Connect with us

Wisconsin

Three takeaways from Wisconsin's 42-10 loss to Iowa

Published

on

Three takeaways from Wisconsin's 42-10 loss to Iowa


Three takeaways from Wisconsin’s 42-10 loss to Iowa

The Wisconsin Badgers played their ninth game of the 2024 season and sixth conference game on Saturday evening, losing to the Iowa Hawkeyes in Kinnick Stadium, 42-10.

Here are my three biggest takeaways from Wisconsin’s loss.

Defense gets steamrolled

Iowa’s offense didn’t greet Wisconsin with any surprises.

The Hawkeyes have one of the best running backs in the country in Kaleb Johnson, and everybody knew the game revolved around him. But I’m not even sure Johnson broke a sweat. It was the easiest 135-yard, three-touchdown performance I’ve ever seen. His offensive line created holes that coach Kirk Ferentz could’ve ran through.

The Badgers stuck to their guns and mostly stayed in nickel, which Iowa took full advantage of.

“Obviously, at the second level, [Johnson’s] tough because he’s a big back and he’s got the speed to make you worried,” Luke Fickell said after the game.

Advertisement

“But I don’t think I would go much further than to say the guys up front were where the difference in the ball game was.”

The Hawkeye offense began with a more balanced offensive approach on the first two drives. But once they realized the Badgers didn’t pose much of a threat on the ground, it was curtains.

Their back-to-back touchdown drives in the second quarter lasted six and seven plays, respectively — consisting of one pass and 12 runs for an average of 9.7 yards per carry.

The dominance continued for the rest of the day. All in all, the Hawkeyes rushed 54 times for 329 yards, the most the Badgers have allowed since the 2012 Rose Bowl.

The Badgers aren’t deep enough up front, as Fickell admitted earlier this week.

Advertisement

“Maybe at the end of the game, we were a little bit worn down, defensively, and I think that, in the long run, cost us,” Fickell said on Monday.

However, they were overmatched immediately. We can call it what it is — a toughness issue.

This can’t even be compared to the Alabama or Penn State games. As programs, Iowa and Wisconsin are peers. They even entered Saturday’s game with the same record. Yet, against a good-not-great Hawkeye team, the Badgers were utterly embarrassed.

A rivalry game does a good job of showing where a team stands on the conference totem pole. Wisconsin can beat teams like Purdue and Northwestern, but has yet to threaten any team worth a damn.

“November is a time when you have to find out what you’re made of, and that’s not a good showing for what it is that we’re made of,” Fickell said.

Advertisement

“This was something that’s kinda your worst nightmare, to be kind of overtaken and manhandled and dominated, especially in the second half.”

Offense puts up disaster class

The trench domination took place on both sides of the ball.

Iowa’s defensive front was as unrelenting as the offense’s. They completely shut down running back Tawee Walker, who finished with just 16 carries for 52 yards. The team as a whole ran just 28 times for 124 yards.

If the Hawkeyes couldn’t break through the offensive line, they made easy work of the perimeter blockers.

Advertisement

“We’ve gotta be able to loosen some people up. We’ve gotta be able to get the ball on the edge a little bit more. But we couldn’t do it tonight. We’ve gotta block on the perimeter a little bit better, so when we do get the ball to the edge, it’s not a one-yard gain or a two-yard gain,” Fickell said.

“But this is where Iowa is really good. They do a great job at creating and setting edges and making you work for everything. And obviously we didn’t work hard enough to get it done tonight.”

After Walker’s first few attempts were unsuccessful, offensive coordinator Phil Longo panicked and instantly abandoned the run. Of their first seventeen plays, Longo called 12 passes and only five runs. He put far too much pressure on quarterback Braedyn Locke, which he proved he wasn’t capable of handling.

But. in Locke’s defense, the offense couldn’t do anything right. The line couldn’t block, which shut down the running game, and the receivers weren’t giving Locke many breaks.

This comes back to coaching. It feels like a foregone conclusion that Longo’s days as coordinator are numbered. The offense has no sense of identity. They only ever look competent against bad defenses. When they get punched in the mouth, they immediately crumble.

Advertisement

“Everybody knows that Iowa’s gonna make it difficult to [run the ball]. You thought you had a good plan coming in, with the ability to create some seams and find ways to loosen them up a little bit, but we were not able to do that tonight,” Fickell said.

It was the type of performance that inspires true soul searching.

Whether or not bringing in an Air Raid coordinator was the right decision can be debated. But we know that Longo isn’t the right guy for the job.

Locke crumbles underneath pressure

When the run wasn’t working, Locke’s weaknesses became incredibly obvious. Too much was put on his shoulders for him to handle, and he collapsed beneath the weight.

Advertisement

Locke could simply never create any sense of rhythm. He didn’t complete more than two passes in a row until the end of the third quarter, leading up to their first touchdown when the score was 28-3.

He started out okay, leading a field goal drive to strike first blood.

But disaster soon struck. At the end of the first quarter, Locke dropped back and attempted to throw a 25-yard pass to receiver Quincy Burroughs, but didn’t see boundary cornerback Deshaun Lee, who jumped up for an easy interception.

This killed all of the Badgers’ momentum. And they couldn’t recover it at any point throughout the rest of the night.

After nine starts, Locke has shown us who he is.

Advertisement

He’s a quarterback who can look capable when his offensive line gives him time and the running game allows for effective play action, which can also be said about most quarterbacks in the FBS.

I don’t want to put all of the blame on Locke, because there are obvious issues at coordinator and receiver, but it’s clear he’s not the right quarterback for this specific period of Badger football.

Locke is simply not good enough to create wins by himself. He’s become a product of his environment.

_________________________________________________

*Chat about this article in The Badgers’ Den

Advertisement

*Check out our videos, interviews, and Q&As on our YouTube channel

*Subscribe and listen to the BadgerBlitz.com podcast (as seen on Apple, Google, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcasts)

*Follow us on Twitter: @McNamaraRivals, @TheBadgerNation, @RaulV45, @seamus_rohrer, @DonnieSlusher_

*Like us on Facebook





Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

‘Play is the work of a child’: Wisconsin parents back bill that would double daily recess

Published

on

‘Play is the work of a child’: Wisconsin parents back bill that would double daily recess


MADISON, Wis. (WMTV) – A proposal at the state Capitol would require Wisconsin schools to increase daily recess time for students in kindergarten through sixth grade, with supporters saying more opportunities for unstructured play could improve focus, behavior and overall well-being.

Assembly Bill 810 would require public schools to provide 60 minutes of recess each school day for K-6 students, doubling the amount many schools currently offer. The bill has been referred to the Legislature’s education committee.

The bill’s author, State Rep. William Penterman of Hustisford, said the proposal is based on research showing physical activity supports learning and child development.

“Especially younger kids, like our elementary kids, it’s so important that they get moving throughout the day,” Penterman said. “We’re trying to get our kids to learn and develop mentally, emotionally, but also physically.”

Advertisement

Penterman emphasized the bill is not intended to extend the school day or reduce instructional time. Instead, he said schools could restructure existing schedules to include more frequent movement breaks.

“We’re not looking to expand the school day. Absolutely not,” Penterman said. “It’s already set. We’re going to leave it at that. It’s about increasing efficiencies.”

The proposal would give schools flexibility in how the time is scheduled, allowing recess to be broken into multiple shorter periods throughout the day.

“But 60 minutes of play a day — it could be three 20-minute recesses. It could be two 30-minute recesses,” Penterman said.

Parents in the Madison Metropolitan School District say concerns about limited recess became apparent once their children came home from school.

Advertisement

“I saw that we only had 30 minutes of recess at our school, and I felt like that wasn’t enough,” said Victoria Carey, a parent with a child in elementary school.

Carey said she initially assumed recess policies were determined by individual schools or districts, but later learned minimum requirements are set at the state level.

“So I looked into — is that our school’s policy? Is that our district’s policy?” Carey said. “And then I realized that it wasn’t either of those. Really, it was the state.”

Ally Grigg, another MMSD parent and former teacher, said a lack of movement during the school day can lead to challenges with emotional regulation and behavior at home.

“If that need is not being met at school, they come home, and my experience is my child frequently has meltdowns as soon as she gets home,” Grigg said. “A lot of times they have a lot of energy and they’re bouncing off the walls because they didn’t get that out during the day.”

Advertisement

Grigg and Carey are part of a parent-led advocacy effort ‘Say Yes to Recess’, pushing for increased recess time statewide. They say their goal is not to burden teachers or administrators, but to recognize play as a meaningful part of the learning process.

“They are great tinkerers, little scientists, as they’re referred to often,” Carey said. “And they do that through play. I think recess is a great opportunity for play to practice what they’re learning in the classroom and with each other.”

Carey said parents they’ve spoken with, including some educators, often share similar concerns, even if there are questions about how additional recess would fit into already packed schedules.

“Most of the reaction is very positive,” Carey said. “Everybody agrees that kids need recess. It’s really about finding the balance between instructional time and what kids need developmentally.”

Penterman said the bill was shaped after an earlier proposal focused on increasing overall physical activity faced pushback over concerns about unfunded mandates.

Advertisement

“So we kind of revamped it and looked at it,” he said. “What’s something we already have existing in place now that we can just expand?”

The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction said it is in the process of analyzing the legislation and does not yet have an official position.

The bill is still early in the legislative process. Penterman said he hopes the proposal encourages broader discussion about how schools balance academic demands with students’ physical and mental health.

“Play is the work of a child,” Penterman said, quoting educator Maria Montessori. “And it’s so important to their development.”

Click here to download the WMTV15 News app or our WMTV15 First Alert weather app.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin DHS reaffirms childhood vaccine recommendations after CDC changes

Published

on

Wisconsin DHS reaffirms childhood vaccine recommendations after CDC changes


The Wisconsin Department of Health Services on Thursday reaffirmed its recommended childhood vaccine schedule after recent changes at the federal level.

Wisconsin vaccine guidance

Local perspective:

Advertisement

On Monday, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control announced changes to its childhood vaccine schedule. The DHS said those modifications further stray “from alignment with America’s leading medical associations and organizations.”

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android

Advertisement

At this time, the DHS said it is not making changes to its vaccine recommendations – including no changes to Wisconsin’s school or child care vaccine recommendations.

The DHS said it continues to endorse the American Academy of Pediatrics schedule and has issued guidance to Wisconsin health care providers reaffirming that recommendation.

What they’re saying:

Advertisement

“The CDC’s new recommendations were based on a brief review of other countries’ practices and not based on data or evidence regarding disease risks to children in the United States,” DHS Secretary Kirsten Johnson said in a statement. “This upends our longstanding, evidence-based approach of protecting our children from the viruses that pose a risk in our country.

“Copying another country’s schedule without its health and social infrastructure will not produce the same health outcomes. It creates chaos and confusion and risks the health of Wisconsin’s youngest and most vulnerable citizens.”

Advertisement

Big picture view:

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said the CDC will continue to recommend that all children are immunized against 10 diseases for which there is international consensus, as well as chickenpox.

The updated schedule is in contrast to the CDC child and adolescent schedule at the end of 2024, which recommended 17 immunizations for all children. On the new schedule, vaccines – such as those for hepatitis A and B, meningitis, rotavirus and seasonal flu – are now more restricted. They are recommended only for those at high risk or after consultation with a health care provider. 

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

“President Trump directed us to examine how other developed nations protect their children and to take action if they are doing better,” Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. “After an exhaustive review of the evidence, we are aligning the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule with international consensus while strengthening transparency and informed consent. This decision protects children, respects families, and rebuilds trust in public health.”

Advertisement

The Source: The Wisconsin DHS released information about its childhood vaccine recommendations. Information about the CDC changes is from LiveNOW from FOX with contributions from The Associated Press.

HealthWisconsinNews



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin man accused of killing parents to fund Trump assassination plot set to enter plea deal

Published

on

Wisconsin man accused of killing parents to fund Trump assassination plot set to enter plea deal


MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin man accused of killing his parents and stealing their money to fund a plan to assassinate President Donald Trump is set to enter a plea deal resolving the case Thursday.

Nikita Casap, 18, is expected to agree to the deal during a morning hearing in Waukesha County Circuit Court in suburban Milwaukee. He goes into the hearing facing multiple charges, including two homicide counts, two counts of hiding a corpse and theft, with a trial scheduled to begin March 2.

Online court records did not list the terms of the plea agreement. Harm Venhuizen, a spokesperson for the state public defender’s office, which is representing Casap, said state Supreme Court ethics rules prevent the office from commenting on cases. The Waukesha County District Attorney’s Office did not respond to questions about the deal.

According to a criminal complaint, investigators believe Casap shot his mother, Tatiana Casap, and his stepfather, Donald Mayer, at their home in the village of Waukesha on or around Feb. 11.

Advertisement

He lived with the decomposing bodies for weeks before fleeing across the country in his stepfather’s SUV with $14,000 in cash, jewelry, passports, his stepfather’s gun and the family dog, according to the complaint. He was eventually arrested during a traffic stop in Kansas on Feb. 28.

Federal authorities have accused Casap of planning his parents’ murders, buying a drone and explosives and sharing his plans with others, including a Russian speaker. They said in a federal search warrant that he wrote a manifest calling for Trump’s assassination and was in touch with others about his plan to kill Trump and overthrow the U.S. government.

Stay up to date with the news and the best of AP by following our WhatsApp channel.

Follow on

Advertisement

“The killing of his parents appeared to be an effort to obtain the financial means and autonomy necessary to carrying out his plan,” that warrant said.

Detectives found several messages on Casap’s cellphone from January 2025 in which Casap asks how long he will have to hide before he is moved to Ukraine. An unknown individual responded in Russian, the complaint said, but the document doesn’t say what that person told Casap. In another message Casap asks: “So while in Ukraine, I’ll be able to live a normal life? Even if it’s found out I did it?”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending