Connect with us

Minneapolis, MN

Minneapolis Has More Households Than Ever Before

Published

on

Minneapolis Has More Households Than Ever Before


Although Minneapolis’ population has grown in the past 15 years, its current population sits far below its mid-20th century peak. With about 425,000 residents, the city has nearly 60,000 fewer people than in 1960, when its population was about 483,000. Despite strong population growth during the 2010s, Minneapolis has still not returned to its 1960s population levels. 

One might think that this long-term population decline means Minneapolis doesn’t need to build more housing. After all, if Minneapolis was able to house tens of thousands more people a few decades ago, shouldn’t the city already have enough housing for a considerably smaller population today? 

This isn’t true for one key reason: Today, Minneapolis has more households — that is, distinct groups of people who live in the same home — than ever before. In 1970, Minneapolis had 161,141 households, but by 2020 it had 187,670 households. This reflects a 16% increase in the city’s number of households, for reasons that we explain below.

Because households nowadays tend to have fewer people, Minneapolis’ household growth has outpaced recent population growth. This reflects a wider trend in the United States, where the average size of households is shrinking.

Advertisement

An important implication of this peak in the number of households is that Minneapolis needs to build more housing in order to accommodate its residents.

What Is Household Formation? 

In seeing household growth outpace population growth, Minneapolis is no outlier. In the United States at large, the number of households has grown by around 100%, while the population has grown 60% since 1970. 

A few factors have driven this change:

  • Since the 1970s, the makeup of American households has changed significantly. For example, many more households have just one person: In 1970, around 18% of households were occupied by a single person. By 2020, that number had risen to nearly 28%.
  • In that same time frame, the number of households headed by older adults (65 and older) nearly quadrupled, while the number of young adult (under 30) households only approximately doubled. This is significant because older adults tend to live in households with fewer people. 
  • There are also relatively fewer married households than there were in 1970. From 1970 to 2024, the percentage of married households shrank by around 23%, while the percentage of non-family households (households with only one adult, or composed of non-related individuals) grew by 16%.

The graph below highlights another one of these trends in Minneapolis: Most of Minneapolis’ recent growth in its number of households has been driven by childless households. 

A graph showing the number of children in a household from 1960-2020. The section of graph representing households with 0 children has been steadily rising since 1990.

Lessons for Minneapolis Housing Policy

Despite long-term population loss, Minneapolis still needs to build more housing. That’s the only way to accommodate a higher number of households. And not only does the city need to build more housing, it needs to build more types of housing to accommodate different kinds of households.

Such changes have been the aim of many recent policy initiatives in Minneapolis. Minneapolis 2040, the comprehensive plan passed in 2018 and supported by Neighbors for More Neighbors, adjusted zoning rules to allow denser housing throughout the city, especially on neighborhood arterial streets — and the policy is showing positive results. 

In order to accommodate the city’s highest-ever number of households, Minneapolis should continue to address obstacles to providing more housing. 

Advertisement

For example, the city has seen relatively little development on many of its neighborhood side streets. That’s in part because restrictive limits on building size, including floor-area ratio and height, make triplex development unfeasible in some zoning districts. Easing these restrictions would help Minneapolis build more housing, and a wider variety of housing types. 

Furthermore, as the types of households have changed in Minneapolis, more flexibility is needed to accommodate different kinds of houses. Zoning regulations should allow many different kinds of homes, instead of favoring specific types (like single-family homes versus apartments).

For example, Minneapolis’ legalization of accessory dwelling units offers one flexible option for young singles or older people (which is why AARP supports them). Allowing all neighborhoods to have a mix of single-family homes and apartment buildings can offer families of different sizes a range of options that might work for them. Legalizing houses built on smaller lots by reducing minimum lot-size requirements are another way to let households access homeownership at a lower starting cost.

Many of Minneapolis’ neighboring municipalities, including St. Paul and nearby suburbs, also have record-high numbers of households today. This is true whether the cities have gained or lost population since 1970. 

A graph showing the formation of households versus overall population in 12 MN cities. The number of households tends to increase over time.

Similar policy approaches are necessary for these places. This is particularly true in suburban municipalities, where zoning rules are typically far less flexible than in Minneapolis or St. Paul. Such widespread growth in households suggests a stronger role for the Minnesota Legislature in setting statewide zoning standards that allow for more homes to be built. Unfortunately, such reforms have once again been halted during this year’s legislative session due to opposition from suburban localities.

Denser housing comes with other benefits, too. More housing options help people use fewer resources to travel outside of their community, thus lowering carbon emissions. Because people travel outside of their neighborhood less, these options also foster more vibrant and complete neighborhoods, where people of all backgrounds have access to secure and affordable homes. These goals all complement one another.

Advertisement

Minneapolis’ boom in households means that it needs more houses to hold them. If it fails to build more housing, Minneapolis will struggle to remain affordable and to fit the needs of an increasingly large and diverse number of households.



Source link

Advertisement

Minneapolis, MN

Ellison, Minneapolis, St. Paul update lawsuit against Operation Metro Surge with new data

Published

on

Ellison, Minneapolis, St. Paul update lawsuit against Operation Metro Surge with new data


(ABC 6 News) – Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and Minneapolis and Saint Paul updated their lawsuit over Operation Metro Surge with new survey data on economic harm.

Researchers at the University of California San Diego conducted two surveys tied to the amended lawsuit. The lawsuit says the federal operation violated the Constitution and caused lasting economic damage.

The first survey was done between February and March and included nearly 1,400 residents. It found workers lost more than $240 million in wages during the operation.

A separate newly released survey of about 900 businesses found more than $600 million in lost revenue. The updated lawsuit from Keith Ellison and the cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul adds that new data to its claims.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

Prince’s legacy still shines in downtown Minneapolis 10 years after his death

Published

on

Prince’s legacy still shines in downtown Minneapolis 10 years after his death


By submitting, you consent that you are at least 18 years of age and to receive information about MPR’s or APMG entities’ programs and offerings. The personally identifying information you provide will not be sold, shared, or used for purposes other than to communicate with you about MPR, APMG entities, and its sponsors. You may opt-out at any time clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email communication. View our Privacy Policy.



Source link

Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

10 years later, our Prince superfan shares his Prince Pilgrimage

Published

on

10 years later, our Prince superfan shares his Prince Pilgrimage


April 21, 2016.

Ten years later, that day still doesn’t seem real to me.

I was sitting in the newsroom of The Montclair Times in the early afternoon when word came that Prince had died.

I was incredulous. One of my musical heroes was gone. No way.

Advertisement

I was skeptical because I am a reporter. But also because it was Prince — a superstar so secretive and controlling of his music and public image that you could imagine he would have to give his permission to let the world know of his demise.

As the day passed, videos showed grieving fans standing outside his home and music studio complex, Paisley Park, not far from his beloved Minneapolis. That’s when the reality dawned on me.

Prince Rogers Nelson had gone 2 the afterworld at only 57 years old.

He was gone so young — he had so much more music in him to record, release and perform in public for an adoring audience. He died alone after collapsing in an elevator at his complex.

Those things made me sad.

Advertisement

But I was also annoyed at myself. For not being a better aficionado of his music — by never seeing him in person and not collecting every piece of music he ever recorded.

After a few days of listening to the radio and online to “Purple Rain” and “1999” being played ad nauseam, I also heard lesser-known cuts like the heartbreakingly melancholic and sadly appropriate “Sometimes It Snows In April.”

When I heard the depressing reports that he died due to an accidental fentanyl overdose, I resolved to pay proper tribute to The Purple One.

I would go to Minnesota on a Prince Pilgrimage.

Advertisement

‘Nothing Compares 2 U’

April to June 2016.

I said I would go to Minneapolis, to Prince’s home ground, to pay my respects to him. I didn’t think I would go through with booking a ticket on United Airlines from Newark for the weekend before his birthday.

I had used up most of my vacation days and had one to spare, but not another to stay through Prince’s actual born day. Just my luck.

At least I was fulfilling a commitment to an artist I adore.

Advertisement

I wouldn’t say I was a fanatic for his Royal Badness (one of the many nicknames he carried in his lifetime). But he’s one of the few musicians who really moved me.

I heard his music growing up in the 1980s in Jersey City as a matter of course when the radio dial was set on R&B or pop music stations like KISS-FM and Z-100.

When Prince’s sixth studio album, “Purple Rain,” was released in the summer of 1984, it was a revolution that pushed the rising star into the stratosphere.

I couldn’t go anywhere without hearing the screeching guitar and chanting of Prince that provided the intro to “When Doves Cry,” or the rhythmic strumming of the guitar and the clashing electric drums that start off the album’s title song.

However, it was watching “Purple Rain,” the movie, that put me on the Prince Express. It didn’t matter that he couldn’t act to the satisfaction of critics or that the plot seemed corny. I was just absolutely enthralled by him and his band, The Revolution, tearing through numbers that were a mélange of funk, rock and new wave, while in a musical rivalry with another badass, Morris Day, and his group.

Advertisement

My 13-year-old self also developed a crush on the leading lady, Apollonia Kotero, for her sultry voice and because she stripped nude to purify herself in the waters of Lake Minnetonka. It blew my mind then (and still blows my mind now).

Prince would remain in the background of my music listening as the years passed.

If it wasn’t his voice, it was the voice of others singing his songs, because he was as adept a songwriter as he was a performer. “I Feel for You” (Chaka Khan), “Manic Monday” (The Bangles) and “Nothing Compares 2 U” (Sinéad O’Connor) are some of the major hits that came from his pen.

The first vinyl album I ever got, in my teens was “Around the World in a Day,” his 1985 anti-commercial and purposely obscured follow-up to “Purple Rain.”

In college and afterward, whenever I had a few bucks in my pocket, I bought various albums on CD: “Diamonds and Pearls,” “The Black Album,” “The Gold Experience” and “Rave Un2 the Joy Fantastic,” and “Lovesexy” on cassette. I paid for a ticket to watch what may be Spike Lee’s worst movie, “Girl 6,” in part to hear Prince’s music.

Advertisement

But it wasn’t just Prince’s virtuoso musicianship that made me a believer. It was also his personality, confounding and infuriating at the same time, that intrigued me.

I chatted with NYU classmates about how he slept no more than two hours a day because he worked so hard in the studio, playing all the instruments and producing every track. Yet he looked like he hadn’t aged a minute.

You would hear stories of him boosting artists that he admired by having them play on his albums and in concert. Then you would hear stories of his unkindness and controlling nature toward his bandmates and others in his inner circle.

He was a man who attained a level of stardom that demanded he bask in the spotlight at all times. Then there was the man who operated in secrecy and would alternate between the public, large-scale appearances and his surprise late-night concerts at small venues.

He was a true Gemini.

Advertisement

In the late spring of 2016, I was taking in all of who Prince was, as he was no longer among us mere mortals, while preparing to pay homage to him.

‘MPLS’ and ‘Uptown’

June 3 to 5, 2016.

“Rock ‘n’ Roll Is Alive! (And It Lives in Minneapolis)”

Prince’s 1993 song popped into my head as the United Airlines plane landed at Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport around 10:30 p.m. on June 3.

Advertisement

In the morning, my Prince Pilgrimage was underway as I took a bus near my hotel toward downtown Minneapolis.

While on the bus, I could see out my window why he spent nearly his entire life in or near this city, and created songs like “MPLS” and “Uptown” that presented his hometown to the world.

The widest boulevards I have ever seen outside of Paris. The streets where you saw yards with no fences and many trees. The heat normally expected in late spring was tempered by the Minnesota coolness.

I had an itinerary of the stops I needed to make on a sunny Saturday.

First Avenue and 7th Street Entry was a Greyhound bus depot converted into two music venues starting in the early 1970s. On the wall outside, a giant painted gold star etched with the name PRINCE. Only fitting, as the “Purple Rain” movie was filmed inside First Avenue.

Advertisement

539 North Newton Ave. in the northern part of Minneapolis is where a teenage Mr. Nelson lived with his dad for a short time until he was thrown out.

When I stopped by to view the three-bedroom house, an African American couple was chatting up a man standing outside the house. After they were done, it was my turn to engage Maurice Phillips, Prince’s former bodyguard, who married his boss’ sister Tyka.

I went into reporter mode to get the inside scoop from him on my favorite recording artist.

What was Prince like? “He’s just a normal kind of guy like us. He put on his pants the same kind of way.”

Are there other thoughts about Prince you want to share? “No. But I know Prince is looking down. I got to get done with this yard work.”

Advertisement

Later, I made my way to the Parkway Theater in South Minneapolis for what I thought was the best way to mourn the man: “This Thing Called Life — The Prince Tribute.”

Julius Collins, on lead vocals, was backed by members of Prince’s 1990’s band, the New Power Generation, along with other singers and instrumentalists. They regaled attendees with renditions of Prince songs while photos and videos of him played on a screen behind them.

Collins’ voice boomed as he sang, “Good times were rolling/She started dancing in the streets,” (“Uptown”), “Do I believe in God?/Do I believe in me? — Controversy” (“Controversy”), and “Police ain’t got no gun/You don’t have to run” (“DMSR”).

It was the perfect end to day one of the pilgrimage. I got back to my hotel in the late evening to have a meal and prepare for day two.

I should have skipped the takeout from the nearby fast-casual joint, because the resulting heartburn had me down for the count  — and nixed plans to visit the last stop on the pilgrimage: Paisley Park.

Advertisement

Yet I had a Plan B for the following day, so I wouldn’t let Prince down.

At 2000 Fourth Avenue South in Minneapolis is Electric Fetus, the iconic record store where Prince reportedly made his last public appearance and last music purchases five days before he died.

On my shopping list was his shopping list:

  • Stevie Wonder, “Talking Book.”
  • Chambers Brothers, “The Time Has Come.”
  • Joni Mitchell, “Hejira.”
  • The Swan Silvertones, “Inspirational Gospel Classics.”
  • Missing Persons, “The Best Of Missing Persons.”
  • Santana, “Santana IV.”

I got only three of those CDs, as the others were (unsurprisingly) sold out. I couldn’t have regrets, because, in a weird way, it was the closest to being there when he was there, the closest I would ever get to meeting him.

His famous opening line to “Let’s Go Crazy” also came to mind: “Dearly beloved. We are gathered here today to get through this thing called ‘life.’”

Advertisement

RIP Prince (June 7, 1958-April 21, 2016).

Ricardo Kaulessar covers race, immigration, and culture for NorthJersey.com. For unlimited access to the most important news from your local community, please subscribe or activate your digital account today.

Email: kaulessar@northjersey.com

Twitter/X: @ricardokaul



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending