Michigan
Purdue basketball left the door open, and Michigan walked through and took the Big Ten lead
Purdue basketball coach Matt Painter on road loss to Michigan
Hear what Boilermakers coach Matt Painter said after Michigan came back to beat Purdue.
ANN ARBOR, Mich. — Purdue basketball’s Braden Smith asked for charity when Michigan’s Danny Wolf stepped to the charity stripe with a chance to ice a victory Tuesday night.
The Boilermakers trailed by two with six seconds remaining. They needed help, so what’s the harm in asking for some?
“I said, ‘Give us one, just one,’ and he did,” Smith said of Wolf missing the front end of his double-bonus opportunity. “And then I said ‘Uh oh, if he gives us another one I’m going to go down and make it.’”
Wolf obliged by missing the second as well. It left him a desperation running heave off one foot from 25 feet — one he said he made consistently shoot around. When it sailed wide of the rim, the Wolverines had a 75-73 victory and sole possession of the Big Ten Conference lead.
Whether that stands up as the decisive margin in the league championship race will be decided over a frantic final few weeks. Michigan State could also have jumped over the Boilermakers into a tie for first. Indiana, with a lame duck coach and a season long since having spiraled out of control, stunned the Spartans 71-67 in East Lansing.
Purdue could not make enough championship plays. If it summons a championship response, it may still control its own destiny.
Fortunes flip quickly in the Big Ten. Ask the Spartans, who 10 days earlier were undefeated in league play. They’ve lost three of four now and must play at Illinois this weekend before Purdue visits the Breslin Center on Tuesday.
This Boilermaker home-and-home with Michigan provided its own testimony.
Purdue ran the Wolverines out of Mackey Arena only 18 days earlier. It forced 22 turnovers — nearly four times as many as it committed. Held them to 6 of 29 3-point shooting and 0.90 points per possession. Built a 30-point lead with under four minutes to play and made a statement: The Big Ten championship still comes through West Lafayette.
The chances of those conditions repeating Tuesday seemed unlikely at best. Teams generally play better at home. Calls tend to go their way.
Home cooking? Perhaps. Ask around the Big Ten and you’ll find plenty of players who say they had their fill of that meal at Mackey Arena.
“That’s something you’ve got to live with,” Furst said. “That’s life on the road. We knew that coming in — and especially in a game like this, going against a team of this caliber.”
Trey Kaufman-Renn remains puzzled by the foul disparity. Smith too. They took a combined 40 shots and did not draw a single trip to the free throw line. (In Purdue’s six losses, Smith has attempted a total of six free throws — all against Ohio State, when he played only 30 minutes due to foul trouble. Go figure.)
The 10 fouls called against Kaufman-Renn and Caleb Furst mattered — more than keeping both out of the game for stretches, and eventually for good. They contributed to an accumulation, of which Michigan took full advantage. It went 8 for 8 in one-and-one situations — four in each half.
Purdue’s lone one-and-one chance came from freshman Raleigh Burgess. He came in with 16 free throw attempts over games which were decided by an average of 24.4 points. He went to the line with 58 seconds left Tuesday, trying to halve Michigan’s four-point lead.
He missed the front end, Ruben Jones scored a put-back dunk against the Kaufman-Renn and Furst-less front line, and Purdue faced a six-point hole with 39 seconds to play.
So yes, the fouls mattered. Yes, the Boilermakers grumbled about them, to a varying extent, both on and off the record.
The best reaction — the one which can still win them a Big Ten championship — was the amount of time they spent blaming the guys in black and gold instead of black and white.
Kaufman-Renn called himself out for two big mistakes. He failed to rotate and get vertical on a late defensive assignment. Then he made an awkward pass in the paint which resulted in a turnover. He was called for his fifth foul trying to rebound on the other end.
“I don’t think the game was lost from the officiating,” Kaufman-Renn said. “… We had our chances.”
Kaufman-Renn, Smith and Fletcher Loyer combined to score 61 points on 51 field goal attempts. Exactly the high-volume efficiency Painter wants and expects from his stars.
The other six combined for 12 points on 4-of-18 shooting with no assists and five turnovers. Michigan’s bench outscored Purdue’s 21-0. In a two-point game with the lead in the Big Ten on the line, those numbers are significant, too.
Purdue missed a handful of chances at the rim. It missed wide-open 3s in rhythm. It would love to have the final few minutes of the first half back, when Kaufman-Renn sat with two fouls and Michigan cut what had been an 11-point deficit down to two.
Back on Jan. 24 at Mackey Arena, the Boilermakers fairly quickly eliminated any hope Michigan might have had of capitalizing down the stretch. Tuesday night on the road, they left the Wolverines exactly enough rope to pull themselves back into the lead and keep it.
A decade of Celebrate Michigan: See the images that won from 2015 to 2025
The Detroit News’ Celebrate Michigan photo contest is 20 years old. We’ve assembled the best of the best: Winners and runners up from 2015 to 2025.
The Detroit News
Gotion Inc. has asked a federal judge to order the Michigan township where it was supposed to call home to repay the roughly $23.7 million it owes the state in taxpayer-funded incentives.
Green Township’s actions opposing Gotion’s planned battery parts plant made it all but impossible to move forward, the company argued, leaving Gotion in default under its agreement with the state and on the hook for the $23.7 million in taxpayer-funded incentives it received for land purchases and improvements.
“Now that it is clear the project cannot move forward in the face of this continued opposition and the state of Michigan’s withdrawal of support, Gotion seeks to add these constitutional claims and request damages as a result of the township’s breach of the development agreement and violation of Gotion’s constitutional rights,” a May 29 court filing in the case said.
Last week’s filing seeks to amend an earlier lawsuit Gotion filed against Green Township over zoning changes that made its development all but impossible to proceed.
In February, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals blocked Gotion’s lawsuit, arguing that it was moot because the state had already found the project in default and had demanded back roughly $23.7 million that had been given to the subsidiary of a Chinese company to purchase and prepare land in Green Township. In light of that ruling, Gotion is seeking to amend its lawsuit to seek additional damages.
“…the Sixth Circuit implied that given the facts of the dispute at this point, the correct form of damages for Gotion’s breach of contract claim against the township is likely monetary damages and no longer injunctive relief,” Gotion said in the May 29 filing.
The amended filing includes demands for damages arising from the “millions” Gotion paid or spent in reliance on the project moving forward, lost profits the company would have made if the manufacturing facility were built, attorney fees and an amount “not less than $23,670,873.56 for funds advanced towards land and development costs related to the project that the state of Michigan is now claiming should be repaid.”
Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office, which is seeking to recoup the $23.7 million on behalf of the Michigan Strategic Fund, said it was aware of Gotion’s May 29 filing against Green Township and is “monitoring the situation.” The office declined further comment, citing attorney-client privilege.
Gotion first sued Green Township in March 2024 after the board — all of whom had been replaced in November 2023 with members concerned about the Gotion project — rescinded two resolutions needed for the project to move forward. Gotion sued in federal court for breach of contract, and a U.S. district court judge issued a preliminary ruling in Gotion’s favor.
But the Sixth Circuit later blocked the case after Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s administration, last fall, found Gotion to be in default of its grant agreement.
The state’s finding of default was in part due to the Green Township lawsuit. The company’s agreement with the state prohibits involvement in a suit that “would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the project or the grantee’s performance of its obligations under this agreement.”
The state also maintained Gotion’s “cessation of eligible activities” for a period of 120 days constituted an “abandonment” in violation of the grant agreement.
The Michigan Strategic Fund said it would seek to recoup the $23.7 million used to purchase and prepare land for Gotion in Green Township.
The Gotion project in Green Township was fraught with controversy shortly after its announcement. The company had planned to locate a battery parts plant in the Big Rapids area, creating up to 2,350 jobs and receiving about $175 million in taxpayer-funded incentives for the project.
Local opponents pushed back on the project because of the secretive nature with which it was negotiated, the unknown environmental effects of the project and Gotion’s parent company in China. Those concerns were amplified by Republican candidates in 2024, including both Vice President JD Vance and President Donald Trump.
The legal maneuverings with Gotion have already come at a cost to the township.
For the past three years, the state Treasury Department has flagged Green Township in Mecosta County because its expenditures have exceeded the amount of money authorized in its annual budget. In a corrective action plan submitted to Treasury last month, the township said its deficits were “primarily due to the legal fees.”
eleblanc@detroitnews.com
A group of residents on Holland Road in Taylor, Michigan, say they are now doing everything they can to keep their neighborhood the way it is after some of them received a letter saying the city is considering rezoning their neighborhood.
“People across the street from me could have warehouse front property instead of woods and nice residential homes,” said Matthew Streicher.
Streicher, whose family has owned property on Holland Road for more than 100 years, says that has been his concern after he received a letter from the city about a proposed rezoning from residential to light industrial directly behind his home near Wick and Holland roads.
“So that’s when I also decided to start knocking on doors around here and saying this is what is going on, we need to speak out and have a voice as to what happens in our backyards, literally,” said Streicher.
Streicher told CBS News Detroit that three of his neighbors received that letter, informing residents that there’s a possibility of a new cold storage warehouse development if this land is rezoned.
“Nothing that belongs in a neighborhood,” said Tim Adkins.
“Heartbreaking, heartbreaking, you know,” said Denise Haggadone.
Many who live on Holland Road say this possibility is even more disturbing because of how long everyone has lived on this quaint road. And these same homeowners say that an industrial facility would only bring in more traffic and take away natural green space, most likely hurting their property value as well.
“It’s nice to see the wildlife, you know, there’s so few places left,” said Adkins.
On Tuesday, CBS News Detroit spoke off-camera with City Council Chairman Charley Johnson, who also lives on Holland Road. Johnson says he understands all of his neighbors’ concerns and agrees with them.
He says the company proposing this rezoning has every right to do so, and that the planning commission will vote on it Wednesday evening.
“It’s sad, I raised my kid here, and he’s planning on having this home after I pass or retire or what have you,” Haggadone said,
The residents hope to see a big turnout at Wednesday’s planning commission meeting at 7 p.m. on Wednesday, June 3, at Taylor City Hall.
The Sterling Heights City Council is set to consider a resolution Tuesday evening opposing tax policy bills in Lansing that one councilmember contends put every municipality “at risk.”
The Michigan House voted in May to pass several bills that would slash property taxes across the state, but skipped a vote on a bill needed to replace some of the more than $5 billion in lost tax revenue.
At its Tuesday evening meeting, Sterling Heights City Council is slated to consider the adoption of a resolution opposing Michigan House Bills 5872 through 5879 due to “their potential negative impact on local government revenue, financial planning, and administrative operations,” a city document said. Sterling Heights City Manager Mark Vanderpool said the city would lose about $5 million in annual revenue from the bills. He said there’s no “guaranteed replacement” for the lost revenue, and the city would need to cut services, he said.
“So we’re deeply concerned about that,” he said.
The House’s sweeping tax cuts can’t be implemented without the passage of a separate bill levying a loosely defined 6% sales tax on services that has yet to be revealed. Republicans who control the House did not hold a vote on the sales tax hike bill, which remains in committee.
All combined, the four property tax cuts passed by the House are estimated to result in a tax revenue loss that could progress from $5.5 billion to $7.5 billion a year, according to a series of nonpartisan House Fiscal Agency analyses.
Vanderpool, the Sterling Heights city manager, said he wants the state Legislature to work “hand in hand” with cities, townships and villages to come up with a solution for “guaranteed revenue replacement.”
“We are more than willing ― I think our reputation precedes us ― to work with our state legislators hand in hand to come up with viable solutions that … may reform property taxes without harming communities across the state,” he said.
Sterling Heights Councilwoman Barbara Ziarko said the legislation reduces the city’s revenue without a guarantee of what it will be replaced with. She said that in the future, the legislation could prevent the city from maintaining positions that it has promised residents it would maintain, including public safety roles.
“When they put the burden on our local government, they’re actually putting it on the residents of whatever community it is,” she said.
State Rep. Steve Frisbie, a Calhoun County Republican, previously said that Michigan residents need to see tax relief immediately. He noted a ballot proposal collecting signatures last year would have eliminated all property taxes in the state. That citizens’ initiative, known as AxMiTax, fizzled out and won’t be on the ballot this fall.
“They realized that our property taxes are too high and they demand that we take action now,” Frisbie said.
More on the bills
The cuts passed by the House in May would eliminate the 6-mill State Education Tax and eliminate the 0.75% real estate transfer tax assessed on the sale price of real estate.
House Republicans also signed off on eliminating the personal property tax. That bill, largely intended to benefit utility companies, is tied to separate legislation that requires utilities such as Consumers Energy and DTE Energy to pass on personal property tax savings by cutting electric and gas rates for their residential customers. It also requires utilities to freeze rates for two years.
Jennifer Varney, Sterling Heights’ finance and budget director, said the elimination of the personal property tax would result in a $4.3 million annual revenue loss for the city. She said the personal property tax refers to the taxes that businesses pay on their assets, such as their machines and vehicles.
Another tax on the chopping block is the so-called “pop-up tax,” an increase in a property tax bill that occurs when a house transfers from one owner to the next in Michigan, uncapping a constitutional limit on the property tax increase on a home’s taxable value.
Under the state Constitution, a property’s taxable value cannot increase by more than the rate of inflation or 5% each year. But when a property is sold, that cap lifts and is reset at a new, often higher taxable value, resulting in a “pop-up” in property taxes.
Varney said the “pop-up” is the only way cities “recapture” the true value of a home. Michigan also has the Headlee Amendment, a state law that requires local governments to roll back millage rates if taxable property values rise faster than the rate of inflation.
“If you take away the pop-up … and you keep the rollback of the millage, you’re basically limiting any kind of growth in taxable base for municipalities,” she said.
Staff Writer Beth LeBlanc contributed.
asnabes@detroitnews.com
-
Los Angeles, Ca44 minutes agoPolice investigate deadly stabbing in Tarzana; suspect in custody
-
Detroit, MI1 hour agoDetroit Tigers sweep Tampa Bay Rays in win as Dillon Dingler stays hot
-
San Francisco, CA1 hour agoRetired San Francisco firefighter dies from lung cancer after Blue Shield denies treatment claims
-
Dallas, TX1 hour agoTrackdown: Dallas 7-Eleven robbery suspect wanted
-
Miami, FL1 hour agoThis new Italian restaurant in Brickell only has 10 items on the menu
-
Boston, MA1 hour agoVisiting Boston this summer? Here are 8 navigation tips you need to know.
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoDenver-ish Central Market? RiNo food hall vendors claim they’ve been pushed out
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoNew Ben & Jerry’s location opening at Seattle waterfront’s Pier 54
