Connect with us

Iowa

Iowa Northern Railway deal warrants heightened scrutiny

Published

on

Iowa Northern Railway deal warrants heightened scrutiny


Quaker Oats plant in Cedar Rapids, photographed by David Harmantas (Shutterstock).

Scott Syroka is a former Johnston city council member.

Attorneys for Canadian Pacific Kansas City submitted a 59-page filing to the U.S. Surface Transportation Board on February 26 regarding the proposed acquisition of Iowa Northern Railway by Canadian National.

The Canadian Pacific Kansas City filing highlights the proposed deal’s “national importance” and cites “competitive concerns of significant magnitude” in calling for the Surface Transportation Board to classify Canadian National’s takeover attempt of Iowa Northern as a “Significant” transaction rather than the “Minor” transaction status that Canadian National has sought.

Advertisement

The distinction matters because “Minor” transactions aren’t subject to the same regulatory requirements as “Significant” transactions—meaning the public would have less access to information and less time to review the deal.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City made clear in its filing that it remains neutral for now on whether the Surface Transportation Board should approve or reject the acquisition. But it is calling for the “Significant” transaction classification “so that the Board and interested members of the public can undertake a more deliberate and thorough exploration of the competitive and other issues the Transaction raises.”

I wrote about some of those potential issues back in December. This week’s filing goes further in building a case in favor of classifying the transaction as “Significant.”

NATIONAL IMPORTANCE

The filing highlights the national significance of Iowa Northern’s service area, explaining that “The area served by Iowa Northern is of critical importance to U.S. agriculture. Cedar Rapids ranks as ‘[t]he largest corn-processing city in the world,’ hosting manufacturing plants for many familiar names, including General Mills, Quaker Oats, Cargill and Archer Daniels Midland. The Quaker Oats plant at Cedar Rapids is the largest cereal mill in the world.”

Advertisement

Beyond that, it underscores the importance of “efficient and competitive rail transportation” in shippers’ ability to transport “commodities like corn, soybeans and oats to processing facilities,” as well as transport “processed commodities like [dried distillers grains] DDGs, soybean oil, ethanol, and biofuels to market.”

ANTICOMPETITIVE CONCERNS

The filing notes that Canadian National and Iowa Northern are currently head-to-head competitors. For that reason, their merger would result in a “clear loss of competition” for local and international shippers alike, such as in the case of Canadian oats that are transported to Quaker Oats’ Cedar Rapids mill.

That loss of competition “would allow CN to drive up IANR’s rates (or reduce its services levels), knowing that doing so would risk nothing.” The filing continues, “All viable routes to Cedar Rapids from Canada would be controlled by CN in the future, whereas today IANR is fully independent of CN.”

The filing states, “The competitive ‘status quo’ will not be maintained. Shipper competitive options will be reduced everywhere that both CN and Iowa Northern have access, and more broadly Iowa Northern will be removed as an independent competitive force across the entire east-central Iowa region that it and CN both serve.”

DUBIOUS BENEFITS

In response to Canadian National’s claims that its proposed acquisition would yield win-win-win benefits for all stakeholders, the Canadian Pacific Kansas City filing states, “There is in fact substantial reason to be skeptical of the magnitude of the benefits CN identifies…”

Advertisement

For example, the filing calls into question the accuracy of the modeling Canadian National used to claim the deal would result in nearly 15,000 trucks being removed from highways.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City also argues that Iowa Northern is already meeting its shippers’ needs and does not need Canadian National to continue to do so. “In CPKC’s experience, Iowa Northern already provides quality service (and provides extra services) on an economical basis,” the filing reads. “It is not clear how CN could provide the same shipper amenities at lower cost to create rail-to-rail diversions.”

CANADIAN NATIONAL’S PR AND LOBBYING EFFORTS

There are signs that Canadian National may be getting nervous over the increased scrutiny. Recently, the company’s Public and Government Affairs team has invested significant resources in public relations and lobbying efforts regarding the deal. Canadian National has gone so far as to produce a podcast episode about the deal, lobbied local and state elected officials, launched a microsite touting the purported benefits of acquiring Iowa Northern, and bought an unknown amount of digital ads on sites like Google to promote the deal.

The microsite and digital ads avoid words like “merger,” which can often contain negative associations with reductions in quality and service, inflated pricing, and monopolization. Instead, they use more neutral words to describe the transaction, such as “combination.”

It all adds up to a significant effort to push through a transaction that Canadian National wants the Surface Transportation Board to classify as “Minor.”

Advertisement

COMPANY’S LOBBYING YIELDS SOME SUCCESS

To date, the following individuals or entities have sent letters to the Surface Transportation Board in support of Canadian National’s acquisition of Iowa Northern:

  • Iowa State Senators Waylon Brown and Tim Kraayenbrink
  • Cedar Rapids Mayor Tiffany O’Donnell
  • Waterloo Mayor Quentin Hart
  • Cedar Falls Mayor Danny Laudick
  • Butler County Supervisors Greg Barnett, Wayne Dralle, and Rusty Eddy
  • Cedar Rapids Metro Economic Alliance
  • Iowa Area Development Group
  • Iowa Association of Business and Industry
  • Sukup Manufacturing Co.
  • Hawkeye Community College, Kirkwood Community College, North Iowa Area Community College
  • the SMART-TD union

These letters can be viewed within the application Canadian National filed with the Surface Transportation Board on January 30, 2024.

Alternatively, you can access Canadian National’s application and other documents related to the proposed deal by visiting the Surface Transportation Board’s website. Start here > confirm “Search For” field is set to “Dockets” > enter Docket Number “FD” and “36744” > this will display the various docket results > click on the “FD_36744” hyperlink under Docket Number > you will now be able to see a list of the filings and decisions submitted in regards to this deal, accessible as hyperlinked PDFs in the Attachment column.

FULL STEAM AHEAD FOR CANADIAN NATIONAL INVESTORS

As Canadian National chugs forward with its attempt to acquire Iowa Northern, it’s full steam ahead in terms of rewarding Wall Street investors. In its year-end earnings results released in January, the company announced a 7 percent dividend increase to shareholders as well as plans to buy back nearly USD $3 billion in stock per the latest currency conversion rate.

Canadian National did not mention any plans to pay back recent taxpayer dollars intended for short line railroads that were invested in Iowa Northern if the acquisition attempt is successful. Since 2021 alone, the U.S. Department of Transportation has awarded at least $13.9 million to Iowa Northern, including an education and training grant to improve safety on short lines across the country and a grant to fund rail improvements specifically in rural areas.

Canadian National also disclosed for the first time it had spent USD $230 million (including transaction costs) on its Iowa Northern acquisition attempt to date.

Advertisement



Source link

Iowa

Democrats put a ‘bullseye’ on Iowa, eager to turn the red state purple

Published

on

Democrats put a ‘bullseye’ on Iowa, eager to turn the red state purple


play

  • Leaders of both parties are eyeing the Hawkeye State as it boasts numerous open and competitive races.
  • Races for governor, U.S. Senate and the U.S. House will dominate the playing field in Iowa.

For a ruby red state controlled at nearly every level by GOP elected officials, Iowa Republicans are unusually nervous going into the 2026 midterm election season.

The state has open races for governor and U.S. Senate, and it will see two of its four U.S. House races heavily targeted as Democratic pickup opportunities.

Advertisement

The governor’s race in particular has unsettled Republicans, as well-funded, well-liked Democratic state Auditor Rob Sand marshals a formidable campaign infrastructure while Republicans fight out a divisive five-way primary race.

The candidate field will be set in the state’s primary elections Tuesday, June 2.

National leaders of both parties see Iowa as a potential key to either holding or reversing national control of Congress, and Democrats hope to reclaim ground with rural voters in a state that has consistently trended red.

“The Democrats have put a bullseye on the state of Iowa,” Texas U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz warned Iowa Republicans at a May 2 rally in suburban Des Moines.

Advertisement

Cruz said Democrats believe they can swing control of the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate away from Republicans just by flipping seats in Iowa.

“And they’re probably right about that,” he said.

National midterm trends favor Democrats, as polling shows voters souring on Republican President Donald Trump, gas prices skyrocket amid war with Iran, and the cost of living remains high.

Advertisement

In Iowa, the state has taken additional hits as trade wars and high costs threaten a renewed farm crisis in the state’s agricultural economy.

But it will be a tough road for Democrats in the Hawkeye State, even if the midterm stars align in their favor.

Registered Republican voters outnumber registered Democrats in Iowa by nearly 200,000, and Republicans have dominated recent election cycles in the state.

Trump carried Iowa by about 13 percentage points in 2024. And Republicans hold all six seats in Congress, both chambers of the state Legislature and every statewide elected office but one.

Advertisement

“We have the record, we have the numbers,” Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds, who is not seeking another term, said at a March event with the Polk County GOP.

“If we show up, we will win,” she said.

U.S. Senate race: Democrats will choose between two ‘fighters’

One of the most closely watched primary races in Iowa is the Democratic contest for U.S. Senate.

Republican incumbent U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst, announced last year she would not run in 2026, leaving the seat open and stoking Democrats’ hopes for reclaiming it.

However, a Democrat has not held a U.S. Senate seat in Iowa since longtime senator Tom Harkin retired in 2015.

Advertisement

A pair of Democrats, state Rep. Josh Turek and state Sen. Zach Wahls, are hoping to change that.

Both are running aggressive primary campaigns, each arguing he is the more electable candidate in a general election.

Turek, of Council Bluffs, touts his grit on the campaign trail.

Growing up with spina bifida, Turek endured 21 surgeries before age 12 and went on to become a gold medal-winning Paralympian representing Team USA in wheelchair basketball.

Advertisement

He says he’s a “battle tested” candidate after winning his Iowa House seat in a western Iowa district that Trump carried.

“I went out, and I crawled stairs and I knocked doors dragging my wheelchair up there to have a conversation with every single person in the community,” he said. “That didn’t matter, Democrats, independents, Republicans. Talked to them all, and talked about the issues they cared about. And I won my first election by just six votes.”

Wahls, of Coralville, says he’ll motivate voters by taking on a corrupt political system that’s rigged in favor of billionaires and corporations at the expense of the middle class.

He rose to political prominence after giving a viral speech at age 19 on the Iowa House floor defending his two moms’ right to marry.

“Iowans want a fighter who has that courage to challenge a broken system and the status quo that is failing our state. I think that’s the core contrast in this race for Democratic primary voters,” Wahls said. “I’m willing to fight back against an establishment that has failed Iowans over and over again. Rep. Turek is being supported by that establishment.”

Advertisement

The candidates share similar views across a range of issues, although Turek cuts a more moderate image, while Wahls leans more progressive — a dynamic that echoes Democratic primaries across the country this year.

One point of contention: Wahls has said he will not vote for U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer as Senate Democratic leader if elected and has called on Turek, who he has criticized for being too closely aligned with the Democratic political establishment, to do the same.

“I’ve called on Josh Turek to join me in rejecting outside spending in this race and rejecting Chuck Schumer’s leadership. He’s refused,” Wahls said. “If he doesn’t have the courage to take on the failed leaders in our own party, he won’t be able to take on Donald Trump either.”

Turek said in a May 5 debate he is “not a D.C. insider.”

Advertisement

“I don’t know these folks,” he said. “I only have one idea with this. And that is: I am not measuring the drapes.” 

But the perception that outside forces are working hard to shape the race has rattled some Iowa Democrats.

VoteVets, an outside group that has previously aligned with Senate Democratic leadership but denies any coordination in Iowa’s race, has spent $10 million on television and digital advertising and direct mail to support Turek since March 23, according to reports with the Federal Election Commission.

Although Turek is not a veteran, he believes his spina bifida was caused by his father’s exposure to Agent Orange while serving in Vietnam.

The $10 million figure has dwarfed what the candidates themselves have raised and spent and could dramatically shape the race’s outcome.

Advertisement

Turek and Wahls have so far raised $3.5 million and $3.7 million respectively.

The winner of Tuesday’s primary is expected to take on Republican U.S. Rep. Ashley Hinson.

Hinson announced her Senate campaign just hours after Ernst said she would not seek reelection. She quickly secured major endorsements from Iowa political leaders, as well as Trump.

She faces a primary from former state Sen. Jim Carlin, although she is heavily favored to win.

Advertisement

Both national parties have signaled their intentions to invest heavily in the state as it moves into the general election — an indication of Iowa’s importance to the parties’ overall strategies.

The Republican-aligned Senate Leadership Fund said it will spend $29 million on behalf of Hinson while the Democrat-aligned Senate Majority PAC plans to spend $13.4 million in Iowa.

Rob Sand energizes Democrats; Republicans will choose nominee in June 2 primary race

Nonpartisan elections analysts at the Cook Political Report have labeled Iowa’s governor’s race as a “toss-up,” moving it into the most competitive category the organization tracks.

“The battle for Iowa’s governorship is officially a barnburner,” wrote Matthew Klein, an analyst who focuses on gubernatorial contests.

Sand, the Democratic state auditor, has energized Iowa voters and garnered national media buzz as he assembles what Iowa Democrats and Republicans alike say is a strong campaign operation.

Advertisement

He started early and aggressively, completing a 100-stop public town hall tour before presumed GOP frontrunner, U.S. Rep. Randy Feenstra, formally got into the race.

Sand plans another 100-stop tour this summer, arguing the effort will help raise his profile among prospective voters, especially in the small towns and rural areas that have abandoned Democrats in recent election cycles.

He said he believes that even if voters don’t completely agree with him, they’ll respect him for having the conversation.

According to the campaign, Sand met with about 10,000 people across all 100 of his town halls, taking roughly 750 questions.

Advertisement

Sand positions himself as an independent-minded Democrat fed up with the two-party political system. And on the campaign trail, he argues that single-party control of government has led to abuses of power.

“We all know the phrase ‘power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely,’” he said as he embarked on his statewide tour. “And now we can say it also takes 10 years. Ten years of one-party control.”

He said that isn’t a partisan statement.

“I invite you to visit the state of California. I invite you to visit the state of New York,” he said. “There, you will find problems. … Either party, when left to its own devices, will begin to serve insiders and special interest groups.”

He’s also incredibly well-funded.

Advertisement

Sand has raised nearly $28 million since the start of his campaign — a number that is boosted significantly by his wealthy in-laws, who have contributed about $11.5 million.

Sand has used his war chest to begin airing a series of accountability-focused television ads, while his opponents are mired in a competitive primary fight.

Five Republicans will be on the June 2 primary ballot, including Feenstra, state Rep. Eddie Andrews, businessman Zach Lahn, former state Rep. Brad Sherman and former state administrator Adam Steen.

Feenstra entered the race as the presumed frontrunner, with millions of dollars already at his disposal and the backing of some of the state’s top elected officials.

Advertisement

He has run a campaign focused on making Iowa a business- and ag-friendly state, improving education, reducing property taxes, and increasing access to quality and affordable health care.

He touts his work helping to secure Trump’s agenda in Congress, including helping to author portions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Trump issued a key endorsement in Feenstra’s favor just days before the primary, which could help buoy his prospects.

Iowa’s MAGA-aligned Republican base has always treated Feenstra with some skepticism — a mood that has intensified as he avoids many public-facing events, including multi-candidate forums and primary debates.

As Election Day nears, Feenstra faces the threat of failing to reach the 35% threshold needed to secure the nomination outright.

Advertisement

If no candidate hits that benchmark, the nomination will be decided by a group of a grassroots delegates at a statewide convention June 13.

In the final days of the race, Feenstra’s campaign has trained its attacks on Lahn, a businessman, entrepreneur and farmer who has aligned himself with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Make America Healthy Again movement.

Lahn has gained momentum on the campaign trail by focusing much of his message on fighting special interests and corporate monopolies, as well as Iowa’s rising cancer rates and problems with water quality.

“We don’t have time to ignore the problem anymore,” Lahn said of Iowa’s cancer and water problems. “And I think Iowans know that.” 

Advertisement

He’s also aired a series of TV ads emphasizing his conservative roots, arguing that “Marxists” have “hijacked” public school curricula and that government jobs should not go to H-1B visa holders in an effort to end illegal immigration.

Lahn outraised Feenstra in the fundraising period that ran from Jan. 1 to May 14, although Feenstra has raised more overall. Lahn has self-funded the bulk of his campaign, contributed $2 million to the effort.

Also on the GOP ballot are state Rep. Eddie Andrews, former state Rep. Brad Sherman and former state administrator Adam Steen.

A pair of congressional races will put Iowa in the spotlight

Two of Iowa’s four congressional races are rated “toss-ups” by the Cook Political Report and are expected to draw significant national attention. There are just 18 such races in the country.

The 3rd District, which encompasses the Capitol city of Des Moines, is perhaps the state’s swingiest.

Advertisement

Currently represented by Republican U.S. Rep. Zach Nunn, the district is about 36% registered Republicans and 31% registered Democrats. Another 32% are no-party voters.

Nunn is being challenged by Sarah Trone Garriott, a state senator from West Des Moines. Both are unopposed for their party’s nomination.

And in the state’s southeast corner, Republican U.S. Rep. Mariannette Miller‑Meeks and Democratic challenger Christina Bohannan are gearing up for what could be their third race against each other since 2022.

Despite each facing party challengers, Both Miller-Meeks and Bohannan have been largely operating in general election mode ahead of the June 2 primary. The two each have stockpiled more than $4 million for one of the nation’s top targeted U.S. House battles.

Advertisement

Democrats have also identified Iowa’s 2nd District as a possible pickup opportunity under the right circumstances. That is an open race after Hinson decided to run for U.S. Senate.

Cook Political Report has shifted the race from “Solid R” to “Likely R,” saying Democrats “have a better shot” at competing now that Hinson is running for another position.

In the Democratic race, state Rep. Lindsay James of Dubuque has emerged as the party’s fundraising leader, followed by former Cedar Rapids nonprofit leader Clint Twedt-Ball and former Kirkwood Community College Dean of Nursing Kathy Dolter.

And on the Republican side, former state Rep. Joe Mitchell of Clear Lake has emerged as the clear frontrunner in the GOP primary, building a massive fundraising advantage over state Sen. Charlie McClintock of Alburnett, while collecting endorsements from Trump and national Republicans.

Advertisement

Des Moines Register reporters Stephen Gruber-Miller and Marissa Payne contributed to this report.

Brianne Pfannenstiel is the chief politics reporter for the Des Moines Register. She writes about campaigns, elections and the Iowa Caucuses. Reach her at bpfann@dmreg.com or 515-284-8244. Follow her on X at @brianneDMR.



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Chicago Cubs’ Matt Shaw expected to begin rehab assignment with Iowa

Published

on

Chicago Cubs’ Matt Shaw expected to begin rehab assignment with Iowa


play

When the Iowa Cubs return to Principal Park in Des Moines on June 2, the Triple-A team will likely be bringing back a familiar face.

Chicago Cubs manager Craig Counsel told reporters in St. Louis, Mo., on May 29 that super utilityman Matt Shaw would likely join Iowa when the team opens a six-game series against Toledo that Tuesday.

Advertisement

“Matts doing super well,” Counsell said during a pregame meeting with scribes. “The plan kind of remains intact that we think he’s going to be able to start a rehab assignment on Tuesday in Iowa. So, assuming everything progresses like it progresses, he’s going to have basically a full weekend of kind of normal pregame stuff. He should be good to go on Tuesday in Iowa.”

Shaw was placed on the injured list back on May 22 with mild back tightness, retroactive to May 20. He was replaced on the big-league roster by prized Cubs prospect Pedro Ramrirez, who tore apart opposing pitching during his first stint in Triple-A in 2026.

Shaw, 24, was hitting .242 (23-for-95) with six doubles, three home runs, three stolen bases and a .291 on base percentage to go along with a .400 slugging percentage in 42 games with Chicago this season. He’s bounced around the field this season and provided an important option off the bench for the Cubs.

Advertisement

Shaw remains one of the organization’s top young players. The Cubs selected in the first round of the 2023 draft. Shaw rapidly rose through the minor leagues and made his big-league debut with Chicago in 2025. After some early-season struggles, Shaw was briefly demoted to Iowa in 2024 before eventually making a return to the big leagues.

While the hitting wasn’t great, the defense was exceptional. Shaw found a home at third base and played so well he became a Gold Glove finalist in 2025.

Iowa starts the series on Tuesday at 6:38 p.m.

Tommy Birch, the Register’s sports enterprise and features reporter, has been working at the newspaper since 2008. He’s the 2018, 2020, 2023 and 2025 Iowa Sportswriter of the Year. Reach him at tbirch@dmreg.com or 515-284-8468.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa Supreme court affirms eviction order for Short’s Burger & Shine

Published

on

Iowa Supreme court affirms eviction order for Short’s Burger & Shine


Following a years-long legal saga, the Iowa Supreme Court recently upheld a decision to evict Short’s Burger and Shine from its South Clinton Street building.

The May 22 decision, delivered by Chief Justice Susan Christensen, agreed with the Johnson County District Court’s decision to evict the downtown burger restaurant after finding that it did not notify the building’s owner — a trust operated by Midwest One Bank — of its intent to extend the lease.

The decision concludes one part of the Short’s legal saga. The now-closed restaurant is also in litigation for a discrimination and retaliation lawsuit Short’s owner, Kevin Perez filed in 2024 against Midwest One Bank, the trust of late building owner Haywood Belle, Belle’s widow, a bank employee, and the City of Iowa City

Advertisement

Iowa City’s Short’s Burgers and Shine closed in 2024

Short’s closed in early 2024 after the court determined Perez hadn’t renewed the business’s lease on time.

Short’s opened at 18 S. Clinton Street in 2008 with the goal of honoring the legacy and story of former building owner H.D. Short, who shined shoes for 50 years, beginning in 1920. The original ownership group included Perez, Dan Ouverson, and former Hawkeye and NFL player Nate Kaeding, who now runs the Gold Cap Hospitality ownership group.

Eviction proceedings started when Short’s temporarily closed in April 2022 “to fix poor building conditions” without notifying Midwest One Bank, the executor of Belle’s trust.

The closure breached a part of the lease agreement that said the restaurant would default on its lease if it “failed to engage” in normal business for more than 15 consecutive business days, the court found. The renovations also violated a provision that forbade structural changes or improvements without prior written approval.

Advertisement

Midwest One Bank sent notice on May 10, 2022, that Short’s would default on its lease if it did not reopen for regular business and cease renovations within 10 days, according to court documents. Shorts responded, claiming it could not reopen for business until renovations were complete because the gas could not be turned back on until repairs were finished.

Midwest One Bank “terminated” the lease and started eviction proceedings in May 2022. Shorts was allowed to continue operating and occupying the building while the case was litigated.

Midwest One Bank filed two eviction claims and delivered notice that Short’s needed to vacate the building by the end of the lease on April 30. Short’s did not vacate, and Midwest One Bank pursued a third eviction claim, accusing the owners of failing to provide notice of renewal.

Advertisement

Short’s argued that because they continued renovations, disputed eviction, and secured insurance, it was evidence of their intent to renew.

The restaurant owners also argued that pending eviction proceedings prevented them from renewal. The court argued that Short’s simply did not declare intent to renew for “whatever reason.”

“Mere forgetfulness does not entitle a party to equitable relief,” the decision reads.

Liam Halawith covers Johnson County local government and public safety for the Press-Citizen. Reach him by email at lhalawith@registermedia.com. Follow him on X at @liam_halawith.   

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending