Connect with us

Minneapolis, MN

Monitoring Minneapolis Police: The business behind overseeing court-ordered reforms

Published

on

Monitoring Minneapolis Police: The business behind overseeing court-ordered reforms


The Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) is facing an unprecedented challenge: two sets of court-ordered reforms.

Last year, the city entered into a settlement agreement with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights after an investigation found MPD engaged in a pattern or practice of race discrimination.

A similar, federal investigation is expected to result in a separate consent decree, overseen by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

The critical piece of both agreements is the independent monitor, a position that holds tremendous power and influence. The monitor, typically a group of individuals, will track MPD’s progress on the reforms and will ultimately recommend to the court when the oversight should be lifted.

Advertisement

Despite a growing need for monitors, a review of federal consent decrees across the country by 5 INVESTIGATES shows a small number of people doing this work in multiple cities.

Among them – David Douglass, the man chosen to lead the oversight of Minneapolis Police.

In March, the city signed a contract with Douglass’ nonprofit, Effective Law Enforcement For All, to serve as the independent evaluator overseeing the settlement agreement with the state.

KSTP-TV

Douglass is also the deputy monitor currently overseeing the federal consent decree between the U.S. Department of Justice and the New Orleans Police Department.

In an interview with 5 INVESTIGATES, Douglass said his work in New Orleans is winding down.

Advertisement

“We are all here and committed to devoting as much time as it’s necessary to get this work done,” he said.

However, the specialized nature of monitoring police departments under consent decrees, paired with the small pool of candidates, has prompted criticism that the niche business is a “cottage industry.”

In 2021, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland ordered a review of the use of monitors in consent decrees and other settlement agreements.

During the review, stakeholders urged the department “to do more to dispel the perception that monitoring is becoming a cottage industry, closed to outside voices,” according to a memo published months later.

Douglass said he doesn’t believe monitoring is a cottage industry.

Advertisement

“There is a monitor because the Department of Justice has identified a need,” he said during the interview. “To the extent that there is a need, then the need should be addressed. And I don’t know that I’m particularly troubled if there is an industry designed to eliminate decades – and in some sense, in some instances – centuries of policing that hasn’t been safe and effective for large segments of the community.”

DOJ recommendations

The DOJ memo laid out recommendations for using monitors in future consent decrees, including restricting the lead monitors’ participation in multiple consent decrees.

“Jurisdictions should not be deprived of subject matter experts whose unique knowledge makes them an asset to multiple monitorships,” the memo reads. “But the person serving as the lead monitor should be solely committed to the jurisdiction they are serving.” 

KSTP-TV

When asked if anyone from the City of Minneapolis or state Department of Human Rights raised concerns about his continued involvement in New Orleans, Douglass said it was discussed, but that he wouldn’t characterize it as a concern or issue. 

He said cities benefit from the experience monitors bring from other consent decrees and pushed back on the justice department’s recommendation.

“I don’t think there should be arbitrary rules about it,” he said. “I think each monitor should be judged on their track record.”

Advertisement

Christy Lopez agrees.

Lopez worked for two decades in the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. She led multiple high-profile investigations of police departments, including in Ferguson, Missouri, after the death of Michael Brown.

Christy Lopez, former U.S. Department of Justice attorney. KSTP-TV

“When people identify a monitor or monitoring team that they have confidence in, city leaders, DOJ, they want to go back to that same person or that same team,” she said.

But Lopez said consent decrees are expensive for cities, and the concern that a monitor may prolong their work to make more money is justified.

“I have seen a couple of monitors take that approach, and I try to call them out when I can,” she said.

Time is money

Last year, 5 INVESTIGATES analyzed consent decrees in a dozen other cities and found those mandates last an average of nine and a half years before the oversight is lifted. 

Advertisement

Contract and invoice data show those cities have spent anywhere from $9 to $12 million on monitoring fees.

In its contract with ELEFA, the City of Minneapolis capped the budget at $1.5 million per year.

Douglass said the best way a city can reduce cost is for a city to work quickly to implement the reforms and sustain that work.

“We’re very committed to achieving change as quickly as we can, but it’s more important that we do it in the right way so that’s lasting,” he said. “If the city does its part, I think it can be out in four or five years.” 

David Douglass, independent evaluator of the Minneapolis Police Department’s settlement agreement with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. KSTP-TV



Source link

Advertisement

Minneapolis, MN

Minnesotans mobilize for third and potentially biggest No Kings Day

Published

on

Minnesotans mobilize for third and potentially biggest No Kings Day


On a freezing February evening last year, around a dozen people gathered on an interstate overpass in Minneapolis and hoisted a sign in view of oncoming traffic.

The sign — letters screwed to long, thin pieces of lumber — read: “STOP THE COUP.”

A week later, the group gathered again, though they had doubled in number. The week after that, they doubled again.

Over a year later, around 40 neighbors and up to 100 on busy nights now squeeze onto the overpass Thursday evenings with a new message for the rush-hour traffic.

Advertisement

They call themselves Democracy Bridge Minneapolis, and have protested almost every week since President Donald Trump’s second inauguration.

And in the lead-up to the third nationwide No Kings protests tomorrow, Democracy Bridge catalyzed a wave of demonstrations like their own spanning the 1,568-mile length of Interstate 35.

From Duluth, Minn., to San Antonio, 47 different bridge protests cut through the midline of the country Thursday with the same message: “YES DEMOCRACY NO KINGS.”

Grassroots organizations 50501 Kansas City, Indivisible Twin Cities and The Visibility Brigade also took the lead on mobilizing this week.

Organizers said they hope their efforts inspired onlookers to participate in what’s projected to be the largest turnout for a single-day protest in United States history.

Advertisement

“We have to help us and we have to start by letting our neighbors know what the hell is going on and why they should care,” Sarah Linnes-Robinson, a founding member of the group, said. 

While millions of Americans will take to the streets in cities across the country, as many as 100,000 people could attend the No Kings Day flagship rally in Minnesota’s capital, St. Paul. 

The flagship rally will feature progressive leaders Gov. Tim Walz and U.S. Sen Bernie Sanders, as well as legend Bruce Springsteen, who will headline with his “Streets of Minneapolis.” 

“ICE OUT OF MN:” The Twin Cities fight back

Democracy Bridge Minneapolis members hold a sign reading “DEFUND ICE” on Jan. 29, 2026.

Past the stardom, the rallies across the Twin Cities may provide catharsis for residents whose lives over the past several months have been upended by Trump’s winter immigration enforcement operation.

Dubbed “Operation Metro Surge,” Trump’s massive deployment of immigration officials in Minnesota resulted in mass unlawful detentions, repeated violent assaults against peaceful protesters, and ultimately, the killings of two U.S. citizens, who were both shot by federal officers. 

Advertisement

Democracy Bridge protesters channeled their outrage over Renee Good’s and Alex Pretti’s killings through their weekly messages.

“DEFUND ICE” and “ICE OUT OF MN” lit up the bridge on Jan. 29, 2026.

Similarly, “HANDS OFF ELECTIONS” appeared following Trump’s threat to “take over voting”  this February, as well as signs protesting the escalation of the Iran war.

Other messages, all of which can be viewed on the organization’s website archive, urged for the release of the Epstein files, opposed a war with Venezuela and admonished Trump’s proposed 2027 budget for its potential impact on Minnesotans’ healthcare.

Most messages are succinct and sometimes abbreviated so while organizers said they would like it, words like “authoritarianism” don’t make the cut.

Advertisement

Some have backgrounds in community organizing, while other bridge-goers are architects and retired researchers. Some come straight from pickleball practice and others from church. 

“All are welcome so you can have a Ukrainian flag, you can have a Palestinian flag, a right side up flag, an upside down flag I mean come as you are,” Rosemary Dolata, a Minneapolis resident and bridge protest organizer, said.

Mary Jane Levine has lived in Minneapolis since 2000 and works in a garden store. But before that, she was a federal law enforcement officer. It’s what brought her to the bridge.

“I’m horrified by what was done to the civil service and even more horrified to see what my former federal law enforcement officers are doing to our citizens,” Levine said.

Do protests work? What the data and the locals say

With thousands of other local protests planned across the U.S, this follows a trend of increasing decentralization within civic action.

Advertisement

That’s according to data from American University researcher Dana Fisher, who has been conducting surveys of widespread protests since the Women’s March in 2017. 

Fisher’s data shows that nationwide protests in recent years have been largely composed of white, highly educated, and primarily older women. While multiple factors are at play, Fisher noted that a lack of diversity is not always reflective of a lack of interest.

As pointed out by organizers as well, many people of color don’t feel safe showing up to a large crowd and making their presence known amid Trump’s deployment of federal agents. And for young people, some are just burned out.

“They’ve had a really hard go of being adults,” Fisher said. “And the country has been in precarious moments of democracy basically consistently.”

In addition to her vast demographic research, Fisher said she’s worried about the national focus on high turnout without a solid plan for what’s next after No Kings Day.

Advertisement

While excited about the potential record turnout this weekend, bridge regulars underscored how their smaller efforts have engendered meaningful local impact in Minneapolis.

Everyone who protests has their first one, and Linnes-Robinson said the project has been a way to meet the moment in a time when many in Minneapolis “are just ready to say yes.”

Fisher added that despite her doubts or larger organizational aims, these local actions remain important for “collective mourning” and fostering “collective identity formation.” 

Demonstrators came together overwhelmingly on the top two issues of “Trump” and “Immigration” at the last No Kings Day, according to Fisher’s data.

“While I’m critical of the way the organizers keep banging on the number, I also just want to recognize that they are very much doing other work to get people to build power and capacity in their communities,” Fisher said.

Advertisement

Sarah Strzok, another founding member of the group, described the organizing process as a true grassroots effort. Each Monday, members text in their Signal group to brainstorm and settle on a message for the signs. Neighbors then build the signs from their “letter library” with wooden sticks and sign holders. 

Because they are not permitted to fasten the signs to the bridge itself, participants get creative with pieces of bamboo and pool noodles to hold up the signs.

Apart from sign logistics, unforgiving Minnesota weather has been another consideration for bridge regulars. While some still made it outside in freezing temperatures, the group organized an indoor project in the coldest months where others could write letters and assemble whistle kits.

Once daylight savings hit, the group moved their demonstration an hour earlier and community members donated reflective tape to ensure signage visibility and safety.

Dolata lives in South Minneapolis and said protesting at the bridge has been a way to not just advocate for change but connect with the community she’s lived in for more than 25 years.

Advertisement

“It’s just been neighbors reaching out to neighbors,” Dolata said.

This “reaching out” has transcended the bridge demonstrations. This winter, Rebecca Shield told Democracy Docket that some in the group found out that families at local schools were facing food insecurity. 

It wasn’t long before the crew decided to chip in. What began as boxes of food for 20 families in need has surged to about 120, Shield said. And bridge friends are pitching in to cover rent for some of the families, too.

The solidarity and community-building that Fisher said No Kings protests have the potential to engender have manifested at the bridge – from mutual aid to merely flashing a smile to a fellow protester in the grocery store.

“It [the bridge] was just another thread that knit us all together,” Strzok said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

Man dead, 2 others hurt in overnight shooting in Minneapolis

Published

on

Man dead, 2 others hurt in overnight shooting in Minneapolis


Police say two people were hurt and one other man died.

A homicide investigation is underway in Minneapolis after a shooting early Friday morning killed one man and hurt two others.

Minneapolis police were called to the area of East Franklin Avenue and Chicago Avenue at around 12:30 a.m.

5 EYEWITNESS NEWS cameras caught more than 65 evidence markers scattered across the ground in the area and shattered glass at a bus shelter. Some nearby businesses also appeared to have some damage.

Advertisement

Minneapolis police are still working to determine what led up to the shooting and who was involved but investigators say first responders found the three men suffering from gunshot wounds.

One injured man is in his 40s, the other in his 50s, police say. Both were taken to a hospital by ambulance.

The third man died at the scene. His name and age haven’t yet been publicly released.

Police say early information suggests the men were on a sidewalk when at least one person opened fire, then fled in a vehicle.

So far, no arrests have been made.

Advertisement

Anyone with information about what happened is asked to call police at 612-673-5845 to leave a voicemail or email policetips@minneapolismn.gov.

“This is a tragic and deeply disturbing act of violence that has taken a life, and left others seriously injured,” MPD Chief Brian O’Hara said. “This kind of violence is unacceptable, and we are committed to identifying those responsible and holding them accountable.”

Minneapolis police investigating alleyway shooting near East Franklin Avenue

It comes less than 30 hours after another serious shooting along East Franklin Avenue, just a half-mile west of Friday’s scene. That incident left a man hospitalized with a potentially life-threatening gunshot wound. No arrests have been announced in that case either.

5 EYEWITNESS NEWS is still working to learn more about this shooting. Stay with KSTP-TV for the latest updates on air and on the KSTP app.

Advertisement

Android app



Source link

Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

A Minneapolis woman recounts death of Alex Pretti as lawyers eye a class action lawsuit

Published

on

A Minneapolis woman recounts death of Alex Pretti as lawyers eye a class action lawsuit


MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — A Minneapolis woman who confronted federal immigration officers alongside Alex Pretti in January was among a group of potential litigants who spoke out Thursday about alleged excessive force against people protesting or monitoring the enforcement surge in Minnesota.

Georgia Savageford, who introduced herself as Wynnie at a news conference, said she was inside an officer’s vehicle when she saw federal agents shoot Pretti.

“That day has changed me forever,” she said. “The trauma will haunt me for the rest of my life, and I will never be the same.”

Savageford said she had been legally observing the actions of federal officers in Minneapolis ever since the shooting death of Renee Good by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer on Jan. 7. She said she was doing so again on the morning of Jan. 24 when an agent pushed her twice and caused her to fall.

Advertisement

“As I was going down, three agents proceeded to tackle me and drag me face-down into the middle of the street. They knelt on my back, twisted my arms and my legs to the ground, and handcuffed me. The cuffs were so tight I lost feeling in my hands, which resulted in temporary nerve damage,” she recounted.

Officials with the Department of Homeland Security and ICE did not immediately respond Thursday to emails seeking comment. Minnesota officials sued the Trump administration on Tuesday for access to evidence they say they need to independently investigate the killings.

Savageford said Pretti recorded video of her arrest and yelled at agents to leave her alone.

She said the officers put her in the back of a vehicle, from which she saw agents shoot and kill Pretti on the other side of the street.

“At that moment, I thought I was going to die too. I pleaded with the agents to understand why another life was taken, and to not take mine,” she said.

Advertisement

She added that they told her to shut up and to stop being hysterical. She said they then took her to an ICE holding facility where she was held for 12 hours in a cold cell without ready access to food, water or the bathroom until she was released without being charged.

“I did not know him, but I knew he had my back,” she said of Pretti. “I know the kind of heart he had. One that loves and protects without limits.”

Savageford shared her story at a news conference where civil rights attorney John Burris, of Oakland, California, and other lawyers laid out how they’re paving the way for potential class-action lawsuits over alleged excessive force used against protesters and monitors.

Burris, who specializes in police misconduct, helped win an $11 million settlement against the Oakland Police Department in 2003, and helped win a civil jury verdict of $3.8 million for the late motorist Rodney King, who was beaten by Los Angeles police officers in 1991.

He said he and his colleagues have filed complaints with federal agencies involved in the Minnesota enforcement surge on behalf of 10 people, including Savageford, as the first step in a process that’s likely to lead to a larger class-action lawsuit.

Advertisement

“We have many others that are under investigation that have not completed the process. But I thought it was important for us to start this process now. Put the government on notice that we’re here,” Burris said.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending