Connect with us

Michigan

How Prop 3 would change Michigan’s abortion laws

Published

on

How Prop 3 would change Michigan’s abortion laws


If accredited, Proposal 3 would rid Michigan of a near-century-old abortion ban and enshrine the precise of residents to make their very own being pregnant choices into the state Structure.

  • If voters reject the proposal on Nov. 8, legal guidelines surrounding the controversial process can be shortly determined by state courts and lawmakers.

Why it issues: Whereas Michigan’s 1931 legislation criminalizing abortions — which was outmoded by Roe v. Wade in 1973— was struck down by an Oakland County choose final month, an attraction by the Republican-majority Legislature continues to be doable.

  • The poll measure would not simply set up Michiganders’ proper to make choices relating to abortions, however to all choices associated to being pregnant, together with contraception, miscarriage administration and postpartum care.

What they’re saying: Prop 3, often called Reproductive Freedom for All, is framing the measure as a middle-ground answer, however opponents say it goes far past what was authorized earlier than the autumn of Roe v. Wade.

  • Genevieve Marnon, the legislative director for Proper to Lifetime of Michigan, tells Axios that, “Voters ought to notice that the opposite facet is saying this can restore Roe; this goes up to now past Roe, individuals do not know,” Marnon says the proposal is “obscure, far-reaching and undefined.”

The opposite facet: “We all know they need to ban abortion in nearly each circumstance, and this effort is known as a fearmongering, diversion tactic,” Darci McConnell, a spokesperson for the poll proposal coalition, tells Axios. McConnell says opponents are intentionally misrepresenting the proposal to mislead voters.

Between the strains: Proper to Life and different opponents of Prop 3 argue probably the most damaging impact of the measure is that it could enable minors to get abortions with out parental permission. However Steve Liedel, an lawyer for the poll group, tells Axios that is not true.

  • Present state legislation requires minors to acquire consent from mother and father or guardians, until waived by a choose, earlier than present process an abortion process.
  • Opponents additionally declare the proposal would give anybody thought-about to be a well being care skilled the power to carry out an abortion, which Liedel additionally says is unfaithful.
  • “There are a variety of claims being made by opponents of proposals which might be outright lies,” Liedel says.”Different of them, they’d fairly distort the reality and supply the reality.”

Of observe: The proposal additionally offers the state the authority to control the availability of abortion care after fetal viability, offered it would not prohibit an abortion {that a} healthcare skilled deems needed to guard the well being of the mom.

  • Marnon factors to the clause permitting well being care suppliers to find out whether or not the well being of the mom is in danger to argue that the proposal would not really enable the state to control the process after fetal viability, a definition she says is up for debate.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Michigan

Michigan federal court judge allows immigrant survivors' lawsuit to move forward

Published

on

Michigan federal court judge allows immigrant survivors' lawsuit to move forward


A Michigan federal district court judge ruled this month that a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security alleging unreasonable delays in initial decisions for people seeking U visas has enough standing to move forward.

U visas provide legal protections for non-citizens who are victims of serious crimes in the U.S. and who help law enforcement prosecute the cases. They can earn work authorization and enter a path to citizenship.

The lawsuit was brought by a group of noncitizens who applied for U visas years ago and have not yet received DHS documentation that allows for work authorization and temporary relief from deportation, called initial bona fide determinations.

The National Immigrant Justice Center, Michigan Immigrant Rights Center, and Winston and Strawn LLP filed the lawsuit on December 19, 2023.

Advertisement

The court previously decided to dismiss the case in A.M.P. v. DHS (formerly known as B.L.R. v. DHS) due to the fact that there is no statutory deadline for the processing of U visa applications. The plaintiffs, who were allegedly left in precarious financial, physical, and mental situations following the decision, asked the court to reconsider.

U visas, created by Congress in October 2000, aim to aid victims of crimes such as rape, trafficking, and sexual assault who have been helpful to law enforcement’s investigation or prosecution. There is, however, a cap on how many U visas can be granted each year: 10,000.

Extended backlogs have prevented U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services from making the initial “bona fide determinations” that would support and grant these applicants amnesty.

Meredith Luneack, a staff attorney at the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center, said initial bona fide determinations allow those waiting to receive a U visa to have an understanding that their case is being processed.

Luneack also said there are community benefits to providing bona fide determination to those eligible for U visas.

Advertisement

“So with a work permit, which is a part of this bona fide determination, is eligibility for a work permit, (with which) comes obviously the ability to work legally in the United States, which allows for taxing in the United States, allows people to get licenses so they can drive, [and] really kind of increases their ability to become a more productive community member,” Luneak explained.

She said that the extended delays have inhibited U visas from mitigating relationships between law enforcement and immigrant communities.

“They are, you know, sitting there waiting often for years without any kind of status or any kind of acknowledgement of the fact that they have this pending U visa,” Luneack said.

This ruling overturns a previous motion brought by DHS to dismiss the case last year.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Dan Mullen Appears On Dakich, Seemingly Rips Michigan Over Alex Orjii

Published

on

Dan Mullen Appears On Dakich, Seemingly Rips Michigan Over Alex Orjii


UNLV head football coach Dan Mullen joined OutKick’s Dan Dakich on the latest episode of Don’t @ Me with Dan Dakich and talked about some of the new players he’s bringing to the Rebels including former Michigan Wolverines quarterback Alex Orji.

Mullen was talking about bringing in Orji as well as former Virginia quarterback Anthony Colandrea which he was able to do thanks to a ton of scouting, made possible in part by his job at ESPN.

Advertisement

“You know, the greatest thing you have been at ESPN is I’ve gotten to watch everybody play,” Mullen said. “You know, you sit in that room all day, and I’m watching every game in college football. I’ve seen them all.”

Mullen had a lot of praise for both of his new signal callers.

“I got to watch Anthony live,” Mullen said. “His ability to extend play, scramble around, throw the ball, tremendous arm talent. Really excited about what he brings to the table.”

He then moved on to praise Orji, but not without getting in what sure seemed like a subtle shot at Michigan in how they used — or, perhaps more accurately — misused their former quarterback.

Advertisement

“I mean, he’s undefeated against Ohio State. Mullen noted, but he didn’t seem to think that Michigan always used him the best way. “He was a guy that was head scratching to me last year. Sometimes I’m watching him and, you know, I don’t know. I’m not in the game meetings, don’t know what like everything going on at Michigan, but I’m saying, ‘I don’t know that they’re highlighting his strengths,’ right?

“I mean, you know, in football, the job of coaches is to put a guy in position to do what he does. Well, that’s what coaching is all about.”

Mullen continued by saying that while systems are important, they should fit the players, not the other way around, something he said confused him about Michigan’s handling of Orji.

“I was watching some of the games, and I’m saying, hey, when they put that guy in a position to do what he does well, Ohio State won’t tackle him, and they’re playing for a National Championship, Mullen said. “But to sit there and put him in a position to do things where you’re not highlighting his strengths all the time, that’s a little confusing.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Michigan

University of Michigan basketball fans return to high school lot to find vehicles broken into

Published

on

University of Michigan basketball fans return to high school lot to find vehicles broken into


Ann Arbor — More than two dozen vehicles in a high school parking lot had their windows smashed and were broken into during a men’s college basketball game at University of Michigan.

Ann Arbor police said the break-ins occurred Sunday, WXYZ-TV reported. Damage was reported to 27 vehicles. No arrests have been made.

Fans watching the Wolverines defeat the Washington Huskies at Crisler Arena discovered the damage as they returned to the lot at Pioneer High School. Cash, purses, wallets and other items were taken from the vehicles, police said.

“Everything was great until we got back out to the car after the game and saw glass everywhere,” Joe Weitz told the TV station.

Advertisement

Weitz, of Kalamazoo, said he had taken his 8-year-old daughter to her first Michigan basketball game.

“It was pretty devastating,” he said. “My daughter was definitely pretty emotional because they went through everything in our car.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending