Kansas
New local podcast brings energy, avoids fatalism about Kansas environmental issues • Kansas Reflector
Like many of you, dear readers, I drive a predictable path to work. Mine takes me back and forth on K-10, or Kansas State Highway 10. My stretch of K-10 takes me from Lenexa to Lawrence.
The features of the drive don’t change much. The same billboards. The same businesses. The same suburban housing. The same trees.
This week, a new and locally produced podcast changed my perception of that landscape dramatically — especially those trees. It’s not the same old drive anymore.
The podcast that did this? “Up From Dust,” from the Kansas News Service and KCUR. Celia Llopis-Jepsen, a veteran Kansas reporter, co-hosts the podcast with David Condos, who recently moved from a reporting hub in Hays to southern Utah. Together they have so far created four episodes, which document how our choices as Kansans have shaped nature around us.
(Disclaimer: I have worked with Llopis-Jepsen and Condos through my previous job at a journalism association.)
During my previous drives down K-10, I had never noticed the “Green Glacier” phenomenon that “Up From Dust” documented in an April episode. Scientists use the term to explain the recent and relentless creep of trees from the eastern portion of Kansas to the vital prairie ecosystem in the western part of the state.
The most obvious and invasive signs of this creeping crisis dot the fence lines and property boundaries along most Kansas highways, including K-10. It’s the red cedar, a tree that spreads quickly into prairie lands originally free of trees. Those prairies are much healthier, as the podcast explains, without red cedars or any other trees.
As I explain this to you, I blush. As many times as I write and rewrite those sentences above, they pale in comparison to the specificity, energy and research that packs “Up From Dust.”
Condos and Llopis-Jepsen have been crafting these episodes for two years, and when paired with the production help of Makenzie Martin, their reporting bounces between light and serious, from scientific to personal, from local to global, from historical to timely. The first episodes mirror the excellence of trailblazing podcasts, such as Planet Money or the Vox explainer podcast, by breaking down complex issues for those of us without Ph.D.s in soil science.
The team calibrated the tone of the series perfectly. “Up From Dust” shows concern for the environment but strives for optimism. It’s a delicate balance. The science of climate change presents an existential threat, so it would be easy to retreat to a gloomy corner.
Instead, the podcast takes us into bright Kansas landscapes: foraging for garlic mustard, reclaiming a prairie stream, spotting swallowtail butterflies. The anecdotes bring wonder back to nature rather than simply leaving us worrying about nature as a victim. The producers describe the podcast as being “about the price of trying to shape the world around our needs, and the folks who are fixing our generational mistakes.”
The tone is also smart because it avoids dividing environmental science into the typical two-sided journalism rhetoric of political conflict: Democrats vs. Republicans, or corporations vs. environmentalists. It’s an easy groove for journalists to fall into, and “Up From Dust” wholly avoids it.
This podcast also suggests incremental steps Kansans can take, while acknowledging that they aren’t cure-alls for the climate damage we have done. Amid threatening daily climate news, the podcast shows Kansas nature as vibrant and resilient. And it shows us Kansans as vital.
In addition to being persuasively practical, this podcast also is subtly emotional. There is sometimes a hint of heartache in Llopis-Jepsen’s voice. In the most recent episode, “Healing the ground we broke,” she sees Kansas pastures missing eight feet of topsoil, the result of plowing and erosion. She watches demonstrations of our current topsoil, powdery and gray, unable to hold together during rainstorms. The damage to forests, fields and streams seems to wrench at her during her visits.
But that sadness is countered by joy. In the same episode, our hosts remind us of the perils of the Dust Bowl almost a century ago: choking storms, failed crops and even death. That mood is immediately followed by optimism: a soil biologist who playfully freezes the interview each time Llopis-Jepsen refers to soil as “dirt.” Throughout these episodes, laughter and joking juxtapose segments acknowledging the environmental damage already done.
A lot of the reporting in the podcast is helpfully historical. Who knew where honeybees came from? Who knew that World War II munitions led to increased use of fertilizer after the war? And who knew the threat posed by each planting of a Bradford pear tree?
In revealing this historical context, Condos and Llopis-Jepsen trust that their listeners understand nuance. Their often-complex explanations don’t provide simple fixes. (Yes, no-till farming has benefits, but it also has costs.) Nuance is also comfortable in their podcast because the length of the episodes, all more than 34 minutes, allow them to explain complicated issues more fully than a four-minute radio story.
All the while, the focus remains on Kansas. Throughout the podcast, farmers, scientists and other experts redirect the gaze of our environmentalism from the coasts to Kansas backyards and crop fields.
“We are saving the last of this ecosystem,” Flint Hills rancher Daniel Mushrush says, referring to the prairie. “If a coral reef is worth saving, if some pristine mountain stream is worth saving, then so are the Flint Hills.”
With its regional focus, this podcast is a priceless educational resource. Every environmental science class in the state should listen as required course work. In addition to the audio journalism, KCUR’s website hosts photos, stories and graphics that further explain the podcast reporting. Any educator will marvel at how Condos and Llopis-Jepsen have fun with science. And by doing so, they make it fun for us.
A few weeks ago, a Kansas high school student contacted me about an ambition. He wants to cover environmentalism in a way that reaches his fellow teenagers. Of course, I will be sending him this podcast because it provides a template for how to cover the Kansas environment.
At the end of the episode titled “The Green Glacier,” the same Flint Hills rancher quoted above describes the grueling days he spends with a chainsaw, clearing trees that threaten his grassland.
Describing the effort to keep 15,000 acres free of trees, he says: “It’s not easy work, but it’s worthy work. At least, there’s a road map forward.”
The same can be said for Kansas journalists after listening to this podcast series: Covering the local environment requires dedication, but there’s now an admirable path to follow.
Eric Thomas teaches visual journalism and photojournalism at the William Allen White School of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of Kansas in Lawrence. Through its opinion section, Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.
Kansas
Pilot of crop duster plane survives crash Monday in NE Kansas
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The pilot of a crop duster aircraft appears to have survived without serious injury after a crash on Monday in northeast Kansas.
The Jackson County, Kansas, Sheriff’s Office was called around 12:30 p.m. Monday on a crash involving a crop duster aircraft south of Kansas Highway 9 near Whiting, Kansas, or about 80 miles northwest of Kansas City.
Jackson County Sheriff Tim Morse said that after the crash, the pilot was able to exit the aircraft before it caught fire. The pilot walked to a nearby farmhouse for help.
Several area fire departments responded to the location to extinguish the fire.
The cause of the crash is under investigation.
—
If you have any information about a crime, you may contact your local police department directly. But if you want or need to remain anonymous, you should contact the Greater Kansas City Crime Stoppers Tips Hotline by calling 816-474-TIPS (8477), submitting the tip online or through the free mobile app at P3Tips.com. Depending on your tip, Crime Stoppers could offer you a cash reward.
Annual homicide details and data for the Kansas City area are available through the KSHB 41 News Homicide Tracker, which was launched in 2015. Read the KSHB 41 News Mug Shot Policy.
Kansas
Keystone Pipeline system’s operator agrees to pay $26.9M penalty over major Kansas oil spill
TOPEKA, Kan. — A proposed legal settlement with the U.S. government would require the Keystone Pipeline system’s operator to pay a $26.9 million civil penalty over a major oil spill in Kansas in December 2022 and spend about $40 million more to prevent future accidents.
The agreement would resolve allegations from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Kansas that South Bow, based in Canada, violated U.S. and state clean water laws. The rupture dumped nearly 13,000 barrels of heavy crude oil into a creek running through a rural pasture in Washington County, Kansas, about 150 miles (241 kilometers) northwest of Kansas City.
The accident was the largest onshore crude pipeline spill in the U.S. in nine years and surpassed all 22 previous ones on the same pipeline system combined, according to a 2021 report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office. The total amount of oil spilled would have nearly filled an Olympic-sized swimming pool.
South Bow also would pay Kansas more than $3 million for environmental restoration projects under a proposed decree filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Kansas. A judge would have to approve the proposal after a 30-day public comment period.
South Bow also would pay Kansas more than $3 million for environmental restoration projects under a proposed decree filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Kansas. A judge would have to approve the proposed decree after a 30-day public comment period.
“The oil spill blanketed land and water, rendering the waterway lifeless and useless and requiring extensive cleanup and remediation,” Jeffrey Hall, the EPA’s assistant administrator for its enforcement office, said in a statement. “The substantial penalty reflects the seriousness of the environmental harm.”
South Bow officials did not respond immediately Sunday to a phone message and email seeking comment, but the company told The Canadian Press that it “proactively” began cleaning up the area before receiving directives from U.S. officials. The cleanup was completed early in 2024.
The company that built the pipeline, TC Energy, spun off South Bow as a separate firm in 2024, after the Kansas cleanup was done.
No pipeline workers or area residents were injured, and officials said public water supplies weren’t affected by the spill. However, a complaint filed Friday by the U.S. government along with the proposed settlement said more than 2,700 animals were harmed or killed. The area is home to an endangered species, the long-eared bat.
In a May 2023 report for the U.S. government, an engineering consulting firm said that a bend in the Keystone system where the spill occurred had been “overstressed” since its installation in December 2010 — likely because construction activity itself altered the land around the pipe. The complaint filed Friday in court said soil under the pipe had been “improperly compacted” and that while the company re-excavated the site in 2013, it did not replace that section of pipe.
The 2,689-mile (4,327-kilometer) Keystone system carries thick, Canadian tar sands oil to refineries in Illinois, Oklahoma and Texas.
In April, President Donald Trump gave the go-ahead for South Bow and another company to build a second pipeline from Canada to Wyoming, a smaller version of a massive $8 billion pipeline project known as Keystone XL blocked by former President Joe Biden’s administration in 2021 over environmental concerns.
—
Kansas
Missouri homebuilders report housing construction slump — but not in Kansas City
The housing industry saw a sharp drop in construction starts nationwide in May, both compared with the previous month and with the same period a year earlier. The broader Midwest region showed resilience, but Missouri builders still reported weaker business activity during this time.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, privately owned housing starts across the country fell 15.4% in May compared to April and 8.7% compared to May 2025. The collapse was driven largely by multifamily construction, which dropped 41.6% in a single month and 12.3% year-over-year, while single-family construction declined slightly, by 1.9%.
The Midwest appeared as the lone regional outlier, as housing starts rose 3.7% from April and 5.9% from a year ago. But, building permits in the Midwest fell 18.1% month-over-month, compared to a 0.7% national decline.
Missouri also has a mixed picture in terms of housing permits in metro areas. According to the Census Bureau, permits in the Kansas City metropolitan statistical area rose 5.7% from April and 66.7% from May 2025. St. Louis permits fell 10.8% from April but rose 14.1% year-over-year. In Columbia, there were 101 permits in May, up 2% from April but down 17.9% from a year ago.
The ground picture, however, doesn’t tell a clean growth story for the housing industry. Builders mostly reported significant declines in their business in recent months, compared to previous years.
What builders are saying
Jeff Hemme is the owner of Hemme Homes and Remodeling, which is based in Columbia and serves the mid-Missouri region. He said the company had a flying start to the year, but business has dropped off sharply in the subsequent months. When the mortgage rate briefly went below 6% earlier this year, his company sold 15 homes in just four weeks. Then mortgage rates climbed back up, and his business slowed down.
“If we don’t think buyers are out there, we’re not going to build,” Hemme said.
He said his company now builds about 25 homes a year in mid-Missouri, down from 50 to 60 just a few years ago. Hemme said this confidence crisis, as much as any cost pressures, shaped the conditions the housing construction industry found itself in this spring.
Shawn Woods, CEO of Ashlar Homes in Blue Springs, also had a similar experience.
“January and February, we started off the year incredibly well, so sales were way ahead of where they were in the previous year,” he said. “And then March, April, and May have kind of been lackluster.”
He estimated his company sold 20% to 25% fewer homes over the three months compared to the same period in 2025.
Parker Girard is a co-owner of Girard Homes, which has been constructing homes in Columbia and mid-Missouri for around 12 years. He also said his business was under strain. He said Columbia has strong underlying demand for housing, but high costs and interest rates make new homes hard to sell at the prices most buyers can afford.
Not every builder experienced similar market swings. Chris DeGuentz is the president of the Home Builders Association of St. Louis and Eastern Missouri and the vice president of Fischer and Frichtel Homes. He said his company saw a flying start this year.
“Relative to this time last year, we have seen an increase of 15% to 20% across all price points we offer due to the type and locations of projects we offer,” he said.
He, however, said many of these business trends may be company-specific.
“There are certain builders that maybe echo the Midwestern trend, and perhaps their growth is only 1% or 2%, which is on par with national data with some cases being flat growth, which may be tied to scarcity of land or poor locations,” he said.
He said he doesn’t see any builders losing ground as the demand is still present in the region.
Contributing factors
According to data from the Housing Affordability Institute, the median price for new homes in Missouri was $437,500 in Dec. 2025, roughly 73% more than the median existing home price at $253,000.
Nick Erickson, the executive director of the institute, said a new home purchase would have consumed 46.5% of Missouri’s median household income in mortgage payments at the end of last year, compared with less than 30% for an existing home. Housing that costs below 30% of income is considered affordable under standard mortgage lending guidelines.
A major reason behind the high cost is new building codes. Jeff Hemme said updated building requirements are adding more expense to each home.
“They are making us do so many things with energy, and making the houses so energy efficient, that they are adding tens of thousands of dollars to an average house every time they change the codes,” Hemme said.
Erickson pointed to Kansas City as a recent case study. The city adopted one of the most aggressive energy codes in the country, and “production in Kansas City ground to a halt for a few months because of this,” he said.
The energy conservation code, which was adopted by the city in 2023, required new homes to be more tightly sealed, better insulated and subject to additional inspections. In February 2026, the city rolled back portions of the code, easing some of the requirements.
Woods mentioned some other factors that are raising costs – stream setback ordinances, wetlands permitting and rising municipal fees.
“Municipalities continue to adopt more and more stringent codes that continue to increase pricing, most of which are not life safety codes but more things that should be left to consumer choice,” Woods said.
Alongside rising costs, Girard pointed to competition from existing homes.
“A lot of times you can go and buy a bigger home with more square footage, that’s an older home that was already built, for less money, than you can build a newer home with smaller square footage, at a higher price point,” he said.
What lies ahead
The season that, as builders say, was supposed to be the strongest one has ended in the red for many. Woods said the market may stay slow for another one or two months before stabilizing.
“For any large uptick or large increase, I think we’re going to have to wait till spring of next year, and see what the interest rates hold,” he said.
Erickson said that an uptick in homebuilding activity will depend greatly on whether government officials enact certain changes.
“Until we see real changes in housing policy at the state, local and federal level, we’re not really going to see much movement,” he said. “We do need to be building more housing, but until we see regulatory relief or a change in rates, there’s not going to be much change in housing production.”
DeGuentz downplayed the national volatility as being very subjective and tied to multifamily starts.
“Starts and permits always fluctuate and you can point to a lot of different things that may affect one builder over another, but overall as single-family home builders we recognize that there’s ups and downs,” he said. “However, builder and new homebuyer sentiment and demand in our region remains above national data.”
This story was originally published by Missouri Business Alert, a fellow member of the KC Media Collective.
-
Los Angeles, Ca2 hours agoRitzy Pasadena hotel settles lawsuit for allegedly price gouging wildfire victims
-
Detroit, MI2 hours agoBrother Nature at Night: Jack’s backyard & kayaking the Huron River
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoHardin Fire in Napa County burns 55 acres near Pope Valley
-
Dallas, TX2 hours agoFormer Dallas ISD Superintendent Michael Hinojosa runs for Dallas Mayor
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoSouth Florida mother arrested for leaving daughter chained to fence, police say
-
Boston, MA2 hours agoBoston man charged after allegedly assaulting Burger King employee, punching customer
-
Denver, CO3 hours agoDenver Country Club caddie earns full-ride Evans Scholarship, becomes first in family to attend college
-
Seattle, WA3 hours agoSeattle very much in running for another World Cup