Connect with us

Ohio

Ohio State Accomplishes Its Most Important Goal for Post-Spring Transfer Window: Retaining All of Its Key Players

Published

on

Ohio State Accomplishes Its Most Important Goal for Post-Spring Transfer Window: Retaining All of Its Key Players


Ohio State hasn’t added any new transfers since the end of spring practice, but it’s already accomplished its most important goal for the final transfer window of the offseason.

The transfer portal closed for the final time before the 2024 season when midnight struck Wednesday, and the 15-day post-spring window to enter the portal came and went with Ohio State losing only six backups: Running back Dallan Hayden, wide receiver Kyion Grayes, guard Enokk Vimahi, linebacker Nigel Glover and safeties Ja’Had Carter and Cedrick Hawkins.

None of their departures were shocking or devastating. Ohio State would have liked to keep Hayden to be its third-string running back this season and a potential starter in 2025, but the Buckeyes still have a loaded running back depth chart led by two of the nation’s best ballcarriers in TreVeyon Henderson and Quinshon Judkins. Losing two safeties leaves the Buckeyes a bit thin with only six scholarship players at the position, but neither Carter nor Hawkins was expected to see substantial playing time this year with Carter entering his final season of collegiate eligibility.

Vimahi started the Cotton Bowl at right guard, but his poor performance against Missouri made it clear he wouldn’t be a viable starting option for the Buckeyes this year. Glover and Grayes didn’t play any snaps in 2023 and remained low on the depth chart at their respective positions.

Advertisement

Every player who was expected to play a significant role for the Buckeyes this season coming out of spring practices is still on the roster with the transfer portal now closed for the year, and that’s a huge win for Ohio State.

Few would have predicted that outcome going into the post-spring transfer window. Amid rumblings that this year’s spring transfer window would be more chaotic than past years, the expectation was that the Buckeyes would lose at least a couple of players of note. It was seen as a foregone conclusion, even among sources close to the program, that Ohio State would lose at least one of its five scholarship quarterbacks.

Instead, Ohio State kept nearly its entire roster intact – a credit to Ohio State’s efforts to build a culture that players want to remain a part of.

“I feel like we have a team that has come together for a common purpose,” Ryan Day said during the final week of spring practice before the portal reopened. “We talk about why do you play so hard here at Ohio State, it’s because of the brotherhood, the love of your teammates. I think we have a good group that way. I think guys want to be here, they want to be at Ohio State, they understand what it means to be a Buckeye, they see the opportunity this season. So I don’t see a bunch of guys that are just looking to run out the door.”

Aside from the first transfer window of this offseason, in which the Buckeyes had 19 scholarship players go portaling, Ohio State’s roster retention rates have compared favorably to other marquee programs in the transfer portal era. The December mass exodus was largely necessary, as Ohio State would have been well above the 85-man scholarship limit otherwise; even in that cycle, most of the departures were players who hadn’t played much for the Buckeyes and weren’t expected to play much more in 2024, with a few notable exceptions like Kyle McCord, Julian Fleming and Jesse Mirco.

Advertisement

Thanks to the impressive post-spring retention, Ohio State will have one of the deepest rosters in college football in 2024. The Buckeyes’ quarterback depth will be the envy of the sport, and they’re loaded with high-level talent at most other positions, too, especially along the defensive line and at cornerback. That depth will be more important than ever as Ohio State faces the prospect of playing 16 or 17 games if it can make a run to the national championship game, which was part of Day’s pitch to his players who might have been considering transfers at the end of spring.

“We know we’re gonna have to play with a lot of depth next year,” Day said. “So you might be you might be a two right now or you might be a three, but you could be in the College Football Playoffs fighting for a championship and be the guy that we’re counting on. So I just think this is a different and unique time that we’re stepping into. So when guys are looking at the depth chart, I don’t think it’s as important as it always has been in the past. There’s gonna be a lot of football played next year, and we’re gonna roll guys and play depth, especially in the first half of the season, because we’re going to need them in the second half of the season.”

“I think guys want to be here, they want to be at Ohio State, they understand what it means to be a Buckeye, they see the opportunity this season.”– Ryan Day on players staying at Ohio State

Ohio State’s work in the transfer portal isn’t done, as players who have already entered the portal can still transfer to new schools even though the portal is now closed. Ideally, the Buckeyes would add another starting-caliber offensive lineman, as right guard remains a major question mark coming out of spring. Adding another safety for depth purposes would be beneficial, as could adding a veteran running back to replace Hayden.

The Buckeyes have five scholarships available to pursue any players they believe can make their roster better. But thanks to the roster retention over the past couple of weeks, Ohio State doesn’t necessarily need to add any more transfers to have a championship-caliber roster this year, which means the Buckeyes have already accomplished their most important post-spring objective from a roster management standpoint.

Advertisement

The lack of post-spring transfer portal activity hasn’t been exclusive to Ohio State. Despite hype that preceded the portal’s reopening, the secondary transfer cycle has been almost entirely devoid of moves involving big-name players. While the winter transfer window is likely to remain de facto free agency for the foreseeable future, fears of another wave of major roster shakeups for the sport’s top teams proved to be unfounded for at least this year.

Because most of college football’s top talent chose to stay put during the April transfer window, Ohio State isn’t likely to make any additions that will be nearly as splashy as the additions of Caleb Downs, Quinshon Judkins, Will Howard and Julian Sayin in January. Some additional talent could trickle into the transfer portal over the next few days, as graduate transfers have until the end of the day Wednesday to enter and schools have 48 hours to process portal entries, but no clear targets have emerged for the Buckeyes yet.

A lack of overall transfer activity, though, is a net positive for the Buckeyes coming out of spring. Ohio State might have the best roster in college football this season, but it had to survive the final transfer window before we could say that for sure.



Source link

Advertisement

Ohio

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center

Published

on

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center


Thousands of people are expected to head to downtown Columbus for the 23rd annual Home Improvement Show this weekend.

Organizers say visitors can find ideas for everything from small interior design projects to major renovations.

The event is being held at the Ohio Expo Center and includes seminars, exhibits and demonstrations from local and national companies.

The show begins at noon Friday and runs until 6 p.m.

Advertisement

It continues Saturday from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Sunday from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Adult tickets cost $5 at the door.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator

Published

on

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator


Matt Patricia’s contract extension earlier this offseason included a pay raise that figures to make him the highest-paid assistant coach in college football this year.

But Patricia, who will make $3.75 million in guaranteed compensation as Ohio State’s defensive coordinator in 2026, also held an appreciation for his situation.

“Ohio State is such a special place, not only just the history, the tradition, the football program, the school, but the people here,” Patricia said. “Having a chance to have a little stability with my family, it’s hard when you have to move your family around, your kids and the new school and all that.”

Advertisement

Before he joined Ryan Day’s staff last year, the 51-year-old Patricia had bounced around as an assistant in the NFL for much of the decade.

He spent 2021 and 2022 in a variety of roles with the New England Patriots, then a year as a defensive assistant with the Philadelphia Eagles. He took off from coaching in 2024. The frequent relocation gave him perspective.

“We had an unbelievable experience settling into Columbus,” Patricia said. “Everybody’s been so nice and welcoming. It feels like home. It’s a big deal for us to be in a place where everybody’s happy. That’s really important.”

Advertisement

Patricia had a significant impact on the Buckeyes in his first year replacing Jim Knowles. Despite heavy roster attrition following their national championship season, he kept the defense atop the Football Bowl Subdivision. For the second straight season, no one allowed fewer points than Ohio State.

The 9.3 points per game allowed by the Buckeyes were the fewest by any defense since Alabama in 2011.

The success made Patricia a hot commodity on the coaching market, rebuilding his reputation as a sharp and creative football mind only a decade removed from his tenure as a Super Bowl-winning defensive coordinator for the Patriots. He was a finalist for the Broyles Award as the nation’s top assistant.

Patricia said he heard about opportunities in the NFL and elsewhere across the college football landscape, though none of them would pry him away from Ohio State.

Advertisement

“It wasn’t necessarily something where you’re looking to leave,” Patricia said, “but you do have to listen when those things come up. I’m just glad everything worked out.”

His challenge in his second season mirrors his previous one, as the Buckeyes are again managing the loss of eight starters on defense.

But unlike 2025, they have fewer returning pieces, relying on a larger class of transfers to help fill the holes on the depth chart.

“With as much coming into the program for the first time, not only are you trying to catch them up on the football scheme, but you’re also trying to catch them up on everything else,” Patricia said. “This is how we work, this is how we do things, this is the standard we’re looking for, this is how we practice, this is how we prepare, this is how we go to school. That has to be also taught. It becomes a lot, but that’s why you bring in the right guys that have the mental makeup to do all that.”

Joey Kaufman covers Ohio State football for The Columbus Dispatch. Email him at jkaufman@dispatch.com and follow him on @joeyrkaufman on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?

Published

on

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?


play

Which central Ohio school districts get the most bang for their buck?

On average, school districts in Ohio spend $16,069 per-pupil for education, according to the education think tank Fordham Institute.

Advertisement

However, different district types spend different amounts of money. For example, large urban districts with very high poverty spend around $21,000 per-pupil, but small towns with low poverty spend around $14,900. The district type closest to the state average are those considered rural and high poverty and suburban districts with low poverty.

Aaron Churchill, lead Ohio researcher for the Fordham Institute, said that urban districts – like Columbus City Schools, the state’s largest district – often have higher spending because they can pull more in tax revenue and the state supports them at a higher rate because they are serving a higher proportion of disadvantaged students. Small, high-poverty towns on the other hand, generate less tax revenue from property values and district employee wages, the highest expense for schools, may be lowered by less market competition.

Churchill said schools should be focused on directing their funding toward initiatives that improve student outcomes and achievement.

“It’s making sure we’re focused on quality, we’re focused on performance, and that we’re rewarding performance,” Churchill said. “And we don’t do enough of that in the education system now.”

Advertisement

Churchill said there is a long-running debate among education researchers about whether increasing spending translates to meaningful results for students. Overall, school funding has increased on average over $2,000 per-pupil since 2015 and reached a record-high in 2025, according to the Fordham Institute.

“You can see in the numbers that we’re spending more than we ever have,” Churchill said. “The real million-dollar question is ‘Can our schools spend the money well?’”

Which central Ohio districts have the best results compared to funding?

The Dispatch compared overall spending per-pupil for central Ohio school districts to the ODEW’s performance index, using 2025 state data.

The Performance Index uses the performance level results for students in third grade through high school on Ohio’s state testing. The Performance Index (PI) score accounts for the level of achievement of every student, not just whether they are “proficient.” Higher performance levels receive larger weights in the calculation, but all achievement levels are included. Overall, the state average of performance scores was 91.8, according to 2025 state data.

Advertisement

The central Ohio school district with the highest spending was Columbus City Schools, which spent $24,505 per pupil and received a PI score of 60.7. The district with the highest PI was Grandview Heights Schools, which received a 106 PI score and spent $21,567 per pupil. New Albany-Plain Local Schools was a close second in PI at 105.1 while spending more than $4,000 less than Grandview Heights at $16,923 per-pupil.

Here’s how central Ohio schools stack up by spending versus achievements on tests, according to the Ohio Department of Education (sorted by highest spending per-pupil):

  • Columbus City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $24,505; PI score: 60.7
  • Grandview Heights Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,567; PI score: 106
  • Bexley City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,025; PI score: 102.7
  • Dublin City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18,702; PI score: 97.6
  • Worthington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18.573 ; PI score: 94.3
  • Madison-Plains Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $17,646; PI score: 88
  • New Albany-Plain Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,923; PI score: 105.1
  • Westerville City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,815; PI score: 89.7
  • Olentangy Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,780; PI score: 103.9
  • Groveport Madison Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,236; PI score: 72.6
  • Upper Arlington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,282; PI score: 103.6
  • Canal Winchester Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16.154; PI score: 89.1
  • Average Ohio school district – Spending per-pupil: $16,069; PI score: 91.8
  • Reynoldsburg City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,956; PI score: 72.2
  • Gahanna-Jefferson City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,742; PI score: 89.7
  • Hilliard City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,694; PI score: 90
  • South Western City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,600; PI score: 78.5
  • Whitehall City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,593; PI score: 66.95
  • Johnstown-Monroe Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,163; PI score: 94.5
  • Jonathan Alder Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,803; PI score: 95.9
  • Pickerington Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,470 ; PI score: 90.9
  • Big Walnut Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,239; PI score: 95.1
  • London City – Spending per-pupil: $13,750; PI score: 81.3
  • Marysville Exempted Village Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,608; PI score: 95.5
  • Licking Heights Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,585; PI score: 85.4
  • Hamilton Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,971; PI score: 82.2
  • Bloom-Carrol Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,720; PI score: 90.89
  • Licking Valley Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,587; PI score: 85

Cole Behrens covers K-12 education and school districts in central Ohio. Have a tip? Contact Cole at cbehrens@dispatch.com or connect with him on X at @Colebehr_report



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending