North Dakota

Group aiming to raise bar for changing North Dakota Constitution submits signatures

Published

on


BISMARCK — A gaggle of North Dakotans making an attempt to boost the brink for amending the state structure has taken a step towards getting its measure to seem on the November poll.

Secretary of State Al Jaeger introduced Friday, April 22, that the measure’s sponsoring committee turned in what it says are about 33,600 signatures in assist of creating it harder to alter the state’s guiding authorized doc.

If Jaeger’s workplace deems no less than 31,164 signatures got here from certified North Dakota residents, the measure will probably be positioned on the Nov. 8 poll.

Below state regulation, constitutional measures can move with a easy majority vote — a bar the group believes is just too low. The measure would elevate that requirement to 60% of the voters in an election. The proposal would additionally mandate that solely a single topic may be addressed in a constitutional poll measure.

Advertisement

The group’s effort comes after a number of profitable constitutional measures handed lately, together with one which established the state Ethics Fee in 2018.

Measure supporters, like Former North Dakota Adjutant Basic Mike Haugen, imagine having an easy-to-change structure

trivializes the necessary doc

and leaves the door open for out-of-state pursuits to flood constitutional initiative campaigns with cash.

Critics of the measure say it makes an attempt to restrict North Dakota residents’ participation in state authorities.

Advertisement

In 2020, voters overwhelmingly rejected a measure backed by the Legislature to offer lawmakers a say in approving constitutional initiatives.

Delivering signatures doesn’t assure a measure will seem on the poll.

Jaeger introduced final month {that a} proposed measure to set time period limits on legislators and governors

is not going to seem on the November poll

after 1000’s of signed petitions failed to fulfill authorized requirements. Backers of the time period limits measure have vowed to combat again, accusing Jaeger’s workplace of improperly tossing the signatures.

Advertisement





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Exit mobile version