South Dakota
Jodi’s Journal: Smithfield story sets stage for Sioux Falls’ future
Feb. 22, 2026
It was a coincidence on the calendar — but in retrospect, an entirely symbolic setting for the biggest business story I’ve witnessed in Sioux Falls.
On Presidents Day at The Steel District in downtown Sioux Falls, our community learned of Smithfield Foods’ decision to build the industry’s most modern pork plant in northwest Sioux Falls and vacate its century-old downtown site.
As the significance of the federal holiday hit me, I thought back on how the most effective of our leaders tend to have been our presidents who have inspired the nation to believe that better days can be ahead.
“It’s morning in America.”
“I still believe in a place called Hope.”
This Presidents Day, our state, local and business leaders gave Sioux Falls and South Dakota a reason to feel that sense of possibility — and to be incredibly hopeful about our shared future. The layers to this are worth unpacking, but let’s start back at the setting — on an upper floor of The Steel District when it was still a construction site.
Sometime in 2023 or 2024, Sioux Falls officials learned Smithfield Foods was considering a major expansion and renovation to its downtown property — one that likely would cement its presence there for decades.
Mayor Paul TenHaken said he asked Erica Beck, his chief of staff at the time, to reach out to the company, which resulted in a connection with vice president of corporate affairs Jim Monroe and an invitation for the company’s leadership to visit Sioux Falls.
“I honestly had low expectations,” TenHaken told me. “I didn’t expect them to take us up on it, but they did. We kicked off the day on the fifth floor of The Steel District overlooking their plant to give them a view of the development happening downtown. Their property was really the last industrial holdout, and we were committing to helping them find a new home here. We wanted them to stay but to find a new location.”
The door had been opened — but just a crack. It was hard to make a financial case for what was anticipated to be a big gap between building new and renovating the existing plant. At one point, city leaders resigned themselves to the fact that putting in some better landscaping requirements and buffering around a larger downtown site might be the only card they held.
And then, everything started to change. As planning moved along, Smithfield’s analysis showed it was worth considering options for a new site.
Fortunately, Sioux Falls had just enough options that one worked: 200 acres in northwest Sioux Falls zoned for heavy industrial use at Foundation Park.
The people who did what it took to create Foundation Park more than a decade ago — and there are many of them — literally helped create a foundation for the business activity that will define the first half of the century for this community.
No matter how technology evolves and changes jobs and industries, this development park and the businesses located here mean that Sioux Falls is able to grow the segment of its economy where people make things. An economic base of manufacturing, food processing, agribusiness and logistics blended with health care and financial services is one that can sustain the volatility I suspect is ahead. It’s one that offers opportunities for everyone from the new American to the new college grad to the person whose industry was disrupted and is looking to learn new skills.
And just as we had the right place, we had the right people. What are the odds that the new leader of the Governor’s Office of Economic Development, Bill Even, happens to be the former CEO of the National Pork Board with strong industry relationships that helped him navigate this deal?
Alongside our state leaders, we have a team of city officials who are smart, solution-minded people who understood at every step of this process the enormity of the opportunity they were trying to capture.
And we have a community of public and private leaders who continually have recognized the importance of Smithfield to this city and state, going back to Gov. George Mickelson and the business leaders who died with him in a 1993 plane crash trying to stop what was then John Morrell & Co. from leaving town: Angus Anson of Northern States Power, David Birkeland of First Bank of South Dakota,; Roland Dolly of the Governor’s Office of Economic Development, Roger Hainje of the Sioux Falls Development Foundation, Ron Reed of the Governor’s Office of Energy Policy and state pilots Ron Becker and David Hansen.
I remember during the worst early days of the COVID-19 pandemic when Smithfield’s operations were disrupted. We immediately heard from local pork producers about how decimating it was.
Now imagine if it went away for good, which is what would have happened if everyone involved hadn’t arrived at a plan and if there hadn’t been a place ready to go to support the company’s growth. Instead, we’re going to be home to the most modern, sophisticated plant of its kind in the nation — possibly the world — and all the benefits that come along with it.

Incredibly, that’s only half the story.
Just as it was not a given that Smithfield would remain in Sioux Falls, it’s important to remember that the community certainly would not have automatically become the owner of its property — or even had the capacity to buy it.

When TenHaken approached philanthropist Denny Sanford about contributing to the opportunity, he “instantly understood the enormity of this and how huge it was,” TenHaken said. “He realized the transformational change that would happen if Smithfield moved. But he also wanted to make sure they stayed. He understood the economic impact of them to the community. So he put on his business hat.”
Sanford’s $50 million gift “was the linchpin” that sealed the deal, TenHaken said.

“Smithfield very likely in other states could have got offered free land to move,” he said. “Other states do that readily to incentive businesses, especially one that provides $3 billion in annual economic impact. We just don’t do that, so knowing we didn’t have a tool to do that, we had to do a work-around and asked Denny if he’d be willing to buy that plant.”
Just think about that: Instead of hoping that Smithfield would have sold the property to developers who would do right by our community, Sanford’s gift puts us collectively in charge of what transpires here. At 90 years old, he just made what will go down as one of his most historic, impactful contributions: He gave us the keys to decades of possibilities and put us in the driver’s seat.
I smile when I see the public speculation about what the 120 acres downtown could become because everything I’ve read is thinking too small and doesn’t recognize the scale of opportunity that awaits. This map says it all:

Many times already, I’ve found myself driving around that property considering the same thing. The truth is, it can be almost unlimited things. It’s literally like creating a second downtown — giving us the chance to build on the success we’ve already achieved at the doorstep to our city’s namesake park.
Just as downtown today is a microcosm of the broader community, The Sanford District hopefully will be the same — and serve as the catalyst for thinking even more strategically about areas including the South Dakota State Penitentiary and throughout the Whittier neighborhood. Every major decision is back on the table. Every master plan we thought we had as a community will need a new look. The world of possibilities just ignited.
TenHaken got the call from Smithfield CEO Shane Smith on a Friday afternoon in December that the deal had been approved.
“I threw my hands in the air and yelled in my office,” he said. “It was fun. It was a good day.”
Presidents Day was an awfully good day too. I hope it also serves as spark for some in our community who have thought about stepping up to help lead in the years ahead.
We’re going to need you. The years to come hold the promise of incredible opportunity, but only if those leading this state and community can harness it through casting a vision, building trust, fostering relationships and getting big ideas across the finish line.
Understandably, there will be questions about many aspects of this major announcement. I guarantee there will be obstacles no one has anticipated in the coming years because there always are. But when you look at the bottom line and the big picture, I hope you feel as excited for the future of this community as I do. We needed this. We needed that next big thing. Our next generation needed that next big thing. We got something bigger than I could have ever envisioned.
Sioux Falls made history on Presidents Day. Thank you to everyone who made it possible.
Jodi’s Journal: It’s time for the ’20s to roar
South Dakota
Black Hills Bottlenecks: Road work update for the week of May 11
RAPID CITY, S.D. (KOTA) – More road work and travel impacts are set to begin across western South Dakota this week, with projects ranging from highway striping and crack sealing to temporary rest area closures as well as an upcoming public meeting on a bridge replacement project in Keystone.
The first projects begin Monday, May 11.
S.D. Highway 44: Striping work
On S.D. Highway 44, crews will complete striping work from about 1.5 miles east of Farmingdale to roughly 10.75 miles east of the community.
Work is scheduled from 6 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday and is expected to continue through Tuesday evening. Drivers should expect daytime lane impacts in the area.
U.S. Highway 385: Striping work
Also beginning Monday, striping operations are scheduled on U.S. Highway 385 from about one mile south of the U.S. Highway 85 junction near Deadwood to the junction itself. Work is expected to take place during daytime hours Monday through Tuesday.
Pavement preservation project on S.D. Highway 20
A pavement preservation project is also scheduled to start Monday on S.D. Highway 20 between Buffalo and Camp Crook. Crews will be sealing cracks in the roadway as part of the project. Traffic will be reduced to one lane during daytime hours, with flaggers and a pilot car guiding motorists through the work zone. Delays of up to 15 minutes are expected.
The contractor for the $112,155 project is Highway Improvement, Inc. of Sioux Falls. The overall completion date is scheduled for Dec. 4.
Drivers are reminded to slow down and use caution around crews and construction equipment in all work zones.
Wasta rest area spring cleaning
Additional travel impacts are expected latter this week with temporary closures planned at the Wasta Rest Areas along Interstate 90 for annual spring cleaning.
The eastbound Wasta Rest Area near mile marker 98 will close at 7 a.m. Tuesday, May 12, and reopen at 9 a.m. Wednesday, May 13. After that reopening, the westbound rest area will close from 9 a.m. Wednesday until 9 a.m. Thursday, May 14. Travelers are encouraged to make alternate plans during the closures.
Public meeting on future bridge replacement project along U.S. Highway 16A in Keystone
On Thursday, May 14, the South Dakota Department of Transportation and Complete Concrete, Inc. will host a public informational meeting on a future bridge replacement project along U.S. Highway 16A in Keystone.
The open house-style meeting will run from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. at the Keystone Community Center, 1101 Madill St. Officials say the meeting is intended to provide project details and answer questions from residents, businesses and emergency personnel.

The bridge replacement project is scheduled to begin in October. Plans call for replacing the existing bridge with a box culvert and include additional improvements such as intersection upgrades, resurfacing, pavement markings, traffic signals, ADA upgrades and erosion control. Pedestrian access on both sides of the structure will also be improved.
More information on the Keystone project is available at South Dakota Department of Transportation’s project page.
Current road conditions, closures and construction updates can be found at SD511 or by dialing 511.
See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.
Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.
Copyright 2026 KOTA. All rights reserved.
South Dakota
SD Lottery Millionaire for Life winning numbers for May 10, 2026
The South Dakota Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at May 10, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from May 10 drawing
01-03-20-35-46, Bonus: 05
Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize
- Prizes of $100 or less: Can be claimed at any South Dakota Lottery retailer.
- Prizes of $101 or more: Must be claimed from the Lottery. By mail, send a claim form and a signed winning ticket to the Lottery at 711 E. Wells Avenue, Pierre, SD 57501.
- Any jackpot-winning ticket for Dakota Cash or Lotto America, top prize-winning ticket for Lucky for Life, or for the second prizes for Powerball and Mega Millions must be presented in person at a Lottery office. A jackpot-winning Powerball or Mega Millions ticket must be presented in person at the Lottery office in Pierre.
When are the South Dakota Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
- Lucky for Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
- Lotto America: 9:15 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Dakota Cash: 9 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
- Millionaire for Life: 10:15 p.m. CT daily.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a South Dakota editor. You can send feedback using this form.
South Dakota
After Standing Rock, could a canceled mine project offer a roadmap for opponents of a new oil pipeline in South Dakota?
Almost exactly a decade since the start of the Standing Rock protests against the Dakota Access pipeline gained national and international attention, new disputes are simmering over tribal rights in the Black Hills of South Dakota.
Earlier this month, an environmental organization and a Native American advocacy group sued the US Forest Service, claiming that an exploratory graphite drilling project on national forest land threatened a recognized ceremonial site on mountain meadows known as Pe’ Sla, or Reynolds Prairie.
But on Friday, Pete Lien and Sons, the company behind the project, abruptly withdrew, saying it would perform reclamation on the site and would not seek to file another plan. The decision came as a striking victory for Native American tribes and environmental groups that had opposed it – but other projects in the works may not meet the same conclusion.
The project, claimed nine groups within the Sioux Nation, including the Standing Rock Sioux, would “directly and significantly” affect the use of Pe’ Sla, which sits within Ȟe Sápa, the Lakota name for the sacred Black Hills of South Dakota, itself the locus of Lakota creation myths.
A second exploratory project by a Canadian company looking to mine uranium on state-owned land could affect Craven Canyon, an area that contains 7,000-year-old sites of importance to Indigenous tribes, historians and archaeologists.
Opposition to the twin projects – backed by Pete Lien, of Rapid City, and by Clean Nuclear Energy Corp – comes as a proposed Alberta-to-Wyoming pipeline for carrying Canadian crude oil to the US is close to securing commitments from oil companies after Donald Trump granted permitting through an executive order.
All the projects have at their heart issues of extraction, water safety and sacred sites, much as the Standing Rock dispute of 2016 that saw “water protesters” gather in a standoff with law enforcement over concerns regarding water safety and sacred sites.
That case began when the Standing Rock Sioux passed a resolution stating that “the Dakota Access Pipeline poses a serious risk to the very survival of our Tribe and … would destroy valuable cultural resources” and was a violation of the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty guaranteeing the “undisturbed use and occupation” of reservation lands surrounding the pipeline.
In the aftermath, the environmental group Greenpeace was ordered to pay damages of $345m by a North Dakota judge to pipeline company Energy Transfer and subsidiary Dakota Access in connection with the protests, an order that is set to go to appeal. Greenpeace claims the legal action is designed to silence activists.
Most of the current disputes relate to energy, reflecting the Trump administration’s drive toward US energy independence and away from dependence on foreign sources, particularly China. Graphite, used in electric vehicle batteries, is almost exclusively imported. Roughly 95%–99% of uranium is purchased from foreign sources, including Russia and Kazakhstan.
The pipeline deal, meanwhile, is expected to help increase oil output from Canada, the world’s fourth-largest producer, to around 6.1m barrels a day, up from 5.5m now. Bridger, the company behind the Alberta-to-Wyoming pipeline, has said the project was being developed in response to identified market interest.
Wizipan “Little Elk” Garriott, a member of NDN Collective, an Indigenous rights group opposing the mining at Pe’ Sla, says the entire process of approval for the planned mine “happened in the dark”.
“There was no notice that they were proceeding provided to us, nor to the sovereign tribal nations,” he says, in violation of environmental and cultural impact study requirements and consultations with the tribes.
Lilias Jarding, director of the Black Hills Clean Water Alliance, one of the parties in the victorious Pe’ Sla action, says the decade since Standing Rock has seen a huge growth in projects attempting to mine tribal lands and areas of ceremonial significance.
Since the start of the second Trump administration, the push for both minerals extraction and energy has dramatically increased. “They’re being more aggressive,” Jarding says. In the case of Pe’ Sla, he adds, the company didn’t stop drilling when the lawsuits was filed: “They started drilling 24 hours a day.”
The alliance, along with tribes, claim the graphite project violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and that the US Forest Service improperly used a process known as a “categorical exclusion” to bypass reviews.
Oglala Sioux president Frank Star Comes Out said in a statement that the Sioux tribes never ceded to the US the lands in the Black Hills, which, he said, “remain the spiritual center of the Great Sioux Nation and they are not for sale, lease or exploitation” and that the lawsuit is a “united tribal response to protect a sacred site from those who continue to desecrate our ancestral lands”.
Oglala activist Taylor Gunhammer said that drilling at Pe’ Sla was akin to “drilling under the Vatican or at a sacred site in Jerusalem”.
A representative of Clean Nuclear Energy Corp, Mike Blady, said the company was “aware of the cultural significance and are doing everything in our power to ensure that there is no collateral damage”.
Will this amount to a populist action similar to Standing Rock?
The Pe’ Sla dispute did not provoke the kind of Indigenous-led, grassroots resistance to fossil-fuel infrastructure projects that accompanied the Dakota Access pipeline, which in some ways became a template for contemporary protests, powered by social media, celebrities and politicians.
The tribes were not in favor of following in that direction, Jarding says: “It’s a deeply sacred spiritual and ceremonial site, and elders have made it clear that it’s not a good place for another Standing Rock with thousands of people. They say this is not the place.”
Under the Biden administration, the tribal groups felt they were entering into a period of co-management policy over federal lands that in many cases lie within treaty agreements. But under the Trump administration, that sense of co-operation has diminished.
“We’ve seen a ramp-up of opening up federal lands for mineral and gas exploration, but as a planet we need to be moving away from fossil fuels and toward policies that are sustainable into the future,” says NDN’s Garriott.
What was planned for Pe’ Sla now, or was happening at Standing Rock a decade ago, or has indeed happened over a long history of disputes between sovereign tribal groups and the US government, he says, is “protecting our land and protecting our water, not only for ourselves but for the planet. We’re not random protesters out there – we’re protecting our own land”.
-
New Hampshire6 minutes ago
Newly naturalized US citizens pledge allegiance in Exeter, N.H., where revolutionaries made history – The Boston Globe
-
New Jersey12 minutes agoRock legend Steven Van Zandt celebrates New Jersey launch of Malvado Maple Mezcal at Hard Rock Atlantic City
-
New Mexico18 minutes agoFour New Mexico companies nominated for ‘Best Hot Air Balloon Ride’ by USA Today
-
North Carolina24 minutes agoNorth Carolina (NCHSAA) High School Softball 2026 State Playoff Brackets, Matchups, Schedule – May 11
-
North Dakota30 minutes agoFire burns at Pallet Green Recycling storage yard in rural Williston
-
Ohio36 minutes ago60% of Ohio children aren’t ready for kindergarten when they start; what’s the plan?
-
Oklahoma42 minutes ago2026 NBA Playoffs: Oklahoma City Thunder at Los Angeles Lakers best bet, odds, prediction
-
Oregon48 minutes ago
Federal and state agencies urge caution as fire season begins in parts of Oregon


