Wisconsin
Lessen gap between CEO and worker pay. Employee well-being should guide wages. | Letters

Minimum wage hike to go into effect for some across US
Workers in several states and cities will see minimum wage increases go into effect on January 1, 2025, as they continue to battle with high prices.
On Dec. 11, the Journal Sentinel published “23 states to boost minimum wage in 2025.”
It’s laudable for full-time workers to receive a living wage. However, I’m not convinced that boosting minimum wage is a long-term solution to economic inequity. A more effective approach might be to decrease the earnings gap between company owners and their employees. I am not anti-CEO. People who run successful companies take great risks and expend much energy and worry. Moreover, for a product to remain successful there must be ongoing research.
I am not advocating that government enforce a ceiling for maximum earnings. In the best of circumstances, management and workers would negotiate together a working wage necessary for a healthy life where the workers live. In the best of worlds, a priority agenda item at shareholders’ meetings would be the well-being of company employees.
Many will scoff at “the best of worlds.” My response is that the only way we can have the best — or, for starters, the better — is if we step forward and make it happen.
Sheryl Slocum, Milwaukee
Tips for getting your letter to the editor published
Here are some tips to get your views shared with your friends, family, neighbors and across our state:
- Please include your name, street address and daytime phone.
- Generally, we limit letters to 200 words.
- Cite sources of where you found information or the article that prompted your letter.
- Be civil and constructive, especially when criticizing.
- Avoid ad hominem attacks, take issue with a position, not a person.
- We cannot acknowledge receipt of submissions.
- We don’t publish poetry, anonymous or open letters.
- Each writer is limited to one published letter every two months.
- All letters are subject to editing.
Write: Letters to the editor, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 330 E. Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 500, Milwaukee, WI, 53202. Fax: (414)-223-5444. E-mail: jsedit@jrn.com or submit using the form that can be found on the on the bottom of this page.

Wisconsin
Wisconsin Badgers 2025 Spring Position Preview: Offensive Line

Wisconsin Badgers 2025 Spring Position Preview: Offensive Line
As Luke Fickell‘s third act in Madison draws closer, BadgerBlitz.com will break down Wisconsin’s roster position-by-position ahead of spring camp, which is slated to take place from March 13 to April 24.
BadgerBlitz.com is once again expected to watch any open practices available for reporters to attend. Thus, our position previews continue Wednesday with the offensive line, a unit entering year two under position coach AJ Blazek.
SPRING POSITION PREVIEWS: QBs | RBs | TEs | WRs
ROSTER OVERVIEW
Wisconsin loses two starters from its offensive line but returns its starting center (Jake Renfro), right tackle (Riley Mahlman) and left guard (Joe Brunner). All told, the Badgers return 2,542 snaps from last fall.
Of the returnees, Mahlman is likely the best of the bunch. In 2024, he allowed a career-high 19 pressures, per Pro Football Focus, but that only translated into two sacks and across 405 pass-blocking snaps, that’s a pressure rate of less than 5 percent. That’ll play. Getting Malhman to return for his fifth-year senior season was enormous for this offensive front.
Renfro returned to action after missing the entire 2023 regular season and did a solid job at center. Like Mahlman, he was a good pass-blocker but struggled to consistently move bodies in the running game. Regardless, his return for a sixth-year senior season is massive as well, as a veteran presence and communicator at center is so critical for the collective performance of an offensive line.
Brunner became a full-time starter last fall, and performed very similarly to the rest of the offensive line: he was lights out in pass protection, not allowing a single sack across 411 pass-blocking snaps, but he didn’t move many bodies as a run-blocker. The Badgers would pull Brunner from time to time to spark their running game, and it’ll be interesting to see if that’s a tactic new offensive coordinator Jeff Grimes — who played offensive line himself — subscribes to.
That leaves left tackle and right guard as the two starting spots up for grabs, and the primary candidates before spring practice kicks off are Kevin Heywood and JP Benzschawel, respectively.
Heywood played 57 snaps at left tackle last fall, the second-most on the team at the blindside tackle spot behind starter Jack Nelson. That included an extended 35 snaps against Purdue, where he didn’t allow a pressure across 14 pass-blocking snaps. In fact, Heywood allowed just one pressure across 50 pass-blocking snaps across the entire season. The highest-rated recruit in Wisconsin’s 2024 recruiting class has a bright future, and looks slated to slide into the starting role this spring.
Benzschwel, meanwhile, will be a redshirt senior this fall. He played a career-high 58 snaps last season, the majority of which came at right guard. He has the seniority and the experience to where he’s clearly the top choice at right guard.
The Badgers have depth on the offensive line past the starters, but most of it is on the younger side. After the aforementioned five projected starters, Wisconsin has super senior Kerry Kodanko (21 career snaps), redshirt junior Barrett Nelson (19 career snaps), senior Leyton Nelson (27 career snaps), four walk-ons and a whopping nine freshman (four of whom redshirted last season). Of those five true freshmen, only three will enroll early, however: Hardy Watts, Nolan Davenport and Michael Roeske.
Wisconsin’s Projected Offensive Linemen on 2025 Spring Roster
Departing Players at Position Group
One question heading into spring practices: How much competition is there at the open spots?
Of the two spots along the offensive line that don’t return a starter, both appear to have a clear candidate to fill them. As mentioned, Heywood (left tackle) and Benzschawel (right guard) should be the runaway favorites at their respective positions.
Still, who could challenge each player? Let’s offer some names for each position. Starting at left tackle, players other than Heywood that figure to have a shot include: 1) Barrett Nelson, 2) Leyton Nelson and 3) Emerson Mandell.
Barrett has exclusively played tackle during his career in Madison, and has the seniority as a redshirt junior to feasibly be one of the first reserve tackles off the bench. Leyton figures to be a candidate as well for the same reasons.
Mandell, meanwhile — a fellow Rivals250 recruit in the 2024 class — has the size to play tackle, but he appears more likely to crack the two-deep at guard.
At right guard, the candidates include 1) Mandell, 2) Colin Cubberly, 3) Kodanko and 4) Ryan Cory.
Cubbery and Cory are redshirt freshmen who played a handful of snaps each at guard last season. The senior Kodanko, meanwhile, has just 21 career snaps but could also be Renfro’s backup at center.
Player to watch this spring: Kevin Heywood
It’s often hard to evaluate the play in the trenches during spring ball without full pads, but it’ll be hard to take ones eyes off Heywood this spring.
For one, you can’t miss him. He’s an absolute unit at a listed 6-foot-8, 325 pounds, and that was last season — how does he look after a full year with strength coach Brady Collins?
It also goes without saying that left tackle is one of the most critical positions on the entire team. Jack Nelson gave the Badgers rock solid if not dominant play at that spot for three years. There’s certainly room for improvement, but the floor is also pretty high. Can Heywood raise the bar at the position?
Potential Depth Chart at Offensive Line
_________________________________________________
*Chat about this article in The Badgers’ Den
*Check out our videos, interviews, and Q&As on our YouTube channel
*Subscribe and listen to the BadgerBlitz.com podcast (as seen on Apple, Google, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcasts)
*Follow us on Twitter: @McNamaraRivals, @TheBadgerNation, @_Perko_, @seamus_rohrer, @DonnieSlusher_
*Like us on Facebook
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Muddies The Picture On K-12 Student Achievement

Wisconsin State Sen. Jon Jagler is amongst a group of lawmakers seeking to reinstate previously high … [+]
Wisconsin State Capitol
Damning national testing results earlier this year should spark a clarion call in state capitals, emboldening leaders to come clean with parents and take meaningful action that improves student learning.
But Wisconsin is running the other way, by lowering its state standards and “cut scores”—the minimum score needed to pass an assessment. The moves make it far more difficult for a parent to determine whether their child is succeeding and truly learning enough to advance to the next grade.
Parents simply aren’t being told the truth.
Colleston Morgan Jr., executive director of the Milwaukee-based City Forward Collective, an education non-profit, shed light on the impact of the most recent standards revision.
“Analyzing educational data should be a straightforward process that allows for clear year-over-year performance comparisons—and most years it is,” Morgan told me in an interview. “But the most recent changes to the Wisconsin Academic Standards and state assessment have both lowered the bar for what we expect from our students and muddied the picture of student outcomes and school performance across years.”
Wisconsin’s 2023-24 state test results show public school students have a proficiency rate of 52% in 4th grade reading and 51% in 8th grade math.
But the most recent results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) paint a less promising picture with 4th grade reading at just 31% proficient and 8th grade math at 37%. That’s a 21-point difference in reading and a 14-point difference in math between the state test and NAEP.
In a press release, the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI) discussed how a public survey influenced its decision on standards and cut scores. It stated, “Wisconsin students noted a decrease in feeling like they belonged at school. Less than half (45 percent) of students who got a “C” letter grade and just 24 percent of students who got a “D/F” said they felt like they belonged at school, survey data indicated. The updated performance level terms improve feelings of encouragement and motivation for all students, including those scoring lower on tests than their peers.”
For Morgan, that’s not justification. “Of course, we want our students to feel encouraged and motivated,” he told me. “But that doesn’t mean we lie to them and tell them that they’re more prepared than they really are. We must believe in them and work to provide them and the entire education system with the supports and resources they need to meet the challenge—the challenge that every other student will face across the country, not just here in Wisconsin.”
Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat, appears to agree. “I think we need to have as high standards as possible. I don’t think we should be lowering them,” he told reporters at a news conference. “It’s hard to compare year-to-year if one year you’re doing something completely different. I think it could have been handled better.”
Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers said at a recent press conference, “I think we need to have as high … [+]
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Help might be on the way for Wisconsin, where a group of state lawmakers has introduced a bill to reinstate Wisconsin’s previous high academic standards and cut scores.
In a statement to the Wisconsin Examiner, bill co-author, Republican Sen. John Jagler accused DPI of making the decision to change the way the state measures academic standards in a nontransparent way.
“These changes were made behind closed doors in advance and revealed only when the test scores were announced,” Jagler said. “Not surprisingly, the massive uptick in artificial performance gains was confusing at best and misleading at worst. We also lost, because of these changes, the ability to compare performance from previous years.”
The bill is still pending in the Wisconsin legislature.
To be clear, raising standards and cut scores alone doesn’t guarantee student achievement.
States need high quality curriculum, strong teacher professional development, and supports for struggling students.
But the truth matters.
Whether they plan to go to college, enter a career or join the military, Wisconsin students should be held to national and global standards. If their proficiency scores at home don’t match what’s expected beyond high school, we’re setting them up for failure.
Wisconsin
Trump's speech to Congress; Wisconsin lawmakers react

MILWAUKEE – President Donald Trump spoke to the nation on Tuesday night, March 4.
Trump speaks to the nation
It was not the State of the Union, since that doesn’t happen in a new president’s first year. He spoke about his first 43 days in office and what’s next for the country.
US President Donald Trump holds a signed executive order that renames a wildlife sanctuary in honor of late Jocelyn Nungaray during a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber of the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, March 4, 2025. D
Big picture view:
Wisconsin was a key battleground state, as it flipped red and helped propel Trump back into the White House.
Cuts to Medicaid
Local perspective:
Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.)’s guest for the president’s speech was a Milwaukee woman, who is a cancer survivor who receives Medicaid.
SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News
“I want to let them know: this is Medicaid. Right here. Stage 4 cancer survivor, who is willing to fight,” Renee Scherck-Meyer said. “I want to live. I want to be healthy. I want to have my health care. I’m very scared that I might not have access to my team anymore.”
A budget resolution adopted Tuesday by House Republicans called for the Energy and Commerce Committee to cut $880 billion in spending. The bipartisan committee for a responsible budget said that will inevitably mean cuts to Medicaid.
The other side:
“Our social safety net programs, and an important one being Medicaid, should be there for the most vulnerable: for children, for pregnant women,” U.S. Rep. Bryan Steil (R-Wis.) said. “But we also have to make sure that we are helping individuals come off and lift their lives up and come off the programs.”

House Republicans applaud during a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber of the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, March 4, 2025. Donald Trump’s primetime address Tuesday night from Capitol Hill, billed as a chronicle of his “Rene
Trump also highlighted the flurry of executive orders on things like freezing foreign aid, and stopping transgender athletes.
The president spoke about what he called “waste,” and praised Elon Musk for the Department of Government Efficiency.
Politicians respond
That’s something on the minds of Wisconsin’s Congressional delegation.
What they’re saying:
“The beginning of this Administration has been riddled with chaos,” Baldwin said. “It’s checks and balances. It’s Congress that passes budgets, that passes appropriations bills, passes laws and it’s to be the President who implements them and administers them. And that’s not happening right now.”
FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android
“The proof will be in what they are able to produce when it comes to numbers,” U.S. Rep. Scott Fitzgerald (R-Wis.) said. “So, I’m still very hopeful that there is a dividend, that at the end of the day, the tax payers will see a reduction ultimately in their taxes as a result of the federal dollars that they’re finding that are really, completely unaccountable.”
Dig deeper:
Democratic Party of Wisconsin Communications Director Joe Oslund:
“Derrick Van Orden, Bryan Steil, and Wisconsin Republicans in DC are working with Donald Trump and Elon Musk to cut as much as $880 billion from Medicaid, dole out massive tax cuts to the rich, and attack hard-earned Social Security benefits Wisconsin seniors depend on. Nothing we heard from Donald Trump tonight changes the disastrous impact this agenda will have for Wisconsin families.”
The Republican Party of Wisconsin Chairman Brian Schimming:
“President Trump has embodied ‘promises made, promises kept.’ In just over a month since taking office, President Trump has secured the southern border, slashed millions of wasteful spending, and stood up to Hamas. Americans are grateful for President Trump delivering his America First agenda and renewing the American Dream.”
The Source: The information in this post was produced by FOX6 News.
-
Sports1 week ago
NHL trade board 7.0: The 4 Nations break is over, and things are about to get real
-
Health1 week ago
As the U.S. Exits Foreign Aid, Who Will Fill the Gap?
-
Science1 week ago
Microsoft Says It Has Created a New State of Matter to Power Quantum Computers
-
Culture1 week ago
‘Never refer to us as Tottenham’ may seem a small edict but it says a lot about the modern game
-
News1 week ago
Justice Dept. Takes Broad View of Trump’s Jan. 6 Pardons
-
Politics1 week ago
Boston councilwoman sounds off after Tom Homan's CPAC promise to 'bring hell': 'We don't scare easy'
-
Science1 week ago
Greenpeace Goes to Court in $300 Million Suit That Poses Bankruptcy Risk
-
News1 week ago
Saying ‘No’ to Musk