Connect with us

Missouri

Requests for emergency contraception kits surge amid policy uncertainty

Published

on

Requests for emergency contraception kits surge amid policy uncertainty


JEFFERSON CITY — The demand for emergency contraception kits has spiked following the presidential election, a trend driven by growing concerns over potential changes in reproductive health policies, according to Leslie Klote, the communications manager for the Missouri Family Health Council.

The spike comes despite major wins for abortion-rights advocates across the nation, with reproductive rights being added to seven state constitutions, including Missouri’s with the passage of Amendment 3. The anticipation of another Donald Trump presidency has seemingly left some women fearful for emergency contraception nationwide, national news outlets report.

“The spike is definitely due to fear and uncertainty,” Klote said. “People are scared of what these new administrations, both at the state and federal levels, could mean for birth control access.”

Advertisement

The Missouri Family Health Council distributes kits that include two doses of over-the-counter emergency contraception, safer sex supplies like condoms, and information on health care resources, such as birth control and STD testing services provided by health centers across the state. Kits are mailed directly to individuals, and they can also be picked up at community distribution points throughout Missouri.

Before the 2020 presidential election, the organization received about 19 requests a day. But in the days following the election, that number surged to 150 requests per day.

“Folks are just taking all precautions they can to ensure that they are able to plan what their families look like and if and when they have families on their own timelines,” Klote said.

Klote said the trend is part of a larger, national movement in which individuals are exploring every available option during an uncertain political climate.

“It’s inspiring to see how many folks are taking advantage of this program,” she said. “People of all ages need birth control, including emergency contraception.”

Advertisement

Laura Bellis, the executive director of the Take Control Initiative, said her program has been slammed with the demand.

Take Control Initiative is an Oklahoma-based contraceptive access program.

“Before the election, we were seeing about 25 to 100 orders a day, so like 70 on average a day,” Bellis said. “The day after the election, we saw over 1,000 orders. The day after that, that doubled, and we saw over 2,000, and it continued to climb.”

The organization has since taken down some of its advertisements so it doesn’t exceed capacity.

“It has settled down a bit; it’s more like 600 a day,” Bellis said.

Advertisement

But that uptick isn’t being felt on the ground in Columbia — at least, not at smaller pharmacies like Flow’s Pharmacy and Kilgore’s.

Managers there said they haven’t seen any noticeable shifts in buying trends for Plan B.

Bellis said the national trend reminds her of panic-buying during the pandemic.

“While we did expect the potential for increased demand, we’ve seen this type of thing before — this has just been so much higher than it has been in the past.”

Still, she said she isn’t afraid of a shortage.

Advertisement

“There are enough pharmaceutical brands, and I think there is enough variety there,” she said. “I think more so it just highlights concerns that people have overall over what resources will be available to them in the future.”

Women are also taking to social media to tell others why they should stock up on Plan B.

Earlier this month, TikTok user @_brynn_182, who didn’t wish to disclose her last name, talked about purchasing both emergency contraception and a pregnancy test.

“You could be somebody like me, on birth control, not dating anyone,” she said. “But this is for emergencies … I live in Oklahoma, and I can’t get an abortion super easily if my life depended on it or if I wanted it.”

She told KOMU 8 that she believes everyone should have at least one or two Plan B doses for emergencies considering their shelf life.

Advertisement

“If a shortage does occur, I would hope the people distributing the products would recognize the demand is higher and adjust accordingly,” she said.

And it’s not just women in their teens and 20s requesting emergency contraceptive kits, Bellis said.

“A lot of who we are hearing from and who are reaching out and asking questions to get the emergency contraception have been parents of young people who are worried, and sometimes it’s someone who is not even a teenager yet,” Bellis said.

The Missouri Family Health Council continues to offer kits statewide. Kits can be requested through the council’s website and are shipped directly to individuals.

Advertisement



Source link

Missouri

Boone Health files lawsuit against Missouri Heart Center, alleging contract breaches, data misuse

Published

on

Boone Health files lawsuit against Missouri Heart Center, alleging contract breaches, data misuse


COLUMBIA, Mo. (KMIZ) 

Boone Health is suing a Columbia-based cardiology group, alleging breaches of contract, misuse of confidential information and plans to engage in unlawful competition.

The lawsuit, filed in Boone County Circuit Court, targets Missouri Cardiovascular Specialists LLP, also known as the Missouri Heart Center or MO Heart, which has provided cardiology services to Boone Health for more than a decade. According to court documents, a renewed agreement was signed in 2021 covering professional services and management of Boone Health’s cardiology operations.

Boone Health alleges it paid the cardiology group millions of dollars under those agreements for staffing, administrative oversight and revenue cycle management, which included access to sensitive financial and patient-related data. In return, MO Heart and its physicians agreed to noncompete and confidentiality provisions designed to protect Boone Health’s business interests.

Advertisement

The health system claims MO Heart violated those agreements by preparing to launch a competing cardiology practice in the Columbia area, potentially as soon as the contracts expire on May 6, 2026. The lawsuit alleges the new venture would fall within a restricted geographic area and time frame outlined in the noncompete clause, which Boone Health argues is enforceable under Missouri law.

Boone Health also accuses MO Heart of disclosing or misusing confidential information, including billing rates, reimbursement data and strategic business details during its transition to new partnerships with outside organizations. Boone Health alleges in the lawsuit those actions could cause “severe and irreparable injury.”

In addition, Boone Health claims MO Heart obstructed access to critical systems and data. The lawsuit alleges the cardiology group cut off Boone Health’s access to a key billing and patient information platform and stopped sharing necessary data, raising concerns about continuity of patient care.

Boone Health alleged that MO Heart indicated that it intends to operate independently and has taken the position that the noncompete provisions are unenforceable, according to the filing.

Boone Health is asking a judge to rule the noncompete agreements that MO Heart signed are valid, as well as having MO Heart return or destroy confidential information, and delay starting a competing practice until May 2027. 

Advertisement

A jury trial has been requested.

A spokesperson for Boone Health told ABC 17 News that it would provide additional details early next week. 

Dr. James T. Elliott of MO Heart disagreed with allegations in the lawsuit through a written statement.

“For months, we have tried to meet with leadership team at Boone Health to work constructively towards a new, collaborative arrangement that would preserve access to and expand high‑quality care for our patients and for the entire community. Unfortunately, Boone refused to engage with us in any meaningful way. Instead, we have been met with a series of escalating legal threats, culminating in today’s filing,” the statement reads.

“Earlier today Boone Health filed a lawsuit against Missouri Heart Center. We disagree with the lawsuit’s allegations and believe those claims are both legally and factually incorrect. This litigation does not change our commitment to caring for patients.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri bill that would split Jackson County and Kansas City gets little support from lawmakers

Published

on

Missouri bill that would split Jackson County and Kansas City gets little support from lawmakers


A Missouri House committee had its first hearing this week on a proposed constitutional amendment that would split Kansas City and Jackson County upon approval by voters.

The legislation is nicknamed “Jackxit,” a nod to Brexit, the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union in 2020.

Republican state Rep. Mike Steinmeyer is sponsoring the bill. He said eastern Jackson County voters feel underrepresented in the county government, and this legislation would give them the power to change that.

At the hearing, committee members listened to Steinmeyer’s presentation of the bill before asking questions and sharing their thoughts.

Advertisement

Democratic state Rep. Bridget Walsh Moore compared what the bill proposes to “The Great Divorce” that saw the legal separation of the city of St. Louis from St. Louis County in 1876.

Several committee members criticized a part of the bill that says if it’s signed into law, the question of whether to split the county in two would appear on the Missouri ballot every 10 years.

Moore called it a “never-ending clause.”

“There’s a provision that says every 10 years this has to go back on the ballot, whether you like it or not,” Moore said. “And we’re going to keep voting on it, until you vote the way we think you should.”

Democratic state Rep. Jeff Hales said the bill’s language suggests the question would reappear on the ballot every 10 years until it’s approved by voters.

Advertisement

“Why does it end when it’s approved if the importance and the value here is giving the voters of Jackson County a right to weigh in on their charter and their government?” Hales said.

Steinmeyer said that clause exists to give Jackson County voters the opportunity to weigh in on their form of government.

“It gives them the right to speak and say we want change, or we want to abolish and start over,” Steinmeyer said. “That’s all we’re asking for.”

Democratic state Rep. Ashley Aune questioned how the ballot question would protect the right of voters. Steinmeyer said it protects their right to vote and be heard, specifically on their governance.

Lobbyist Shannon Cooper testified on behalf of the city of Kansas City, the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce and the Civic Council of Greater Kansas City. He said during a public comment period that the bill was “the most befuddling piece of legislation” that he’s had to testify for or against.

Advertisement

Cooper brought up the historic recall election of County Executive Frank White Jr. and said the recall showed the system Steinmeyer is trying to fix with this bill can work.

“If the voters are not happy, they can deal with their problems,” Cooper said. “They’ve proven that in the last year.”

No action was taken on the bill, and it is not yet scheduled for a future hearing.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Missouri

Kansas City, Missouri, City Council voted Thursday to approve the city’s $2.6 billion budget for 2026-27

Published

on

Kansas City, Missouri, City Council voted Thursday to approve the city’s .6 billion budget for 2026-27


KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The Kansas City, Missouri, City Council voted Thursday to approve a $2.6 billion budget for the city’s fiscal year of 2026-27.

The budget includes $744 million in spending for public safety, including $26.3 million for a new Department of Community Safety and $4.2 million to hire 50 new KCMO Police Department officers, along with 10 call takers and 10 dispatchers.

“Our budget respects the strong fiscal foundation the taxpayers have helped Kansas City build, maintaining a rainy-day fund of over $200 million, increasing road resurfacing, hiring more public safety and city workers, and investing in all Kansas City neighborhoods,” Mayor Quinton Lucas said in a news release from the city. “In a city that can walk and chew gum, we are proud to welcome the world while delivering strong basic services for Kansas City’s families.” 

The council voted to spend $83.8 million for the Kansas City Area Transportation Authority to provide bus services, but the KCATA may have to make cuts in bus services even with a $6 million boost in funding from the city.

Advertisement

In addition, the council approved spending $39.4 million for citywide street resurfacing and $1.5 million for tearing down dangerous buildings.
 
“This budget reflects a collaborative effort across the city, and provides a clear path for Kansas City to keep moving forward with discipline, accountability and a focus on service,” City Manager Mario Vasquez said in the news release. “Thank you to the council for its thoughtful deliberation and input in crafting this budget.” 

More information on the fiscal year 2026-27 budget can be found on the city’s website.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending