Connect with us

Nebraska

Bacon brings backup from Legislature to bash Vargas in 2nd District • Nebraska Examiner

Published

on

Bacon brings backup from Legislature to bash Vargas in 2nd District • Nebraska Examiner


OMAHA — U.S. Rep. Don Bacon brought some Republican friends from the Nebraska Legislature to the food fight in his Omaha-based 2nd District race against Democratic State Sen. Tony Vargas. 

Revenue Committee Chairwoman Lou Ann Linehan, Speaker John Arch and other GOP lawmakers helped Bacon amplify some of his recent criticisms of Vargas’ record.

U.S. Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., criticizes Democratic State Sen. Tony Vargas, his opponent in the 2nd District U.S. House race in Nebraska’s 2nd Congressional District. State Sen. Lou Ann Linehan (right) listens as he speaks. (Aaron Sanderford/Nebraska Examiner)

Linehan, whose committee handles tax-cut proposals, relished reinforcing Bacon’s debate critiques that Vargas was often an impediment to passing property tax relief proposals.

She has skewered senators who claim credit for passing tax cuts but rarely provided her one of the 33 votes needed to break a filibuster until it’s clear a measure has overwhelming support.

Advertisement

“We have a saying down there that it’s hard to get to 33, but boy then do you get to 42,” she said. “The idea that he ran ads saying he fought for property taxes (relief) is just not true.”

Former State Sen. Brett Lindstrom, who has been appearing more with Bacon after many have speculated he might run in the 2nd District when Bacon retires, supported Linehan’s criticism. 

State Sen. Brett Lindstrom
State Sen. Brett Lindstrom of Omaha (Courtesy of Lindstrom campaign)

He worked with Vargas but said his participation in the Bacon press conference “was just business,” not personal. He said he struggled to get Vargas’ vote for income tax cuts.

“What you see on the advertisements is not particularly accurate,” said Lindstrom, a former GOP gubernatorial candidate who acknowledged interest in an open-seat 2nd District bid. 

Vargas defends record

Vargas pointed during debates with Bacon to votes in support of $6 billion in tax cuts or tax relief. He also touted his being named a defender of taxpayers by a conservative organization.

Vargas said Wednesday in a statement that he was proud of his record of supporting tax relief and said that no amount of partisan machinations can change what he has done.

Advertisement

His defenders in the Legislature point to his work on the Appropriations Committee and call him a serious legislator who spent much of his time trying to steer funding.

State Sen. Tony Vargas of Omaha, a Democrat, answers questions after his 2nd District debate Sunday at KETV with U.S. Rep. Don Bacon, a Republican. (Aaron Sanderford/Nebraska Examiner)

“MAGA Republicans can say whatever they want three weeks before an election to try to keep Don Bacon in office, but my record is clear,” Vargas said in response to the press conference. 

Vargas used the term MAGA, which is short for Make America Great Again, the campaign slogan of former President Donald Trump. He often points out Bacon has endorsed Trump three times.

Trump is popular statewide in Nebraska, and he won the 2nd District in 2016. But President Joe Biden beat Trump in the 2nd District in 2020, securing a stray Electoral College vote.

Nebraska and Maine award an electoral vote to the winner in each congressional district, as well as awarding two electoral votes to the winner of the presidential popular vote statewide.

Vargas supporters seek to tie Bacon to Trump and to tie Vargas to Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign. They argue Bacon enables Trump. Harris polls better than Trump in the 2nd District.

Advertisement

Bacon points to public spats between him and Trump over infrastructure funding and more and says he faced a primary challenger this spring for being insufficiently MAGA.

Bacon, Vargas spend final 2nd District debate swinging for undecideds

More than taxes

Bacon’s GOP crew did more than talk taxes. State Sen. Kathleen Kauth, an ally of police unions, slammed Vargas for supporting juvenile justice reforms that Linehan joined Vargas in backing.

Linehan acknowledged to reporters that she, like Vargas, had supported the broader criminal justice package that included the amendment making it harder to detain underage offenders.

She said the Legislature often has to compromise and that not everyone will support everything in a package that contains items they want to pass. Linehan is term-limited.

Advertisement

Kauth then bashed Vargas for opposing her legislation limiting access to some gender care for transgender minors and her bill seeking to restrict them from using certain school bathrooms and locker rooms.

State Sen. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha criticizes State Sen. Tony Vargas of Omaha for opposing her legislation limiting health care for trans minors and other legislation limiting access to school bathrooms and locker rooms for trans students. (Aaron Sanderford/Nebraska Examiner)

“He did not support that at all,” Kauth said. 

Some advocates for trans youth have argued that such legislation risks increasing the risks of self-harm and suicide to a population of children already at greater risk of suffering.

Kauth’s trans health care bill was combined with Nebraska’s current abortion ban, at 12 weeks gestational age, with exceptions for the life of the mother and for rape and incest.

Vargas supports abortion rights. Bacon has co-sponsored federal legislation that would have effectively banned abortion, and the language did not contain exceptions, though he has long said he supports exceptions.

Lately, Bacon has said he accepts Nebraska’s current ban as where the people are and said he would support Initiative 434, which largely sets current law as a ceiling but sets no floor.

Advertisement

Vargas and his campaign have criticized Bacon for trying to soften his abortion stance without acknowledging that Bacon co-sponsored legislation with no exceptions.

Bacon has argued that the legislation did not contain the word abortion and would not have penalized women getting an abortion. But legal experts said it would have made the procedure illegal.

On Wednesday, Bacon said that Vargas is emphasizing abortion because it’s “the only issue he has.” Bacon said voters care more about inflation and jobs, immigration and public safety.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement

Nebraska

Go Big Redcast: Diving into Nebraska’s Big Game in Hoosier Land

Published

on

Go Big Redcast: Diving into Nebraska’s Big Game in Hoosier Land


© 2024 ABG-SI LLC – SPORTS ILLUSTRATED IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF ABG-SI LLC. – All Rights Reserved. The content on this site is for entertainment and educational purposes only. All betting content is intended for an audience ages 21+. All advice, including picks and predictions, is based on individual commentators’ opinions and not that of Minute Media or its related brands. All picks and predictions are suggestions only. No one should expect to make money from the picks and predictions discussed on this website. For more information, please read our Legal Disclaimer. Gambling content intended for 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, crisis counseling and referral services can be accessed by calling 1-800-GAMBLER.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nebraska

Big Ten Network Breaks Down Nebraska Football at Indiana

Published

on

Big Ten Network Breaks Down Nebraska Football at Indiana


Nebraska football is just days away from another shot at getting that first win over a ranked opponent since the Mike Riley era.

The Huskers have lost 25 straight games to Top 25 teams since 2016. That’s the second-longest active streak among power conference teams, only trailing the 40 straight by Rutgers.

On Wednesday, the Big Ten Network’s “B1G Today” looked at Nebraska’s Saturday game at No. 16 Indiana. Dave Revsine and Ashley Adamson discussed the game as part of the show’s “B1G Story”.

“This IU story has captured everyone’s imagination,” Revsine began. “It’s pretty amazing to think that they are unbeaten at this point.”

Advertisement
Nebraska football's Memorial Stadium has sold out every home game since 1962.

Nebraska football’s Memorial Stadium has sold out every home game since 1962. / Nebraska Athletics

The Hoosiers are undefeated through six games for the first time since 1967. The Huskers, however, are an overtime away from also being unblemished.

“The thing I’m most focused on is that Indiana offense, which has been absolutely fabulous, against a Nebraska defense, which has been airtight for most of this year,” Revsine said.

Indiana is top 10 in the nation in total offense, passing offense, third down conversation percentage, and scoring. Nebraska is top in the nation in rushing defense, sacks, and red zone defense.

“It’s strength on strength,” Adamson said. “This is the game that may teach us potentially the most in week eight.”

Adamson said Indiana is now dealing with raised expectations, from just getting to a bowl game in Curt Cignetti’s first season so already being bowl eligible at the midway point of the season.

Advertisement

“When you win games, the games get bigger. That’s exactly what has happened in Bloomington. They have passed every test since Curt Cignetti has taken over, but obviously, Dave, as you look at the schedule and it starts Saturday with Nebraska, those tests are about to get harder,” Adamson said.

Indiana Hoosiers head coach Curt Cignetti looks on from the sidelines against the Northwestern Wildcats.

Oct 5, 2024; Evanston, Illinois, USA; Indiana Hoosiers head coach Curt Cignetti looks on from the sidelines against the Northwestern Wildcats during the first half at Lanny and Sharon Martin Stadium. / David Banks-Imagn Images

Heading into week eight, none of the teams to have faced Indiana currently hold a winning record—16-20 overall. Of the final six games, four currently have winning records—22-15 overall, including 5-1 Nebraska.

“The question for me is what does Nebraska look like,” Adamson said. “Dylan Raiola, we’ve seen him show up in big moments but what does he look like on the road in a big time environment on Saturday.”

Raiola is 1-0 at the collegiate level in road games, having led the 28-10 win at Purdue at the end of September.

Revsine pointed out Nebraska’s need to clean up the special teams. NU is last in the country in allowing both punts and kicks to be blocked.

Advertisement

“That’s a very significant warning sign that you’ve got a little bit of work to do there in special teams,” Revsine said.

As for the offense, Revsine wondered how good Nebraska is.

“Are they great? Is this a great run game? I don’t think it’s a great run game,” Revsine said. “I think what has stood out to me is the decision making from Dylan Raiola has been pretty good.”

Nebraska quarterback Dylan Raiola scans the Rutgers defense.

Nebraska quarterback Dylan Raiola scans the Rutgers defense. / Kenny Larabee, KLIN

Revsine and Adamson echoed each other in that this is the toughest game of the season so far for either team.

“How good are these teams, truly,” Revsine said. “I think they’re good. I think they’re improved. Nebraska fans would be so delighted to get a win this week and just get the bowl thing out of the way and then see where this can get them.”

Advertisement

For anyone living under a rock, Nebraska has the longest bowl drought in power conference football, going back to the 2016 season.

“You’d end the bowl drought. You get all those monkeys off your back and then you could say, ‘Hey where’s this season going to take us?’ Because I think there’s still a chance for it to take them to a really good place.”

You can watch the full segment at the top. Nebraska and Indiana kickoff Saturday at 11 a.m. CDT. The game will be televised on FOX, with the Big Noon Kickoff crew on site.

MORE: The Stretch Big: Nebrasketball Scrimmage Overreaction

MORE: Carriker Chronicles: Indiana-Nebraska Football Prediction Show with a Hoosiers Insider

MORE: Dave Feit’s Nebraska Midseason Coaching Grades

MORE: Nebraska-Indiana Preview with Sammy Jacobs of Hoosier Huddle

MORE: Analytics Preview of Nebraska vs. Indiana

Stay up to date on all things Huskers by bookmarking Nebraska Cornhuskers On SI, subscribing to HuskerMax on YouTube, and visiting HuskerMax.com daily.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nebraska

Nebraska Supreme Court restores LB 20 and lets people with felony pasts register to vote • Nebraska Examiner

Published

on

Nebraska Supreme Court restores LB 20 and lets people with felony pasts register to vote • Nebraska Examiner


OMAHA — The Nebraska Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen was wrong to stop registering voters under a new state law eliminating the two-year wait for people who have served a sentence for a felony conviction.

The court did not decide the constitutional question raised by Evnen and Attorney General Mike Hilgers — which branch of state government has the authority to set the timing of when people who have served a sentence for a felony conviction can vote.

Judges of the Nebraska Supreme Court (and when they were appointed), front row from left: Lindsey Miller-Lerman (1998), Chief Justice Michael Heavican (2006), William Cassel (2012). Back row, from left: Jonathan Papik (2018), Stephanie Stacy (2015), Jeffrey Funke (2016) and John Freudenberg (2018). (Courtesy of the court)

Evnen and Hilgers, in an advisory legal opinion that Evnen cited in deciding to ignore Legislative Bill 20, argued that only the executive branch’s Pardons Board that they and Gov. Jim Pillen serve on can constitutionally restore a person’s civil rights.

Lawyers from ACLU Nebraska, arguing on behalf of Civic Nebraska and two Nebraskans prepared to register to vote, argued that the Legislature has case law and past practice on its side in setting the timing of when someone can legally vote.

Advertisement

One of them is Gregory Spung of Omaha, a plaintiff in the case, who plans to register as a nonpartisan voter. He had registered online before Evnen’s decision and retracted it after Evnen’s decision. He said in a statement that he was “ecstatic.”

For so long, I was uncertain if my voice would truly count under this law. Today’s decision reaffirms the fundamental principle that every vote matters.

– Gregory Spung, plaintiff

Advertisement

“For so long, I was uncertain if my voice would truly count under this law,” Spung said. “Today’s decision reaffirms the fundamental principle that every vote matters. It’s a victory not just for me, but for thousands of Nebraskans.”

The other plaintiff, Jeremy Jonak of Wood River, who plans to register as a Republican, said the decision lifted “a weight off my shoulders” and that of other Nebraskans who had been waiting. He said people had earned a second chance.

Advertisement

“The truth is most of us are just trying to live our lives and leave the past behind us,” Jonak said. “Thanks to this decision, we get to have a say as part of our communities.”

Neither Evnen nor Hilgers had an immediate comment Wednesday. An Evnen spokeswoman said a press release was coming Wednesday afternoon. A Hilgers spokeswoman said they were reviewing the ruling and would have a statement soon.

The narrower ruling means the court could not find five justices who agree on the constitutionality or unconstitutionality of LB 20 or its predecessor, LB 53 from 2005. LB 53 had restored voting rights two years after serving a criminal sentence.

Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

Under Nebraska’s constitution, it takes five justices to declare a law unconstitutional. Because the court did not rule the law unconstitutional, Evnen and Hilgers are likely out of time to stop registrations for the Nov. 5 general election, now less than three weeks away. 

The court essentially took the simplest of the arguments ACLU lawyer Jane Seu made during oral arguments in late August: that Evnen and Hilgers should have known that the law of the land is the law of the land until a court rules it unconstitutional. 

The ruling means the thousands of people that voting rights advocates said were poised to be newly registered will get their chance, if advocates can execute a plan they discussed to let people know they can now register to vote this fall.

Advertisement

Seu called it “justice.”

ACLU Nebraska attorney Jane Seu speaks after Nebraska Supreme Court oral arguments in Lincoln. (Aaron Sanderford/Nebraska Examiner)

“Given the sheer scale of disenfranchisement that this decision corrects, there is no question that it will be remembered as one of our state’s most consequential voting rights decisions,” she said in a statement Wednesday.

RISE, a re-entry program for incarcerated Nebraskans and others in the justice system, has said more than 7,000 people could be newly eligible to vote. Several have discussed the importance of being able to participate fully as key to re-entry efforts.

Thousands more who were also in limbo after Evnen’s move got the reassurance that their voting rights are still sound, the people who had waited two years under the 2005 law and had already registered to vote — and in many cases voted previously.

The time to register voters is tight. Friday is the last day for Nebraskans to register to vote by mail or online for the 2024 general election. The deadline for registering in-person at a county elections office is Oct. 25.

Civic Nebraska, part of a group trying to organize and register voters in time, the Voting Rights Restoration Coalition, said partners would be calling, texting and reaching out to voters to make sure they know of the ruling and their rights.

Advertisement

“From now on, every eligible voter in our state can exercise their constitutional right to participate in our democratic system,” said Steve Smith, a spokesman for Civic Nebraska.

state-ex-rel-spung-v-evnen

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending