Connect with us

Iowa

Driver distracted by phone gets probation in fatal Iowa City crash

Published

on

Driver distracted by phone gets probation in fatal Iowa City crash


Drake Brezina, 25, collects himself Monday after avoiding jail time during sentencing at the Johnson County Courthouse in Iowa City, Iowa. Brezina, of Washington, Iowa, was charged with homicide by vehicle and serious injury by vehicle for an Aug. 7, 2023, car crash in Iowa City that killed Kristina Pearson, 30, and seriously injured a passenger in her car. He was sentenced instead to probation and a fine of more than $100,000 in restitution after pleading guilty. (Geoff Stellfox/The Gazette)

IOWA CITY — Nine days after her 30th birthday a year ago, Kristina Pearson and her partner, Christopher Brown, went out to buy house paint. She stopped at Tractor Supply in Iowa City for a copy of North American Whitetail magazine, featuring her dad on the cover for a fourth time.

“She purchased the magazine and snapped a picture of it at 12:57 p.m.,” her mother, Judith Collora, said. “Then she got in the car, buckled her seat belt, and followed another car through the green light at the intersection.”

At 12:58 p.m. Aug. 7, 2023, as Pearson and Brown headed north on Boyrum Street, Drake Brezina, then 24, stared down at his cellphone as he drove his Chevrolet Silverado through two intersections and then a third on Highway 6, despite the red light — slamming into Pearson’s driver’s side door. The crash rupturing her spleen, tearing her vertebral artery, fracturing her skull, breaking ribs and causing extensive internal bleeding.

Advertisement

Minutes later, Collora got a call from her husband, telling her Kristi and Chris were in an accident, that they were both unresponsive at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, and that the couple was to come immediately.

“After three and a half hours of surgery, they directed us back to the neural department, to a room with tables and chairs and Kleenex,” Collora said. “The young doctor came in to tell us they could not save her.”

The physicians expected Brown to survive. And they were able to keep their daughter’s heart beating until the family could gather to say goodbye.

“They said I needed to let them know when to stop the heart medicine,” Collora said. “It was 9:30 p.m. Kristi kept it going for about 20 minutes. We watched her last heart beat.”

Judith Collora, mother of Kristina Pearson who was killed in a 2023 car crash in Iowa City, holds back tears Monday during a victim impact statement at a sentencing hearing for defendant Drake Brezina, 25, at the Johnson County Courthouse in Iowa City. Evidence showed Brezina was looking at his cellphone instead of the road when he crashed into Pearson’s car. (Geoff Stellfox/The Gazette)

Judith Collora, mother of Kristina Pearson who was killed in a 2023 car crash in Iowa City, holds back tears Monday during a victim impact statement at a sentencing hearing for defendant Drake Brezina, 25, at the Johnson County Courthouse in Iowa City. Evidence showed Brezina was looking at his cellphone instead of the road when he crashed into Pearson’s car. (Geoff Stellfox/The Gazette)

Just under two months later, on Sept. 29, 2023, officers arrested Brezina on suspicion of vehicular homicide and serious injury by motor vehicle due to reckless driving.

Advertisement

The second-grade teacher had no prior criminal offenses. Beloved by family, friends and members of his community — having transferred to Iowa Mennonite School, now Hillcrest Academy, in Kalona as a high school freshman — Brezina pursued elementary education at Northwestern College in Orange City, returning to Washington, Iowa, after graduation to teach at Highland Elementary.

Expressing devastation at his own actions, Brezina pleaded guilty and took responsibility for his distracted driving and the lives it destroyed. And on Monday in a packed Johnson County courtroom — walls lined with family and friends on both sides who couldn’t find a seat — Brezina, now 25, awaited his fate.

Prosecutors requested the maximum 15 years in prison. Brezina sought probation, promising to share his story as a warning against distracted driving and honoring Kristi “so that something like this never happens again.”

“There are no words that I can say to express how deeply sorry I am for what happened on that day,” Brezina said. “That sorrow will live in me forever.”

With those opposing sentence requests before him, Johnson County District Court Judge Chad Kepros faced the question of whether to make an example of Brezina or a testament of him — to make him pay behind bars, or behind a microphone, sharing the tragic consequences of his decision to focus on his phone instead of the road.

Advertisement

“This case is just extraordinarily challenging,” Kepros said. “In fact, I personally believe that this type of sentencing can be the most difficult that a judge faces.”

On one hand, he said, “The consequences flowing from the defendant’s criminal acts are just the worst. They can’t be overstated.”

“What’s even more tragic is that all of this pain of loss was completely avoidable,” Kepros said. “While Kristi’s death and Christopher’s injuries certainly weren’t intended, it’s not accurate or fair to describe them as accidental. Because they only came about due to defendant’s recklessness.”

So the real question, the judge said, the one required of him by law, is what sentence would offer “the maximum opportunity for rehabilitation and protection of the community.”

“The nature of this offense is, I think, extremely challenging, because we’ve all seen, perhaps on a daily basis or near a daily basis, people driving while distracted by phones,” Kepros said. “And yet, this is the exact thing that is the danger when you operate a heavy piece of machinery in reckless way. Just because a lot of people do it doesn’t mean that you get a pass when something tragic happens.”

Advertisement

Ultimately, he said, prison wouldn’t offer the maximum opportunity for rehabilitation — nor was it necessary for community protection. Imposing supervised probation for five years instead, Kepros took the extra step to ensure Brezina follows through on his commitment to share his story.

A portrait and appreciation of Kristina Collora Pearson is seen Sept. 27, 2023, in the Honoring the Human Form art exhibit in the Schwartzkopf Gallery at the Cherry Building in southeast Cedar Rapids. The exhibit, by the The Cedar Rapids Drawing Group, honored Pearson, one of the models depicted in the groups’ artworks, who was killed in a car crash at 30. (Jim Slosiarek/The Gazette)

A portrait and appreciation of Kristina Collora Pearson is seen Sept. 27, 2023, in the Honoring the Human Form art exhibit in the Schwartzkopf Gallery at the Cherry Building in southeast Cedar Rapids. The exhibit, by the The Cedar Rapids Drawing Group, honored Pearson, one of the models depicted in the groups’ artwork, who was killed in a car crash at 30. (Jim Slosiarek/The Gazette)

“I generally don’t order community service as a part of a suspended sentence, in fact I don’t remember ever doing it,” Kepros said. “But in this instance, the court believes that Mr. Brezina can potentially have a positive influence on the community by speaking about these events, the dangers of distracted driving, texting and other forms of distracted and impaired driving as a major problem in our society.”

Upon hearing the judge’s sentence, Brezina’s family wept, gripped one another’s hands, lips quivering. Pearson’s family — who in March filed a wrongful lawsuit against Brezina, set for trial in February 2026 — remained stoic, having just shared their concerns that letting Brezina walk will cost more lives.

“I have no forgiveness for Drake Brezina,” Judith Collora told the court. “He knew very well what he was doing. What would you feel if it was your child? How many more people have to die because they’re texting instead of driving?”

Family of Drake Brezina brace for his sentencing Monday at the Johnson County Courthouse in Iowa City. Brezina, 25, of Washington, pleaded guilty to homicide by vehicle and serious injury for an Aug. 7, 2023, car crash. Turning aside a request from prosecutors for a 15-year sentence, a judge sentenced Brezina to five years of probation instead. (Geoff Stellfox/The Gazette)

Family of Drake Brezina brace for his sentencing Monday at the Johnson County Courthouse in Iowa City. Brezina, 25, of Washington, pleaded guilty to homicide by vehicle and serious injury for an Aug. 7, 2023, car crash. Turning aside a request from prosecutors for a 15-year sentence, a judge sentenced Brezina to five years of probation instead. (Geoff Stellfox/The Gazette)

Comments: (319) 339-3158; vanessa.miller@thegazette.com





Source link

Advertisement

Iowa

Iowa Great Lakes businessman Butch Parks dies at 81

Published

on

Iowa Great Lakes businessman Butch Parks dies at 81


SPIRIT LAKE, Iowa (KTIV) – The Iowa Great Lakes community is remembering Leo “Butch” Parks, a longtime lakes-area businessman and founder of Parks Marina.

He died Tuesday, Jan. 6, at the age of 81.

Parks established the marina on East Lake Okoboji in 1983, growing it from a small fishing boat operation into a business with marinas, sales, service, rentals, storage, and popular destinations like the Barefoot Bar.

Parks and his wife, Debbie, also owned Okoboji Boat Works for 23 years.

Advertisement

Funeral services are set for Friday, Jan. 16, at St. Mary’s Catholic Church in Spirit Lake. It will be followed by a celebration of life at Snapper’s restaurant in Okoboji that evening.

Want to get the latest news and weather from Siouxland’s News Source? Follow these links to download our KTIV News app and our First Alert Weather app.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa woman accused of pandering for prostitution and harassment after incidents at Casey’s and a daycare

Published

on

Iowa woman accused of pandering for prostitution and harassment after incidents at Casey’s and a daycare


AURELIA, Iowa (KTIV) – A Northwest Iowa woman is facing charges of harassment and pandering for prostitution after two incidents took place in December 2025.

Forty-seven-year-old Kristal Miller of Odebolt was taken into custody on an arrest warrant and faces three charges: one count of pandering for prostitution and two counts of first-degree harassment, according to court documents.

Kristal Miller(Cherokee County Jail)

The charges stem from two separate incidents that took place on Thursday, Dec. 18. 2025.

According to court documents, at 6:15 a.m., Miller reportedly went to the Casey’s General Store, located at 100 Pearl St. in Aurelia. Documents state Miller approached an employee and customers, requesting money from them.

Advertisement

Authorities state Miller claimed she was wanted by the FBI and told people, if anyone called the police, “she would kill them.”

During this encounter, she also allegedly asked an employee to remove the string from her hooded sweatshirt. Documents state when the employee refused this request, she threatened to strangle them.

That same day at 7 a.m., Miller reportedly approached a female employee outside an Aurelia daycare and asked them for money.

Court documents stated Miller suggested the unnamed employee leave her boyfriend. Miller reportedly told the employee, if she did, then she and Miller would both be paid.

Authorities say when she was told no by the employee, Miller became upset and started yelling at them.

Advertisement

Miller also allegedly threatened to “steal her car” and ”take her away to her guys to start a new life.”

She was booked into the Cherokee County Jail on a cash-only bond of $5,000. A preliminary hearing has been scheduled in Cherokee for Friday, Jan. 9, at 10 a.m.

Want to get the latest news and weather from Siouxland’s News Source? Follow these links to download our KTIV News app and our First Alert Weather app.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa law on police appeals ‘constitutionally vacuous,’ prosecutor says

Published

on

Iowa law on police appeals ‘constitutionally vacuous,’ prosecutor says


play

  • The Iowa Supreme Court is reviewing a 2024 law that allows law enforcement officers to appeal their placement on a Brady-Giglio list.
  • A dispute between Jefferson County’s attorney and sheriff led to the sheriff being placed on the list, which identifies officers with credibility issues.
  • The county attorney argues the law is unconstitutional because it lets judges interfere with a prosecutor’s duty to disclose evidence to defendants.

A feud between two Jefferson County officials has landed before the Iowa Supreme Court, which must decide if a 2024 addition to Iowa’s Rights of Peace Officers law is unconstitutional.

Jefferson County Attorney Chauncey Moulding is asking the state’s high court to overturn what he calls the “constitutionally vacuous” law, which allows officers to petition the courts to be removed from their county’s Brady-Giglio list.

Advertisement

Named for two U.S. Supreme Court decisions, the lists compiled by prosecutors identify law enforcement officers and others whose credibility is in question, and it can provide grounds for questioning their testimony in court.

After a dispute over a case involving a sheriff’s deputy’s use of force, Moulding in 2024 notified Jefferson County Sheriff Bart Richmond he was placing him on the Brady-Giglio list. Richmond petitioned a court to reverse Moulding’s decision, and a district judge did, finding Richmond’s actions in connection with the case, while unprofessional, did not bring his honesty or credibility into question.

In his appeal, Moulding argues that’s not up to the court to decide, and that the law lets judges improperly intrude on prosecutors’ professional judgment and, ultimately, defendants’ rights.

“The practical real application of (the 2024 law) is to create a Kafkaesque scenario where a criminal defendant could face the prospect of criminal charges involving a State witness who is so lacking in credibility that the State’s attorney has qualms about even calling him to testify, but is prevented from disclosure,” Moulding wrote. “Such a situation is unconscionable, and underlines the constitutional vacuousness of the statute itself.”

Advertisement

The court has not yet scheduled arguments for the case, which could have impacts far beyond Jefferson County. Attorney Charles Gribble, representing Richmond, said this is just one of three Iowa Brady-Giglio appeals he personally is involved in.

What is a Brady-Giglio list?

Under the Fifth Amendment, criminal defendants are entitled to due process of law. In Brady v. Maryland in 1963 and in subsequent cases the U.S. Supreme Court held that due process requires a prosecutor to disclose any known exculpatory evidence to the defense. That includes anything giving rise to doubts about the credibility of the prosecution’s witnesses, including law enforcement officers.

In 2022, Iowa formalized that process by mandating prosecuting agencies maintain a Brady-Giglio list of officers whose credibility can be questioned due to past dishonesty or other misconduct. The law requires agencies to notify officers when they are being put on a list and allows them to seek reconsideration.

Advertisement

Being placed on a list can damage or destroy an officer’s career, as prosecutors generally will decline to call them as witnesses or to bring charges that would depend on their testimony.

2024 law gives courts a role in Brady-Giglio lists

Iowa’s 2024 law went beyond requiring officers be notified of their placement on a Brady-Giglio list by giving them the right to appeal to a district court if their prosecuting agency refuses to take them off a list. The law requires judges to confidentially review evidence and allows them to affirm, modify or reverse an officer’s Brady-Giglio listing “as justice may require.”

In less than two years, courts have reversed local prosecutors on several Brady-Giglio placements, including a messy Henry County dispute in which prosecutors accused a sheriff’s deputy of making misleading statements on a search warrant application.

What happened in Jefferson County?

The lawsuit before the Iowa Supreme Court involves an April 2024 traffic stop by a Jefferson County deputy. As laid out in a subsequent memo by Moulding, video recordings show the deputy handling the driver roughly and, when the man complains, telling him “I can do whatever I want” and, “You’re not going to tell me what I can and can’t do. … You’re going to learn what respect is, young man.”

After learning about the incident, Moulding wrote, he repeatedly emailed Richmond, asking if the deputy’s actions had violated any county policies. Richmond did not respond. Concerned about possible litigation against the county, Moulding then asked another county to conduct an investigation. While the details are disputed, Moulding accuses Richmond of stonewalling both his office and the outside investigators and instructing his subordinates also not to cooperate.

Advertisement

“A county sheriff ordering deputies not to cooperate with an inquiry into a deputy’s use of force represents a fundamental lapse in judgment and raised serious concerns regarding the Sheriff’s honesty, candor and ethics as a law enforcement official,” Moulding wrote.

He scheduled a meeting that Richmond did not attend and then placed him on the county’s Brady-Giglio list. In an emailed statement, Moulding called the entire matter “unfortunate.”

“Frankly, I am shocked that instead of attempting to address this matter with my office cooperatively, the Sheriff instead decided to stonewall an investigation, stonewall the Brady-Giglio investigation, and then take this matter to court instead of sitting down and addressing the matter like an adult and an elected official,” he said.

In a letter, Moulding warned Richmond that he would no longer be called as a law enforcement witness and advised him to limit his involvement with criminal investigations, as “your engagement in such activities could likely negatively impact the outcomes in court.”

Judge disagrees with sheriff’s placement on list

After Moulding denied Richmond’s request for reconsideration, Richmond filed suit. In February 2025, Judge Jeffrey Farrell ruled Richmond should be removed from the list.

Advertisement

Farrell’s order criticized both parties, finding that Moulding had failed to comply with some procedural elements of the law but that Richmond could have avoided the whole situation with “basic and professional” responses to Moulding’s emails. Nonetheless, he found Richmond’s actions did not demonstrate dishonesty or deceit that would justify placement on a Brady list.

“This is not a case in which an officer lied to a court, was convicted of a crime, manufactured or destroyed evidence, or committed some other act that would serve as the basis for impeachment in any criminal case,” Farrell wrote. “Game-playing the county attorney is not the standard of professionalism that Iowans expect of our elected county sheriffs,” he added, but does not constitute grounds for a Brady-Giglio listing.

Prosecutor appeals, argues law is unconstitutional

In his appeal, Moulding does not address Farrell’s factual findings, instead asking the court only to decide whether the law is constitutional.

“The most glaring constitutional defect in (the 2024 law) is that it impedes a criminal Defendant’s substantive and procedural due processes of law, and right to a fair trial,” the appeal says. “These fundamental rights constitute the bedrock raisons d’être for the entire body of Brady-Giglio jurisprudence in the first place.”

Iowa appears to be the only state with a law allowing officers to sue to be removed from a Brad-Giglio list, but Moulding cites a recent federal lawsuit where a judge rejected a South Dakota officer’s attempt to get removed from a list, finding the request “in essence, asks this Court to require a State’s Attorney to violate the constitution.” He further argues that the law violates the constitutional separation of powers and is “so poorly drafted as to be unenforceable and void for vagueness.”

Advertisement

Sheriff’s attorney says single lapse of judgment is not grounds for listing

Gribble, Richmond’s attorney, argued in his Supreme Court brief that the law is constitutional and that the sheriff’s actions fall well short of Brady-Giglio standards.

“Under (the 2024 law), placement on the Brady-Giglio list results not from a single lapse of judgment but rather from repeated, sustained, intentional and egregious acts over a period of time,” he wrote. “Thus, while a singular act of bad judgement may undermine a police officer’s credibility in a particular case, placement on the Brady-Giglio list places a permanent and unreviewable scarlet letter on the officer that he/she is unlikely to be able to ever overcome.”

He also suggests that a court order removing an officer from a list “does not in any way alter the prosecuting attorney’s duty to provide exculpatory evidence in all cases.” In an interview, he argued there should be a legal distinction between prosecutors disclosing concerns about an officer’s conduct in the case in which it occurred, and doing so in every future case involving them.

“To me, that’s what Brady-Giglio is for, not for occasional or first-time wrongs, even if established of a police officer, but those that have a history of that sort of thing,” he said.

The Supreme Court has not yet set a date for arguments in the case.

Advertisement

William Morris covers courts for the Des Moines Register. He can be contacted at wrmorris2@registermedia.com or 715-573-8166.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending