Connect with us

Kansas

Kansas primary voters were smarter than megadonors expected. But too many stayed home.

Published

on

Kansas primary voters were smarter than megadonors expected. But too many stayed home.


Kansans show up to vote in the Aug. 5 primary election. (Maya Smith for Kansas Reflector)

Big money thought it could hornswoggle Kansas Democrats in the 35th District into selecting Rep. Marvin Robinson as their candidate.

Robinson, for those of you outside the Kansas City area, essentially swapped parties in 2023, siding with Republicans on hot-button issues. Groups that usually boost Republican candidates swamped his district with deceptive mailers touting supposed accomplishments. The most shameless by far swiped former President Barack Obama’s “O” logo and images of the Democratic leader.

Voters didn’t fall for it. They selected educator Wanda Brownlee Paige instead. She won a whopping 49% of the vote, while Robinson trailed with 22% and two others followed him.

Advertisement

This was one of the most heartening results from primaries held Tuesday, an example of how voters can stand up against the interest groups that usually dominate Kansas politics. Along the same lines, moderate GOP stalwarts Sen. Barbara Dietrich and Rep. Mark Schreiber won their respective races. Johnson County Sheriff Calvin Hayden lost his reelection bid, showing that even Republicans have tired of election conspiracy-mongering.

On the other hand, we could have done more.

I’ve encouraged Kansans to step up and participate in the electoral process using the metaphor of a board game.

If you don’t play, not only can’t you win, but you can’t even affect the outcome.

Unfortunately, numbers from early Wednesday showed that only 16.1% of Kansas voters bothered. That equals 318,728 ballots from nearly 2 million registered voters. Put another way, that means 1.68 million Kansans who could vote didn’t.

Advertisement

Secretary of State Scott Schwab suggested beforehand that turnout might be comparable to that in 2016’s primary, in which 24% of voters cast ballots. More ballots will likely be added to this year’s total as elections officials complete their work, but Kansans sure didn’t set any records. We weren’t even close.

Mark my words. In early 2025, we will see polls and hear from Kansans upset about what the Kansas Legislature’s course.

They will wonder, once again, why our state can’t expand Medicaid health insurance coverage for families in need, why we can’t legalize even medical cannabis, and why budget proposals pander to millionaires and billionaires. They will be right to ask these questions. I’ll ask them too.

But Kansas voters had an opportunity this past week to choose a different course. They could have removed many barriers to progress at the Statehouse. With a handful of exceptions, they chose to stay at home or vote for familiar faces.

Already, a large swath of next year’s legislature has been decided.

Advertisement

Fifty-two candidates made it past their primaries and will run unopposed for the 125-member Kansas House. For those who prefer percentages, that means 42% of state representatives have been set. Nine candidates won’t face challengers for seats in the 40-member Kansas Senate. That’s 23% of state senators decided. As the saying goes, “Game over, man.”

Bernadette Kinlaw of the Southern Poverty Law Center explains the basics: “Your vote holds elected officials accountable for their actions. It forces them to listen to you and the issues that most concern you. Your vote is your report card on lawmakers. If you’re not content with the job an elected official has done, you can use your vote to remove that official from office.”

That goes for general elections and primaries.

Voting reshapes our government directly. Not taking to the streets, not posting on social media, not writing opinion columns. Kansans should do all those things when so moved, but they only go so far. Voting actually creates change.

That’s what makes the primary results bittersweet. At least a handful of voters understand the stakes. They rid themselves of unrepresentative embarrassments Robinson and Hayden. They didn’t need to be persuaded by big money or glossy mailers; they took the initiative on their own. Cheers to all who showed up and took a stand.

Advertisement

But many other folks couldn’t be bothered. They chose not to vote at all, allowing others to make choices for them.

Those 2 million registered Kansas voters will have another, smaller, set of choices in November.

We’ll see what happens then.

Clay Wirestone is Kansas Reflector opinion editor. Through its opinion section, Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.



Source link

Advertisement

Kansas

The North Kansas City stadium site might just be the best one

Published

on

The North Kansas City stadium site might just be the best one


A lot has happened since John Sherman, principal owner of the Kansas City Royals franchise, first floated the idea of a new stadium in November of 2021. The road since then has been winding and frustrating, and four years and one failed vote later and we don’t know where the stadium is going or what it will look like.

But there is a light at the end of the tunnel. The Royals’ lease with the Truman Sports Complex ends after the 2030 season, which means they have to start on construction relatively soon to be ready by the 2031 season. Missouri and Kansas have both passed state-level funding. And the Royals had planned on announcing their final plan earlier this year, which implies they are close to an answer themselves.

Lately, there has been a lot of smoke surrounding the North Kansas City option. The office of NKC mayor Jesse Smith put out a press release on October 16 stating that:

The City of North Kansas City continues to have conversations with the Kansas City Royals regarding the possibility of a stadium and related development in North Kansas City. These discussions are substantial and will ultimately involve collaboration among the State of Missouri, Clay County, and the City in any final framework.

Additionally, the Missouri legislature had previously passed a bill that allows Clay County to create a sports complex authority that would govern the stadium. And we can’t forget that North Kansas City was one of two initial proposed sites by the Royals back in August 2023.

Advertisement

Like many folks, my reaction to the proposed Clay County site was one of skepticism. What was the point? To just leave a suburban area to go to another suburban area? Why not just stay in Kauffman Stadium?

I have since come around, and not because I am being paid off by the Royals. I have no idea what they’re doing and they have declined to comment on media requests about the stadium for a while now. No; I genuinely think that the North Kansas City site is the best one outside the East Village site, which seems dead. Let’s dig into why.

The Royals’ new stadium goals

So much has happened that it’s worth re-visiting the first real piece of official communication the Royals put into the world: an open letter from Sherman about what the Royals wanted to accomplish.

There are two things that stand out as clear benchmarks for what the Royals wanted the stadium to be from the very start of this project. First, though downtown was the primary goal, the Royals were cognizant that there were other sites that could work. They were pursuing sites “both in downtown Kansas City and close to it.”

Advertisement

Second, and most importantly, the Royals wanted to build a ballpark district, with “residential, commercial, and community components.” As Sherman wrote, their version was to construct “a new ballpark district and all that comes with it – one that is woven into the fabric of our city, can host events and concerts, and boosts our local economy.”

Why North Kansas City works

Kauffman Stadium is a beautiful park that exists within an ugly car dystopia that sucks the life out of the entire area. It’s surrounded by acres and acres of useless concrete. It’s cut off from goods, services, housing, and lodging. It is an unwalkable island wasteland.

Contrast that with walkable areas, where you don’t have to drive a car to get to where you want to go. More importantly, there are people already there. People live in walkable areas in multiunit apartments and condos, and walkable areas have narrower streets, more public transit, and a significantly higher density of resources and services than car-centric areas.

Downtowns are usually the only areas in American cities that have walkability and density. But suburbs can be walkable, too. Consider the area around Johnson Drive and Lamar in Mission, Kansas, versus the area around 119th Street and Strang Line Road in Olathe. Both Kansas City suburbs, but one is significantly prettier, more lively, and livable than the other.

Advertisement

North Kansas City is one of the only areas in the metro that has the ingredients for significant walkability. Indeed, the Armour Road area is already walkable and bikeable.

The above screenshot of Google Maps shows roughly where the Royals have proposed their site: bordered by Armour Road on the north and 16th Avenue on the south, and from Erie Street on the west to Howell Street on the east. North of Armour Road, there are rows and rows of houses, a public library, North Kansas City High School, and multiple new apartment complexes.

Add the streetcar into the equation, and the area quickly becomes an opportunity to transform into the type of urban neighborhood that is a destination. RideKC has already created an extensive and recent study of what an extension would look like up to North Kansas City, and their plan is to extend the line over the Heart of America Bridge and then up Swift Street.

And though walkability is key, car access is still easy. I-35 is immediately to the east, and there’s access to I-29, I-635, and Highway 169—along with access to downtown and I-70 via Highway 9.

So why wasn’t NKC the first choice?

Advertisement

No site is perfect, which I’m sure the Royals have grappled with significantly.

At the same time, there are some pretty big reasons why downtown is a better option than North Kansas City. One is population; the downtown KC population is about 32,000 people, compared to under 5,000 people in NKC as of the 2020 census. Furthermore, Jackson County has over two and a half times as many residents as Clay County, which is a significant difference when it comes to tax revenue and the inevitable “public” part of the “public-private partnership” that the Royals want.

And, of course, that streetcar thing? It’s already downtown.

But at this point in the juncture, North Kansas City is also the only place that fulfills all of the Royals’ initial desires for the project. The Washington Square Park site downtown is tiny and there is not space for a “ballpark village.” No site in Johnson County or Wyandotte County makes much sense for that, either, and a Legends site would end up as Kauffman Stadium West (derogatory).

If the Royals aren’t going to pull the trigger on the East Village site—which has always been the best choice—for whatever reason, North Kansas City provides a way to catalyze some public transit investment and transform the area into something the Royals can be proud of.

Advertisement

At least, if the public isn’t on the hook for too much money. But that, as they say, is a whole different ball game.



Source link

Continue Reading

Kansas

Additional Light Shed on Simmons Timeline, Past and Future

Published

on

Additional Light Shed on Simmons Timeline, Past and Future


KANSAS CITY, Mo. – The Chiefs pulled away in the second half to secure an impressive Monday night win over the Commanders. But their prior Monday night game actually began the Josh Simmons timeline.

According to SI insider Albert Breer, the deeply personal family issues with which the rookie is currently navigating first surfaced just before the Oct. 6 Monday night loss in Jacksonville. Shortly before kickoff in that game and after pregame warmups, the Chiefs announced that Simmons had been added to the injury report as questionable with an illness.

josh simmon

Sep 28, 2025; Kansas City, Missouri, USA; Kansas City Chiefs offensive tackle Josh Simmons (71) and running back Kareem Hunt (29) line up against the Baltimore Ravens during the game at GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Denny Medley-Imagn Images / Denny Medley-Imagn Images

A 6-5, 310-pound rookie, Simmons wound up starting and playing the full game, a 31-28 loss to the Jaguars. He didn’t appear on the team’s injury report the following week until five hours prior to kickoff in the Sunday night victory over Detroit on Oct. 12.

That’s when the Chiefs announced Simmons – the final choice in the first round of April’s draft — as questionable for personal reasons. Kansas City ruled him out before kickoff, and Jaylon Moore has started each of the last three games, all Chiefs wins.

Advertisement
jaylon moor

NFL Kansas City Chiefs offensive line Jaylon Moore / Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

Money well spent

“For now,” Breer wrote Tuesday, “the first thing to know is the two-year, $30 million deal the Chiefs gave Jaylon Moore in the offseason, even if he’s not the starting left tackle they paid him to be, is money well spent.

“The Chiefs have depth at those positions that they didn’t before. Last year, a black hole at left tackle forced the team to move Joe Thuney there, setting off a cascade that blew up in the team’s Super Bowl loss. They’ll likely have no such problem this year.”

joe thuney, patrick mahome

Feb 9, 2025; New Orleans, LA, USA; Kansas City Chiefs guard Joe Thuney (62) blocks for quarterback Patrick Mahomes (15) against the Philadelphia Eagles in Super Bowl LIX at Ceasars Superdome. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images / Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

Chairman and CEO Clark Hunt addressed the Simmons situation prior to Monday’s win over the Commanders.

“It’s not something I can go into but it is a private family matter,” Hunt said Monday, noting he has a high level of confidence Simmons will return. “And we’ve had good communication with him, and there’s an understanding by both parties where he is. And we’re hopeful to have him back with the team sometime in the future.”

clark hun

Sep 24, 2023; Kansas City, Missouri, USA; Kansas City Chiefs chief executive officer Clark Hunt on field against the Chicago Bears prior to a game at GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Denny Medley-Imagn Images / Denny Medley-Imagn Images

A good sign

Breer also noted that if Brett Veach and Andy Reid expected a long-term absence, they had the option to place the rookie on a reserve list, shelving him for at least four games. But the team is not believed to be considering that choice.

Advertisement

While Moore played well his first two starts in place of Simmons, the veteran tackle struggled against the Commanders. Reid said after Monday’s game that Washington has an elite defensive front. Edge rusher Jacob Martin sacked Patrick Mahomes twice, one allowed by Moore.

josh simmons, travis kelc

Aug 9, 2025; Glendale, Arizona, USA; Kansas City Chiefs offensive tackle Josh Simmons (71) and tight end Travis Kelce (87) against the Arizona Cardinals during a preseason NFL game at State Farm Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images / Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

“They’re better with the wildly talented Simmons in there,” Breer wrote. “What I know is that the issue first arose just before the Jaguars game. Simmons ended up playing in that matchup, then left right before the Lions game. The cited family aspect of his absence is real, and that was a part of the background that teams had to work through when he was coming out.”

The Chiefs (5-3) have to travel to Buffalo (5-2) on a short week, then get a midseason bye.

Chiefs Kingdom, keep that browser right here for your best in-depth news and info, totally free; the best way to get it is to follow @KCChiefsOnSI, @ZakSGilbert and @Domminchella on X (Twitter). And tell us your thoughts on the Chiefs’ offensive line by visiting our Facebook page (here).



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Kansas

So, Is Taylor Swift Styling a Chiefs vs. Commanders Outfit Tonight?

Published

on

So, Is Taylor Swift Styling a Chiefs vs. Commanders Outfit Tonight?


At 8:15 p.m. ET on October 27, Monday Night Football viewers weren’t one hundred percent focused on the field where the Kansas City Chiefs faced the Washington Commanders. They were scanning the stands for a glimpse at Taylor Swift’s game-night outfit.

Last week, when the Chiefs played the Las Vegas Raiders, Taylor Swift spent the night at Arrowhead Stadium largely unnoticed. Her look for the evening—a Chanel 25 bag, Prada corset, short shorts, and her diamond engagement ring by Artifex Fine—was only revealed during a post-game trip to 1587 Prime with fiancé Travis Kelce.

This week, the “Opalite” singer’s play is still unpredictable. While Kelce made his tunnel walk before the game in a Showgirl orange chore jacket and pants, Swift’s own Chiefs vs. Commanders outfit remained under wraps.

Travis Kelce took the traditional tunnel walk to the locker room for the Kansas City Chiefs vs. Washington Commanders game. Taylor Swift was not seen before the game.

(Image credit: Getty Images)

By the end of the first quarter, reports from Arrowhead Stadium said Swift’s attendance hadn’t yet been confirmed. No vintage Chiefs jackets, no glitter freckles, no Joseph Cassell Falconer styling, no sighting of the singer, period. There’s a chance that she is attending the game but remaining off-screen. If Swift does make an appearance, or hits 1587 Prime after the ref blows the final whistle, Marie Claire editors will update this story with all the details.

Taylor Swift wearing a Charlotte Simone coat

Last season, Taylor Swift made several stops by the Arrowhead Stadium tunnel in Chiefs-centric fashion.

Advertisement

(Image credit: Getty Images)

This NFL season, spotting Taylor Swift’s Kansas City Chiefs game-day outfits has seemed harder than a reversing a twenty-point loss with two minutes left in the game. For the Chiefs vs. Detroit Lions, Swift’s Ganni jersey dress was identified only by a snippet of its custom stitching shown on the nighttime broadcast. The singer appeared to skip the Chiefs vs. Philadelphia Eagles game altogether—until a friend of Swift’s and Kelce’s shared photos of her plaid Jonathan Simkhai set, Chanel necklace, and Gucci slingback heels following the match. Even the season opener, against the Los Angeles Chargers, went by Swift-less. (However, the singer had a valid excuse to skip an outfit: The game was held in Brazil.)

Taylor Swift posing with Travis Kelce and wearing a plaid two piece set with slingback heels

Taylor Swift has skipped tunnel walks this NFL season, instead making quiet appearances with friends following the Chiefs’ games.

(Image credit: @kanebrown)

Instead, Taylor Swift’s Life of a Showgirl style has taken up all her center-stage photo ops this October. The singer made a quick press circuit through London and New York City in the lead-up to her album’s release, stopping by Late Night’s couch in Wiederhoeft and The Tonight Show‘s interview in a Giuseppe Di Morabito mesh dress. The only snapshot of her everyday style arrived at an Oct. 8 dinner, when she wore a fall plaid mini skirt and knee-high boots to visit New York City’s Eighty Six.

Advertisement

Taylor Swift wearing Wiederhoeft on the Late Show With Seth Meyers

Taylor Swift wearing Wiederhoeft to Late Night with Seth Meyers.

(Image credit: Getty Images)

Taylor Swift’s tunnel walks at Arrowhead Stadium have been missed. Between her first two seasons, more than 30 Kansas City Chiefs game outfits received their own red carpet treatment: dedicated photo sessions where style experts could catalogue Swift’s Chiefs-colored Vivienne Westwood sets, her head-to-toe Chanel runway pulls, and her Dior saddle bags.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending