Connect with us

Michigan

Michigan Republican Tom Barrett seeks do-over in critical House race with one edge: ‘My opponent is not a woman’ – Washington Examiner

Published

on

Michigan Republican Tom Barrett seeks do-over in critical House race with one edge: ‘My opponent is not a woman’ – Washington Examiner


EXCLUSIVE — The abortion matter was a political albatross for former Michigan Republican state Sen. Tom Barrett’s first campaign for Michigan‘s 7th Congressional District, one of the country’s most expensive races last election cycle.

But with eventual winner Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), a second-term incumbent, running for Michigan’s open U.S. Senate seat, Barrett is hoping the matter will be less politically charged now, particularly after the state constitutionally protected access to the procedure in 2022.

During an hourlong interview with the Washington Examiner at his campaign headquarters in Lansing, Barrett, 42, downplayed the possibility to “ever replicate the intensity around the [abortion] issue that it had in 2022.”

Roe v. Wade had just been overturned, 50 years of precedent, and all of a sudden, we wake up the next day, and that’s not the case anymore,” Barrett said. “And then, at the same time, Michigan had this pending ballot, constitutional amendment, to ratify a pretty extreme pro-abortion standard in Michigan in our constitution.”

Advertisement

While contending that Democrats are underscoring abortion to overshadow concerns regarding the southern border, the cost of living, and crime, Barrett, a former Michigan state representative and Army veteran, also argued that members of Congress have “a lot smaller of a role as it relates to abortion policy.” Regardless, Democrats — including one-time state Sen. Curtis Hertel Jr., a declared candidate for Michigan’s 7th District — are preparing to criticize him for his abortion positions, especially his stance on a federal ban.

“The fundamentals of this race remain the same: Tom Barrett supports banning abortion with no exceptions for rape or incest and voted five times against legislation that is creating thousands of good paying union jobs in mid-Michigan,” a Hertel spokeswoman told the Washington Examiner. “Voters already rejected his out-of-touch extremism once and will do so again next November.”

Barrett reiterated his defense of his 2021 opposition to the incentives for a new General Motors electric vehicle battery factory in nearby Delta Township.

“It was easy to attack me on it under the guise of, ‘Look what’s going to happen’ and ‘Tom Barrett voted against X number of jobs,’” he said. “That’s a potent attack. But when you explain to people the cost per job, that the corporate executives are going to be getting all this money and very little of it is going to be given to the actual workers doing the jobs, and you point out the national security concerns and other things, I think you erode the public support for a program.”

Barrett is the only Republican who has announced a campaign for the 7th District, a central Michigan district anchored by Lansing and whose lines between Detroit and Grand Rapids were redrawn in 2022 because of post-2020 census redistricting. And with Hertel, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer‘s (D-MI) former legislative director, the only declared Democrat, the pair’s primary posturing is a preview of their likely general election, considered a Democratic-leaning toss-up contest by prognosticators, such as the CookPoliticalReport. Their respective primaries are not until August.

Advertisement

Aside from abortion, Barrett attributed his 2022 campaign loss to Slotkin’s incumbency advantage — for example, the former CIA analyst and Pentagon official’s fundraising edge — as well as problems with the top of the then-Republican ticket, namely GOP gubernatorial nominee Tudor Dixon. For reference, Slotkin’s campaign raised $9.9 million two years ago, compared to Barrett’s $2.8 million, excluding outside fundraising and spending. She won Michigan’s 7th District by 6 points, 52% to Barrett’s 46%, or 20,185 votes.

“My opponent is not a woman. He does not have the depth of resources that Slotkin had. The top of the ticket should be far more competitive. The abortion proposal, which dominated the race and every race in America seemingly two years ago, is not on the ballot in Michigan this year,” Barrett said. “In addition to that, I feel like the same issues that we were really highlighting in 2022 — cost of living, energy, national security, the border, crime, all of these things — are as bad or worse today as they were in 2022.”

“I already know people in the district. I’m not meeting them all for the first time,” he added. “It’s never easy to raise money, but it’s a little bit easier when donors are a little more familiar with you because they’ve heard your name before.”

Hertel, though, also has name recognition, with his father, Curtis Hertel Sr., serving as co-speaker of Michigan’s House of Representatives from 1993 to 1994, and his brother, Kevin Hertel, winning his state Senate campaign in 2022.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Advertisement

With Barrett repeating that his 2024 campaign could be “the end of the road” for his political career, he was simultaneously “cognizant of the challenges” should he win in November and become part of a U.S. House Republican conference that appears to disagree with him largely, specifically on foreign policy.

“We essentially have a tied game in the U.S. House right now, so it makes it extremely difficult to govern from that standpoint,” he said. “I don’t go into this with rose-colored lenses. My best-case scenario is I win this election, and then the hard work really starts in trying to govern this country and move us in the right direction, in spite of the challenges that we’re facing, in spite of all the differences that we have, in spite of the overheated political rhetoric. We still got to do our part to move the country in the right place.”



Source link

Michigan

Residents in Taylor, Michigan, fight against possible rezoning

Published

on

Residents in Taylor, Michigan, fight against possible rezoning


A group of residents on Holland Road in Taylor, Michigan, say they are now doing everything they can to keep their neighborhood the way it is after some of them received a letter saying the city is considering rezoning their neighborhood. 

“People across the street from me could have warehouse front property instead of woods and nice residential homes,” said Matthew Streicher.

Streicher, whose family has owned property on Holland Road for more than 100 years, says that has been his concern after he received a letter from the city about a proposed rezoning from residential to light industrial directly behind his home near Wick and Holland roads. 

“So that’s when I also decided to start knocking on doors around here and saying this is what is going on, we need to speak out and have a voice as to what happens in our backyards, literally,” said Streicher.

Advertisement

Streicher told CBS News Detroit that three of his neighbors received that letter, informing residents that there’s a possibility of a new cold storage warehouse development if this land is rezoned.

“Nothing that belongs in a neighborhood,” said Tim Adkins.

“Heartbreaking, heartbreaking, you know,” said Denise Haggadone.

Many who live on Holland Road say this possibility is even more disturbing because of how long everyone has lived on this quaint road. And these same homeowners say that an industrial facility would only bring in more traffic and take away natural green space, most likely hurting their property value as well.

“It’s nice to see the wildlife, you know, there’s so few places left,” said Adkins.

Advertisement

On Tuesday, CBS News Detroit spoke off-camera with City Council Chairman Charley Johnson, who also lives on Holland Road. Johnson says he understands all of his neighbors’ concerns and agrees with them. 

He says the company proposing this rezoning has every right to do so, and that the planning commission will vote on it Wednesday evening. 

“It’s sad, I raised my kid here, and he’s planning on having this home after I pass or retire or what have you,” Haggadone said,  

The residents hope to see a big turnout at Wednesday’s planning commission meeting at 7 p.m. on Wednesday, June 3, at Taylor City Hall. 

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Michigan

Sterling Heights to consider opposing Michigan House tax policy bills

Published

on

Sterling Heights to consider opposing Michigan House tax policy bills


The Sterling Heights City Council is set to consider a resolution Tuesday evening opposing tax policy bills in Lansing that one councilmember contends put every municipality “at risk.”

The Michigan House voted in May to pass several bills that would slash property taxes across the state, but skipped a vote on a bill needed to replace some of the more than $5 billion in lost tax revenue.

At its Tuesday evening meeting, Sterling Heights City Council is slated to consider the adoption of a resolution opposing Michigan House Bills 5872 through 5879 due to “their potential negative impact on local government revenue, financial planning, and administrative operations,” a city document said. Sterling Heights City Manager Mark Vanderpool said the city would lose about $5 million in annual revenue from the bills. He said there’s no “guaranteed replacement” for the lost revenue, and the city would need to cut services, he said.

“So we’re deeply concerned about that,” he said.

Advertisement

The House’s sweeping tax cuts can’t be implemented without the passage of a separate bill levying a loosely defined 6% sales tax on services that has yet to be revealed. Republicans who control the House did not hold a vote on the sales tax hike bill, which remains in committee.

All combined, the four property tax cuts passed by the House are estimated to result in a tax revenue loss that could progress from $5.5 billion to $7.5 billion a year, according to a series of nonpartisan House Fiscal Agency analyses. 

Vanderpool, the Sterling Heights city manager, said he wants the state Legislature to work “hand in hand” with cities, townships and villages to come up with a solution for “guaranteed revenue replacement.”

“We are more than willing ― I think our reputation precedes us ― to work with our state legislators hand in hand to come up with viable solutions that … may reform property taxes without harming communities across the state,” he said.

Sterling Heights Councilwoman Barbara Ziarko said the legislation reduces the city’s revenue without a guarantee of what it will be replaced with. She said that in the future, the legislation could prevent the city from maintaining positions that it has promised residents it would maintain, including public safety roles.

Advertisement

“When they put the burden on our local government, they’re actually putting it on the residents of whatever community it is,” she said.

State Rep. Steve Frisbie, a Calhoun County Republican, previously said that Michigan residents need to see tax relief immediately. He noted a ballot proposal collecting signatures last year would have eliminated all property taxes in the state. That citizens’ initiative, known as AxMiTax, fizzled out and won’t be on the ballot this fall.

“They realized that our property taxes are too high and they demand that we take action now,” Frisbie said.

More on the bills

The cuts passed by the House in May would eliminate the 6-mill State Education Tax and eliminate the 0.75% real estate transfer tax assessed on the sale price of real estate.

Advertisement

House Republicans also signed off on eliminating the personal property tax. That bill, largely intended to benefit utility companies, is tied to separate legislation that requires utilities such as Consumers Energy and DTE Energy to pass on personal property tax savings by cutting electric and gas rates for their residential customers. It also requires utilities to freeze rates for two years.

Jennifer Varney, Sterling Heights’ finance and budget director, said the elimination of the personal property tax would result in a $4.3 million annual revenue loss for the city. She said the personal property tax refers to the taxes that businesses pay on their assets, such as their machines and vehicles.

Another tax on the chopping block is the so-called “pop-up tax,” an increase in a property tax bill that occurs when a house transfers from one owner to the next in Michigan, uncapping a constitutional limit on the property tax increase on a home’s taxable value.

Under the state Constitution, a property’s taxable value cannot increase by more than the rate of inflation or 5% each year. But when a property is sold, that cap lifts and is reset at a new, often higher taxable value, resulting in a “pop-up” in property taxes.

Varney said the “pop-up” is the only way cities “recapture” the true value of a home. Michigan also has the Headlee Amendment, a state law that requires local governments to roll back millage rates if taxable property values rise faster than the rate of inflation.

Advertisement

“If you take away the pop-up … and you keep the rollback of the millage, you’re basically limiting any kind of growth in taxable base for municipalities,” she said.

Staff Writer Beth LeBlanc contributed.

asnabes@detroitnews.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Michigan

Search for Lynette Hooker reopened after Michigan woman disappeared in Bahamas

Published

on

Search for Lynette Hooker reopened after Michigan woman disappeared in Bahamas


The search for a missing Michigan in the Bahamas has been reopened after authorities say her husband allegedly gave police false information.

Lynette Hooker and her husband Brian were boating in the Bahamas in early April when, according to her husband, she fell off the boat and was swept to sea. Brian told police he had to paddle to shore after Lynette fell into the water because she had the key.

Advertisement

Brian was taken into custody in the Bahamas after Lynette’s disappearance, but was later released and returned back to Michigan.

Recently, it was revealed that new location data from Brian’s cell phone contradicts the story he gave to authorities, and suggests he may have sent search crews to the wrong area. This new information has led to the U.S. Coast Guard reopening its search for Lynette.

Advertisement

The Source: Previous reporting and information from FOX News were used in this story. 

Crime and Public SafetyMichiganWorld



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending