Connect with us

Ohio

Disappointment hits Wisconsin again in 34-0 shutout loss to Ohio State

Published

on

Disappointment hits Wisconsin again in 34-0 shutout loss to Ohio State


The Wisconsin Badgers were shut out for the second consecutive week on Saturday, losing 34-0 to the Ohio State Buckeyes at Camp Randall Stadium to fall to 2-5 on the season and 0-4 in Big Ten play.

It was a tough game for the Badgers from the start, as they couldn’t get any offensive consistency, having four three-and-outs, another punt, and an interception in the first half.

Meanwhile, Ohio State flourished, scoring on three of its first four opening possessions and playing strong complementary football from start to finish.

“If I said it once at the end of the game, this’ll be the fifth or sixth time I’ve said it: I’m incredibly disappointed in a lot of things. Obviously, the scoreboard is probably the most notable,” head coach Luke Fickell said after the game. “To not find a way to put points on the board will never give us a chance. We know we have to be able to do that and we have to get a hell of a lot better at it.

Advertisement

Let’s get into our recap of the game.

The Badgers began the game with the ball, looking to put some early points up on the talented Ohio State defense, but the troubles for the offense continued as they have all season. Wisconsin went three-and-out to start the game, unable to generate any type of rhythm or momentum.

Ohio State, led by sophomore Julian Sayin, started the game on fire. Sayin connected on eight passes on the first drive for 95 yards and a touchdown. The score came on a 3rd & 12 when junior receiver Carnell Tate climbed the ladder to catch the ball over Wisconsin safeties Matt Jung and Austin Brown.

Down seven early, the offense needed to respond and retake the momentum. Wisconsin’s second drive started promisingly with a huge 15-yard catch by tight end Jackson McGohan. That drive was quickly derailed, however, when a dropped pass by Cade Yacamelli fell right into Sonny Styles’ hands for the first interception of the game. Styles returned it to the Wisconsin 43, setting up the Ohio State offense in a prime position to go up two scores.

The Badgers defense stood their ground though, allowing only a single first down. Ricardo Hallman came up with a big pass deflection in the endzone against Jeremiah Smith on 1st down, and from there, the front seven kept the Buckeyes from advancing. Sebastian Cheeks and Mason Posa combined for a sack on third down, forcing Ohio State to settle for a field goal and a 10-0 lead with four minutes left in the first quarter.

Advertisement

The Badgers offense remained stagnant—a common sight this season. With three straight run plays, Dilin Jones and Cade Yacamelli were getting beaten up by the Ohio State front four. Wisconsin punted after another three-and-out, their second in three drives. Through three possessions, the Badgers had totaled just 34 yards and an interception.

With a chance to go up three scores, Julian Sayin did not disappoint. Starting at their own 11-yard line, the Buckeyes picked up three first downs and 54 yards in just three plays. Following a couple of short runs from Bo Jackson, Sayin connected with Carnell Tate for a 10-yard touchdown pass. Similar to last week against Iowa, the Badgers faced a steep uphill battle, down 17-0 in the first quarter.

On their fourth drive, the Badgers finally showed some life, picking up three first downs and driving into Ohio State territory. Unfortunately, a set of penalties created a 3rd and 17 that ended with an incomplete pass when Hunter Simmons’ hand was hit as the ball came out. While the drive didn’t end well, there were signs of life. On 3rd and 12, Simmons found Lance Mason over the middle for 24 yards, and the play before saw Simmons execute the bootleg well, connecting with Mason for seven yards and a first down. Lance Mason has been one of the very few bright spots in the offense this season. Interestingly, the Badgers moved away from targeting Vinny Anthony and Trech Kekahuna, with neither receiving a single target through the first four drives.

The defense continued to battle, getting multiple stops following the first three scoring drives. With a 3rd and 2 at the Ohio State 22-yard line, the Badgers came up big, stuffing the run up the middle for one yard and forcing the punt. Freshman linebacker Cooper Catalano made the play on third down, shooting the gap and standing Bo Jackson up to prevent the first.

With a stop and some momentum finally on their side, the crowd was looking for offensive production, but it remained nonexistent. The Badgers went three and out for the third time in their first five drives, giving Ohio State another chance before halftime. The Buckeyes responded immediately. Superstar receiver Jeremiah Smith caught three straight passes totaling 27 yards. Following a set of rushes and precise passes from Sayin, the Buckeyes faced a 3rd and 4 at the Wisconsin 20-yard line. The Badgers defense came up big, forcing a fourth down and a subsequent missed field goal.

Advertisement

Still down 17-0 with one minute left in the half, the Badgers got the ball back but were clearly ready to take it to halftime. Wisconsin ran the ball three times before punting for the fourth time. Out of seven first-half drives, four ended with three-and-outs.

The Buckeyes offense was on fire in the first half, totaling over 200 passing yards and two touchdown passes. However, the Badgers’ run defense held strong, limiting the Buckeyes to just 35 first-half rushing yards.

Ohio State’s offense picked up right where it left off in the second half, driving downfield to the Wisconsin 17-yard line. Two passes to Carnell Tate—including a big 17-yard pitch and catch on 4th & 4—put Ohio State in prime scoring position. The Badgers defense stood firm as Christian Alliegro and Mason Reigor combined for a big 4-yard tackle for loss, setting up a long third down and eventually another field goal. Julian Sayin went 6-for-6 on the drive, totaling 60 yards, but was unable to convert in the red zone.

Unfortunately, the Badgers offense and Hunter Simmons couldn’t even come close to the red zone. On the following drive, Wisconsin finally committed to the pass game, but two straight incompletions led to yet another three-and-out. Without complementary football, it’s hard to win a game, but without an offense capable of gaining 100 total yards, it’s impossible. The defense continued to work hard and fight all game long, to no avail.

The Wisconsin linebacking corps also saw significant substitution. Look out for next week, as one of the freshman linebackers may take the start over Tackett Curtis, who did not have a great overall game today.

Advertisement

Ohio State continued to dominate offensively, scoring following another Wisconsin three-and-out. While the defense initially forced a fourth down, Ryan Day didn’t back down and called a quarterback sneak, getting the first down and letting Sayin take it from there. He connected with Bo Jackson and Quincy Porter for gains of 16 and 22 yards, respectively. Running back Isaiah West also had a big 15-yard rush to put the Buckeyes at the Wisconsin 4-yard line. From there, Sayin connected on a tight end pop pass for a touchdown—his third passing touchdown of the game—putting the Buckeyes up 27-0 with a minute left in the third quarter.

The Badgers were backed up on the ensuing possession. After a third-down sack on Hunter Simmons that ended his day, Wisconsin faced a 4th and 19. Looking for a lifeline, freshman punter Sean West came up with a huge run, breaking tackles and fighting his way to a first down—the second biggest offensive play of the game. The energy brought by the punter was quickly killed by the offense, and the ball was punted right back to the Buckeyes.

Sayin was ready to put the final nail in the coffin, driving downfield, this time on the ground. Running backs Bo Jackson and Isaiah West carried the ball a combined seven times for 33 yards. The icing on the cake was a beautiful pass from Julian Sayin to Brandon Innis on a deep crosser at the back of the endzone, putting the Buckeyes up 34-0.

At this point, Wisconsin fans were extremely frustrated, and the “Fire Fickell” chants started again. Some fans in the student section even mimicked what Oklahoma State fans were doing, taking their shirts off and swinging them over their heads.

With one last chance to avoid the shutout, the Badgers offense—with Danny O’Neil at the helm—tried to put together some sort of last-ditch scoring attempt. With running backs Dilin Jones and Durrion Dupree out, Gideon Ituka got the nod, rushing for 30 yards on three attempts. The drive stalled yet again. On 4th and 5, Danny O’Neil couldn’t find anyone past the sticks and threw a hospital ball to Trech for no gain.

Advertisement

Ohio State came into Camp Randall and made it their second home, shutting out the Badgers and putting up 34 points. The Badgers look to have a long season ahead and a lot of changes coming their way during the offseason if they want to compete in the Big Ten.



Source link

Ohio

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center

Published

on

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center


Thousands of people are expected to head to downtown Columbus for the 23rd annual Home Improvement Show this weekend.

Organizers say visitors can find ideas for everything from small interior design projects to major renovations.

The event is being held at the Ohio Expo Center and includes seminars, exhibits and demonstrations from local and national companies.

The show begins at noon Friday and runs until 6 p.m.

Advertisement

It continues Saturday from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Sunday from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Adult tickets cost $5 at the door.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator

Published

on

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator


Matt Patricia’s contract extension earlier this offseason included a pay raise that figures to make him the highest-paid assistant coach in college football this year.

But Patricia, who will make $3.75 million in guaranteed compensation as Ohio State’s defensive coordinator in 2026, also held an appreciation for his situation.

“Ohio State is such a special place, not only just the history, the tradition, the football program, the school, but the people here,” Patricia said. “Having a chance to have a little stability with my family, it’s hard when you have to move your family around, your kids and the new school and all that.”

Advertisement

Before he joined Ryan Day’s staff last year, the 51-year-old Patricia had bounced around as an assistant in the NFL for much of the decade.

He spent 2021 and 2022 in a variety of roles with the New England Patriots, then a year as a defensive assistant with the Philadelphia Eagles. He took off from coaching in 2024. The frequent relocation gave him perspective.

“We had an unbelievable experience settling into Columbus,” Patricia said. “Everybody’s been so nice and welcoming. It feels like home. It’s a big deal for us to be in a place where everybody’s happy. That’s really important.”

Advertisement

Patricia had a significant impact on the Buckeyes in his first year replacing Jim Knowles. Despite heavy roster attrition following their national championship season, he kept the defense atop the Football Bowl Subdivision. For the second straight season, no one allowed fewer points than Ohio State.

The 9.3 points per game allowed by the Buckeyes were the fewest by any defense since Alabama in 2011.

The success made Patricia a hot commodity on the coaching market, rebuilding his reputation as a sharp and creative football mind only a decade removed from his tenure as a Super Bowl-winning defensive coordinator for the Patriots. He was a finalist for the Broyles Award as the nation’s top assistant.

Patricia said he heard about opportunities in the NFL and elsewhere across the college football landscape, though none of them would pry him away from Ohio State.

Advertisement

“It wasn’t necessarily something where you’re looking to leave,” Patricia said, “but you do have to listen when those things come up. I’m just glad everything worked out.”

His challenge in his second season mirrors his previous one, as the Buckeyes are again managing the loss of eight starters on defense.

But unlike 2025, they have fewer returning pieces, relying on a larger class of transfers to help fill the holes on the depth chart.

“With as much coming into the program for the first time, not only are you trying to catch them up on the football scheme, but you’re also trying to catch them up on everything else,” Patricia said. “This is how we work, this is how we do things, this is the standard we’re looking for, this is how we practice, this is how we prepare, this is how we go to school. That has to be also taught. It becomes a lot, but that’s why you bring in the right guys that have the mental makeup to do all that.”

Joey Kaufman covers Ohio State football for The Columbus Dispatch. Email him at jkaufman@dispatch.com and follow him on @joeyrkaufman on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?

Published

on

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?


play

Which central Ohio school districts get the most bang for their buck?

On average, school districts in Ohio spend $16,069 per-pupil for education, according to the education think tank Fordham Institute.

Advertisement

However, different district types spend different amounts of money. For example, large urban districts with very high poverty spend around $21,000 per-pupil, but small towns with low poverty spend around $14,900. The district type closest to the state average are those considered rural and high poverty and suburban districts with low poverty.

Aaron Churchill, lead Ohio researcher for the Fordham Institute, said that urban districts – like Columbus City Schools, the state’s largest district – often have higher spending because they can pull more in tax revenue and the state supports them at a higher rate because they are serving a higher proportion of disadvantaged students. Small, high-poverty towns on the other hand, generate less tax revenue from property values and district employee wages, the highest expense for schools, may be lowered by less market competition.

Churchill said schools should be focused on directing their funding toward initiatives that improve student outcomes and achievement.

“It’s making sure we’re focused on quality, we’re focused on performance, and that we’re rewarding performance,” Churchill said. “And we don’t do enough of that in the education system now.”

Advertisement

Churchill said there is a long-running debate among education researchers about whether increasing spending translates to meaningful results for students. Overall, school funding has increased on average over $2,000 per-pupil since 2015 and reached a record-high in 2025, according to the Fordham Institute.

“You can see in the numbers that we’re spending more than we ever have,” Churchill said. “The real million-dollar question is ‘Can our schools spend the money well?’”

Which central Ohio districts have the best results compared to funding?

The Dispatch compared overall spending per-pupil for central Ohio school districts to the ODEW’s performance index, using 2025 state data.

The Performance Index uses the performance level results for students in third grade through high school on Ohio’s state testing. The Performance Index (PI) score accounts for the level of achievement of every student, not just whether they are “proficient.” Higher performance levels receive larger weights in the calculation, but all achievement levels are included. Overall, the state average of performance scores was 91.8, according to 2025 state data.

Advertisement

The central Ohio school district with the highest spending was Columbus City Schools, which spent $24,505 per pupil and received a PI score of 60.7. The district with the highest PI was Grandview Heights Schools, which received a 106 PI score and spent $21,567 per pupil. New Albany-Plain Local Schools was a close second in PI at 105.1 while spending more than $4,000 less than Grandview Heights at $16,923 per-pupil.

Here’s how central Ohio schools stack up by spending versus achievements on tests, according to the Ohio Department of Education (sorted by highest spending per-pupil):

  • Columbus City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $24,505; PI score: 60.7
  • Grandview Heights Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,567; PI score: 106
  • Bexley City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,025; PI score: 102.7
  • Dublin City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18,702; PI score: 97.6
  • Worthington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18.573 ; PI score: 94.3
  • Madison-Plains Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $17,646; PI score: 88
  • New Albany-Plain Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,923; PI score: 105.1
  • Westerville City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,815; PI score: 89.7
  • Olentangy Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,780; PI score: 103.9
  • Groveport Madison Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,236; PI score: 72.6
  • Upper Arlington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,282; PI score: 103.6
  • Canal Winchester Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16.154; PI score: 89.1
  • Average Ohio school district – Spending per-pupil: $16,069; PI score: 91.8
  • Reynoldsburg City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,956; PI score: 72.2
  • Gahanna-Jefferson City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,742; PI score: 89.7
  • Hilliard City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,694; PI score: 90
  • South Western City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,600; PI score: 78.5
  • Whitehall City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,593; PI score: 66.95
  • Johnstown-Monroe Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,163; PI score: 94.5
  • Jonathan Alder Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,803; PI score: 95.9
  • Pickerington Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,470 ; PI score: 90.9
  • Big Walnut Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,239; PI score: 95.1
  • London City – Spending per-pupil: $13,750; PI score: 81.3
  • Marysville Exempted Village Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,608; PI score: 95.5
  • Licking Heights Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,585; PI score: 85.4
  • Hamilton Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,971; PI score: 82.2
  • Bloom-Carrol Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,720; PI score: 90.89
  • Licking Valley Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,587; PI score: 85

Cole Behrens covers K-12 education and school districts in central Ohio. Have a tip? Contact Cole at cbehrens@dispatch.com or connect with him on X at @Colebehr_report



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending