Connect with us

Minnesota

It's down to Trump v. Haley in Minnesota on Super Tuesday. What are her chances here?

Published

on

It's down to Trump v. Haley in Minnesota on Super Tuesday. What are her chances here?


Julia Coleman knows she’s one of the few elected officials in her party who will openly endorse a Republican other than Donald Trump in Minnesota’s presidential primary.

The two-term GOP state senator from Waconia voted for Trump in 2020, but she’s supporting former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley this year after watching her party lose ground in the suburbs over the last two election cycles, largely due to Trump’s style.

“A lot of them privately [support Haley] but they don’t want to anger their donor base,” said Coleman of other Republican officials. “People feel a sense of loyalty to the former president.”

That’s Haley’s dilemma in Minnesota, a state where Trump has locked down endorsements from the entire GOP congressional delegation. His near-flip of the state in 2016 brought a new group of Republican activists into state politics.

Advertisement

But Haley’s supporters think she has a chance to win a state like Minnesota, which has an independent streak and didn’t back Trump in the 2016 precinct caucuses. Fear of a Trump and Joe Biden rematch in 2024 has helped them build quiet support for her behind the scenes, supporters say.

“We are organizing and people are coming out of the woodwork on a regular basis. I am getting calls and texts from people who want to help,” said Debjyoti “DD” Dwivedy, a Republican activist who is part of a grassroots group trying to turn out voters for Haley in Minnesota.

She’s now the only challenger running against Trump in Minnesota’s March 5 presidential nominating contest, after Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie and Vivek Ramaswamy all dropped out. Trump handily won Minnesota’s presidential primary in 2020, but he was unopposed on the ballot that year.

In 2016, when Minnesota still used the precinct caucus system to nominate the president, Trump placed third, following Republican U.S. Sens. Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz.

“I’m very bullish on this: Marco Rubio won Minnesota, and he didn’t run his campaign on rhetoric but on policy solutions,” said Dwivedy. “Haley’s politics are based on policies. In this country right now we need less rhetoric and less divide and we need someone who will be grounded on policies.”

Advertisement

Neither Trump nor Haley appear to have paid staff on the ground in Minnesota, focusing their attention on Iowa, New Hampshire and the upcoming Feb. 24 Republican primary in South Carolina. Trump beat Haley by more than 30 percentage points in Iowa and by 11 points in New Hampshire.

Polls show Trump leading Haley in South Carolina, where she was governor. Trump’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

“The margin there will signal a lot. If it’s close or if, surprisingly, she should win, that should do a lot to give her campaign a boost,” said University of Minnesota political science professor Kathryn Pearson. “If Trump wins big in Haley’s home state, I think it’s going to be challenge for her to play in any state, including in Minnesota on Super Tuesday.”

Haley’s supporters are encouraging her to stay in the race until at least Super Tuesday — when 16 states hold presidential primaries — to give voters in more states a chance to weigh in on the race.

“Our party is better when we have a contest, and whoever ends up being the nominee will be better off having to face the voters, stump for votes and do speeches and take questions,” said Rep. Kristin Robbins, R-Maple Grove, one of the leaders of the grassroots effort pushing Haley in Minnesota.

Advertisement

She said Haley has 17 delegates to Trump’s 33, and it takes 1,215 delegates to win the nomination. On Super Tuesday, 36% of delegates are up for grabs.

Coleman is thinking about her party long-term in backing someone other than Trump in the primary.

“My support for Nikki Haley comes from watching what happened to the election map here under Donald Trump,” she said. “I saw the suburbs in the last election start flipping blue and the Republican message start getting lost in the noise.”

Coleman outperformed the former president in her district, signaling an openness to a Republican candidate with different communication tactics. She thinks Haley could break through, particularly among women voters.

“I think under Trump we might have a great economy,” she said. “But we might lose an entire generation of female voters in the state.”

Advertisement



Source link

Minnesota

Medical services in limbo for thousands of providers amid Minnesota fraud crisis

Published

on

Medical services in limbo for thousands of providers amid Minnesota fraud crisis


The Minnesota Department of Human Services is reexamining over 5,000 Medicaid service providers across the state in an effort to combat fraud. 

The federal government said it would pull $2 billion in annual Medicaid funding from Minnesota in January if the state didn’t make changes.

The Minnesota Department of Human Services set out to revalidate thousands of providers in programs deemed high risk for fraud by asking providers to submit verification paperwork and making unannounced site visits. The deadline passed on Sunday. 

The latest data, published on May 27, shows 1,009 providers approved, 1,151 disenrolled and over 3,000 providers with pending applications. 

Advertisement

Paige Berland and Camille Heyman run Minnesota Behavioral Specialists, providing autism care to children through two locations in the metro area. The women say that after submitting their paperwork, they received letters from DHS with determinations for both locations: the Bloomington center was terminated and the Eagan office was approved. 

“It doesn’t make sense, everything is the same minus the location,” Berland said. “So why was one approved and one wasn’t approved?”

The termination letter said the Bloomington center was denied because they failed to disclose a managing employee during a site visit. Berland disputes that and said she already submitted an appeal.

“We were told to keep running, keep continuing as we are while we go through this process,” she said. “It just means that we don’t have the money coming in.” 

Josh Berg with Accessible Space says they’re also in limbo. Berg said they offer integrated community supports, which means caretakers provide in-unit assistance for people with spinal cord injuries and disabilities. 

Advertisement

“Most of the folks that we support are wheelchair-bound,” Berg said. “Helping with meals, helping with medications, helping them just live their lives.”

Berg said that of the seven locations where people are housed, the Department of Human Services terminated five and approved two. He believes the timeline to conduct this revalidation process was too aggressive. He said Accessible Space has also submitted an appeal.

“We’re not able to bill for services, we’re not able to start new services for anybody or change any of the supports that they receive,” he said. 

Both Berg and Berland say they agree fraud needs to be dealt with, but they hope Minnesotans who truly need services aren’t left without the services they need. 

“Not just the clients rely on services, but the families do too, so we can’t stop services; that’s not an option on our plate,” Berland said. “We want to continue to provide these services; they are medically necessary.” 

Advertisement

The Minnesota Department of Human Services said a disenrollment letter could be sent for a few reasons, including failure to submit revalidation application after two notification attempts, failure to provide all requested documents within the required timeframe and failure to meet the criteria required during an on-site visit.

A spokesperson for the Department of Human Services said it’s currently in the process of compiling data from the thousands of applications, but didn’t say when the department would share those final numbers. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

Minnesota GOP disavows Chauvin moment of silence at convention

Published

on

Minnesota GOP disavows Chauvin moment of silence at convention


play

The Minnesota Republican Party is distancing itself from a moment of silence held for Derek Chauvin during its state convention, saying the gesture was not part of leadership planning, not included in the official program, and should not be interpreted as a party position.

GOP officials said in a Monday, June 1 Facebook post that the recognition of the former Minneapolis police officer, who was convicted in the killing of George Floyd in 2020, emerged from a spontaneous delegate motion on the convention floor and was not initiated or endorsed by leadership.

Advertisement

The controversy quickly escalated after state leaders, civil rights attorneys and Democratic lawmakers condemned the action, describing it as deeply harmful to Floyd’s family and inconsistent with accountability under the law.

The moment of silence took place during the party’s annual gathering in Duluth on May 30 and comes just days after the sixth anniversary of Floyd’s murder in Minneapolis, an event that reshaped national debates over policing and racial justice.

Republican Party of Minnesota says gesture was not leadership action

In a statement, the Republican Party of Minnesota said the recognition of Derek Chauvin originated as a delegate request during floor proceedings at the convention in Duluth and was handled under standard rules of order.

Advertisement

Party officials emphasized that convention leadership, including chair Danny Nadeau, did not propose the motion. The statement said leadership’s role was procedural only, and that presiding over the motion did not reflect agreement with or endorsement of its subject matter.

Officials reiterated that the convention agenda itself did not include any planned recognition of Chauvin and said the episode should not be interpreted as a leadership-driven decision or policy stance.

Minnesota attorney general calls action ‘profound cruelty’

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, who led the prosecution of Chauvin, sharply criticized the gesture, calling it an “act of profound cruelty” toward the Floyd family.

Advertisement

Ellison said the timing, so close to the anniversary of Floyd’s death, compounded the harm.

He said honoring Chauvin “dishonors the memory of George Floyd and wounds his loved ones all over again,” and called it “disturbing” to recognize someone convicted of violating his oath as a police officer.

Ellison also said the action was “disrespectful” to law enforcement officers who serve honorably, and reaffirmed that courts had already upheld Chauvin’s conviction through multiple appeals.

Broader backlash and political fallout

Democratic state Rep. Jamie Long called the moment of silence “disgusting,” arguing that Republicans chose to honor a convicted murderer rather than victims of violence or service members.

The gesture also drew criticism from civil rights attorneys Ben Crump and Antonio Romanucci, who represented George Floyd’s family in its civil case after his death. The attorneys called the moment of silence immoral and demanded a retraction and apology, saying it disrespected both the Floyd family and the broader public record of Chauvin’s conviction.

Advertisement

Floyd was killed on May 25, 2020, when Chauvin, a white former Minneapolis police officer, knelt on his neck for more than nine minutes. Chauvin was later convicted of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter, and sentenced to 22½ years in state prison.

The killing sparked global protests and became a defining moment in the Black Lives Matter movement and debates over policing in the United States.

Chauvin’s conviction has been upheld through multiple appeals, including a denial by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2023, and he is serving his sentence in federal custody.

Party officials say despite the controversy, their focus remains on candidate endorsements and upcoming elections, not the floor action that triggered the backlash.

Reporter Anthony Thompson can be reached at ajthompson@usatodayco.com, or on X @athompsonUSAT.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

Where to watch Chicago White Sox vs Minnesota Twins: TV channel, start time, streaming for Jun. 02

Published

on

Where to watch Chicago White Sox vs Minnesota Twins: TV channel, start time, streaming for Jun. 02


play

The 2026 MLB season has surpassed the quarter mark, and after each team’s first 40 games, there’s plenty of reasons to tune in all summer long.

Chicago White Sox slugger Munetaka Murakami has already proven doubters wrong by launching 17 home runs, Pittsburgh’s Paul Skenes consistently looks like the best version of himself on the mound and Milwaukee ace Jacob Misiorowski is throwing harder than any starter in the majors.

Advertisement

The MLB action continues on Tuesday as the Chicago White Sox visit the Minnesota Twins.

Here’s everything you need to know to tune in for the first pitch.

See USA TODAY’s sortable MLB schedule to filter by team or division.

What time is Chicago White Sox vs Minnesota Twins?

First pitch between the Minnesota Twins and Chicago White Sox is scheduled for 7:40 p.m. (ET) on Tuesday, Jun. 02.

How to watch Chicago White Sox vs Minnesota Twins on Tuesday

All times Eastern and accurate as of Tuesday, June 2, 2026, at 6:33 a.m.

Advertisement

Watch MLB all season long with Fubo

MLB regional blackout restrictions apply

MLB scores, results

MLB scores for Jun. 02 games are available on usatoday.com . Here’s how to access today’s results:

See scores, results for all of today’s games.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending