South Dakota
Summit pipeline hits potential roadblock in South Dakota
A unanimous decision by the South Dakota Supreme Court this week cast doubt on whether a carbon dioxide pipeline company is eligible to use eminent domain to build a pipeline in that state.
The ruling focused on Summit Carbon Solutions’ ability to survey land against the wishes of landowners, but the justices said Summit’s multistate project might not qualify as a “common carrier,” a requirement for eminent domain.
Summit intends to build a 2,500-mile pipeline network in five states, including Iowa, to transport captured carbon dioxide from ethanol producers to North Dakota to be pumped deep underground. The project would make the company and the ethanol plants eligible for generous federal tax credits that reward carbon sequestration and the production of low-carbon fuels.
The use of eminent domain — a government mechanism that allows the company to force unwilling landowners to host its pipeline — is a primary source of opposition to the project.
Summit requested eminent domain for about a quarter of its initial 690-mile route in Iowa, where state regulators have approved its use.
The South Dakota justices also questioned whether Summit would be transporting a commodity. Other pipelines transport gas and oil, for example, which are sold to fuel appliances and vehicles.
The South Dakota court, in its consideration of an early, lower court ruling, said Summit has not yet provided enough evidence that it is “holding itself out to the general public as transporting a commodity for hire.”
“It is thus premature to conclude that (Summit) is a common carrier, especially where the record before us suggests that CO2 is being shipped and sequestered underground with no apparent productive use,” the Supreme Court ruling stated.
The justices reversed the decisions of two circuit courts and directed them to resume the litigation over whether Summit is a common carrier that can conduct pre-condemnation land surveys.
State rules differ
Summit has long maintained that the carbon dioxide it transports will go underground as a means to deplete the amount of the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere.
Some of those who oppose the project have suspected the carbon dioxide would eventually be used to extract more oil from depleted reservoirs, which Summit has rebuffed.
But that type of use might make it qualify as a commodity. The gas also can be used for other commercial purposes, such as the production of dry ice or methanol fuel.
“We are evaluating the South Dakota Supreme Court’s decision and look forward to providing the information requested to the district court that reaffirms our role as a common carrier, and that CO2 is a commodity,” said Sabrina Zenor, a Summit spokesperson.
Summit was successful in arguing it is a common carrier in Iowa, which has different standards for the classification.
When the Iowa Utilities Commission approved the project in June, it said, in part: “All that is required for a pipeline to be vested with the right of eminent domain is that the pipeline company reserve 10 percent of its capacity for walk-up shippers.”
Minnesota does not allow eminent domain for carbon dioxide pipelines.
South Dakota is a crucial state for the Summit project. It has the second-most ethanol producers of the five states — 15 of them — and is a conduit between Iowa and North Dakota. Iowa has 30 ethanol producers that have agreements to be part of the project.
Summit has said its project isn’t feasible without approval in South Dakota.
South Dakota utility regulators denied Summit’s first request for a pipeline permit about a year ago because its route violated county zoning ordinances. The company has said it will reapply with a different route but has not disclosed when.
Opponents of the project cheered the South Dakota decision. The Sierra Club of Iowa, a leading organizer of that opposition, noted: “Without eminent domain powers, Summit’s path forward is insurmountable.”
Comments: (319) 368-8541; jared.strong@thegazette.com
South Dakota
Fact brief: Does South Dakota require front license plates?
(South Dakota News Watch) – Yes. South Dakota is one of almost 30 states that require front and back license plates on vehicles, though there are a couple of exceptions.
Vehicles that are used for “occasional transportation, public displays, parades and related pleasure hobby activities” can use a rear-only plate. The plates cost $25 in addition to the normal registration cost. To qualify, drivers must provide their odometer reading at the time of registration and not exceed 7,500 miles in a year.
Motorcycles are also only required to have one plate.
Why use rear-only plates? Many owners don’t like how front plates take away from the aesthetic of their vehicles. But dual plates are touted as a way to assist law enforcement with crime.
South Dakota offers more than a dozen different types of plates: construction, emblem, habitat conservation, Dignity sculpture, historical, amateur radio license, disabled person, firefighter, EMS, tribal, tribal veteran, veteran and several military plates.
Source
South Dakota Department of Revenue, Personalized and Specialty Plates
South Dakota Department of Revenue, License plate application
Lakota Times, South Dakota specialty plates available July 1
South Dakota laws, 32-5-98
Thompson Law Injury lawyers, Which states require front license plates?
South Dakota News Watch partners with Gigafact to publish fact briefs that refute or confirm a claim with supporting information and additional evidence and context.
- Read previous fact briefs.
- Read our verification standards and other best practices policies.
- Submit a question for us to answer on the South Dakota News Watch Tipline.
- Send questions or feedback to factbrief@sdnewswatch.org.
This story was produced by South Dakota News Watch, an independent, nonprofit organization. Read more stories and donate at sdnewswatch.org and sign up for an email to get stories when they’re published. Contact Michael Klinski at michael.klinski@sdnewswatch.org.
Copyright 2025 South Dakota News Watch. All rights reserved.
South Dakota
SD Lottery Powerball, Lucky For Life winning numbers for Dec. 22, 2025
The South Dakota Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Dec. 22, 2025, results for each game:
Winning Powerball numbers from Dec. 22 drawing
03-18-36-41-54, Powerball: 07, Power Play: 2
Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Lucky For Life numbers from Dec. 22 drawing
09-16-23-34-46, Lucky Ball: 07
Check Lucky For Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Lotto America numbers from Dec. 22 drawing
01-09-18-19-44, Star Ball: 02, ASB: 05
Check Lotto America payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize
- Prizes of $100 or less: Can be claimed at any South Dakota Lottery retailer.
- Prizes of $101 or more: Must be claimed from the Lottery. By mail, send a claim form and a signed winning ticket to the Lottery at 711 E. Wells Avenue, Pierre, SD 57501.
- Any jackpot-winning ticket for Dakota Cash or Lotto America, top prize-winning ticket for Lucky for Life, or for the second prizes for Powerball and Mega Millions must be presented in person at a Lottery office. A jackpot-winning Powerball or Mega Millions ticket must be presented in person at the Lottery office in Pierre.
When are the South Dakota Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
- Lucky for Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
- Lotto America: 9:15 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Dakota Cash: 9 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a South Dakota editor. You can send feedback using this form.
South Dakota
ICE in SD — from small towns to Operation: Prairie Thunder
Five months after Operation: Prairie Thunder officially began, the South Dakota Highway Patrol’s collaborative anti-crime and immigration enforcement effort will continue into the new year, the governor’s office has confirmed.
The program was originally announced by Gov. Larry Rhoden to take place from July 28 through December.
One portion of Operation: Prairie Thunder involves the state’s entrance into multiple 287(g) agreements with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement that allow ICE to delegate some authority to state and local law enforcement agencies.
That happened as immigration enforcement operations ramped up after the inauguration of President Donald Trump, who nominated former South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem as the Department of Homeland Security secretary.
Under Trump and Noem, more than 500,000 people have been deported from the country, according to Homeland Security, which has not released state-by-state deportation numbers.
ICE arrest data indicates focus on Hispanic, male individuals
In South Dakota, ICE and Homeland Security have been visible, especially in small towns in the eastern part of the state.
In July, ICE confirmed an active investigation at the Trail King Industries Inc. manufacturing plant in Mitchell, though no further information has been released about whether that investigation resulted in arrests, detainments or deportations.
In May, Manitou Equipment and Global Polymer Industries in Madison saw eight people arrested on immigration charges.
And in October, Drumgoon Dairy near Lake Norden confirmed that the company had been subjected to an immigration audit by Homeland Security, which is not the same as an immigration raid. But it resulted in the forced termination of 38 employees with citizenship information that was outdated, inaccurate or incomplete.
While nationwide ICE arrests and deportations have targeted a wide variety of individuals from multiple countries – including in neighboring Minnesota, where Somalian people have been the most recent target of ICE operations – South Dakota arrests have involved nearly all Hispanic people.
Most recent ICE arrestees in South Dakota are citizens of Mexico and Central America, with the majority coming from Mexico and Honduras, and 98% are male, according to government data obtained via a FOIA request from the Deportation Data Project and analyzed by South Dakota News Watch.
The project currently retains accurate state-based data from July 1 to Oct. 15. The data cannot accurately reflect any arrests prior to July 1 but can help to understand general arrest trends in South Dakota.
Hispanic people across the state have reported feeling less safe, said Ivan Romero, vice president of the South Dakota Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. The Latino Festival and Parade, which is hosted in Sioux Falls by the South Dakota Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, was canceled this year due to safety concerns, Romero told News Watch in October.
Hispanic population thrives in one small SD town
Rural towns like Plankinton, population 768, are growing their community services to fill needs.
“That was unfortunate, but people just don’t feel comfortable coming to Sioux Falls at this point,” he said.
The vast majority of detainer requests from July 1 to Oct. 15 went to the Minnehaha County Jail in Sioux Falls, followed by the Pennington County Jail in Rapid City and the South Dakota State Penitentiary in Sioux Falls.
The Deportation Data Project defines detainer requests as “all requests to state, county, and municipal jails and prisons either for a person to be held on a detainer or for a notification of release date and time. A detainer is a request to a local jail to hold someone for 48 hours beyond when they otherwise would be released so that ICE can make an arrest in the jail while the individual remains detained.”
ICE said that detainer requests are most often lodged against an individual in an agency’s custody that poses a “public safety threat.” Other Homeland Security agencies can issue detainers, but most come from ICE, according to the agency’s website.
Operation: Prairie Thunder focuses on drug operations
To date, ICE has signed more than 1,200 287(g) agreements with agencies in 40 states, including five with various South Dakota agencies enabling parts of Operation: Prairie Thunder.
Those agreements take three different forms:
- Task Force Agreement: The “force multiplier” program that allows law enforcement officers to adopt limited immigration enforcement duties, with ICE oversight. The South Dakota Highway Patrol signed this agreement on May 22 and the South Dakota Department of Criminal Investigations signed it on June 11.
- Warrant Service Officer: Allows law enforcement officers to execute warrants on behalf of ICE on individuals in their agency’s jail. The South Dakota Department of Corrections signed this agreement on Aug. 28, the Minnehaha County Sheriff’s Office signed it on March 17 and the Hughes County Sheriff’s Office in Pierre signed it on March 7.
- Jail Enforcement Model: Allows law enforcement officers to identify and process individuals who may be in violation of immigration laws while they are serving time in their agency’s jail. The DOC signed this agreement on July 25.
While Operation: Prairie Thunder’s immigration enforcement prong has been well-publicized in the state, the majority of the program’s activity comes from enhanced traffic monitoring and drug enforcement, according to data released from the governor’s office.
According to a press release from Operation: Prairie Thunder, 260 of 406 – 64% – of individuals currently in custody as a result of Operation: Prairie Thunder have a drug charge and 156 have been cited with a drug charge and released. More than 2,000 traffic citations have been issued.
The “ICE Contacts” section of Operation: Prairie Thunder’s most recent dataset said that 89 people had been contacted in ICE-related situations since the program was announced. A representative from the Department of Public Safety told News Watch in a statement: “The intent of (Operation: Prairie Thunder) is to reduce crime in our communities.
“It is important to note that any ICE contacts are incidental contacts – we aren’t seeking out illegal aliens during the saturation patrols. However, the 287(g) agreement allows us to coordinate swiftly with ICE if a stop uncovers undocumented individuals. Those undocumented, non-citizens, are the people counted as ‘Individuals Contacted.’ Not all of those found to be undocumented are taken into custody, per ICE guidance, therefore the ‘Contacts’ and ‘Arrests’ sections differ.”
The program, which initially concentrated most of its efforts in Sioux Falls and the surrounding area, has started other efforts across the state.
Operation: Prairie Thunder most recently carried out operations in Belle Fourche, Huron and Yankton, where 75 individuals were taken into custody, 42 with a drug charge. Twenty-seven people were identified as ICE contacts.
The city of Brookings issued a statement on Dec. 12 that the operation would be coming to town Dec. 17-19 and that the city “would not be participating.”
Josie Harms, Rhoden’s press secretary, said the ongoing arrest and citation statistics indicate successful crime-fighting efforts.
“Our results remain impressive, and it is clear that this operation is keeping South Dakota strong, safe, and free — so we are going to keep it up,” Harms said in a statement.
This story was produced by South Dakota News Watch, an independent, nonprofit organization. Read more stories and donate at sdnewswatch.org and sign up for an email for statewide stories. Investigative reporter Molly Wetsch is a Report for America corps member covering rural and Indigenous issues. Contact her at molly.wetsch@sdnewswatch.org.
-
Iowa1 week agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Maine1 week agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland1 week agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
New Mexico7 days agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead
-
South Dakota1 week agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago‘Love being a pedo’: Metro Detroit doctor, attorney, therapist accused in web of child porn chats
-
Health1 week ago‘Aggressive’ new flu variant sweeps globe as doctors warn of severe symptoms
-
Maine7 days agoFamily in Maine host food pantry for deer | Hand Off

