Connect with us

Ohio

Young Indiana women’s basketball ‘not going to lose hope’ after 0-8 Big Ten start

Published

on

Young Indiana women’s basketball ‘not going to lose hope’ after 0-8 Big Ten start


It was a “tale of two halves,” Indiana women’s basketball coach Teri Moren said Thursday night.

Her team had a tall task heading to No. 11 Ohio State, but for the first 20 minutes, they lived up to it. Indiana started the game on a 13-4 run and maintained that advantage throughout the first half, leading by as many as 15 points and going into halftime with a 10-point lead.

Then, similar to much of Indiana’s losses so far this season, it fell apart in the second half.

Advertisement

“Tale of two halves. I thought we played very well in the first half,” Moren said following IU’s 81-67 loss in Columbus. “Loved how we shared the ball, kept them out of transition, did a lot of really, really good things (in the first half). And then, you know, the second half came, and we knew they were going to turn up their pressure. We didn’t handle it as we needed to.”

IU collapsed under Ohio State’s full-court press in the second half, with the Buckeyes guarding the inbounder and any receivers in the far backcourt.

Ohio State initiated 16 steals over 40 minutes, and IU had 26 turnovers to give Ohio State 34 points off them. So, even though IU shot 56% from the field (22 of 39) with a 64% mark from 3-point range (11 of 17), Ohio State had a clear advantage with 25 more shot attempts on 48.4% shooting from the field (31 of 64).

“Twenty-six turnovers is going to make it pretty hard to win a basketball game,” redshirt sophomore Lenee Beaumont, IU’s leading scorer with 20 points, said. “And I think that goes back to just kind of helping each other. You know, there were a few in the first half where we left people on an island, or I remember one specifically in the second half, where we got the rebound and then they went back and trapped Shay (Ciezki) and we’re all running and on the other side of the half court. So we got to be more aware.”

It was yet another learning lesson for the young Hoosiers, who are now 0-8 in Big Ten play with no end in sight.

Advertisement

With a lot of turnover because of graduations and transfer portal entries after the 2024-25 season, Moren has a young team — even younger, she says, than it appears on paper.

Maya Makalusky and Nevaeh Caffey, both in the starting lineup, are freshmen. Moren considers sophomore Zania Socka-Nguemen and Beaumont pseudo-freshmen, too, considering how little they played before this season. 

Socka-Nguemen transferred to Indiana after one year at UCLA, where she played minimal minutes. Beaumont played minimal minutes off the bench as a freshman at Indiana in 2023-24, then was out the entire 2024-25 season because of a knee injury. 

“Maya and Nevaeh are true freshmen, but you’re talking about two other kids that have had little to zero playing time in the Big (Ten) and this is a very, very great, this is a great conference,” Moren said. “And we’ve played all the ones, and you know that have been ranked so far, right? We haven’t had an easy path to start Big Ten play. And you know, that’s been part of it. It’s the league, it’s how good it is. And, you know, nobody feels sorry for Indiana.”

Advertisement

Moren’s job, too, is to teach her young players how to work through this tough slew of games. IU has seen a lot of success as a program over the past five years, including a Big Ten championship and No. 1 seed in the NCAA tournament, so this is uncharted territory — and likely not what players expected when they committed to the Hoosiers.

But this is where they’re at now. And Moren needs to make sure her players don’t lose hope in this stretch.

“It’s just the communication piece, right,” Moren said. “It’s making sure that we are showing them, you know, the things in film, those lessons that we have to learn. But it’s also showing them all the things that they’re doing well. And then, last night, at the end of the night, when we watched film, we had a deep dive of some analytics, some statistics. We’re so close, and that’s what we keep saying to them.”

Advertisement

IU may have some opportunities for its first Big Ten win in its games coming up; it plays in-state rival Purdue, who is 2-6 in Big Ten play, on Jan. 25 and Feb. 8, and Northwestern, also 2-6 in conference, on Feb. 1.

And Beaumont thinks her team will have the fight for it.

“Believe it or not, I do believe that the fight in the locker room is in a really good spot, and we’re not going to lose hope,” Beaumont said. “We just take tomorrow as a new opportunity to continue to grow and get better. It would be so easy for us to fall apart right now and not stay together, but I give credit to the people in the locker room that we’ve stayed together as one unit, the best that we could possibly do that.”

Want more Hoosiers coverage? Sign up for IndyStar’s Hoosiers newsletter. Listen to Mind Your Banners, our IU Athletics-centric podcast, on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Watch the latest on IndyStar TV: Hoosiers.



Source link

Advertisement

Ohio

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator

Published

on

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator


Matt Patricia’s contract extension earlier this offseason included a pay raise that figures to make him the highest-paid assistant coach in college football this year.

But Patricia, who will make $3.75 million in guaranteed compensation as Ohio State’s defensive coordinator in 2026, also held an appreciation for his situation.

“Ohio State is such a special place, not only just the history, the tradition, the football program, the school, but the people here,” Patricia said. “Having a chance to have a little stability with my family, it’s hard when you have to move your family around, your kids and the new school and all that.”

Advertisement

Before he joined Ryan Day’s staff last year, the 51-year-old Patricia had bounced around as an assistant in the NFL for much of the decade.

He spent 2021 and 2022 in a variety of roles with the New England Patriots, then a year as a defensive assistant with the Philadelphia Eagles. He took off from coaching in 2024. The frequent relocation gave him perspective.

“We had an unbelievable experience settling into Columbus,” Patricia said. “Everybody’s been so nice and welcoming. It feels like home. It’s a big deal for us to be in a place where everybody’s happy. That’s really important.”

Advertisement

Patricia had a significant impact on the Buckeyes in his first year replacing Jim Knowles. Despite heavy roster attrition following their national championship season, he kept the defense atop the Football Bowl Subdivision. For the second straight season, no one allowed fewer points than Ohio State.

The 9.3 points per game allowed by the Buckeyes were the fewest by any defense since Alabama in 2011.

The success made Patricia a hot commodity on the coaching market, rebuilding his reputation as a sharp and creative football mind only a decade removed from his tenure as a Super Bowl-winning defensive coordinator for the Patriots. He was a finalist for the Broyles Award as the nation’s top assistant.

Patricia said he heard about opportunities in the NFL and elsewhere across the college football landscape, though none of them would pry him away from Ohio State.

Advertisement

“It wasn’t necessarily something where you’re looking to leave,” Patricia said, “but you do have to listen when those things come up. I’m just glad everything worked out.”

His challenge in his second season mirrors his previous one, as the Buckeyes are again managing the loss of eight starters on defense.

But unlike 2025, they have fewer returning pieces, relying on a larger class of transfers to help fill the holes on the depth chart.

“With as much coming into the program for the first time, not only are you trying to catch them up on the football scheme, but you’re also trying to catch them up on everything else,” Patricia said. “This is how we work, this is how we do things, this is the standard we’re looking for, this is how we practice, this is how we prepare, this is how we go to school. That has to be also taught. It becomes a lot, but that’s why you bring in the right guys that have the mental makeup to do all that.”

Joey Kaufman covers Ohio State football for The Columbus Dispatch. Email him at jkaufman@dispatch.com and follow him on @joeyrkaufman on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?

Published

on

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?


play

Which central Ohio school districts get the most bang for their buck?

On average, school districts in Ohio spend $16,069 per-pupil for education, according to the education think tank Fordham Institute.

Advertisement

However, different district types spend different amounts of money. For example, large urban districts with very high poverty spend around $21,000 per-pupil, but small towns with low poverty spend around $14,900. The district type closest to the state average are those considered rural and high poverty and suburban districts with low poverty.

Aaron Churchill, lead Ohio researcher for the Fordham Institute, said that urban districts – like Columbus City Schools, the state’s largest district – often have higher spending because they can pull more in tax revenue and the state supports them at a higher rate because they are serving a higher proportion of disadvantaged students. Small, high-poverty towns on the other hand, generate less tax revenue from property values and district employee wages, the highest expense for schools, may be lowered by less market competition.

Churchill said schools should be focused on directing their funding toward initiatives that improve student outcomes and achievement.

“It’s making sure we’re focused on quality, we’re focused on performance, and that we’re rewarding performance,” Churchill said. “And we don’t do enough of that in the education system now.”

Advertisement

Churchill said there is a long-running debate among education researchers about whether increasing spending translates to meaningful results for students. Overall, school funding has increased on average over $2,000 per-pupil since 2015 and reached a record-high in 2025, according to the Fordham Institute.

“You can see in the numbers that we’re spending more than we ever have,” Churchill said. “The real million-dollar question is ‘Can our schools spend the money well?’”

Which central Ohio districts have the best results compared to funding?

The Dispatch compared overall spending per-pupil for central Ohio school districts to the ODEW’s performance index, using 2025 state data.

The Performance Index uses the performance level results for students in third grade through high school on Ohio’s state testing. The Performance Index (PI) score accounts for the level of achievement of every student, not just whether they are “proficient.” Higher performance levels receive larger weights in the calculation, but all achievement levels are included. Overall, the state average of performance scores was 91.8, according to 2025 state data.

Advertisement

The central Ohio school district with the highest spending was Columbus City Schools, which spent $24,505 per pupil and received a PI score of 60.7. The district with the highest PI was Grandview Heights Schools, which received a 106 PI score and spent $21,567 per pupil. New Albany-Plain Local Schools was a close second in PI at 105.1 while spending more than $4,000 less than Grandview Heights at $16,923 per-pupil.

Here’s how central Ohio schools stack up by spending versus achievements on tests, according to the Ohio Department of Education (sorted by highest spending per-pupil):

  • Columbus City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $24,505; PI score: 60.7
  • Grandview Heights Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,567; PI score: 106
  • Bexley City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,025; PI score: 102.7
  • Dublin City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18,702; PI score: 97.6
  • Worthington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18.573 ; PI score: 94.3
  • Madison-Plains Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $17,646; PI score: 88
  • New Albany-Plain Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,923; PI score: 105.1
  • Westerville City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,815; PI score: 89.7
  • Olentangy Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,780; PI score: 103.9
  • Groveport Madison Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,236; PI score: 72.6
  • Upper Arlington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,282; PI score: 103.6
  • Canal Winchester Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16.154; PI score: 89.1
  • Average Ohio school district – Spending per-pupil: $16,069; PI score: 91.8
  • Reynoldsburg City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,956; PI score: 72.2
  • Gahanna-Jefferson City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,742; PI score: 89.7
  • Hilliard City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,694; PI score: 90
  • South Western City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,600; PI score: 78.5
  • Whitehall City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,593; PI score: 66.95
  • Johnstown-Monroe Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,163; PI score: 94.5
  • Jonathan Alder Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,803; PI score: 95.9
  • Pickerington Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,470 ; PI score: 90.9
  • Big Walnut Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,239; PI score: 95.1
  • London City – Spending per-pupil: $13,750; PI score: 81.3
  • Marysville Exempted Village Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,608; PI score: 95.5
  • Licking Heights Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,585; PI score: 85.4
  • Hamilton Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,971; PI score: 82.2
  • Bloom-Carrol Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,720; PI score: 90.89
  • Licking Valley Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,587; PI score: 85

Cole Behrens covers K-12 education and school districts in central Ohio. Have a tip? Contact Cole at cbehrens@dispatch.com or connect with him on X at @Colebehr_report



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Ohio BCI breaks ground on new evidence collection building in London, Ohio

Published

on

Ohio BCI breaks ground on new evidence collection building in London, Ohio


Officials broke ground on a new evidence collection building for the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation in London, a project aimed at strengthening the agency’s crime-scene and cold-case work.

The new facility will replace BCI’s current evidence collection building, which is 800 square feet. Attorney General Dave Yost said the new building is needed to better track evidence and bring justice to victims as DNA technology evolves.

“But this story illustrates why it’s so important to have enough space to be able to hold the materials for these cases, to be able to store them properly, to maintain their integrity, so that when the science does catch up, we’re able to process a rape or a murder case and find the person who did it. There’s nothing that keeps me up at night more than thinking about unsolved cases,” Yost said.

The project is expected to take one year.

Advertisement
Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

BCI also unveiled a new gun range at the Ohio Peace Officer Training Academy in London, intended to boost officers’ training.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending