Minnesota
Federal lawsuit challenges Minnesota’s abortion laws, alleging current rules are unconstitutional
MINNEAPOLIS — A lawsuit filed in federal court last Friday seeks to nullify Minnesota’s laws protecting access to abortion, arguing they violate the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Plaintiffs argue that the laws terminate parental rights without due process.
Women are not being informed about their rights when it comes to the procedure, the lawsuit alleges, resulting in thousands of “involuntary” abortions a year.
The lawsuit, filed by the Women’s Life Care Center, National Institute of Family and Life Advocates and several women who have had abortions, comes after Minnesota Democrats passed a law to protect abortion in the wake of Roe v. Wade being overturned and a 2022 court ruling overturned the state’s restrictions on abortion services, eliminating a mandatory 24-hour waiting period. In April 2023, the Minnesota Court of Appeals rejected an attempt to appeal the decision.
The filing says Minnesota’s current abortion laws do not provide any due process protections or equal protection in the termination of the mother and child’s relationship.
Among those being sued are Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison; Gov. Tim Walz; Department of Human Services Commissioner Jodi Harpstead; Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota; Planned Parenthood North Central States; Red River Women’s Clinic and several other doctors and health officials.
“Minnesota has a legal and regulatory scheme implemented, administered, and enforced by various state officials, which delegates the state function of terminating a pregnant mother’s rights and interests in her relationship with her child to defendants…all of which have interests in direct conflict with those of the pregnant mother and the child she wants,” the lawsuit states.
The Minnesota Attorney General’s Office said it will respond to the lawsuit in court.
The Department of Human Services said it does not comment on pending litigation.
WCCO has contacted the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, Walz’s office and Planned Parenthood North Central States for comment but has not heard back.
“It’s about the women’s rights and what it comes down to, in short, is that some of the greatest rights mothers have in all of life are being destroyed. The complaint sets forth some of that,” Harold Cassidy, one of the attorneys for the plaintiffs, said in a statement provided to WCCO.
Women are terminating their pregnancies due to coercion or pressure, the lawsuit claims, and there needs to be more safeguards to ensure women are voluntarily getting the procedure, including a full court hearing and counseling beforehand that provides information on their rights and other available resources.
Three women who all say they are victims of abortions they did not want are also plaintiffs in the lawsuit. According to court documents, all women were pressured by the father of the child to have the procedure and allegedly did not receive counseling or assistance from their abortion providers.
The lawsuit demands abortion providers stop operating under “current post-repeal” abortion laws until there are laws in place that do not violate the 14th Amendment and ensure the patient completely understands the process.
“The basic argument in this suit is that they want to characterize an abortion as a termination of parental rights under constitutional law,” University of Minnesota law professor Jill Hasday said.
Pregnancy help centers
A big piece of the lawsuit includes the role of pregnancy help centers such as Dakota Hope Clinic and Women’s Life Care Center, two of the plaintiffs. The lawsuit claims these centers are “the protectors of the 14th Amendment rights of pregnant mothers,” and that the state is working with abortion providers to defeat “efforts to protect them.”
In August 2022, Ellison issued a consumer alert against crisis pregnancy centers, saying they “may pose as reproductive healthcare clinics despite not providing comprehensive reproductive healthcare to consumers,” and that pregnant women should instead consult with a licensed reproductive health care provider.
The consumer alert cited a study that found that more than 90% of pregnancy help centers do not have a licensed physician on staff and more than 95% do not provide prenatal or wellness care to pregnant women.
The lawsuit claims much of the alert contains inaccurate information and is harmful to the mothers’ rights and interests.
The lawsuit alleges that abortion providers have “waged war” against pregnancy help centers because the centers result in a loss of so-called abortion sales. It goes on to say that Minnesota’s abortion laws harm pregnancy resource centers’ financial, reputational and professional interests.
Abortion in Minnesota today
Abortion access is protected by a 1995 Minnesota Supreme Court decision and a state law guaranteeing a “fundamental right” to the procedure.
Minnesota officials have touted the state as a haven for abortion seekers and providers — having a “shield” law designed to protect people who come to the state for access and the doctors who provide the procedure. Additionally, the number of out-of-state abortion patients jumped from 9% in 2020 to 30% in 2023, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports abortion rights.
In May, the Minnesota House passed the Equal Rights Amendment that protects “making and effectuating decisions about all matters relating to one’s own pregnancy or decision whether to become or remain pregnant.” That amendment goes before voters in 2026.
What’s next
University of Minnesota law professor Jill Hasday says she expects similar lawsuits to pop up in federal court going forward.
“For the anti-abortion movement, the overruling of Roe in 2022 isn’t the end, it’s the middle,” she said. “Their ultimate goal is to have abortion be illegal throughout the United States, either through federal legislation or through a federal court finding that abortion is inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution.”
Any ruling will take a while. Hasday says it could take months if not years for the case to move through federal district court.
“It’s very hard to predict the future, but my own prediction is that the suit is exceedingly unlikely to succeed, in part, because just of the many differences between abortion and involuntary termination of parental rights,” Hasday said. “Don’t see this case as this is the case that’s going to end legal abortion in Minnesota.”
Minnesota
Minnesota weather: Southern snowfall later on Saturday, frigid weekend ahead
MINNEAPOLIS (FOX 9) – Southern Minnesota will be under a winter weather advisory as a clipper system moves across the region.
The Twin Cities will be on the northern edge of that system, with less than an inch of snow expected.
Saturday forecast
Local perspective:
A cold front is splitting Minnesota in half at the I-90 corridor, bringing snow to the southern part of the state and heavier accumulation at the Iowa border.
High temperatures in the Twin Cities are starting at 22 degrees on Saturday morning.
A winter weather advisory will be in effect for all of southern Minnesota starting at noon on Saturday.
A few snowflakes are expected to fall in the Twin Cities in the early evening.
Extended forecast
What’s next:
Sunday will be slightly sunnier with windchills bringing temperatures below zero degrees.
Snow chances return to the area on Tuesday.
How much snow could MN get?
FOX 9 weather forecast. (FOX 9)
By the numbers:
The highest snow totals will be found along the border with Minnesota and Iowa.
Some north Iowa counties will exceed 6 inches of snow.
Meanwhile, the Twin Cities will see a trace of snow to about an inch of accumulation.
The Source: This story uses information from the FOX 9 weather forecast.
Minnesota
Tim Walz slams Trump for calling Minnesota’s Somali community ‘garbage’: ‘Unprecedented’
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat, criticized President Donald Trump on Thursday for describing the state’s Somali community as “garbage.”
Walz said Trump’s statements of contempt for the state’s Somali community were “unprecedented for a United States president.”
“We’ve got little children going to school today who their president called them garbage,” the blue state governor said.
Minnesota has the largest Somali population in the country, with about 84,000 people in the Minneapolis and St. Paul area of Somali descent. Nearly 60% of Somalis in the state were born in the U.S., while 87% of the foreign-born Somalis are naturalized U.S. citizens.
TREASURY SECRETARY LAUNCHES PROBE INTO MINNESOTA TAX DOLLARS ALLEGEDLY FUNDING AL-SHABAAB TERRORISTS
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz criticized President Donald Trump for describing the state’s Somali community as “garbage.” (Getty Images)
Trump’s comments about Somalis in the state have intensified after the City Journal, a conservative news outlet, claimed last month that taxpayer dollars from defrauded government programs have been sent to the Somali militant group al-Shabab, an affiliate of al-Qaida.
The alleged ringleader of the fraud scheme is white, but dozens of people in the Somali community have reportedly been involved.
On Thanksgiving, Trump said Minnesota was “a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity” and that he was terminating Temporary Protected Status for Somalis in the state.
On Tuesday, the president said at a Cabinet meeting that he did not want Somali immigrants to remain in the U.S.
“We can go one way or the other, and we’re going to go the wrong way if we keep taking in garbage into our country,” he said.
During the meeting, he also called Somalia-born Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., “garbage” and said Somalia “stinks.”
Gov. Tim Walz said President Donald Trump’s statements of contempt for the state’s Somali community were “unprecedented for a United States president.” (Christopher Mark Juhn/Anadolu via Getty Images)
On Wednesday, Trump said Minnesota had become a “hellhole” because of the Somali community.
“Somalians should be out of here,” he told reporters. “They’ve destroyed our country.”
The Trump administration launched immigration enforcement operations targeting migrants living among Minnesota’s Somali community.
“Demonizing an entire group of people by their race and their ethnicity, a very group of people who contribute to the vitality — economic, cultural — of this state is something I was hoping we’d never have to see,” Walz told reporters during a briefing on the state’s budget. “This is on top of all the other vile comments.”
Republican legislative leaders have been reluctant to condemn Trump’s remarks, although some did suggest he went too far. They also contended that the dispute would not have happened if Walz had acted more effectively to stop fraud in social service programs.
ILHAN OMAR PRESSED TO EXPLAIN HOW FRAUD IN MINNESOTA GOT ‘SO OUT OF CONTROL’
Republican legislative leaders have been reluctant to condemn President Donald Trump’s remarks. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
“In no way do I believe any community is all bad. Just like I don’t believe any community is all good. What we need to do is call the fraudsters in any community accountable for their actions and stop it here in the state of Minnesota,” Republican Minnesota House Speaker Lisa Demuth, who is running for governor and hopes to secure Trump’s endorsement, told reporters.
Republican state Sen. Eric Pratt, who is running for the congressional seat being vacated by Democrat U.S. Rep. Angie Craig, also would not defend the president’s comments.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“It wasn’t said the way that I would have said it,” Pratt said. “But what I will say is, I share the president’s frustration in the amount of fraud and corruption that’s effectively gone on in the state. I mean, it’s really put a black eye on the state, and we are in the national news for all the wrong reasons.”
Trump and Walz have repeatedly hurled insults at each other in the past, including the president hitting the Minnesota Democrat as “grossly incompetent,” a “mess” and “re—-ed” and the governor calling Trump a “wannabe dictator,” a “cruel man” and a “bad human being,” and ICE under the administration a “modern-day Gestapo.”
Minnesota
Minnesota officials saw signs of massive fraud even before COVID hit
In July 2019, Minnesota state officials spotted early signs of fraud that would eventually siphon away more than $1 billion in taxpayer money, but they quickly faced pressure from leaders of the charitable group Feeding Our Future to stop asking questions, according to multiple former employees at the Minnesota Department of Education.
The scandal, which has already led to 61 convictions, has widely been viewed as a byproduct of the COVID-19 pandemic. At one point, then-Attorney General Merrick Garland called it “the largest pandemic relief fraud scheme” in the United States.
Acting U.S. Attorney Lisa D. Kirkpatrick said those convicted “took advantage of the Covid-19 pandemic to carry out a massive fraud scheme that stole money meant to feed children.”
But state officials say the schemes aimed at diverting federal dollars meant for people who are poor, food insecure or disabled, actually started far sooner, months after Minnesota’s Democratic Gov. Tim Walz took office in 2019. In its early stages, members of the charitable group Feeding Our Future billed the state for some $3.4 million.
By 2021, however, that number ballooned. Before it was finally halted, Feeding Our Future had falsely claimed to have served 91 million meals, for which the group received nearly $250 million in federal funds, according to federal prosecutors. That money did not go to feed kids, federal officials said. Instead it was used to fund lavish lifestyles.
Investigators say the money came from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, with oversight from state governments. In Minnesota, those funds were administered by the state Department of Education, with meals historically provided to kids through schools and day care centers.
In recent weeks, renewed attention to the scandal has focused on the state’s failure to identify and halt the theft before it spun out of control. Conservative politicians and bloggers have alleged the state’s liberal establishment was cowed into inaction by intimidation from Feeding Our Future, which contracted within the state’s large Somali community — because the food charity sought to paint early scrutiny of the nonprofit as racism.
Well before the pandemic, state officials told CBS News that they began experiencing tension with the woman later convicted of masterminding the fraud, Aimee Bock. They began documenting her “concerning behavior.” One former employee told CBS News that Bock almost immediately began pressuring state workers who might have had follow up questions or concerns before processing reimbursements.
Within weeks of Feeding Our Future’s first submissions to the state, Minnesota workers also recognized that the charity was claiming to serve meals in numbers that were “not consistent” and “not realistic,” one official told CBS News.
Then the pandemic took hold. The officials told CBS News the scheme rapidly accelerated. Safeguards fell away — removed intentionally to insure residents in need did not go hungry.
But as state workers asked more questions — and even stopped payment on some receipts — Feeding Our Future ratcheted up pressure in response. In 2020, the charitable group filed a lawsuit alleging the state had “harmed Feeding Our Future by subjecting it to additional procedural hurdles in violation of federal regulations.”
The state “intentionally and wrongfully refuse[d] to do business with Feeding Our Future and the community it serves by discriminating … because of Feeding Our Future’s race, national origin, color, and religion.”
A judge dismissed the civil case after the FBI executed search warrants on Feeding Our Future and made public its investigation in January 2022.
The entire episode played out in the aftermath of the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer, as racial tensions ran high.
Seven months later, federal prosecutors first announced criminal charges against 47 people in the Feeding Our Future scandal. The number charged grew to 78 in total, and 59 have since been convicted, including Bock, who is awaiting sentencing.
Reached by phone on Thursday, Bock’s attorney Kenneth Udoibok said his client plans to appeal her conviction. He denied Bock exerted pressure on state officials so they would not properly scrutinize meal claims.
“That doesn’t meet the smell test,” Udoibok said. “A government agency with all its resources, and its reputation is afraid of Amy? That is just rich. It’s a lie.”
Udoibok said the state Department of Education employees leveling the accusation weren’t acknowledging their own role in the massive fraud.
“No one in the state of Minnesota, no one in the Department of Education has taken any responsibility for this fraud that they allowed to go through,” he said
While Bock, who is White, was described by investigators as the mastermind, most of the other defendants and alleged co-conspirators are Somalis, provoking fresh attacks from the Trump administration against the state’s large Somali community.
In recent days, President Trump has claimed Somali migrants “ripped off” Minnesota and has referred to the state as a “hellhole.” He has called people from Somalia “garbage” who “contribute nothing” and said: “I don’t want them in our country, I’ll be honest with you.” This week, Immigration and Customs Enforcement began enhanced operations in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area, home to a large population of Somalis.
Walz on Thursday said Mr. Trump’s comments are “unprecedented for a United States president,” and he denounced Trump’s barrage of anti-Somali statements as “vile, racist lies and slander towards our fellow Minnesotans.”
Walz said on “Meet the Press” last weekend that the fraud cases are “totally disconnected” from the broader Somali community. “To demonize an entire community on the actions of a few, it’s lazy,” he said.
House Republicans on Wednesday launched an investigation into the governor’s handling of the fraud cases. Walz has long been criticized for being slow to act, but he has said his administration caught the fraud early and reported it first to the USDA, and then to the FBI.
Prosecutors have charged nearly a dozen others in cases involving other alleged COVID-related fraud in Minnesota. The schemes are alleged to have operated similarly to the original one focused on nutrition funds, but these involve housing assistance and behavioral health services.
Prosecutors in all those cases have charged an additional eight people, most of whom are Somali, bringing the total number charged to 87, with 61 convictions. Sources at the U.S. attorneys office tell CBS News the investigations are ongoing in all of the fraud cases, including Feeding Our Future, with the total amount of stolen money reaching more than $1 billion.
-
Politics4 days agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Technology1 week agoNew scam sends fake Microsoft 365 login pages
-
News4 days agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
Ohio2 days ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
World4 days agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Texas7 hours agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
Politics1 week agoRep. Swalwell’s suit alleges abuse of power, adds to scrutiny of Trump official’s mortgage probes
-
News1 week ago2 National Guard members wounded in ‘targeted’ attack in D.C., authorities say