Milwaukee, WI
Milwaukee Bucks Offseason Big Board: How They Retool If Giannis Antetokounmpo Stays
The Milwaukee Bucks season is officially over and they have a ton of work to do and a lot of questions to answer this offseason. This could be one of the most important offseason in franchise history, and everything revolves around Giannis Antetokounmpo.
If Giannis stays, this is not a rebuild. It’s a retool, but not a small one. This roster, as currently constructed, is not good enough to compete at a championship level. The Bucks have lost their identity, struggled defensively, and lacked consistent shot creation outside of their superstar.
So if Giannis commits, the front office has one job: build a real contender immediately.
This is what their offseason big board should look like.
Players They Should Keep: The Foundation Pieces
Myles turner
Turner is one of the most interesting decisions. He has three years left on his deal and provides two key things: rim protection and spacing. That combination is rare, and it fits extremely well next to Giannis. While his age (29) could make him expendable in a bigger deal, Milwaukee should lean toward keeping him unless they’re getting a clear upgrade.
Ryan Rollins
Rollins is an easy decision. He’s young, improving, and on one of the best contracts on the roster, just $4 million annually over the next two seasons. He’s exactly the type of player you keep around a star like Giannis.
Ousmane Dieng
Dieng has quietly become one of the most intriguing young players on this roster. Over the past couple of months, he’s shown real growth, averaging around 17.8 points, nearly five assists, and six rebounds when given opportunities. At just 22 years old, he offers upside, versatility, and a potential long-term role.
AJ Green
Every contender needs shooting, and Green provides it. He spaces the floor, plays within his role, and doesn’t need touches to be effective.
Players They Should Move: Clearing the Deck
Kyle Kuzma
Kuzma stands out as the most obvious trade candidate. He’s on a $20 million expiring contract and hasn’t delivered consistent production. That contract becomes a valuable trade chip for Milwaukee to upgrade elsewhere.
Myles Turner
I know I had him as a player they should keep but based on his salary he will be a contract that must be included if the Bucks are looking to trade for star this summer. Again, Turner fits, but if a star becomes available, he could be included in a larger package.
Trade Targets:
If Giannis stays, the Bucks cannot be conservative. They need to take real swings and take real risks.
Ja Morant
Morant’s value is at an all-time low, which is exactly why Milwaukee should explore it. He’s still only 26 years old and has already proven he can be a superstar in this league. Ja Morant can bring elite shot creation and explosiveness. He is an underrated playmaker in my opinion, so he should help facilitate.
The Bucks have struggled to generate offense in half-court situations. Morant fixes that immediately. Of course, the risk is obvious: injuries and off-court concerns. If Milwaukee is serious about maximizing Giannis’ prime, this is the type of move that could change everything.
Michael Porter Jr.
Michael Porter Jr. had a breakout season with the Brooklyn Nets averaging 24 points 7.1 rebounds and 3 assists per game. This could be one of the cleanest fits next to Giannis. Michael Porter Jr. provides elite shooting, size on the wing and scoring without needing the ball in his hands.
Giannis thrives when surrounded by spacing, and Porter would open the floor in a way this team desperately needs. The concerns are defense and durability, but offensively, the fit is undeniable.
Trey Murphy III
If Milwaukee wants a lower-risk, high-impact move, Murphy is the perfect choice Trey Murphy III is 25 years old and has had really good back to back seasons. Murphy averaged 21.5 points 5.7 rebounds and 3.8 assists per game. He’s the type of two-way player that every teams wants. Murphy is a great 3 and D player whose athletic and efficient.
Murphy doesn’t need touches, defends multiple positions, and fits seamlessly next to Giannis. He also helps restore a defensive identity.
Free Agent Targets: Contingent on Creating Cap Flexibility
Here’s the reality for the Milwaukee Bucks: They’re projected to be roughly $43 million over the cap, which means free agency won’t be straightforward.
Any move they make is going to be tied directly to what happens before free agency even begins. If Milwaukee wants to be active, it’ll need to create flexibility through trades or internal decisions. One of the biggest factors here will be their players with player options, including names like Gary Trent Jr., Gary Harris, Taurean Prince, and Jericho Sims. If some of those players decide to decline their options and test the market, the Bucks could open up some breathing room. If they opt in, that makes things tighter and forces Milwaukee to look elsewhere to clear salary.
So this isn’t a situation where the Bucks can just go out and spend. Every potential signing is contingent on what they’re able to do with their current roster first .
With that in mind, here are the types of free agents they should prioritize if they’re able to create even a little flexibility.
Norman Powell
If Milwaukee can open up enough room, Norman Powell should be one of their top targets. He gives them something they’ve clearly been missing all season, reliable scoring outside of Giannis. Powell is coming off a breakout year where he averaged around 23 points per game, and he’s capable of creating his own shot while still fitting into a team offense.
The challenge is that Powell will have a strong market, and Milwaukee likely wouldn’t be able to afford him without making a real move to clear salary. But in terms of fit, he checks every box.
Rui Hachimura
Rui Hachimura is a more realistic option depending on how the market plays out. He brings size, physicality, and improved shooting, and he’s the type of forward who can slot into multiple lineups without needing touches to be effective.
For a Bucks team that has lacked versatility, Hachimura would help balance the roster and give them another playable option in bigger lineups next to Giannis.
Coby White
If Milwaukee isn’t able to land a big-name guard through a trade, Coby White becomes an intriguing alternative. He’s taken a step forward as both a scorer and playmaker, and he can operate both on and off the ball.
White wouldn’t be the headline move, but he would raise the offensive floor of this team, which is something they’ve struggled with throughout the season.
Kelly Oubre Jr.
Kelly Oubre Jr. is the type of signing that makes sense for a team operating over the cap. He likely wouldn’t command a massive deal, and he brings energy, athleticism, and scoring off the wing.
He’s not a star, but he’s the type of player contenders add to round out their rotation and bring consistency over the course of a long season.
A Tight Window With Big Decisions
For the Milwaukee Bucks, this isn’t a typical offseason, it’s a pressure-filled one.
They don’t have the luxury of cap space, and they don’t have time to slowly figure things out. Every move is going to require strategy, timing, and a clear vision of what this team is supposed to be around Giannis. If Milwaukee can find a way to navigate the cap, make the right decisions on player options, and clear just enough room to be active, they have a chance to reshape this roster in a meaningful way.
If they can’t, they risk running it back with a team that already showed it isn’t good enough.
Milwaukee, WI
New book documents Violent Femmes’ rise to fame from Milwaukee roots
Before the Violent Femmes became a world-famous band with a multi-platinum record, they started the same way any other group would in Milwaukee: playing wherever they could.
Local clubs weren’t interested in their unique musical style, so they took to playing on sidewalks and street corners until they were first discovered while performing outside of a Pretenders concert at the Oriental Theater in 1981.
They self-funded their first album, which went on to sell more than 7 million copies.
Understanding Wisconsin, Together.
WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” newsletter keeps you connected to the state you love without feeling overwhelmed. No paywall. No agenda. No corporate filter.
The story of the Violent Femmes’ Milwaukee origins and improbable rise to fame is the subject of a new book in the long-running music book series called “33⅓.”
Author Nic Brown joined WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” to share the significance of the band’s self-titled debut album and what he learned from interviewing band members and producers.
The following was edited for clarity and brevity.
Rob Ferrett: For people who aren’t familiar with the Violent Femmes, how would you describe their music?
Nic Brown: They occupy this overlapping realm of folk, punk and jazz — which I’d call a Bermuda Triangle for anybody, but they pull it off because their songs are so great. Gordon Gano, the primary singer-songwriter, had this incredible collection of songs when the band formed, and they’re so well put together that they could have worked in any setting, really.
The Violent Femmes themselves had one of the most unique arrangements of instruments possible, and that’s the biggest surprise for people when they see them. A lot of what’s most unusual about them is often invisible on a recording, but they’re a one-of-a-kind band. Their debut record is a one-of-a-kind record. It didn’t sound like anything else then, and it still doesn’t sound like anything else today.
RF: What were their early public performances like?
NB: They had a hard time getting gigs. They busked, and they had instrumentation that made it easy for them to do that, and that was by design, too. Victor DeLorenzo, the drummer, played standing up with brushes, with just a snare drum and then what he calls a tranceaphone, which is a metal bushel basket placed on top of another drum. Gordon (Gano) would play guitar on the street, usually an acoustic guitar. And then Brian Ritchie would play an acoustic bass guitar, which to most people sounds like stand-up bass, like what you’d see in a jazz trio. It looked more like a mariachi-style bass, and Brian’s point was, he couldn’t haul a stand-up bass around. He didn’t even have a driver’s license.
They had instruments that were made to play on the street, and the fact that they spent so much time playing on the street is part of the reason the band works so well. There are few performance spaces less forgiving than a street corner in Milwaukee, or anywhere. They honed this act on the street corners so that they could make their songs work in that setting. And because of that, when they finally got into the studio to record their debut album, they were a really well-oiled machine, despite the fact they hadn’t spent much time on actual stages.
RF: What was it like for them to try to get a record deal and record their first album?
NB: It was failure after failure, really. They tried to get a record deal before they went into the studio. They had one very small label out of New York that was interested, but that fell through, so that’s why they eventually recorded it themselves. They had a lot of pressure from some people who did recognize a spark there to do that ’80s rock ‘n’ roll production with the more processed sound and synthesizers, and they had a surprising amount of confidence at the age that they were at to stick with their sound.
Eventually, there was a label called Slash Records, a small punk label in California, and they turned the band down. But two employees at Slash loved this recording so much that they kept playing the cassette in the offices until the owner finally said, “OK, I can’t take it anymore. I’m going to sign this band, not because I want to, but because I’m so sick of hearing my employees playing it every day.” So that’s how they ended up getting their record deal with Slash Records.
They say it’s the worst record deal any band could ever have signed. But they did what they had to, the record came out, and the rest is history, right?
RF: It took four years before the album went gold and then another four years to go platinum. How did it pick up popularity and go viral in the pre-internet era?
NB: I describe it as going viral over eight years via cassette. Young people connected with the songs and shared dubbed cassette tapes. They say this album has sold 7 million copies, and I say you need to ask Maxwell how many blank tapes they sold between 1983 and 1991 and add in about 30 percent of that.
A lot of people don’t know what the album cover looks like. I had a guy recently tell me that the album cover is whatever guy’s handwriting wrote “Violent Femmes” on the blank tape, so it was a real organic word-of-mouth build-up over eight years.
RF: How unique was Brian Ritchie’s bass playing in what you described as a “lead bass” role in the band?
NB: This is probably the most bass-forward recording in popular music history. Brian Ritchie is an incredible musician, and so this thing happens on these songs where the melodic statements that aren’t happening with Gordon’s vocals are usually made on the bass guitar, and then Brian Ritchie takes long bass solos, unaccompanied by any other instrument.
They sound so natural and great that you actually don’t even think they’re bass solos. Often, if there’s a bass solo happening, that’s when we might skip the song. I’m sorry to say, but that doesn’t apply to Brian Ritchie’s work. He’s the lead.
RF: As a musician yourself, what drew you so enthusiastically into writing this book?
NB: The book series that it’s part of, “33⅓,” is just a classic series, and guys like me were always dreaming about what record I would pitch to write about. This album had always been in my head as that record. I published a memoir about three years ago about my career as a musician, and in it I mentioned how important this album was.
One of the members of the Femmes management read that memoir and actually reached out to me about maybe doing a project with them at some point. So this simmering dream of mine to pitch a “33⅓” book rose to the surface, and I thought, I’m gonna go for it. It was sort of a double-dream for me to have a book in the series and to be able to write it with the participation of all three members and the producer. It’s a fan’s dream come true.
Milwaukee, WI
Auburn baseball vs Milwaukee regional championship: Time, TV, how to watch
AUBURN — It’s tough enough to win an NCAA regional championship, and considering the circumstance Auburn baseball put itself in, it’s rather miraculous the Tigers will be playing for one on Monday, June 1 (5 p.m. CT, TBA).
The fourth overall seed in this year’s NCAA Tournament, Auburn dropped its regional-opener four days prior, losing to 4-seed Milwaukee and tasked with working itself out of the field’s elimination bracket.
Since then, Auburn’s rattled off three-straight victories, sending 3-seed NC State and 2-seed UCF packing before besting the Panthers in a rematch that started late Sunday and didn’t end until the early hours of Monday morning.
It’ll wind up being a three-game set between the Tigers and Panthers, who go to battle one last time in a winner-take-all contest, with a super regional berth on the line.
BUY TICKETS FOR AUBURN BASEBALL’S NCAA REGIONAL HERE
Here’s everything you need to tune into Auburn’s upcoming contest, including viewing options and more:
How to watch Auburn baseball vs Milwaukkee today: TV, streaming
STREAM AUBURN BASEBALL HERE
It’s not yet known where, or if, Auburn’s NCAA regional championship will be nationally televised, but it’ll stream on ESPN+, which can be accessed with an ESPN subscription.
Mark Neely and former Auburn pitcher Gregg Olson are expected to be on the call, handling play-by-play and color commentator duties, respectively.
Listen live to Auburn baseball vs Milwaukee on the radio
Today’s game will be broadcast live on WMSP-AM (740) in Montgomery and WGZZ-FM (94.3) in Auburn. The radio call can also be streamed online. Andy Burcham and Brad Law are expected to be on the call.
When does Auburn baseball play Milwaukee today? First-pitch time, probable starters for NCAA regional
- Time: 5 p.m. CT
- Date: Monday, June 1
- Location: Plainsman Park (Auburn)
Here’s who the Tigers and Panthers will have toeing the rubber:
- Auburn: TBA
- Milwaukee: TBA
Auburn baseball’s 2026 schedule: Results, times, how to watch
| Date(s) (Times) | Opponent | Results | TV (Streaming) |
| Feb. 13-15 (5:30, 6, 2 p.m.) | Youngstown State | G1: 2-1, AU; G2: 2-1, AU (10); G3: 17-2 AU (7) | N/A (SECN+) |
| Feb. 17 (6 p.m.) | Cincinnati | 8-0, Cincinnati | N/A (SECN+) |
| Feb. 20 (7 p.m.) | Kansas State* | 5-1, Auburn | N/A (FloSports) |
| Feb. 21 (3 p.m.) | No. 14 Florida State* | 8-5, Auburn | N/A (FloSports) |
| Feb. 22 (10:30 a.m.) | No. 11 Louisville* | 10-3, Auburn | N/A (FloSports) |
| Feb. 25 (6 p.m.) | West Georgia | 4-3, Auburn | N/A (SECN+) |
| Feb. 27 – March 1 (6, 2, 1 p.m.) | Nebraska | G1: 9-8, NU (10); G2: 15-4, AU (7); G3: 12-3, AU | N/A (SECN+) |
| March 3 (6 p.m.) | Samford | 6-2, Auburn | N/A (SECN+) |
| March 6-8 (6, 6, 1 p.m.) | Winthrop | G1: 10-0, AU (7); G2: 6-0, AU; G3: 8-1, AU | N/A (SECN+) |
| March 10 (6 p.m.) | UAB | 17-2, Auburn (7) | N/A (SECN+) |
| March 13-15 (6, 4, 1 p.m.) | at Missouri | G1: 2-0, AU; G2: 4-3, AU (10); G3: 9-2, AU | N/A (SECN+) |
| March 17 (4 p.m.) | No. 3 Georgia Tech | 9-2, Auburn | N/A (SECN+) |
| March 20-22 (6, 6, 2 p.m.) | No. 2 Texas | G1: 4-3, AU; G2: 7-6, UT; G3: 5-0, UT | N/A (SECN+) |
| March 24 (6 p.m.) | South Alabama* | 10-0, Auburn (8) | TBA |
| March 27-29 (6, 7, 1 p.m.) | at No. 23 Alabama | G1: 11-1, UA (8); G2: 3-2, UA; G3: 3-1, UA | SECN (G1); (SECN+) |
| March 31 (6 p.m.) | at No. 3 Georgia Tech | 13-3, Georgia Tech (8) | ESPN2 |
| April 2-4 (6, 6, 2 p.m.) | No. 16 Arkansas | G1: 10-2, AU; G2: 3-2, ARK; G3: 8-3, AU | ESPN2 (SECN+) |
| April 7 (6 p.m.) | Jacksonville State | 15-4, JSU (8) | N/A (SECN+) |
| April 10-12 (6, 7, 2 p.m.) | Kentucky | G1: 12-5, AU; G2: 5-4, UK; G3: 11-0, AU (7) | SECN (G2, G3); (SECN+) |
| April 14 (6 p.m.) | Alabama State | 13-0, Auburn (7) | N/A (SECN+) |
| April 16-18 (6, 4:30 p.m., 11 a.m.) | at No. 18 Florida | G1: 6-3, UF; G2: 5-3, AU; G3: 8-5, AU | SECN (G1, G2), ESPN2 (G3); (SECN+) |
| April 21 (6 p.m.) | at Samford | 14-2, Auburn (7) | TBA |
| April 24-26 (6, 6, 2 p.m.) | No. 13 Oklahoma | G1: 6-4, AU; G2: 2-1, OU; G3: 14-4, AU (8) | N/A (SECN+) |
| May 1-3 (7, 2, 1 p.m.) | at No. 7 Texas A&M | G1: 18-5, AU (7); G2: 5-4, AU; G3: 4-3, A&M | SECN (G1); (SECN+) |
| May 5 (6 p.m.) | at UAB | 10-2, Auburn | TBA |
| May 7-9 (7, 7:30, 3 p.m.) | at No. 16 Mississippi State | G1: 10-3, MSU; G2: 5-4, AU; G3: 13-2, AU (7) | ESPNU (G1), SECN (G2, G3); (SECN+) |
| May 12 (6 p.m.) | at No. 25 Jacksonville State | 4-1, Jacksonville State | TBA |
| May 14-16 (6, 6, 2 p.m.) | No. 4 Georgia | G1: 2-1, UGA; G2: 9-7, UGA; G3: 14-4, AU (8) | N/A (SECN+) |
| May 20 (8 p.m.) | (14) LSU^ | 3-1, Auburn | SECN (SECN+) |
| May 22 (8:25 p.m.) | (3) Texas A&M^ | 7-0, Auburn | SECN (SECN+) |
| May 23 (4 p.m.) | (7) Arkansas^ | 2-1, Arkansas | SECN (SECN+) |
| May 29 (Noon) | (4) Milwaukee% | 13-8, Milwaukee | N/A (ESPN+) |
| May 30 (2 p.m.) | (3) NC State% | 17-13, Auburn | ESPN (ESPN+) |
| May 31 (2 p.m.) | (2) UCF% | 9-3, Auburn | ESPN2 (ESPN+) |
| May 31 (10:10 p.m.) | (4) Milwaukee% | 9-1, Auburn | N/A (ESPN+) |
| June 1 (5 p.m.) | (4) Milwaukee% | TBA (ESPN+) | |
| Record: 41-20 (17-13 SEC) |
Adam Cole is the Auburn athletics beat writer for the Montgomery Advertiser. He can be reached via email at acole@gannett.com or on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, @colereporter. To support Adam’s work, please subscribe to the Montgomery Advertiser.
Milwaukee, WI
Milwaukee Panthers Putting Together a Great Run in the NCAA Tournament – World Baseball Network
The Milwaukee Panthers are in the driver’s seat in the NCAA Tournament’s Auburn regional. The Panthers have two wins over the Auburn Tigers and UCF Knights and made it to the regional final.
The Panthers are looking to make it to their first super regional in program history.
From a rocky start to a red-hot Horizon League Tournament run
Milwaukee did not have a smooth start to the 2026 college baseball season. The Panthers were 5-22 overall on April 3 and had an uphill battle to climb to end the season.
From April 3 to the end of the regular season, Milwaukee went 17-9. However, they still had a below-average overall record of 22-31. The Panthers needed to win the Horizon League Tournament to make it into the NCAA Tournament as an automatic bid.
The Panthers posted a solid conference record of 14-10 in 2026. This gave them the number two seed in the Horizon League Tournament, which was played at Nischwitz Stadium in Dayton, Ohio.
Milwaukee defeated Northern Kentucky and the tournament host, Wright State, twice to win the tournament title. They outscored their opponents 23-7 across those three games. The 2026 Horizon League Tournament title is the first conference tournament title for the Panthers since 2010.
Milwaukee’s wins over Auburn and UCF
An automatic bid placed Milwaukee as the fourth seed in the Auburn regional. The Panthers faced off against the Tigers on Friday, May 29.
Milwaukee got off to a huge, early lead on Auburn. Heading into the bottom of the fourth inning, the Panthers had a 10-0 lead on the Tigers. Milwaukee would go on to win 13-8.
Joey Spence, John Hadley VI, and Grant Ross led Milwaukee offensively with three hits apiece. Spence had two doubles in the game and an RBI. Hadley VI had a double and a triple against Auburn.
Charlie Marion and Bradyn Horn both had three-run home runs early on in the game that were huge for the Panthers. Those home runs allowed them to gain a big 10-0 lead early.
The magic did not stop on Friday for Milwaukee. On Saturday, May 30, the Panthers defeated the UCF Knights in the “1-0” game by a score of 13-6.
Ross continued his big performance in the regional. After a three-hit game against Auburn, the Milwaukee third baseman hit a home run and a double against UCF. He finished the game with two hits, three RBIs, and five runs scored.
Marion finished with a multi-hit game against the Knights. Milwaukee’s center fielder, Dylan O’Connell, had two doubles in the game that led to four RBIs.
Up next for Milwaukee
The Milwaukee Panthers will play the winner of the game between Auburn and UCF in the Auburn regional final on Sunday, May 31.
The Auburn-UCF elimination game is at 3 p.m. ET at Plainsman Park, and the game can be watched on ESPN2. Milwaukee’s game against the winner will be at 8 p.m. ET. That game will be on ESPN+.
WBN NCAA: https://worldbaseball.com/league/ncaa/
PHOTO: Via Dominic Kibler on Instagram (@dominic.kibler)
-
Washington2 minutes agoWorker killed by falling tree in Washington County
-
Wisconsin9 minutes agoIs Wisconsin violating the rights of disabled voters? Court hears arguments
-
West Virginia12 minutes agoStarting Lineups + Live Score Updates for West Virginia vs. Kentucky — Regional Final
-
Wyoming17 minutes agoWyoming man imprisoned for sexually assaulting girl at Colorado water park
-
Crypto24 minutes agoDavidson County warns of phone scammers calling for payments via cryptocurrency, gift cards or mobile apps
-
Finance27 minutes agoBudgeting apps can help track spending, but habits still matter
-
Fitness32 minutes agoI’m feeling my best ever at 80: these are my daily habits – and the one thing I never do
-
Movie Reviews42 minutes agoSecond Sight’s Insomnia 4K UHD Review: The Film That Beat Nolan to It
