the finale, Danny won $10,000 and a 10-day cruise for two anywhere in the world Holland America sails. 

“I’m going to the finale, I got $53,000 and I’m going on a cruise?” he said. “This feels really good.” 

I bet so, Danny! 

Advertisement

Who was sent home on ‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’ Episode 13? 

Who would be the next chef to join Danny in the finale? 

Thank goodness for that “caboose” dish, which saved Dan and secured his spot in the finale, too. 

“I’ve wanted to be in this position forever,” he said to the judges. “And I’m just happy you guys have given me this opportunity.” 

That brought it down to Savannah and Laura, two talented chefs who’ve been on a hot streak the past few episodes, but lost their footing at the end. 

Advertisement

This week, Savannah’s dishes were uninspired and Laura’s just had too many flaws. 

For Laura, who’d won her way back into the competition from Last Chance Kitchen, her journey on “Top Chef” would end. 

“I feel good to be part of this,” she said after Kish asked her to pack her knives and go. “To have an opportunity to work with amazing chefs, to learn from other people, to get feedback from Kristen and from Tom and from Gail. To see the evolution of me as a chef.” 

Savannah would join Danny and Dan in the finale. 

But the energy had been sucked from the room. The chefs had reached a major milestone, but their subpar dishes had shaken their confidence and stripped away any sense of celebration they’d earned. 

Advertisement

“You should feel good about this,” Colicchio said. “And I know why you don’t: You didn’t do your best work today. I get it, but you have an opportunity to make it up.” 

Kish, who’d stood in their chef’s coats on “Top Chef” before, urged the chefs to relish the position they were in. 

“It’s a fantastic moment that you are going to remember forever,” she said through tears. “So have fun with it, truly. It’s really amazing.” 

The whole room got emotional as the weight of the moment sank in. 

Next week, Dan, Danny and Savannah will compete in the “Top Chef: Wisconsin” finale, one of them taking home the title for the season. 

Advertisement

They’ll be joined by six eliminated contestants: Amanda, Michelle, Soo, Manny, Laura and Kaleena, who will partner with the top three as sous chefs, helping them cook a multi-course meal that will determine who will win the competition. 

This is the point where I need to chime in and say I am a giant fan of all three contestants. Danny’s talent and artistry have been awe-inspiring from the start. And I’ve loved cheering on “underdog” Savannah as she’s risen and proven herself as an exceptional chef. 

But, c’mon. I live in Milwaukee. Of course I’m going to be a homer. 

Dan all the way, baby! He’s been such a fantastic representative for our city and state and it’s been so exciting to watch our hometown chef realize his yearslong dream. 

“I’m on the cusp of being the next Top Chef,” he said as the credits rolled. “I’m happy to represent my city of Milwaukee, I’m happy to represent the state of Wisconsin. Let’s go.” 

Advertisement

How to watch ‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’: TV channel, streaming    

Viewers can watch live on Bravo on Wednesday nights at 8 p.m. or stream the next day on Peacock, BravoTV.com or the Bravo app. 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wisconsin

Wisconsin kayaker who faked his own death has told investigators how he did it, sheriff says

Published

on

Wisconsin kayaker who faked his own death has told investigators how he did it, sheriff says


GREEN LAKE, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin man who faked his own drowning this summer so he could abandon his wife and three children has been communicating with authorities daily from Eastern Europe, even telling them how he did it, but has not committed to returning home, a sheriff said Thursday.

Ryan Borgwardt has been talking with authorities since Nov. 11, Green Lake County Sheriff Mark Podoll said at a news conference. The sheriff showed a video that Borgwardt sent the sheriff’s office that day. His investigators don’t know exactly where he is, Podoll said, but it was somewhere in Eastern Europe.

Borgwardt, wearing an orange T-shirt and not smiling, looked directly into the camera in the video, which appears to have been taken on his phone. Borgwardt said he was in his apartment and briefly panned the camera to show the inside, but mostly showed just a door and bare walls.

“I’m safe and secure, no problem,” Borgwardt said. “I hope this works.”

Advertisement

Borgwardt has supplied authorities with details about how he faked his death and fled, Podoll said. He traveled about 50 miles (80 kilometers) from his home in Watertown to Green Lake, where he overturned his kayak, dumped his phone in the lake and then paddled an inflatable boat to shore. He told authorities he picked that lake because it’s the deepest in Wisconsin at 237 feet (over 72 meters).

After leaving the lake, he rode an electric bike about 70 miles (110 kilometers) through the night to Madison, the sheriff said. From there, he took a bus to Detroit, then boarded a bus to Canada and got on a plane there, the sheriff said.

Police were still verifying Borgwardt’s description of what happened, Podoll said.

“The great news is we know that he is alive and well,” Podoll said. “The bad news is we don’t know where Ryan exactly is, and he has not yet decided to return home.”

Podoll suggested Borgwardt could be charged with obstructing the investigation into his disappearance, but so far no counts have been filed. The sheriff said authorities “keep pulling at his heartstrings” to return home.

Advertisement

“Christmas is coming,” Podoll said. “And what better gift could your kids get than to be there for Christmas?”

But whether Podoll returns, the sheriff said, is “on his own free will.”

Borgwardt’s disappearance was first investigated as a possible drowning after he went kayaking on Green Lake, about 100 miles (160 kilometers) northwest of Milwaukee. But subsequent clues — including that he obtained a new passport three months before he disappeared — led investigators to speculate that he faked his death to meet up with a woman he had been communicating with in Uzbekistan, a former Soviet republic in Central Asia.

The sheriff declined to comment when asked what he knew about the woman, but he said police contacted Borgwardt “through a female that spoke Russian.”

Prior to the sheriff’s office speaking with Borgwardt last week, he had not been heard from in three months. On the night of Aug. 11, Borgwardt texted his wife in Watertown shortly before 11 p.m., saying he was headed to shore after kayaking.

Advertisement

Deputies located his vehicle and trailer near the lake. They also found his overturned kayak with a life jacket attached to it in an area where the lake’s waters run more than 200 feet (60 meters) deep. An angler later discovered Borgwardt’s fishing rod.

Investigators initially speculated that Borgwardt’s kayak capsized and he didn’t have a life jacket. The search for his body went on for more than 50 days, with divers on several occasions exploring the lake.

In early October, the sheriff’s department learned that Canadian law enforcement authorities had run Borgwardt’s name through their databases the day after he was reported missing. Further investigation revealed that he had reported his passport lost or stolen and had obtained a new one in May.

The sheriff’s office said the analysis of a laptop revealed a digital trail that showed Borgwardt planned to head to Europe and tried to mislead investigators.

The laptop’s hard drive had been replaced and the browsers had been cleared the day Borgwardt disappeared, the sheriff’s office said. Investigators found passport photos, inquiries about moving money to foreign banks, and communication with a woman from Uzbekistan.

Advertisement

They also discovered that he took out a $375,000 life insurance policy in January, although the policy was for his family and not him, the sheriff said.

Authorities tried every phone number and email address on the laptop in “a blitz fashion,” Podoll said. They eventually reached a Russian-speaking woman who connected them with Borgwardt. It’s unclear whether she is the woman in Uzbekistan.

Podoll said he wasn’t sure how he was supporting himself but speculated he has a job: “He’s a smart guy.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Rural voters and their discontents • Wisconsin Examiner

Published

on

Rural voters and their discontents • Wisconsin Examiner


Is Wisconsin — or the country — really as divided as the maps make it look?

On the spreadsheet of unofficial election totals posted by each of Wisconsin’s 72 counties following the election Nov. 5, a handful showed a clear majority for the Democratic presidential ticket of Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. Many more counties were won by the winning Republican ticket of former President Donald Trump and Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance. Trump garnered enough votes to carry Wisconsin and enough states to return to the Oval Office in January.

A lot of those Trump-voting counties were rural ones, contributing to longstanding stereotypes about a monolithic body politic of deep blue cities and a bright red countryside.

But months before Election Day, on a mild August evening in a quaint round barn north of Spring Green, the writer Sarah Smarsh cautioned against oversimplifying the politics of rural voters — and against turning a blind eye to a part of the country that, she said, has too often been written off.

Advertisement
Sarah Smarsh speaks during a presentation in August near Spring Green, Wisconsin. (Wisconsin Examiner photo)

“I grew up on a fifth-generation wheat farm in south central Kansas,” Smarsh said that evening. It’s a place of “tall grass prairie, which happens to be the most endangered ecosystem … and simultaneously the least discussed or cared about or protected. And I don’t think it’s a coincidence that that’s the ecosystem of the place and people that I also happen to believe have not been given fair attention and due consideration.”

Smarsh made her mark with the book “Heartland: A Memoir of Working Hard and Being Broke in the Richest Country on Earth.” As a journalist and author she has straddled the community of her upbringing and the urbane, academic world that she entered when she became the first in her family to pursue higher education.

The child of a carpenter and a teen mom, Smarsh has explored the socioeconomic divide in the U.S., mapping it to the destruction of the working class, the demise of family farms and the dismantling of public services from health care to public schools. 

“I write about socioeconomic class and I write about rural issues, but that’s because I grew up in working poverty, and that’s because I grew up on a farm,” Smarsh said. And while those identities “are enormously consequential,” she added, she seeks to break down the assumptions that people carry about them. Her message: “You don’t know who my family is, and especially if what we assume is that they’re white trash, worthless.”

It’s a story that gives new context to the election results from 2016 on, and takes on new importance after the election of 2024. The residents of those places dismissed as “flyover country,” Smarsh said back in August, have many of the same concerns of urban and suburban voters, including reproductive rights, public schools, gun violence and other subjects. And understanding them in their diversity and complexity casts politics, especially national politics, in a more diffuse and complicated light.

Advertisement

Where ‘people don’t care about political affiliations’

Concern about climate change and a desire to live more sustainably led Tamara Dean and her partner to move to western Wisconsin’s Vernon County in the early 2000’s, where they built a homestead, grew their own food and became part of the local agricultural community.

Tamara Dean

Climate change followed them. In their county, extreme weather events became almost the norm, with a 500-year flood “happening every few years or every year,” Dean said in an interview.

“A rural community really coalesces when extreme situations happen and they help each other out,” Dean said. “And when we were cleaning up after a flood, helping our neighbors salvage their possessions or even getting people to safety, no one’s going to ask who you voted for, and people don’t care about political affiliations.”

Dean has written a collection of essays on the couple’s time in the Driftless region of Wisconsin, “Shelter and Storm,” to be published in April 2025 by the University of Minnesota Press.

Distrust of the federal government

Residents, she found, had something of an ambivalent relationship with the federal government. 

For all the complexity of agricultural economics, the U.S. Department of Agriculture programs that provide financial farm support were familiar and well-understood by longtime farmers and easily accessible to them, she said. But when the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) promised recovery assistance for flooding in 2018, “it just took forever to come, and it took a lot of bureaucracy to try to get it,” Dean said. For individual applicants, “getting any kind of assistance might be so daunting that they just wouldn’t think it’s worth it.”

Advertisement

For Dale Schultz, a former Republican state senator who has been thinking at length about politics and government in recent years, the election outcome has prompted contemplation.

Schultz left the Legislature a decade ago after splitting with Republican then-Gov. Scott Walker over legislation stripping public employees’ union rights and weakening Wisconsin’s mining laws.

Since then he has campaigned for redistricting reform and supported the overturning of Wisconsin Republicans’  gerrymandered legislative maps. iIn October he went public as a Republican supporting the Harris campaign for president.

In his part of the state, he saw a distinct contrast between the Democratic campaign and the Republican one.

“I saw an extremely good Democratic effort to talk to people face-to-face,” Schultz said in an interview. The GOP campaign along with allied outside groups such as American for Prosperity, however, appeared to him to focus almost entirely on mailings, phone calls and media.

Advertisement

“It became clear to me that politics is changing from the time I spent in office, being less people powered and more media powered,” Schultz said.

Ignored by both parties

Schultz said he’s observed a level of anger among some of his one-time constituents that has alarmed and surprised him, a product, he suggests, of having been ignored by both parties.

Dale Schultz

One target has been regulation, to the point where “they’ve lost track of why regulations are important and why they should support them,” he said. Yet he sees the direct answer to that question where he lives in Southwest Wisconsin.

“In the last 20 years there has been a renaissance in trout fishing, like I could not even have imagined 20 years ago,” Shultz said. He credits the Department of Natural Resources and its personnel for working with local communities to ensure conditions that would turn trout streams into suitable habitat to support a burgeoning population of fish. “That doesn’t happen without water quality and water quality regulations, and land use and land use regulations.”

Schultz has been  spending time in conversation with friends “who are like-minded and similarly curious,” he said. “And then you just watch and wait and see what happens, and try to voice concerns that are real and that need to be dealt with, and [that] we’re not going to be able to hide from as a country.”

He hopes for the return of a time when people like him,  who consider themselves “just to the right of center,” can again “talk to everyone and possibly craft a solution.”

Advertisement

Back in August, Sarah Smarsh offered a gentle warning about the coming election to her audience in the round barn north of Spring Green.

“Whatever happens in November, everybody else is still here — the other side is still here,” Smarsh said. “And so there’s going to be some caring to do, and that’s probably going to be for generations, because we didn’t arrive at this moment overnight.”

Wisconsin red barn
Photo by Gregory Conniff for Wisconsin Examiner

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

2nd-Year Wisconsin Badgers QB will reportedly enter the transfer portal

Published

on

2nd-Year Wisconsin Badgers QB will reportedly enter the transfer portal


This time of the year, plenty of college football players across the country are getting ready for the end of the season, while others are already looking ahead to 2025. We’re of course referencing the transfer portal, with things set to officially open up next month.

Wisconsin, just like every season, is expected to lose some players who will be looking for playing time elsewhere. Such will be the case for redshirt-freshman quarterback Cole LaCrue. A former 3-star signee from the 2023 class, LaCrue is buried on the depth chart. According to On3’s Pete Nakos, LaCrue will enter the portal. He has four years of eligibility left available to him:

LaCrue deciding to head elsewhere isn’t a stunner whatsoever. When QB Tyler Van Dike went down with his torn ACL, Braedyn Locke stepped in as the team’s new starting quarterback. Behind him is freshman Mabrey Mettauer, a four-star signee from last year’s recruiting class.

LaCrue was never going to see playing time for the Badgers this season. Not only that, but Wisconsin is among the finalists for four-star 2025 quarterback Carter Smith, an elite signal-caller who recently backed off his pledge from Michigan.

According to 247’s Evan Flood, Smith is down to Wisconsin and Florida State. He’s taking an official visit to Tallahassee later this month, with a decision coming leading up to the Early Signing Period, which starts on Dec. 4. The Badgers appear to be in a great spot to potentially land Smith’s services.

Should he end up signing to play for Fickell and Co., it’s only going to make the QBs room even more crowded in Wisconsin and LaCrue will fall down further on the depth chart. Once the portal opens up, he’ll start looking for a new place to call home for next season. When he signed with Wisconsin, he did so over other offers from Colorado, Central Michigan, Northern Colorado, South Dakota and Tulane.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending