Connect with us

South Dakota

South Dakota high school basketball scores for Feb. 3

Published

on

South Dakota high school basketball scores for Feb. 3


South Dakota high school basketball scores for Saturday, Feb. 3, 2024:

Beresford 52, Alcester-Hudson 51

Brandon Valley 55, Rapid City Stevens 49

Custer 62, Belle Fourche 38

Advertisement

Flandreau 54, Elkton-Lake Benton 38

Freeman 65, Bon Homme 33

Freeman Academy/Marion 63, Flandreau Indian 14

Great Plains Lutheran 54, Arlington 45

Hanson 57, Parker 37

Advertisement

Huron 65, Sturgis 60

James Valley Christian 66, Estelline/Hendricks 52

Lakota Tech 92, Hill City 80

Miller 61, Platte-Geddes 59

Mitchell 59, Spearfish 45

Advertisement

Pine Ridge 65, Crow Creek 53

Rapid City Christian 79, Alliance (Neb.) 49

Red Cloud 78, Lead-Deadwood 66

Sioux Falls Christian 61, Sioux Falls Lincoln 53

Sioux Falls Jefferson 65, Tea Area 52

Advertisement

Sioux Falls O’Gorman 60, Rapid City Central 38

Sioux Falls Roosevelt 56, Marshall (Minn.) 38

Wagner 62, Irene-Wakonda 27

Waverly-South Shore 44, Warner 40

Waubay/Summit 63, Northwestern 39

Advertisement

Wessington Springs 65, Tripp-Delmont/Armour 53

Wilmot 58, Langford Area 28

Winner 64, Cheyenne-Eagle Butte 46

Wolsey-Wessington 74, Sanborn Central/Woonsocket 35

Highmore Action Club Classic

Advertisement

Burke 57, Herreid/Selby Area 56

Leola/Frederick Area 64, Jones County 52

North Central 57, Lyman 50 (OT)

Philip 64, Highmore-Harrold 57

Little Moreau Conference Tournament

Advertisement

Championship

Faith 75, Lemmon 58

Third place

Timber Lake 67, Harding County 56

Sanford Pentagon Heritage Classic

Advertisement

Aberdeen Christian 50, McLaughlin 35

De Smet 50, Sioux Valley 44 (OT)

Lennox 55, Viborg-Hurley 39

St. Thomas More 63, Lennox 50

Sioux City East (Iowa) 77, Western Christian (Iowa) 55

Advertisement

Arlington 69, Great Plains Lutheran 45

Belle Fourche 54, Custer 34

Brandon Valley 51, Rapid City Stevens 38

Crow Creek 64, Pine Ridge 32

Dell Rapids St. Mary 61, Elkton-Lake Benton 47

Advertisement

Huron 60, Sturgis 54

James Valley Christian 49, Estelline/Hendricks 36

Marshall (Minn.) 65, Sioux Falls Roosevelt 42

Miller 51, Platte-Geddes 32

Mitchell 52, Spearfish 43

Advertisement

Rapid City Christian 40, Alliance (Neb.) 30

Sioux Falls O’Gorman 67, Rapid City Central 55

Red Cloud 94, Lead-Deadwood 25

Wagner 67, Irene-Wakonda 28

Wakpala 71, Oelrichs 30

Advertisement

Warner 58, Waverly-South Shore 15

Wilmot 47, Langford Area 45

Winner 71, Cheyenne-Eagle Butte 18

White River 52, New Underwood 21

Dakota XII/Northeast Conference Clash

Advertisement

Canton 56, Deuel 30

Clark/Willow Lake 46, Dell Rapids 32

Dakota Valley 53, Milbank 31

Elk Point-Jefferson 44, Groton Area 23

Lennox 45, Hamlin 37

Advertisement

Madison 61, Tiospa Zina 49

Sioux Falls Christian 70, Sisseton 62

Tea Area 79, Parkston 60

Tri-Valley 49, Redfield 26

Vermillion 75, Aberdeen Roncalli 41

Advertisement

West Central 66, Webster Area 23

Highmore Action Club Classic

Highmore-Harrold 64, Lower Brule 41

Jones County 43, North Central 27

Leola/Frederick Area 49, Philip 41

Advertisement

Lyman 42, Herreid/Selby Area 25

Sanford Pentagon Heritage Classic

St. Thomas More 48, Worthington (Minn.) 16

Spirit Lake (Iowa) 49, Moorhead (Minn.) 48





Source link

Advertisement

South Dakota

Nature: Prairie chickens in South Dakota

Published

on

Nature: Prairie chickens in South Dakota




Nature: Prairie chickens in South Dakota – CBS News

Advertisement














Advertisement



























Advertisement

Watch CBS News


We leave you this Sunday morning with prairie chickens and sharp tail grouse near Ft. Pierre, South Dakota. Videographer: Kevin Kjergaard.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Democrats fail to field candidates for a majority of South Dakota legislative seats

Published

on

Democrats fail to field candidates for a majority of South Dakota legislative seats


(SOUTH DAKOTA SEARCHLIGHT) – Democrats are running for 46 of South Dakota’s 105 legislative seats — leaving 56% of seats without a Democratic candidate.

That doesn’t bode well for the party ahead of November, said Michael Card, professor emeritus of political science at the University of South Dakota.

“It doesn’t put them in a position to actually put forward their ideological policy preferences and have much of a success at getting those enacted,” Card said.

In the state Senate alone, Democrats have failed to field a candidate for 22 seats, which is nearly two-thirds of the chamber. In the House, Democrats have failed to field a candidate for 38 seats, which is 54% of the chamber.

Advertisement

There is only one Democratic legislative primary in the state: a state Senate race in District 26, which includes the Rosebud Reservation.

There are no statewide Democratic primaries, after announced candidates for governor and U.S. House dropped out or failed to gather enough petition signatures to make the ballot, leaving one Democrat in each of those races.

Statewide candidates will have less name recognition than Republican candidates ahead of the general election, since they didn’t have primaries, Card said. In the Legislature, Card said Democrats “are guaranteeing they won’t get a majority.”

In contrast, Republicans have primary races for governor, U.S. House and U.S. Senate. Five legislative districts do not have Republican primaries, but do have Republican candidates. There is a Republican candidate running for every legislative seat, except for one House seat in District 27, which includes the Pine Ridge Reservation.

Card said there are several factors leading to poor candidate turnout among Democrats, including a self-fulfilling cycle of failure.

Advertisement

“A lack of winning makes fewer people willing to take a chance on running for office,” Card said. “Why run if I think I’m going to lose?”

Democrats haven’t held a statewide office since 2015, and they haven’t held a majority of either legislative chamber since 1994.

Joe Zweifel, deputy executive director of the South Dakota Democratic Party, said the organization worked “really, really hard” to convince Democrats to run for office.

“But you can’t force people to run for office,” said Zweifel, of Sioux Falls, who’s running for a legislative seat himself in District 12.

He’s heard the open seats called a “failure.” But he disagrees, choosing to focus on the Democrats who did step forward.

Advertisement

“We’re running quality, good candidates in those races,” Zweifel said.

The South Dakota Democratic Party hopes to build on legislative successes, such as a new law from Rep. Kadyn Wittman, D-Sioux Falls, that commits state funding to cover the family portion of reduced-price school meals.

“That specifically is a return on investment for our donors, and it shows that Democrats are doing good things for the people of South Dakota,” Zweifel said.

Wittman’s success helped inspire Democratic District 13 House of Representatives candidate Ali Rae Horsted, of Sioux Falls, to take a second run at the Legislature. Horsted ran unsuccessfully for the Senate against Sen. Sue Peterson in 2024, garnering 42% of the vote.

Horsted plans to build on that success and the name recognition she already has in the district. She hopes she’ll have “better odds” in this election, since there are two House seats for every district.

Advertisement

Horsted said it would better serve South Dakota if the state had a more balanced Legislature. While the latest Legislature was 92% Republican, 52% of voters in South Dakota are Republican. South Dakota has the lowest percentage of Democrats, 7.6%, in the Legislature nationwide.

“I think it’s important that people have options on the ballot,” Horsted said, “and people are able to vote for candidates that represent their values and their vision for the future of South Dakota.”

Makenzie Huber is a lifelong South Dakotan who regularly reports on the intersection of politics and policy with health, education, social services and Indigenous affairs. Her work with South Dakota Searchlight earned her the title of South Dakota’s Outstanding Young Journalist in 2024, and she was a 2024 finalist for the national Livingston Awards.

South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Advertisement

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Copyright 2026 KOTA. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

From Big Ideas to Better Places: Building Livable Communities Across South Dakota

Published

on

From Big Ideas to Better Places: Building Livable Communities Across South Dakota


From East River to West River, South Dakota communities share a common goal: creating places where people of all ages can live, work and thrive. AARP’s Domains of Livability provide a framework to help communities do just that. Through the AARP Community Challenge grant program—designed to spark quick, impactful local projects—South Dakota communities are turning big ideas into visible, people-centered improvements.

Read the South Dakota Community Challenge Grant Report, which showcases grant-funded projects across the state designed to build more livable communities.

What Are AARP’s Domains of Livability?

AARP’s approach to livable communities is rooted in eight interconnected domains that together support quality of life at every age:

  1. Outdoor Spaces and Buildings – Safe, accessible parks, streets and public buildings
  2. Transportation – Affordable, accessible options for getting around
  3. Housing – A range of choices that support independence
  4. Social Participation – Opportunities to connect, learn and have fun
  5. Respect and Social Inclusion – Communities that value people of all backgrounds and ages
  6. Civic Participation and Employment – Meaningful ways to engage and contribute
  7. Communication and Information – Clear, accessible ways to stay informed
  8. Community Support and Health Services – Access to services that support well-being

These domains work best when addressed together—something South Dakota communities are embracing.

bike lane in neighborhood being separated by wire

Advertisement

Turning Vision into Action with Community Challenge Grants

AARP Community Challenge grants fund short-term, “quick-action” projects that can ignite long-term change. Across South Dakota, these grants have helped communities pilot ideas, build momentum and demonstrate what’s possible when residents put people first.

Here’s how local projects are bringing the Domains of Livability to life:

  • Outdoor Spaces and Buildings: Communities have used grants to enhance parks, create pop-up public spaces, add benches and shade and install wayfinding signs. These improvements invite people to linger, gather, and enjoy shared spaces—supporting both physical activity and social connection.
  • Transportation: Small, thoughtful transportation projects can make a big difference. Community Challenge grants have supported safer crossings, improved walkability and bikeability around key destinations and the planning or installation of transit amenities like shelters and seating—especially important for older adults and people with mobility challenges.
  • Housing and Community Support: Some projects focus on helping residents age in place by improving access to information about home modification resources or by testing neighborhood-level solutions that connect people to services. These efforts strengthen independence and peace of mind.
  • Social Participation and Inclusion: Murals, community events and creative placemaking projects funded by AARP grants have sparked community pride and social connection. By involving residents in design and implementation, these projects foster respect, inclusion and a strong sense of belonging across generations.
  • Communication, Civic Participation and Opportunity: From hosting community conversations to creating new tools for sharing local information, South Dakota communities are using grants to engage residents in shaping their future. These efforts elevate local voices and encourage ongoing civic participation.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending