Wisconsin
IU basketball: Wisconsin at Indiana — The report card
Sounds the alarms, Indiana won! Too soon for alarm jokes?
The Hoosiers started strong against nemesis Wisconsin, running out to a 32-17 lead with 6:09 left. But from there the Badgers started to chip away, and trailed by just five at halftime. At the 10:31 mark of the second half, Wisconsin completed the comeback, tying the game at 54. After the game was suspended for 20 minutes due to a fire alarm, Wisconsin led by two with 2:06 left. But Indiana closed the game on a 6-0 run to win it.
Let’s take a deeper look at how IU won 74-70 with another edition of The Report Card.
Indiana (15-13, 7-10) will next travel to Maryland for a Sunday afternoon contest.
COACHING (B+)
Mike Woodson deserves major credit for getting his team to show up and play hard. Yes, that’s his job, but it isn’t always a given in these situations when seasons appear to be spiraling out of control. It was apparent from the opening tip Indiana was ready to play.
Equally important: After his team dropped a 15-point lead, Woodson and his team were able to find answers late.
Woodson also continues to show he is not fixed on a set rotation. This time it was C.J. Gunn out of the lineup. In general the right buttons were pressed. Woodson did make a somewhat questionable decision to play Payton Sparks when Kel’el Ware needed a rest instead of inserting Reneau with two fouls. That was the point at which the lead started slipping away in the first half.
There was some kind of miscommunication late in the game that led to Malik Reneau’s fifth foul, and while the decision to use fouls late in games makes sense, Indiana’s execution always seems choppy at best.
OFFENSE (B+)
On paper Wisconsin should have matched up reasonably well with Kel’el Ware and Malik Reneau, given that they have their own 7-footer in Steven Crowl, and a solid power forward in Tyler Wahl. Ware and Reneau were certainly central to Wisconsin’s game plan.
But the IU big men were too much, combining for 41 points on 17-of-20 shooting.
“Those two draw a lot of attention and we didn’t do a good enough job on both of those guys,” said Wisconsin coach Greg Gard.
Part of the answer for IU was good spacing rather than a crowded lane. And Indiana went to a heavy dose of ball screen offense late in the game to secure the win. Trey Galloway was masterful at facilitating in those actions, producing 12 assists on the night.
The Hoosiers were unable to be effective on the offensive glass, with just four boards on that end.
Indiana scored 1.18 points per possession. That was their highest mark since the first Wisconsin game, and second-highest against a high-major team this season. Their effective field goal percentage of 68.1 percent was a season-high. That included 70 percent from two and 43 percent from three.
DEFENSE (B)
The Badgers closed the game with six straight misses. That was the end of a 4-of-16 finish to the game by them over the final eight minutes as Indiana clamped down. The Hoosiers were also solid at the start of the contest, when UW made just 7-of-23 over the opening 14:22.
In between things got dicey.
Wisconsin made the wise decision to put their big man Steven Crowl out on the perimeter, which pulled Kel’el Ware out with him. That opened up driving lanes for the Badgers and they took full advantage. Indiana didn’t always have the quickness to stay in front of ball on those drives. But led by Reneau, they did limit Wahl to a 4-of-11 game from the field.
Indiana survived some open Wisconsin looks from three, but the Badgers made just 8-of-26 from long range.
The unheralded stat of the night might have been that Wisconsin only shot three free throws. This is a program that has seemingly lived at the stripe against IU. Credit the Hoosiers for being fundamentally sound and only committing eight fouls for the entire game, including some that were intentional. The Badgers are a very good free throw shooting team, so keeping them off the line matters.
That low volume of freebies helped offset just three forced turnovers by IU. Wisconsin had to score from the field to win, and they weren’t efficient enough, especially at crunch time.
Wisconsin scored 1.11 points per possession, which isn’t a great figure, but a massive improvement over the 1.4 the Badgers scored against IU in Madison.
MORE GAME COVERAGE
THE PLAYERS
*Trey Galloway (B) For the second time in two weeks, Galloway produced a 12 assist game. Four of the assists came in the game’s final six minutes, along with a floater in the final two. You know the story, he didn’t make threes. But he also didn’t practice the last two days due to a foot injury, and he was exceptional in this game otherwise.
*Mackenzie Mgbako (B+) In the game’s final 5:35 Mgbako made a three, had a block and made two critical free throws. He was clutch. Mgbako wasn’t a factor on the glass and got caught up in some difficult defensive matchups, but this was another step forward.
*Malik Reneau (B+) Foul trouble once again limited Reneau’s role, and he had late game turnover that could have proven costly. But on the whole this was a solid effort, including a difficult shot in the paint with under a minute remaining that proved to be the game-winner. He’s also continuing to improve when it comes to reading post doubles.
*Kel’el Ware (A) The sophomore center was in the zone in the first half, making his first eight shots including a three. His five blocks were a career high, and he took care of the ball. Ware is the second player this season in Division I College Basketball to record at least 20 points, 10 rebounds, and five blocked shots in a game. This was a game that made his NBA Draft status a no-doubter.
*Gabe Cupps (C+) The freshman guard was steady if not a major factor in this one. He wasn’t a great defensive matchup once Wisconsin started emphasizing the dribble drive.
Anthony Leal (B) The senior guard gave IU solid minutes in the clutch with a tough, physical defensive presence, and he made a three.
Xavier Johnson (D) Johnson made a couple shots in his return, but obviously his five turnovers in just 15 minutes were problematic. He tried to force the issue into crowds at times.
Anthony Walker (B) Walker played important minutes with Reneau in foul trouble.
Payton Sparks saw limited action.
C.J. Gunn and Kaleb Banks did not play, coach’s decision.
————————
Jakai Newton (knee) is out long-term.
The Daily Hoosier –“Where Indiana fans assemble when they’re not at Assembly”
Related
Wisconsin
No. 3 Wisconsin Badgers vs. No. 1 Texas Longhorns: Game Thread
The Wisconsin Badgers are facing off against the Texas Longhorns in the Elite 8 on Sunday evening, looking to make their way back to the Final Four in Kansas City next week.
Wisconsin pulled off an impressive win over the No. 2 Stanford Cardinal on Friday, as it out-hit the latter in a thriller behind strong efforts from Mimi Colyer (27 kills) and Charlie Fuerbringer (61 assists).
Now, they’re facing a team that they were swept by earlier in the season, as the Longhorns thrived off Badger errors during their first matchup.
Texas has cruised through its competition so far in the NCAA Tournament, beating Florida A&M, Penn State, and Indiana en route to the Elite 8.
If Wisconsin can win, it would face the No. 1 Kentucky Wildcats on Thursday in the Final Four, with the No. 3 Texas A&M Aggies and No. 1 Pittsburgh Panthers being the other two teams still left in the field.
Can the Badgers get a huge upset and break the Texas streak of wins on Sunday? Join us as our game thread is officially active.
Wisconsin
WI lawmakers should support data center accountability bill | Letters
Data centers proposed in our area pose multiple threats to our water, wildlife, and wallets. We all can take action by asking our senators and representatives to back SB729.
Fly over the Microsoft data center construction site in Mount Pleasant
Take a flight around the Microsoft Corp. data center campus construction site in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin as construction continues.
The data centers proposed in our area in Mount Pleasant, Port Washington, and Beaver Dam pose multiple threats to our water, wildlife, and wallets. The centers will require vast amounts of water to cool their equipment. Plus, 70% of the water consumed each year in Wisconsin goes to electric power generation, so the water needed for energy production adds to the millions of gallons these centers will need on peak days.
The massive energy infrastructure required to build and operate the data centers is expensive and threatens to burden customers for years with the huge costs. Also, at a time when the impacts of climate change make it clear that we should be transitioning to clean renewable energy sources, utility companies are using data centers as justification for building new fossil gas power plants, thereby keeping us from achieving the zero emissions future that we so desperately need.
Take action by backing Data Center Accountability Act
The Data Center Accountability Act, bill SB729, was introduced recently in the Wisconsin legislature. If passed, the bill would stipulate that:
- Data center must meet labor standards and use at least 70% renewable energy.
- All data centers must be LEED certified or the equivalent.
- Data center owners must pay an annual fee that funds renewable energy, energy efficiency, and a low-income energy assistance program.
We all can take action to prevent the worst impacts from data centers by asking our senators and representatives to vote for SB729. To find your legislators go to https://myvote.wi.gov/en-us/My-Elected-Officials.
Jenny Abel, Wauwatosa
Here are some tips to get your views shared with your friends, family, neighbors and across our state:
- Please include your name, street address and daytime phone.
- Generally, we limit letters to 200 words.
- Cite sources of where you found information or the article that prompted your letter.
- Be civil and constructive, especially when criticizing.
- Avoid ad hominem attacks, take issue with a position, not a person.
- We cannot acknowledge receipt of submissions.
- We don’t publish poetry, anonymous or open letters.
- Each writer is limited to one published letter every two months.
- All letters are subject to editing.
Write: Letters to the editor, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 330 E. Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 500, Milwaukee, WI, 53202. Fax: (414)-223-5444. E-mail: jsedit@jrn.com or submit using the form that can be found on the on the bottom of this page.
Wisconsin
Can ‘completely different’ Wisconsin volleyball upset Texas in NCAA tournament?
Texas coach anticipates ‘fun chess match’ against Wisconsin volleyball
Texas coach Jerritt Elliott had high praise for Wisconsin and explained why the Badgers have been playing their best volleyball at this time of year.
AUSTIN, Texas – Wisconsin volleyball’s first weekend of the 2025 season featured a high-profile match against Texas.
Wisconsin’s either final or penultimate weekend of the season – depending on whether UW can advance – also features a high-profile match against Texas.
But both sides will caution against reading too much into Wisconsin’s Aug. 31 loss to Texas ahead of a rematch in the NCAA tournament regional finals as each team seeks a return to the Final Four.
“We are completely different teams than what we saw however many months ago that was,” Wisconsin middle blocker Carter Booth said.
Texas coach Jerritt Elliott said almost the exact same thing in the Longhorns’ press conference, and his players echoed similar sentiments as well.
“I feel like both teams are just a lot more developed at this point in the year,” Texas setter Ella Swindle said. “At the beginning of the season, we were kind of just figuring out who we are and who we want to be. So now at this point, I feel like we know our identities, and we’re ready to go out and battle.”
Here are three keys for the much-improved Badgers to have a better outcome against the also-much-improved Longhorns in the NCAA tournament:
How efficient can Wisconsin’s attack be against Texas’ physicality at net?
Wisconsin’s path to advancing in the Texas regional has already required defeating one team with outstanding physicality at the net, and it is unlikely to get any easier in the regional finals.
“I was watching Stanford warm up, and you’re like, ‘Jiminy Crickets,’” Sheffield said. “It’s like watching the NBA dunking contest. It’s like, ‘Holy cow.’ They’re just bouncing balls on the 10-foot line and just really dynamic and impressive. And Texas probably has it even more than that.”
Texas’ physicality was abundantly apparent in its three-set sweep over Indiana in the regional semifinals. The Longhorns had a 12-2 advantage in blocks, and Indiana committed 23 attack errors. Going back to when UW faced Texas in August, the Badgers committed a season-high 26 attack errors despite it lasting only three sets.
“But each team has their thing,” Sheffield said. “And if we try to play their game, we’re going to get whacked. And if they try to play ours, that’s going to be problems for them as well.”
Can Badgers keep Texas’ talented pin hitters in check?
The Wisconsin-Texas match will feature two of the best outside hitters in the country.
Wisconsin’s Mimi Colyer has averaged 5.38 kills per set, which is the highest among players who advanced to the NCAA regional finals and is destined to break the UW program record. Texas’ Torrey Stafford is ninth in the country with 4.78 kills per set while hitting .368.
“Both of them are fearless,” Sheffield said. “They’re extremely, extremely talented. I think volleyball fans are going to be following them for a long, long time. Both of them have tremendous careers in front of them.”
Stafford was virtually unstoppable in the Longhorns’ sweep over Indiana, recording 19 kills without any attack errors and hitting a video-game-like .679. But for as talented as the AVCA national player of the year semifinalist is, she is not the only pin that can give opponents fits.
Texas freshman Cari Spears has immediately stepped into a major role in the Longhorns’ attack as the starting right-side hitter in every match this season. In the second match of her career, she led Texas with 11 kills while committing only one attack error in the win over the Badgers.
“She was just trying to figure out how to breathe during that first match, and it just takes time,” Elliott said. “And now she actually understands our offense a lot more, she’s developed a lot of her blocking, her range has gotten better, and that applies to all of our team. Ella’s been doing the same thing. Her offensive system is completely different than it was the first week of the season.”
The Wisconsin match was the first of seven consecutive matches for Spears with at least 10 kills.
“Seeing that I can compete with one of the top teams in the nation and seeing the trust that my teammates had with me and the trust that the coaches had in me – it was a huge confidence boost for me,” Spears said.
As for how to stop Stafford, Spears and Co., Booth said it goes back to the Badgers’ fundamentals.
“I know I’m beating a dead horse, but that’s really what this is all about,” Booth said. “At the highest level, the margins are so thin that you’re not trying to reinvent the wheel again. You’re honing in on the details of what you already know to do. So it’s not necessarily about being perfect on the block. … Our focus is just going to be taking away good space for our defense and then trusting that the people around us have put in the work to be able to defend those shots.”
How do Badgers respond to adversity?
When Wisconsin defeated Stanford after an otherworldly offensive showing in the first set, Booth said it was “really an emphasis for us to always be the one throwing punches, not the ones taking them.”
The ability to punch first is far from a guarantee against a team as talented as Texas is, however. The Longhorns have only lost once this season at Gregory Gym, and that was against Kentucky, which is one of the other top seeds in the NCAA tournament.
Even in a neutral crowd situation, Wisconsin’s ability to not let Stanford’s momentum snowball was crucial in the four-set win. Now with the vast majority of the anticipated 4,500 people in attendance rooting against the Badgers in the regional finals, Wisconsin’s resiliency when Texas does pack a punch will be crucial.
“We are definitely more equipped to withstand those highs and lows of a set and able to step up after a mistake or come back after a battle,” Booth said. “You see yesterday, (we) come out very dominant in the first set, and then we dropped the second in a fashion that was a little bit uncharacteristic to the way we want to play. And being able to just step up and come back third and fourth playing our game – I think that goes to show how much we’ve grown in that sense.”
The Badgers – already confident before the tournament and now with even more reason for confidence after the Stanford win – are not ceding the possibility of still throwing that figurative first punch either.
“We are the writers of our own destiny, and I think that we are always in a position to be able to throw the first punch, no matter who we’re seeing across the net,” Booth said.
-
Alaska1 week agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Texas1 week agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
Washington6 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa1 week agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire
-
Miami, FL1 week agoUrban Meyer, Brady Quinn get in heated exchange during Alabama, Notre Dame, Miami CFP discussion
-
Iowa1 day agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoMan shot, killed at downtown Cleveland nightclub: EMS
-
World1 week ago
Chiefs’ offensive line woes deepen as Wanya Morris exits with knee injury against Texans