Kansas
UFC KC’s Best Betting Props, Parlays & Picks
UFC Kansas City goes down this weekend (Sat., April 26, 2025) inside T-Mobile Center in Kansas City, Missouri. The ESPN+-streamed main event sees Ian Machado Garry stepping in on short notice (again) to take on the streaking Carlos Prates. With both men ranked high in the Welterweight division, an impressive win could clear a path to the winner of Belal Muhammad vs. Jack Della Maddalena (though, don’t tell that to Muhammad).
UFC Kansas City’s co-main event features the impressive Zhang Mingyang taking on former 205-pound title challenger, Anthony Smith. The main card also has Giga Chikadze vs. David Onama, Michel Pereira vs. Abus Magomedov, Randy Brown vs. Nicolas Dalby and Ikram Aliskerov vs. Andre Muniz.
UFC Kansas City’s “Prelims” have some fun tilts, too. Those include Da’Mon Blackshear vs. Alatengheili and Jaqueline Amorim vs. Polyana Viana.
As always, there’s lots to bet on this card and we’ve got odds for all the fights below:
UFC Kansas City Main Card Money Line Odds
Ian Machado Garry (-125) vs. Carlos Prates (+105)
Garry lost his “O” in his last fight, a unanimous decision defeat to Shavkat Rakhmonov. As far as narratives go, though, Garry walked away from that fight with a Pyrrhic victory. Prior to that fight many believed Garry was a lot of talk and not much action and the overwhelming thought was that the terrifying Rakhmonov would turn him into mincemeat. Rakhmonov didn’t do that, though. Instead, the pair put on a close and gritty fight that showed off a lot of toughness, technique and strategy for both men.
This was the first loss on Garry’s 16-fight career. Prior to the loss, he took decisions over Michael Page, Geoff Neal and Neil Magny.
Prates, meanwhile, has steamrolled his way through UFC’s roster to earn this main event slot (which was supposed to be opposite Geoff Neal). He’s coming off devastating finishes of the aforementioned Magny (see it here), Li Jingliang (see it here) and Charles Radtke (see it here).
He’s undefeated (5-0) in UFC with all finishes (including his Contender Series appearance).
“Half a Pack a Day” Prates’ striking has been as brutal as it’s been technical and selective over his UFC tenure. He doesn’t spam strikes and get lucky. He throws like he has a laser-guiding system. His precision and timing allowed him to devastate Magny and Li in ways we’re not used to seeing.
This is a big step up for the Brazilian, though. He’s meeting someone who is in his prime and who has a very expansive MMA tool kit.
Garry hasn’t hit the same highlights as Prates, but he’s been excellent in piecing together a UFC career worthy of a title challenger.
Garry is the slight favorite in this match-up. If he fights how he has done recently, I think he might have some trouble with Prates.
Since entering the Top 10, Garry has adopted a more passive style of fighting. He has been inviting opponents onto him and looking to react with counters and takedowns. I don’t think Prates is the right person to do that against.
Prates has had a few opponents back off of him now (since they are rightfully concerned about his striking power). When that happens, though, Prates simply walks them down, measures a shot and then lands it. Radkte felt Prates’ power early and decided to back track. Prates simply followed, stretched out a hand to make contact and then blitzed forward with that crushing knee.
I can see something like that happening here. Garry might let himself be walked to the fence in hopes he can make Prates miss. That would be a big gamble given that Prates lands 57 percent of his significant strikes.
If Garry fights more aggressively, though, I think this is a very winnable fight for him. If he lands leg kicks early and hides some takedowns behind his jab, he should be able to disrupt Prates’ striking enough that he can earn a decision win and maybe even get a submission on the ground.
To do that, Garry will need to show some guts and prove he’s not afraid of being caught with a counter punch. I think we’ll just have to wait and see what happens in that respect. I’d love to see him be more aggressive, personally. I think that would present a far more interesting fight to watch and be a great test for Prates.
As the slight underdog, Prates is getting points on this fight. You can get him at +5.5 for -165. That feels like a no brainer in such a close fight where your fighter has ungodly stopping power.
The round total for this one is set at 3.5 rounds. The over is -125 and the under -105. As you can see, Vegas is very conflicted over whether this goes to a decision or not. I’m with them. This is really hard to call. I feel like this fight might go over, since Garry is very skilled at long distance fighting.
When it comes to likely prop bets, we’re looking at +165 for Prates to win via KO/TKO/DQ and +225 for Garry to win by +350.
For me, though, I can’t pass up the point spread with Prates. That being said, I did lose with Diego Lopes +5.5 last time out (his combined scorecard with Alex Volkanovski was 139-146) at similar odds.
Best bet: Carlos Prates +5.5 (-165)
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965086/2186455960.jpg)
Anthony Smith (+375) vs. Zhang Mingyang (-550)
Smith is being fed to the lions at UFC Kansas City.
Even though Mingyang lost a bunch in his early career (including a knockout to record fraudster Askar Mozharov), he’s now undefeated since 2020 and has finished 11 straight fights.
All but two of those was because of strikes.
Last time out, Zhang destroyed Ozzy Diaz (someone whose chin was praised in his last fight against Djorden Santos). Prior to that, he beat up Brendson Ribeiro (see it here) and Tuco Tokkos. Neither Ribeiro nor Tokkos are serious UFC talents. However, despite the low level of opponents he’s faced (and obliterated), I think we’ve seen enough to believe that Zhang can do a lot of damage in a division like Light Heavyweight.
Zhang’s promise is magnified given the vibes around Smith right now.
He wept on his way to the cage at UFC 310. That was totally understandable, given the sudden and recent death of his coach. He didn’t seem in any shape to fight that night (at all), gifting Dominick Reyes a technical knockout win (see it here).
Before that, he lost a very boring decision to Roman Dolidze, a former training partner. That fight, which was put together on short notice, looked like a sparring match.
Those losses have helped us forget his big upset win over Vitor Petrino in Brazil. Petrino, who came into that fight with the kind of hype Zhang is getting now, stormed at Smith with his head down and was promptly submitted (see it here).
I’m sure some betters think that might happen again. But, I’m not riding with them. I think Zhang is going to charge forward, but he’s going to be swinging for the fences when he does.
Zhang lands a ridiculous 8.57 significant strikes per-minute with a decent 55 percent accuracy. Smith’s defense is somewhat porous at 45 percent.
Zhang hasn’t had enough UFC fights to be considered in the official stat leader rankings. His numbers right now would have him top in significant strikes per-minute (current leader Carlos Ulberg has 6.82). He’d also be top for significant strike differential and top five for significant striking accuracy.
So yeah, despite his record having more tomato cans than my local No Frills, I’m all in on Zhang to win this one — violently.
Vegas agrees.
Zhang by KO/TKO/DQ is just -280. Zhang to win by KO/TKO/DQ in round 1 is just -105. The round total is set at 1.5 rounds with the under at -188. Zhang to win by KO/TKO/DQ in round two is +450. That’s tempting because of the odds, but I’m really struggling to see Smith survive that first round if Zhang starts as quickly as he has done in each of his last few fights.
For my best bet, I’ll just take the under.
Best bet: Under 1.5 rounds (-188)
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965090/2163992797.jpg)
Giga Chikadze (+150) vs. David Onama (-180)
Chikadze returned from a long layoff to lose to Arnold Allen last July. He’s had another near year long-off before this fight. If you’ve been reading these pieces for awhile, you know I don’t like that.
This year we’ve seen lots of high-profile fighters lose to tough opposition after around a year on the sidelines (Josh Emmett, Marvin Vettori, Jan Blachowicz, etc.). That already has me weary of picking Chikadze here.
Onama, on the other hand, has been active and winning in all the time Chikadze has been out (something he shares with the fighters who beat Emmett, Vettori and Blachowicz).
He took on a short-notice replacement last time out, beating Roberto Romero by unanimous decision. Onama got off to a slow start in that fight, but was able to win all three rounds against a tougher than advertised opponent. Before that, he beat Jonathan Pearce by decision (in a fight he came in heavy for).
I think we can expect a kickboxing fight from these two. Neither has shown much interest in getting a takedown and both have good takedown defense (excellent in the case of Chikadze).
Onama is the busier striker, landing 5.6 significant strikes per-minute and eating 5.07. Chikadze lands 3.92 and absorbs 3.5. As you can see, both men don’t have much of a significant strike differential. I think this tells us that we’re going to see them hit each other a roughly equal amount of times.
Chikadze’s defense is better, though. He defends 61 percent of the significant strikes slung at him. That’s above average. Onama’s defense is more mid, at 52 percent. This could mean that Chikadze will be able to keep himself safe from the biggest shots Onama throws at him.
If Chikadze had fought and won four months ago, I’d comfortably pick him here — favoring his striking approach over Onama’s and recognizing his impressive strength of schedule. The lay-off has me worried, though.
One thing I do feel more confident in is the chances this fight goes to a decision. Onama couldn’t finish Romero despite landing 121 significant strikes and neither he nor Chikadze have ever been stopped with strikes. Because of that, and the fact I can see either guy winning a decision, I’ll take the over.
Best bet: Over 2.5 rounds (-188)
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965091/1328068023.jpg)
Michel Pereira (-125) vs. Abus Magomedov (+105)
Back in Oct. 2024, Pereira took one of the more one-sided and prolonged beatings we’ve seen in UFC recently. It was ugly. Anthony Hernandez brutalized him for almost the entire fight before a technical knockout was mercifully called in the fifth (see it here). This fight was one of the strongest candidates, ever, for why corners should throw in the towel during MMA fights.
I interviewed Spencer Fisher once and he remarked on a war he had with Josh Neer as “taking years off his life.” I fear that’s what Hernandez did to Pereira that night. My concern carries over for how he might perform in this fight just six months later. I know I don’t like lay-offs, but this was definitely a situation where a fighter should chill for a year and regroup.
Fortunately for Pereira, he’s not meeting a killer striker in his return.
On the contrary, Magomedov lands just 2.65 significant strikes per-minute and his accuracy is a dreadful 44 percent. Magomedov also absorbs more than he lands (3.35). That’s another metric I look for (and fade).
Magomedov was losing the striking battle with Brunno Ferreira in his last fight. He was knocked down, but was able to come back and win with a late submission.
All things being even, I think Pereira’s striking would be too much for Magomedov. But, I just don’t have high hopes for how Pereira will look after the shellacking he took last time out.
With another fight too close to call, I’m again looking at the round totals. Vegas inexplicably set the round total at 1.5 rounds. I don’t think there’s any way this fight finishes that quickly. And the public must agree — the odds on the over are pretty short at -195.
For a little better odds, I’m going to go with Fight to Start Round 3 at -125. I’m doing this because I think Pereira won’t be his explosive self and that he and Magomedov might have a slow and plodding fight that might go to a decision.
Best bet: Fight to Start Round 3 (-125)
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965092/2158758963.jpg)
Randy Brown (-240) vs. Nicolas Dalby (+195)
Dalby dropped a close decision to Rinat Fakhretdinov in Saudi Arabia last year. The judging on that fight was a little questionable, with more media scores going to Dalby than Fakhretdinov. A few months later, Fakhretdinov won a decision over Carlos Leal in United Arab Emirates in what is one of the biggest robberies I’ve ever seen on the scorecard (David Lethby scored for Fakhretdinov in both those fights).
Anyways, that “loss” snapped a four-fight win streak for Dalby. Before that fight, he stopped Gabriel Bonfim with knees and punches (see it here) as a +455 underdog.
Brown, meanwhile, just lost a split decision to Bryan Battle in a bit of a weird fight. Battle seemed a little compromised during the bout, either physically or mentally, but was still able to pull out the win. Before that, Brown beat Elizeu Zaleski by unanimous decision.
I think this fight is closer than Vegas thinks and Dalby deserves a little more respect. Both Dalby and Brown are past their fighting primes, but both are competitive Welterweights in the ranks just below the Top 15.
I like Brown’s reach and motor in this fight. He’s also six years younger than the 40-year-old Dalby. I don’t think he stops Dalby, though (no one has, ever). Because of that, I’ll take yet another over bet as my best bet.
Best bet: Over 2.5 rounds (-250)
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965094/2158781418.jpg)
Ikram Aliskerov (-725) vs. Andre Muniz (+450)
This fight was supposed to happen at UFC’s last trip to Saudi Arabia, but Andre Muniz couldn’t get his passport sorted out in time. Before that, this fight was scheduled for an APEX card, but had to be rescheduled after Muniz withdrew.
Aliskerov’s last fight was in Saudi Arabia. He came in as a late replacement for Khamzat Chimaev and then was blown away by Robert Whittaker inside of two minutes (see it here). That was Aliskerov’s second professional loss. The first was to Chimaev back in their BRAVE CF days.
Muniz, on the flip side, defeated “The Iron Turtle” Jun Yong Park via split decision in his last fight. That was back in Dec. 2023.
Muniz is going to want to get this fight to the ground. Historically, he’s been pretty good at that. He’s 50 percent on his takedowns and lands over four of them every 15 minutes.
Aliskerovs’ takedown defense is untested in UFC … literally. No one has ever attempted to take him down.
I don’t have much of a read on Aliskerov, but I don’t think he’s as good as we are being led to think he is. Before the Whittaker fight, he was sold as one of the most dangerous and brightest prospects in the division. UFC had to do that to justify him getting the main event slot in its Saudi Arabia debut.
He’s a long high-volume striker. But, he’s another guy who takes more hits than he lands. He dishes out 7.03 significant strikes per-minute and absorbs 7.27. His defense is a terrible 36 percent. Those numbers are a little warped by the disparity in his Whittaker fight, though, where he landed just five shots and took 14.
Even so, his successful striking displays have come against some of the more hittable fighters UFC could offer (Warlley Alves, Phil Hawes, Mario Sousa).
I’m protesting Aliskerov’s hype and his odds here by picking Muniz (despite the long lay-off!). Muniz is a solid all-around fighter and, if he gets his takedowns, this thing is a wrap.
Best bet: Andre Muniz moneyline (+410)
UFC Kansas City ‘Prelims’ Under Card Odds
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965095/2170746040.jpg)
Matt Schnell (-265) vs. Jimmy Flick (+215)
Oh Matt Schnell … what is you doing?
When you get out of this stuff, you gotta stay out. Back in Sept. 2024, Schnell tapped out to a ninja choke from Cody Durden (see it here) and then laid his gloves down in the cage. That was his fourth loss in his last five and all have been stoppages. The only loss in that stretch was his wild “Fight of the Year” candidate with Sumudaerji. That was only a “Fight of the Year” candidate because Schnell had the hell beat out of him in the first half of the fight.
Flick, for what it’s worth, also had a fake retirement. His came after beating Cody Durden, though, with a flying triangle (see it here). That was in 2020. He returned in 2023 and lost back-to-back fights Charles Johnson and Alessandro Costa, both due to ground-and-pound. He lost a decision to Nate Maness in his last fight.
This is a horrible fight.
On their best days, Schnell is a more talented fighter than Flick. I don’t know what kind of day either of these guys will be having on Saturday, though. Both these guys are submission artists and neither have much left in the tank. I think that translates to one of them getting a submission and one of them, at some point, saying “F— it, I’m done for the night”
Best bet: Fight ends in Submission (+140)
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965096/2161925367.jpg)
Evan Elder (-195) vs. Gauge Young (+165)
Elder was supposed to fight Ahmad Hassanzada at this event. However, Hassanzada was pulled off the card after being accused of a ghastly crime (full details here). Before that, Elder had a fight with MarQuel Mederos cancelled for an unknown reason.
Elder’s last appearance was back in July when he submitted Darrius Flowers.
Young, on the other hand, flubbed his Contender Series audition, losing to Quillan Salkilld by decision. He then got a win on the regional scene and has now been called up as the late replacement for Hassanzada.
I’m not going to overthink this. I’ll just take Elder, who is in fighting shape and has lots of reps (and some wins) against UFC-caliber opposition.
Best bet: Evan Elder moneyline (-195)
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965099/2203879855.jpg)
Chris Gutierrez (-140) vs. John Castaneda (+120)
Both these guys must desperate to get inside the Octagon.
Gutierrez beat Quang Le back in Aug. 2024. Le was a late replacement for Javid Basharat. Gutierrez then had a fight with Jean Matsumoto fall through in March. Castaneda actually came in as the late replacement for that bout, but then Castaneda got sick on fight day.
Before his pulling out of the Gutierrez fight, Castaneda saw his fight with Douglas Silva de Andrade fall through on weigh-in day after the veteran Brazilian was not medically cleared.
I think Gutierrez is going to have success with his leg kicking game against Castaneda, who is not a great mover. Castaneda might try and get this to the mat, but Gutierrez has a very impressive 71 percent takedown defense. That’s even more impressive considering how often he’s kicking people in the leg.
Best bet: Chris Gutierrez moneyline (-140)
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965100/2205293817.jpg)
Da’Mon Blackshear (-500) vs. Alatengheili (+350)
Blackshear has hit a groove lately. He’s looked excellent in dominating and submitting Cody Stamman and Cody Gibson with his smothering and creative grappling game.
Alatengheili is coming off a decision win over Kleydson Rodrigues. That followed a decision loss to Chris Gutierrez.
Blackshear is one of the biggest favorites on this card because he’s one of the biggest size bullies in the promotion. He’s five inches taller than Alatengheili and has an eight-inch reach advantage with his arms. His leg reach advantage is probably even greater, which matters when it comes to passing guard.
Blackshear is going to be all over Alatengheili like a rash and is probably going to win with something funky. I’ll say … mounted gogoplata.
Best bet: Under 2.5 rounds (+120)
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965101/2108230285.jpg)
Malcolm Wellmaker (-120) vs. Cameron Saaiman (+100)
Saaiman is another member of the one-year lay-off club. He’s been on a break since back-to-back losses to Payton Talbott and Christian Rodriguez. Those were the first losses of his career. The Talbott loss was a technical knockout (see it here).
Wellmaker, meanwhile, improved to 8-0 after scoring a first round knockout on Contender Series. He’s got some pretty nasty boxing.
Wellmaker is bigger and longer and has been more active than Saaiman.
Best bet: Malcolm Wellmaker moneyline (-120)
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965103/2170731001.jpg)
Jaqueline Amorim (-950) vs. Polyana Viana (+550)
Amorim put her elite Brazilian jiu-jitsu on display in her submission win over Vanessa Demopoulos (see it here). Demopoulos said that Amorim was grabbing her gloves in that move, but … this is MMA. If you aren’t cheating, you aren’t trying. And given how lax referees are with every single foul in the book, you need to at least expect dirty tricks if not go for them yourself.
That was Amorim’s second armbar in a row. She also caught Cory McKenna with one (see it here).
Amorim is a nice example of a legit black belt in the women’s ranks who can get their opponent on the ground and terrorize them with her best asset.
Viana last competed back in Jan. 2024, losing to Gillian Robertson due to ground-and-pound (see it here). Prior to that, she was submitted by Iasmin Lucindo.
I don’t think Viana’s defensive grappling is up to snuff here and Amorim should make good on those rather ridiculous odds.
Best bet: Jaqueline Amorim moneyline (-950)
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965106/2157771330.jpg)
Timmy Cuamba (+100) vs. Roberto Romero (-125)
Cuamba needs a win to save his UFC skin on Saturday. He was counter punched into a decision loss by Lucas Almeida last time out. Prior to that, he dropped a split decision to Bolaji Oki. Those losses spoiled his undefeated record, amassed on the B-level promotions of the U.S. regional scene.
And I’ve already mentioned Romero. He came in on short-notice and put in a good performance in a losing effort opposite the aforementioned Onama. He almost had Onama finished in the first round, too. Romero did that at UFC 309 in Madison Square Garden. I think that showed that Romero isn’t someone who shys away from a big occasion.
Romero faded badly in that Onama fight. Now he has a full camp and a much more beatable opponent. I think we could see a good performance in a winning effort from him this Saturday.
Best bet: Roberto Romero moneyline (-125)
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965107/2166245637.jpg)
Chelsea Chandler (+240) vs. Joselyne Edwards (-300)
Chandler’s appearance at UFC Vegas 95 might have been the worst performance we saw in the Octagon in 2024. She came in five pounds heavy and did nothing against Yana Santos. That was Chandler’s second weigh-in miss in a row. She came in heavy for her fight with Josiane Nunes, too, which she won by decision.
Edwards, though, is no stranger weigh-in misses. She was three pounds heavy in her win over Tamires Vidal. That’s her third time coming in heavy in UFC.
We’ll see if this one even makes to the cage on Saturday night.
Best bet: Joselyne Edwards moneyline (-300)
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25965710/2188813253.jpg)
UFC Kansas City Long Shots!
Here’s a couple of long shots for Saturday night’s action.
Ian Machado Garry vs. Carlos Prates to end in Submission (+475)
I bet you wish you’d gotten Jean Silva by submission against Bryce Mitchell, no? The Fighting Nerds have become famous for devastating striking, but they have some jits, too! Maybe Prates rocks Garry and finishes him with something on the ground?
Or, maybe it’s Garry who gets the tap? Prates has three submission losses on his record (50 percent of his pro losses). And Garry trains at Chute Boxe with Charles Oliveira. He must have picked up a thing or two on the ground.
Two-bet parlay: Da’Mon Blackshear to beat Alatengheili and Andre Muniz to beat Ikram Aliskerov (+515)
Let’s call this one Grappler’s Delight. I think it’s pretty obvious that Da’Mon Blackshear will be able to drag down and bully the smaller Alatengheili. The second leg of this parlay is far more speculative. I belive Ikram Aliskerov is a paper tiger, though, and the non-flashy, takedown, top control game of Andre Muniz might expose him.
Anthony Smith vs. Zhang Mingyang – Fight to End in the 1st 60 Seconds of Round 1 (+500)
I think Anthony Smith is going out on his shield on Saturday night and that it might happen quickly. If we pick away at Zhang Mingyang’s record we might find some hope for Smith. But with Smith declining and Zhang rising, I think Zhang is going to announce himself as a player at 205 lbs this weekend and it will be at the expense of poor “Lionheart.”
MMAmania.com will deliver LIVE round-by-round, blow-by-blow coverage of the entire UFC Kansas City fight card RIGHT HERE, starting with the ESPN+ “Prelims” undercard bouts at 6 p.m. ET, followed by the remaining main card balance on ESPN2/ESPN+ at 9 p.m. ET.
To checkout the latest and greatest UFC Kansas City news and notes be sure to hit up our comprehensive event archive here.
Kansas
Severe weather sets back Kansas wheat harvest
WICHITA, Kan. (KSNW) — Severe weather and humidity are holding back the wheat harvest in Kansas and adding to historically low yields.
Justin Gilpin, the chief executive officer of the Kansas Wheat Commission said Thursday that nearly 20% of the acres planted won’t be harvested this year because of poor crop conditions.
“It’s been a challenging year for Kansas wheat farmers from production because of weather,” Gilpin said. “And ironically, the dry weather’s what caused the low, low estimates and low yields, and now, we’re seeing some crop losses because of too much rain and high humidity.”
He said some recent crop losses are piling on top of what was going to be one of the lowest productions Kansas has seen since the 1960s.
But some farmers have had more luck than others, Gilpin said.
While some are collecting yields of 10 to 15 bushels per acre, others are getting 50 per acre, depending on when the rain hits and how the wheat varieties respond.
Gilpin said harvest has been slow because farmers have had to pause for the weather multiple times.
Despite a 40% decrease in production compared to last year, Kansas remains the largest wheat producer in the United States, which Gilpin said, is being watched by people across the globe.
“A lot of eyes, you know, around the United States but also around the world are always eager to see how the bushels are going to come in from our Kansas farms because of the impact that we have,” he said.
For more Kansas news, click here. Keep up with the latest breaking news by downloading our mobile app and signing up for our news email alerts. Sign up for our Storm Track 3 Weather app by clicking here. To watch our shows live on our website, click here.
Kansas
Kansas City area boosted infrastructure for FIFA World Cup. Now, the games begin
An estimated 650,000 visitors will flood the Kansas City area over the course of the month-long FIFA World Cup, which chose Kansas and Missouri as the home for four teams and at least six matches.
The event catalyzed a major transportation expansion, created temporary diplomatic offices, and established dedicated health care infrastructure to support Kansas City visitors. The area is one of 11 American host cities for the North American tournament.
The first match between Mexico and South Africa begins Thursday in Mexico City.
Kansas City’s first match is scheduled for June 16 at Arrowhead Stadium in Kansas City between Argentina and Algeria, both of which will be based in the Kansas City area for the tournament’s duration, along with the teams from the Netherlands and England.
KC2026, the area’s nonprofit World Cup planning organization, estimated Kansas City could see more than $650 million in economic activity.
As home to the tournament’s smallest host city, the states of Kansas and Missouri, and local governments will be looking to recoup $111 million in public investments dedicated to the tournament. Combined with federal funds, almost $200 million in public money has laid the foundation for the 2026 World Cup in Kansas City.
Salma Aouam, a former Fulbright Scholar and graduate student at Kansas State University, said the Kansas City area has the opportunity to capitalize on the predicted tourism influx by promoting surrounding attractions beyond the World Cup.
“They’ll visit national parks in Arkansas, visit bison farms in Missouri, and hike prairies in Kansas. They’ll experience that classic version of Midwest America, and it’s something they’ll remember long after the tournament,” Aouam said on June 4, citing her graduate research, which examined the effect of major sporting events on urban mobility.
KC2026 brought in 200 new buses to create three new bus service systems: A regional service that will connect riders to area attractions, a stadium service that will act as match-day transportation for ticket holders, and an airport service that runs between the Kansas City International Airport and downtown Kansas City every 15 minutes.
The bus systems exist on top of existing bus, car and streetcar transportation. Aouam said the expanded park-and-ride bus options should be implemented long-term, if they prove successful. She encouraged KC2026 to continue its work after the tournament to provide long-lasting transportation solutions to the region.
“All of these are big ‘ifs,’” Aouam said. “We may see a lot of confusion when international tourists land in Kansas City for the World Cup and find out they can’t walk to the stadium, like they might in other big cities or in their home countries.”
The planning committee established in Overland Park a Consular Services Center, which provides temporary diplomatic and citizen support services for Algeria, Argentina, Austria, Ecuador and Netherlands, and Curaçao.
The countries’ governments expect the World Cup to draw “significant numbers of visitors” to the Kansas City area, according to the committee.
Algeria, Argentina, England and Netherlands have base camps in the Kansas City area.
The consulates will be located at the Overland Park Convention Center. They are equipped to help with emergency passports and travel documents, citizen registration, welfare checks and coordination during legal or medical emergencies, according to the committee.
“Providing direct access to consular support services helps ensure visitors feel informed, supported and connected while they are here in our region,” said Pam Kramer, CEO of KC2026.
The University of Kansas Health System is the designated medical provider for the World Cup, offering first aid and medical care planning.
Leading up to kickoff, the health system has published a series of short, informational videos under the banner “Before the First Kick” discussing firework and burn injuries, mass casualty events, heat illness, and the difference between urgent care and emergency care.
U.S. Rep. Sharice Davids, a Democrat representing a Kansas City-area congressional district in Kansas, delivered remarks Monday on the U.S. House floor, commemorating the start to the tournament.
“The matches will bring excitement, visitors and economic opportunity to the Kansas City metro area. And the impact won’t end when the final whistle blows,” Davids said. “The investments we’ve made in infrastructure, transportation, safety, and community development will benefit Kansas City and our surrounding communities for generations to come.”
Davids founded the Congressional FIFA World Cup 2026 Caucus, which helped lead federal preparations. The federal government allocated $625 million to the country’s host cities for safety and security costs and $100 million for transit operations. Her office estimated the tournament will generate 185,000 jobs and $17.2 billion in GDP.
But that depends on visitors actually arriving, staying and spending the projected amount of money in host cities.
A May report from the American Hotel and Lodging Association that surveyed hoteliers across the country warned of hotel bookings trailing expectations.
Between 85 and 90% of Kansas City-area respondents reported bookings were below expectations, falling short of a typical June or July without any major events, the report said.
Kansas
Tornadoes reported as severe weather hits Kansas
WICHITA, Kan. (KSNW) — Severe storms brought hail and reports of tornadoes to Kansas on Wednesday night.
Here are the reports received so far:
- Golf ball-size hail, 3 N Enterprise, Dickinson County
- Tornado, north of Enterprise and east of Abilene
- 2-inch hail, 5 NNE Nickerson, Rice County
- Funnel, 3 WNW Woodbine, Dickinson County
- Tornado, 4 NNW Herington, Dickinson County
- Golf ball-size hail, 1 S Lyons, Rice County
- Power outages in Durham, Tampa, Lincolnville, Lost Springs
- Ping pong ball-size hail, 5 S Windom, McPherson County
- 2-inch hail, 5 WSW Ellinwood, Barton County
- 60 mph wind gust, 5 SSE Milford, Geary County
For more Kansas news, click here. Keep up with the latest breaking news by downloading our mobile app and signing up for our news email alerts. Sign up for our Storm Track 3 Weather app by clicking here. To watch our shows live on our website, click here.
-
Business28 seconds agoVideo: SpaceX Goes Public
-
Lifestyle27 minutes ago‘Stop! That! Train!’ is Loud! Dumb! and Gay!
-
Technology35 minutes agoSo you want to buy a gaming handheld PC
-
World43 minutes agoFormer South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol sentenced to 30 years over North Korea drone flights
-
Politics45 minutes agoMamdani touts massive taxpayer-funded investment for trans healthcare: ‘First step’
-
Health51 minutes agoNightly glass of wine may not be as harmless as many people think, study suggests
-
Sports58 minutes ago2026 World Cup Odds: Teams Favored to Advance to Knockout Stage
-
Technology1 hour agoStolen iPhones fuel scary passcode scam