Connect with us

Ohio

No. 13 Ohio State 60, Iowa 59: Another Close Call

Published

on

No. 13 Ohio State 60, Iowa 59: Another Close Call


No. 13 Ohio State 60, Iowa 59: Another Close Call

Iowa’s bid for a fourth-straight Big Ten Tournament title — and what would have been a record-setting 12th consecutive Big Ten Tournament victory — came up just short on Friday night, as the Hawkeyes fell to No. 13 Ohio State, 60-59. The Hawkeyes led with under a minute to go, but couldn’t see out the victory; a pair of Cotie McMahon free throws with 6.7 seconds to go gave Ohio State its final lead of the game and the Hawkeyes weren’t able to convert a pair of scoring chances at the other end before time expired.

Advertisement

With the defeat, Iowa falls to 22-10 overall, while Ohio State improves to 25-5. The Hawkeyes will now have two weeks off until the 2025 NCAA Tournament gets underway.

The Deep Three breaks down the big takeaways from Iowa’s very narrow loss.

1. Almost Got ‘Em – Again

For all the strides Iowa has made in this rebuilding season without Lisa Bluder, Caitlin Clark, Kate Martin, Gabbie Marshall, and more, one thing has elude the new-look Hawkeyes under head coach Jan Jensen: close game success. Tonight’s defeat drops the Hawkeyes to 0-5 in one-possession games this year — that’s half of Iowa’s total losses for the season. Truly, one-score games have been Iowa’s kryptonite.

In several of those losses, Iowa has had potential game-winning (or game-tying) shots at the buzzer, but couldn’t convert. Addison O’Grady missed game-ending baskets at Oregon and against UCLA, while Sydney Affolter and Hannah Stuelke each got off unsuccessful potential game-winning shots tonight.

“I think when you go, you kind of think [of] your sets, sometimes you kind of go with who you think is going to hit the corner pocket,” said Jensen after the game. “Then I’ll go back and think, oh, maybe we should have thrown it inside. Maybe we shouldn’t have driven it.”

Advertisement

The end-of-game struggles in close games seem indicative of this Iowa team in a few ways. One, this team is good — and very, very close to being really good. It just hasn’t been able to quite get over that hump to win the tightest games. Two, this is a roster — and a coach — learning on the fly.

For the last four years, Iowa had the benefit of an all-time closer in Caitlin Clark, an offensive wizard with the ability to take — and make — any shot she wanted or draw a foul in the biggest moments. Iowa also had a head coach with a deep reserve of experience in Lisa Bluder, who could call upon those years of experience to try to find the right play in those key moments.

Don’t miss out on any of our exclusive football, basketball, and recruiting coverage. Sign up with Hawkeye Beacon here.

This Iowa team has no Clark and no Bluder; the Hawkeyes don’t have a go-to superstar to try and close out games and Jan Jensen is still feeling her way through late-game situations. She acknowledged as much after the game.

Advertisement

“I don’t feel like — I’m not dismayed by it. I just wish we would have did this a little better, but I think it’s just sport,” said Jensen. “Last night I felt pretty good about what I called. This one, I’m like, oh, maybe I should have gone a different way in that last 6.8 seconds.”

Close losses are always a bitter pill to swallow — lose a game by a point and it’s impossible not to think about what could have gone differently to reverse that result. A made layup here, a better pass there; a three-pointer that rattles in instead of out, a successful box-out and rebound; a whistle blown here, a foul not called there. And so on. Still: while the result stings, it doesn’t take away from what this team has accomplished over the last 6+ weeks. Iowa has gone 10-3, with two of the three defeats coming by a combined three points against teams ranked in the top-15 (and the third loss was in overtime).

2. A Defensive Identity

Iowa’s team identity during the Caitlin Clark era reflected its high-scoring superstar: an all-gas, no brakes offensive powerhouse. In the first year of the post-Clark era, the team’s identity swung back more towards the defensive side of the ball and that increased focus on defense was on full display on Friday night, as Iowa and Ohio State went toe-to-toe for 40 grinding and intense minutes.

The Buckeyes had the second-highest scoring offense in the Big Ten this year, averaging 80.0 ppg. On Friday, Iowa held them to just 60 points. The Hawkeyes limited Ohio State to 36.5% shooting from the floor, including a meager 35.5% on 2-point attempts (as well as 38.9% from beyond the arc). Those shooting numbers dipped to 27.3% from the field in the fourth quarter (though the Buckeyes did drain two of their seven three-pointers in the game in the back-and-forth final quarter).

Advertisement

Iowa forced 14 Ohio State turnovers and turned those giveaways into 12 points. The Hawkeyes had five steals and blocked four shots in the game, with Kylie Feuerbach leading the team in both categories, with two apiece. Feuerbach was maybe the most spectacular individual defender on the night, but Iowa’s defensive success was truly a team effort. “I thought we knew our personnel pretty well. I thought our defensive schemes, I think they were always in the moment,” said Jansen.

Switching to a zone defense led to a lot of Iowa’s success, as Ohio State head coach Kevin McGuff acknowledged. “They played zone defense the first time we played them, and we didn’t execute real well against it, and that gave us problems,” said McGuff.

“Late in the game we got better shots, but for a while there, we just kind of stood around and didn’t move ourselves, didn’t move the ball very effectively,” added McGuff. “Finally got it right at the end, but Iowa played really great defense tonight.”

Defense has been the backbone of Iowa’s mid-season turnaround and current 10-3 run — opponents eclipsed 70 points just twice in that run and one of those two games came in overtime. Locking down opponents created the platform for Iowa’s success in the Big Ten Tournament as well, as opponents averaged just 58.3 ppg in Iowa’s three tournament games. Maintaining that same defensive ferocity in the NCAA Tournament will be key to Iowa’s ability to put together any sort of run in this year’s tourney.

Advertisement

3. Shining Stars, Old and New

Five players scored all of Iowa’s 59 points, with four players accounting for 88% (52) of Iowa’s points in the game. This was not a spread-it-around scoring effort; instead Iowa relied on its best players to carry the load — and they more or less did.

Lucy Olsen, Hannah Stuelke, and Sydney Affolter led Iowa with 14 points apiece, though all three scored their points at different points in the game. Olsen kept Iowa afloat early in the game, when no one else could manage to get the ball to go through the basket; she had seven points in the first quarter and 12 total in the first half — nearly half of Iowa’s 28 points in the first 20 minutes. Olsen wasn’t particularly efficient — those 12 points came on 5-of-15 shooting — but Iowa just needed someone to make shots and Olsen was one of the few who could in the opening half.

In the second half, Olsen had just two points on 1-of-3 shooting, as Ohio State’s defense increased its pressure on her and focused on shutting down her scoring. Still, while she scored just two points in the second half, she was still very influential on offense, dishing five assists to get Iowa’s offense rolling.

Advertisement

Hannah Stuelke scored six of her 14 points in the second quarter as Iowa roared back into the game, then added six more in the third quarter as Iowa traded blows with Ohio State. Stuelke’s sharp cuts and smooth finishes around the basket helped pace Iowa’s offense in the middle of the game. She was also a force on the glass, hauling down 12 rebounds for her team-high seventh double-double of the season (and 11th of her Iowa career).

Meanwhile, Sydney Affolter scored nine of her 14 points in the second half — with six of those nine coming in the fourth quarter on back-to-back made three-pointers. Affolter’s huge made triples took Iowa from a 58-53 deficit to a 59-58 lead with just over a minute to go. For the game, Affolter was 4-of-5 from beyond the arc and made over half of Iowa’s three-pointers (7) for the entire game.

Olsen, Stuelke, and Affolter are familiar stars for Iowa, players who’ve produced at a high level several times this season (and in the past). But Friday night also saw the emergence of a newer star, as Ava Heiden followed up her breakthrough 11-point effort against Michigan State last night with a 10-point showing against the Buckeyes.

Advertisement

“Ava’s been coming, right? In my opinion, in my coaching career, whatever chair I sit on, the timing of when you kind of unleash can make all the difference,” said Jensen after the game. “I think Ava’s done a lot, and she’s showed she’s ready for the moments.”

She certainly has done that; 21 points over two games on 8-of-10 shooting is a head-turning performance. Heiden’s skills were on full display in both games — her deft touch around the rim, her crisp footwork in the post, her dazzling speed and finishing ability in transition. She’s made an extremely compelling case, both for more minutes in however many games Iowa still has left in this season — and especially for what she can offer in upcoming seasons as she continues to unlock her considerable abilities.

NEXT: For the first time since the 2019-20 Big Ten Tournament, Iowa won’t be playing on the weekend. Iowa had played in the last four Big Ten Tournament finals, winning the last three. Now Iowa will wait to see what seed they receive in the 2025 NCAA Tournament — and where they’ll be headed to play a first round game. The 2025 NCAA Tournament Selection Show is scheduled for Sunday, March 16 at 7 PM CT and will be televised by ESPN.



Source link

Advertisement

Ohio

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center

Published

on

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center


Thousands of people are expected to head to downtown Columbus for the 23rd annual Home Improvement Show this weekend.

Organizers say visitors can find ideas for everything from small interior design projects to major renovations.

The event is being held at the Ohio Expo Center and includes seminars, exhibits and demonstrations from local and national companies.

The show begins at noon Friday and runs until 6 p.m.

Advertisement

It continues Saturday from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Sunday from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Adult tickets cost $5 at the door.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator

Published

on

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator


Matt Patricia’s contract extension earlier this offseason included a pay raise that figures to make him the highest-paid assistant coach in college football this year.

But Patricia, who will make $3.75 million in guaranteed compensation as Ohio State’s defensive coordinator in 2026, also held an appreciation for his situation.

“Ohio State is such a special place, not only just the history, the tradition, the football program, the school, but the people here,” Patricia said. “Having a chance to have a little stability with my family, it’s hard when you have to move your family around, your kids and the new school and all that.”

Advertisement

Before he joined Ryan Day’s staff last year, the 51-year-old Patricia had bounced around as an assistant in the NFL for much of the decade.

He spent 2021 and 2022 in a variety of roles with the New England Patriots, then a year as a defensive assistant with the Philadelphia Eagles. He took off from coaching in 2024. The frequent relocation gave him perspective.

“We had an unbelievable experience settling into Columbus,” Patricia said. “Everybody’s been so nice and welcoming. It feels like home. It’s a big deal for us to be in a place where everybody’s happy. That’s really important.”

Advertisement

Patricia had a significant impact on the Buckeyes in his first year replacing Jim Knowles. Despite heavy roster attrition following their national championship season, he kept the defense atop the Football Bowl Subdivision. For the second straight season, no one allowed fewer points than Ohio State.

The 9.3 points per game allowed by the Buckeyes were the fewest by any defense since Alabama in 2011.

The success made Patricia a hot commodity on the coaching market, rebuilding his reputation as a sharp and creative football mind only a decade removed from his tenure as a Super Bowl-winning defensive coordinator for the Patriots. He was a finalist for the Broyles Award as the nation’s top assistant.

Patricia said he heard about opportunities in the NFL and elsewhere across the college football landscape, though none of them would pry him away from Ohio State.

Advertisement

“It wasn’t necessarily something where you’re looking to leave,” Patricia said, “but you do have to listen when those things come up. I’m just glad everything worked out.”

His challenge in his second season mirrors his previous one, as the Buckeyes are again managing the loss of eight starters on defense.

But unlike 2025, they have fewer returning pieces, relying on a larger class of transfers to help fill the holes on the depth chart.

“With as much coming into the program for the first time, not only are you trying to catch them up on the football scheme, but you’re also trying to catch them up on everything else,” Patricia said. “This is how we work, this is how we do things, this is the standard we’re looking for, this is how we practice, this is how we prepare, this is how we go to school. That has to be also taught. It becomes a lot, but that’s why you bring in the right guys that have the mental makeup to do all that.”

Joey Kaufman covers Ohio State football for The Columbus Dispatch. Email him at jkaufman@dispatch.com and follow him on @joeyrkaufman on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?

Published

on

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?


play

Which central Ohio school districts get the most bang for their buck?

On average, school districts in Ohio spend $16,069 per-pupil for education, according to the education think tank Fordham Institute.

Advertisement

However, different district types spend different amounts of money. For example, large urban districts with very high poverty spend around $21,000 per-pupil, but small towns with low poverty spend around $14,900. The district type closest to the state average are those considered rural and high poverty and suburban districts with low poverty.

Aaron Churchill, lead Ohio researcher for the Fordham Institute, said that urban districts – like Columbus City Schools, the state’s largest district – often have higher spending because they can pull more in tax revenue and the state supports them at a higher rate because they are serving a higher proportion of disadvantaged students. Small, high-poverty towns on the other hand, generate less tax revenue from property values and district employee wages, the highest expense for schools, may be lowered by less market competition.

Churchill said schools should be focused on directing their funding toward initiatives that improve student outcomes and achievement.

“It’s making sure we’re focused on quality, we’re focused on performance, and that we’re rewarding performance,” Churchill said. “And we don’t do enough of that in the education system now.”

Advertisement

Churchill said there is a long-running debate among education researchers about whether increasing spending translates to meaningful results for students. Overall, school funding has increased on average over $2,000 per-pupil since 2015 and reached a record-high in 2025, according to the Fordham Institute.

“You can see in the numbers that we’re spending more than we ever have,” Churchill said. “The real million-dollar question is ‘Can our schools spend the money well?’”

Which central Ohio districts have the best results compared to funding?

The Dispatch compared overall spending per-pupil for central Ohio school districts to the ODEW’s performance index, using 2025 state data.

The Performance Index uses the performance level results for students in third grade through high school on Ohio’s state testing. The Performance Index (PI) score accounts for the level of achievement of every student, not just whether they are “proficient.” Higher performance levels receive larger weights in the calculation, but all achievement levels are included. Overall, the state average of performance scores was 91.8, according to 2025 state data.

Advertisement

The central Ohio school district with the highest spending was Columbus City Schools, which spent $24,505 per pupil and received a PI score of 60.7. The district with the highest PI was Grandview Heights Schools, which received a 106 PI score and spent $21,567 per pupil. New Albany-Plain Local Schools was a close second in PI at 105.1 while spending more than $4,000 less than Grandview Heights at $16,923 per-pupil.

Here’s how central Ohio schools stack up by spending versus achievements on tests, according to the Ohio Department of Education (sorted by highest spending per-pupil):

  • Columbus City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $24,505; PI score: 60.7
  • Grandview Heights Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,567; PI score: 106
  • Bexley City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,025; PI score: 102.7
  • Dublin City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18,702; PI score: 97.6
  • Worthington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18.573 ; PI score: 94.3
  • Madison-Plains Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $17,646; PI score: 88
  • New Albany-Plain Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,923; PI score: 105.1
  • Westerville City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,815; PI score: 89.7
  • Olentangy Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,780; PI score: 103.9
  • Groveport Madison Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,236; PI score: 72.6
  • Upper Arlington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,282; PI score: 103.6
  • Canal Winchester Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16.154; PI score: 89.1
  • Average Ohio school district – Spending per-pupil: $16,069; PI score: 91.8
  • Reynoldsburg City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,956; PI score: 72.2
  • Gahanna-Jefferson City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,742; PI score: 89.7
  • Hilliard City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,694; PI score: 90
  • South Western City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,600; PI score: 78.5
  • Whitehall City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,593; PI score: 66.95
  • Johnstown-Monroe Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,163; PI score: 94.5
  • Jonathan Alder Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,803; PI score: 95.9
  • Pickerington Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,470 ; PI score: 90.9
  • Big Walnut Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,239; PI score: 95.1
  • London City – Spending per-pupil: $13,750; PI score: 81.3
  • Marysville Exempted Village Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,608; PI score: 95.5
  • Licking Heights Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,585; PI score: 85.4
  • Hamilton Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,971; PI score: 82.2
  • Bloom-Carrol Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,720; PI score: 90.89
  • Licking Valley Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,587; PI score: 85

Cole Behrens covers K-12 education and school districts in central Ohio. Have a tip? Contact Cole at cbehrens@dispatch.com or connect with him on X at @Colebehr_report



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending