Connect with us

Michigan

2 Michigan Hooters abruptly close. Are any left after latest closures?

Published

on

2 Michigan Hooters abruptly close. Are any left after latest closures?


play

Advertisement
  • Hooters suddenly closed two Michigan locations June 4, leaving just one open in the state.
  • The restaurant chain has faced financial struggles, filing for bankruptcy in March 2025.

Hooters is near the end of an era in Michigan — abrupt closures this week have left just one location open in the state.

The sports bar and grill chain closed more than 30 locations across multiple states Wednesday, June 4, including two in Michigan, USA TODAY reported. The restaurants in Flint and Taylor were among the closings. A Saginaw location is Michigan’s last one remaining restaurant.

The move comes several months after the restaurant chain filed for bankruptcy in late March 2025, though it had said no locations would close at the time.

Here’s what to know.

Which Michigan Hooters restaurants closed?

In Michigan, the Flint and Taylor Hooters closed June 4, USA TODAY reported, leaving just one Hooters location open in the state.

Advertisement

The restaurant chain, known for its chicken wings and servers wearing orange shorts and low-cut tank tops, began in 1983 and expanded to 29 countries before its decline, closing numerous locations in recent years.

Where else did Hooters close?

The following Hooters in other states also closed, per USA TODAY:

  • Sanford, Florida
  • Orlando, Florida – Kirkman Road
  • Kissimmee, Florida – Osceola Parkway
  • Melbourne, Florida
  • Atlanta, Georgia – Downtown
  • Douglasville, Georgia
  • Gwinnett, Georgia
  • Valdosta, Georgia
  • Greenwood, Indiana
  • Rockford, Illinois
  • Newport, Kentucky
  • St. Louis, Missouri – Downtown
  • Charlotte, North Carolina – South Boulevard
  • Columbia, South Carolina
  • Rock Hill, South Carolina
  • Murfreesboro, Tennessee
  • Memphis, Tennessee – Downtown
  • Nashville, Tennessee – Harding Place
  • Grapevine, Texas
  • Houston, Texas
  • San Marcos, Texas

Why did the locations close?

Hooters said in a statement to USA TODAY that the closed stores were company owned and called the closures a “difficult decision.”

“Hooters will be well-positioned to continue our iconic legacy under a pure franchise business model,” the company said. “We are committed to supporting our impacted team members throughout this process and are incredibly grateful to our valued customers for their loyalty and dedication to the Hooters brand.”

The company did not respond to a followup inquiry on a list of closed locations or when employees were notified of the closures.

Advertisement

How many restaurants did Hooters have?

There were 305 Hooters locations, including 151 owned and operated by the company itself and a separate 154 operated by franchisees. The company has been closing locations suddenly since at least 2024.

What’s happening at Hooters?

The company filed for bankruptcy in late March 2025 amid financial challenges. The Atlanta-based restaurant chain was then $376 million in debt and looking to sell 151 of its corporate-owned restaurants to a buyer group comprised of two existing Hooters franchises.

At the time, no locations were expected to close and Hooters said it would “continue providing customers with the guest-obsessed hospitality experience and delicious food they have come to expect over the past 40 years.”

Are any Michigan Hooters still open?

The closures leave one Hooters open in Michigan, at 5538 Bay Road in Saginaw.

USA TODAY contributed.

Advertisement

Contact Jenna Prestininzi: jprestininzi@freepress.com.



Source link

Michigan

Zoning limits bills prompt cities and towns to fight Michigan lawmakers

Published

on

Zoning limits bills prompt cities and towns to fight Michigan lawmakers


Mayors and township supervisors across Metro Detroit are alarmed about state housing legislation that they said could result in much denser development that would tax local infrastructure, though advocates argued it would reduce the cost of housing.

The legislation, introduced in February, has pitted local officials against some state lawmakers who contend that Michigan needs to address local regulations that restrict the building of more affordable housing. The bills, now in a Michigan House committee, would allow for smaller lot sizes and smaller setbacks, paving the way for more affordable homes, said State Rep. Kristian Grant.

“What we know is that over the last 20 to 30 years, zoning regulations that may have been well-intended when they started have gone further and further and have really become a redlining tool to keep people out of communities,” said Grant, a Grand Rapids Democrat who is championing the bills.

Advertisement

But local government officials said the bills take a one-size-fits-all approach to zoning across the state and that local infrastructure, including sewer and water systems, can’t support potential increases in housing density. They countered that the bills do not ensure that the new housing will be sold or rented at affordable prices.

Multiple communities, including Bloomfield Township, Clinton Township, Romulus and Sterling Heights, have passed formal resolutions opposing the legislation. Dozens of officials from across Metro Detroit gathered at a February press conference, organized by the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, to blast the legislation.

“There’s never been an issue in Lansing in the time that I’ve been working on legislative advocacy that has galvanized our membership and local leaders statewide in favor or against something so much ― in this case, against a bill package,” said Kevin Vettraino, SEMCOG’s director of planning.

The Michigan Municipal League, SEMCOG and the Michigan Townships Association have organized a letter of opposition that more than 2,000 officials across the state and over 100 residents have signed. The issue is about local control, they said.

“We are strongly of the opinion that we are closest to residents and that we should have a say,” Bloomfield Township Treasurer Michael Schostak said. “We have the ultimate say on our issues that impact the local community.”

Advertisement

But Grant argued that zoning is one of the issues that increases the cost of housing. Americans live differently than they did several generations ago, as more families have single parents and some married people don’t have kids, she said, necessitating more housing units.

Grant said her legislative package is not focused on “getting rid of zoning in any kind of way.”

“It focuses really closely on five zoning laws that are very directly correlated to housing,” she said. “It also does not remove local input.”

Not all local officials in Metro Detroit oppose the legislation. Ann Arbor officials support the proposals as addressing the unaffordability of housing by increasing the supply and thus lowering the price.

Ann Arbor Mayor Christopher Taylor said the legislation doesn’t eliminate local planning, but rather “ensures that there are minimum levels of housing opportunity everywhere.”

Advertisement

“This package provides a floor,” Taylor said. “It doesn’t provide a ceiling.”

Home builders explain why zoning rules are costly

Zoning rules often make it prohibitive for developers to build smaller starter homes, said Dawn Crandall, executive vice president for government relations at the Home Builders Association of Michigan.

“If they have, say, one-acre minimum lot sizes, … that increases the cost of a home just in the land,” she said.

Crandall said the costs of land and building materials, as well as lending issues, have made home development more expensive. Zoning law changes are “one piece of the puzzle” to increase the state’s housing stock, she said.

Advertisement

“This is just one way that we can look at maybe putting some guardrails and some stability across the state for builders who sometimes build in numerous communities,” Crandall said.

But SEMCOG’s Vettraino said the bills don’t ensure that newly constructed units are affordable. He pointed to a development under construction in Harper Woods that is targeting families earning 60-120% of the area median income. He said that this ensures that the units are “affordable currently and into the future.”

“There is no confidence that the end result of that bill package results in affordable housing, because it gives all the decision-making to the developers,” said Amy O’Leary, SEMCOG’s executive director.

Grant countered by noting that the current low supply of new housing is driving up costs. and. She pointed to Austin, Texas, where a Pew Charitable Trusts article said policy reforms starting in 2015 “aimed at encouraging the development of new housing, especially rentals,” resulted in rents decreasing as more homes were built.

Dearborn Mayor Abdullah Hammoud said he hasn’t been able to pinpoint how the package helps reduce the cost of home construction.

Advertisement

The city is already conducting quick reviews of site plans — Dearborn’s site plan guide says reviews take about 20 days — and working on pre-approved housing designs for single-family homes and duplexes, he said. The moves are intended to speed up construction by vetting certain home designs in advance to ensure they comply with local zoning and building codes.

“We are doing all the right things, but the cost of construction is just high,” Hammoud said.

Romulus Mayor Robert McCraight said he’d rather see lawmakers give developers an incentive to build higher-density housing by subsidizing infrastructure costs, such as utilities and roads, that have to be paid before home construction can start. That can cost $100,000 per house, he said.

If legislators can find a way to provide that kind of incentive, McCraight said, “Now you’re talking.”

What the zoning bills say

House Bills 5529 and 5530, which are sponsored by Grant and state Rep. Jennifer Wortz, R-Quincy, respectively, would prohibit communities from establishing a minimum parcel size of more than 1,500 square feet for detached single-family residences served by public water and sewer, according to a SEMCOG summary of the bills.

Advertisement

Grant said land is expensive.

“If we require people to buy large amounts of it for one single-family home, not only does that take away from someone else who could have built on that land, but it prices people out,” she said.

House Bill 5583, sponsored by state Rep. Matt Longjohn, D-Portage, would ensure that the zoning in communities in or adjacent to a Metropolitan Statistical Area, such as Metro Detroit, doesn’t require setbacks larger than 15 feet at the front of a building or five feet at the side or rear. A setback is the space between where a property line starts and where a housing unit is built.

The setback changes would allow more land to be used for housing, Grant said.

Grant’s House Bill 5582 would restrict zoning ordinances from requiring more than one parking space per dwelling unit in a multifamily development. And House Bill 5584, sponsored by Rep. Joey Andrews, D-St. Joseph, would make duplexes “a permitted use” in any zoning district that allows single-family residences.

Advertisement

Developers would be able to submit a proposal for a duplex, but local governments could still set requirements for duplexes, including regarding the design of the building or its parking, Grant said.

“What the bill is essentially saying is that you cannot, off the bat, just make duplexes illegal to build in your community,” she said.

How the proposed legislation would increase housing density

SEMCOG’s Vettraino said the bills don’t specify how the setback sizes and minimum parcel sizes were determined. The legislation would allow 1,500-square-foot lots with homes that are 500 square feet in size and “minimal setbacks,” he said.

“What does this really look like?” Vettraino said. “When you do the math for a single acre, this would result in as many as 29 single-family units on a single acre.”

The legislation doesn’t talk about setting aside land for green space, utilities or infrastructure, but if 30% of the land were reserved for those elements, there would be 20 single-family units per acre, he said.

Advertisement

“This still is far more dense than anything that we currently have in the region,” Vettraino said, adding that Hamtramck is the densest city in Michigan at 18 housing units per acre, followed by Detroit at 12, Ypsilanti at nine and Center Line at eight.

The smallest lot sizes in Sterling Heights are 7,200 square feet, which are typically 60 feet by 120 feet, said City Planner Jake Parcell, which equates to just under six homes per acre.

Sterling Heights City Manager Mark Vanderpool said a few thousand housing units need to be built in the city in the coming years.

“Now, is it smarter to do it in the way we’ve been doing it, or is it better to have legislation that just mandates density anywhere in the community residential areas?” Vanderpool said.

The city manager pointed to the Lakeside City Center project, which will include “a couple thousand” housing units. The project will turn the Lakeside Mall property on M-59 into a mixed-use center, with restaurants, hotels, housing, park space and more.

Advertisement

Officials debate setback concerns

In Oakland County, which is home to hundreds of lakes, officials worried that reduced setbacks — meaning the space between where a property line starts and where a housing unit is built — could put developments too close to wetlands.

Orion Township Supervisor Chris Barnett said his community has had “major flooding” in recent years — something he said the proposed bills don’t take into consideration.

The Oakland County Board of Commissioners passed a resolution opposing the bills out of committee in March. Gwen Markham, a Democratic county commissioner from Novi, said the setback for wetlands in the county is currently 50 feet. One legislative proposal would allow up to a 25-foot setback from wetlands, inland lakes or streams, and high-water marks for the Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair, according to the SEMCOG summary.

“Wetland setbacks protect buildings, whether it’s homes or businesses or public buildings,” Markham said.

“The local officials don’t feel as though you can just tell us across the board, ‘You need to be able to do this.’”

Advertisement

Ann Arbor City Councilwoman Lisa Disch disagreed, arguing that Oakland County could create natural feature protections in its zoning code that would address bodies of water and coexist with the proposed rules.

Macomb officials worry that communities could be ‘upended’

Macomb Township Supervisor Frank Viviano said that when he and his wife were deciding where they wanted to raise their family, they chose an area where they thought they could “get value” and liked the surrounding community.

“Now, if these bills were to go through, the community that I invested to, and the community that literally hundreds of thousands of southeast Michigan residents invested into, could be upended, meaning that we could have a duplex next to us, five feet from our property line,” Viviano said.

Clinton Township Supervisor Paul Gieleghem said he and other township officials believe the proposed changes would reduce property values.

“Reducing the value of someone’s home is literally pulling money from them,” Gieleghem said, adding that a family’s single largest investment.

Advertisement

“We are for development and affordable housing options, but where the infrastructure exists to be able to support it,” Gieleghem said.

Kelly Karll, the manager of SEMCOG’s environment and infrastructure group, said municipal engineers are responsible for making sure roads, water, sewer and stormwater lines in an area can safely support what’s being built.

“So when the state overrides local control with one-size-fits-all-type mandates like this, it breaks that connection between development decisions and the capacity checks that engineers are required to make,” she said.

Karll said the bills would allow “major increases” in density in places where infrastructure was sized for a significantly lower level of use.

But Rep. Aragona said he and the other lawmakers are not trying to “overwhelm any type of system.” If they have to amend the legislation to ensure that infrastructure isn’t overwhelmed, they will, he said.

Advertisement

“We don’t want anybody’s basement flooding or any streets getting ruined because … there’s not enough impervious surface or what have you,” Aragona said.

Some opponents are backing another proposal, called the MI Home Program, which was introduced as House Bill 5660 by State Reps. Mark Tisdel, R-Rochester, and Samantha Steckloff, D-Farmington Hills.

Under the MI Home Program, the state would spend $160 million annually for five years to accelerate housing construction and rehabilitation and promote updates to local zoning regulations, a Michigan Municipal League document said. The homes built or rehabbed using the state money would be required to be sold to people earning within 120% of the area median income, SEMCOG’s O’Leary said.

“If they want to actually fix affordability, they need to put some funding behind it,” said Orion Township’s Barnett, who supports this bill.

asnabes@detroitnews.com

Advertisement

mbryan@detroitnews.com

jcardi@detroitnews.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Whitmer named Michigan State University’s spring commencement speaker

Published

on

Whitmer named Michigan State University’s spring commencement speaker


East Lansing ― Michigan State University President Kevin Guskiewicz said Friday that Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, an MSU alumna, will be speaking at the university’s spring 2026 graduation ceremony.

Whitmer will be speaking at MSU’s spring undergraduate convocation, which is scheduled for 12:30 p.m. on Friday, May 1, at the Breslin Center.

Whitmer is a two-time MSU graduate, earning both her bachelor’s and law degrees from MSU.

Whitmer has been the governor since 2019.

Advertisement

Christopher Fernandez was announced as the speaker for the university’s master’s and educational specialist ceremony, scheduled for 9 a.m. on May 1 at Breslin Center.

Fernandez is a member of MSU’s School of Human Resources & Labor Relations Advisory Board, which he served as president of from 2014-16. He also runs a company called Agentic Connect, which is focused on individuals in the labor market realizing a direct benefit from a human-centered artificial intelligence approach.

Ann Austin, university distinguished professor for the Department of Educational Administration in the College of Education, will be speaking at the doctoral ceremony for the university, scheduled for 2:30 p.m. May 1 at the Breslin Center.

Austin has served on the faculty in higher, adult and lifelong education in the College of Education since 1991, including serving as interim vice provost and associate vice president for faculty and academic staff affairs from 2022-23 and assistant provost for faculty and academic staff development from 2016-21.

kgraham@lsj.com

Advertisement

@KarlyGrahamJrn

The Detroit News contributed.



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Elliot Cadeau agrees to deal to return to Michigan basketball

Published

on

Elliot Cadeau agrees to deal to return to Michigan basketball


If there was any doubt that Elliot Cadeau wasn’t going to return to Michigan for another season, it was officially put to rest.

Shortly after ESPN reported Thursday that Cadeau has agreed to a new deal for the 2026-27 season, the point guard shared the news on Instagram with a short message: “(Let’s) do it again.”

Several Michigan basketball assistant coaches also reacted on social media, including Akeem Miskdeen, who wrote: “PG1 back! Lets gooooooo.”

The news comes just days after Cadeau helped lead Michigan to its first national championship since 1989 and was named Most Outstanding Player of the Final Four.

Advertisement

Cadeau averaged 10.5 points and 5.9 assists in 27.3 minutes during his first season with the Wolverines after spending the first two seasons of his college career at North Carolina. A pass-first facilitator who controlled Michigan’s offense, he scored in double figures in 21 games, dished out 10 or more assists six times and shot a career-best 37.6% from 3-point range.

After backup point guard L.J. Cason suffered a torn ACL late in the season, Cadeau took on more minutes and was at his best in the NCAA Tournament. During Michigan’s run to the national title, he averaged 12.3 points, 7.5 assists and 1.7 steals in 32.3 minutes per game and tied his season high with 19 points in the 69-63 championship game win over UConn.

“(Coach) Dusty May will bring the best out of you and that’s exactly what he did with Elliot,” guard Nimari Burnett said. “He trusted and believed in him. I remember before Elliot decided to come to Michigan … (May) was like, ‘We recruited a wizard in the portal.’ You could tell his excitement about somebody just being as unselfish as Elliot is and you know he was going to make him a better player.”

With Cadeau running it back for his senior year and fellow guard Trey McKenney also expected to return, Michigan’s starting backcourt appears set heading into next season.

Advertisement

jhawkins@detroitnews.com

@jamesbhawkins



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending