Connect with us

Iowa

DCI investigating group that recruited spoiler candidates, Zach Nunn says at fundraiser

Published

on

DCI investigating group that recruited spoiler candidates, Zach Nunn says at fundraiser


play

CLIVE — U.S. Rep. Zach Nunn said Saturday that the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation is investigating complaints against a shadowy group of operatives that recruited candidates to run in Iowa’s highly competitive congressional districts.

As Iowa and national Republicans rallied voters at the Horizon Events Center in Clive to re-elect the first-term congressman representing Iowa’s 3rd District, Nunn again raised concerns about the Associated Press’ report on the Patriots Run Project. The AP found the group worked in at least six congressional races — two in Iowa — to recruit independent spoiler candidates to divert votes from Republicans.

Advertisement

Joe Wiederien, a fervent supporter of former President Donald Trump from Scranton, said operatives with the group worked to get him on the ballot for the 3rd District seat. He withdrew his name from the ballot.

“When you try and steal an election by taking advantage of guys like Joe or any Iowans in this room, I don’t care what your party, we fight back,” Nunn said.

Little is known about the true identities of the operatives behind the effort, prompting Americans for Public Trust, a nonprofit conservative government watchdog organization, to file a complaint with the Federal Election Commission. The complaint alleged that the Patriots Run Project violated campaign finance law by failing to register as a political committee and file disclosure reports. The nonprofit called for an investigation into the group and the people behind it.

Wiederien told the Des Moines Register at the event Saturday that DCI officials have interviewed him and he’s provided authorities with more information about his contact with the operatives.

Advertisement

“I think it’s getting down to the bottom of it,” Wiederien said.

The revelation that an investigation is underway topped off Nunn’s remarks focused on the need to keep spending down, cut taxes and secure the southern border amid a record influx of migrants.

Nunn is seeking a second term in office after he flipped the seat from Democratic control in a close 2022 race that was decided by about 2,000 votes. The 3rd District covers 21 counties in south central Iowa, including the Des Moines metro area, Winterset, Osceola and Ottumwa.

“The stakes in November could not be higher,” Nunn said. “We are but a handful of votes in Congress away from losing control of our economy, the border and our future. It’s important that we win the Senate and we have the opportunity to win the White House. We never forget about the people’s house. You are at the crossroads right now of making sure this happens.”

Advertisement

U.S. Rep. Ashley Hinson, the Marion Republican representing Iowa’s northeastern 2nd District, said “the left is so intimidated by Zach,” referring to the Patriots Run Project’s ploy.

“They will stop at nothing,” Hinson said. “They will literally stop at nothing to try to take back power. We have a shared vision, and our vision is to return power to you.”

Competition close in race for Iowa’s 3rd District congressional seat

Nunn and other speakers touted his military record at the second annual “Operation Top Nunn: Salute to the Troops” fundraiser.

Nunn last year was promoted to colonel in the U.S. Air Force, four ranks from general. He served almost two decades as an airborne intelligence officer, according to his U.S. House website. He flew recon missions off the coast of China and Russia. After 9/11, Nunn was deployed to the Middle East three times.

Advertisement

His opponent, Democrat Lanon Baccam, a former U.S. Department of Agriculture official, also has highlighted his military background on the campaign trail. Baccam was a combat engineer in the Iowa National Guard from 1998 to 2006, where he earned the rank of corporal. He was deployed to Afghanistan in 2004.

A Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll conducted earlier this month found that more likely Iowa voters favor a Republican candidate over a Democrat in three of the state’s four congressional districts. Southeast Iowa’s 1st District was the only area where likely voters preferred a Democrat.

In the 3rd District, the Iowa Poll found 52% of likely voters prefer a Republican, while 44% favor a Democrat. Four percent say they are not sure.

Republicans currently hold all four congressional seats, but Democrats and Republicans are heavily targeting Iowa’s 1st and 3rd District races as the parties wrestle for control of Congress. Cook Political Report has rated the two races as “lean Republican,” but political forecasters with Inside Elections have most recently rated the contests as a “toss up.”

U.S. Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks, who is looking to stave off competition from Democrat Christina Bohannan in the 1st District, told the crowd that Nunn is “the fighter you want in Congress.”

Advertisement

“The Democrats are pouring money into Zach’s race, my race, and they’re recruiting people from anywhere to run against us,” Miller-Meeks said. “Why? Because they think they can lie and buy their way into Congress and the White House.”

The Baccam and Bohannan campaigns have said they were not involved in and had no knowledge of the Patriots Run Project’s candidate recruitment efforts.

Abortion could be major issue in Iowa’s 3rd Congressional District

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in a statement Friday said the Inside Elections ratings switch signaled Baccam is gaining momentum as women voters “are learning more about Nunn’s anti-abortion record.” Baccam is running ads criticizing Nunn’s response in a 2022 Republican primary debate when he raised his hand after being asked if he believed all abortions should be illegal, with no exceptions. 

Nunn has said this year that he does not support a federal abortion ban and believes states should decide abortion policy. 

As a state legislator in 2018, Nunn voted for a six-week abortion ban, dubbed the “fetal heartbeat” law that prohibits most abortions after cardiac activity is detectable, which can occur as early as six weeks of gestation.

Advertisement

The 2018 law is similar to the ban that took effect in July, which Iowa lawmakers passed in 2023 when Nunn was in Congress. Both versions, including the one Nunn supported, make exceptions for cases of rape, incest and when the procedure was necessary to save the pregnant person’s life.

Republicans emphasize need to secure border, slash federal spending

U.S. Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, a U.S. Air Force veteran, asked members of the crowd if they wanted to see Vice President Kamala Harris, a Democrat, elected president.

“No,” the crowd of about 350 responded.

Pfluger called on the crowd to nudge their friends and neighbors to vote for Nunn, a “battle-tested” servant who he said understands family values and put his life on the line to defend the country. With 38 days until the election, Pfluger said voters had to keep Nunn in Congress.

Advertisement

“It’s going to be less than 10,000 votes that separates us from having the majority in the House of Representatives or going back to (former House Speaker) Nancy Pelosi or (House Minority Leader) Hakeem Jeffries,” Pfluger said. “… Just 10,000 votes. You’re at the epicenter.”

Pfluger condemned “border czar Kamala Harris” for the high number of undocumented immigrants crossing the U.S-Mexico border and said border policies have “ravaged” states like Texas. Republicans have seized on Harris being asked by President Joe Biden to explore the root causes of migration from Central America. Despite the moniker, he did not task Harris with overseeing border security.

Nunn told reporters after the event that supported a Republican-backed border bill that passed the House last year but wasn’t taken up in the Senate. He has complained that the Senate didn’t vote on its own bipartisan border deal. Senate Republicans blocked the bill after Trump urged them to reject it.

Families are feeling the pinch of “Biden inflation,” raising the cost of necessities such as groceries and housing, Nunn told the crowd. He warned of what would happen if Democrats controlled tax policy as cuts enacted in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act are slated to expire.

“We’ve had the opportunity to have that American dream by making sure that your tax dollars are given back to you,” Nunn said.

Advertisement

Democrats hit Iowa’s GOP congressional delegation for campaigning without a new farm bill

Iowa Democratic Party Chair Rita Hart in a statement lambasted the state’s GOP congressional delegation for campaigning instead of focusing on negotiations for a new farm bill. The important five-year legislation expired in 2023 and was extended through this month. It’s slated to expire Monday, though funds will largely last through the end of the year.

The farm bill authorizes financial and infrastructure support for farmers and rural areas. It outlines terms for the federal government’s nutritional efforts such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and authorizes crop insurance.

Negotiations stalled as the parties disagreed over scaling back spending on nutritional programs and funding more subsidies to large commercial growers.

“Our legislators should be more concerned about supporting production agriculture, promoting soil conservation and feeding hungry kids than they are about going home to campaign,” Hart said in a statement. “This has been the most do-nothing Congress in history and it’s time to send new leaders to Congress who will harvest a bipartisan farm bill for the benefit of the Iowans they serve.”

Nunn told reporters after the event that he had asked for the farm bill to come for a vote before leaving town, but saw opportunity to advance negotiations in the lame-duck session.

Advertisement

“We all know it takes two parties to tango on this, and the reality is the Senate hasn’t even so much as drawn down on a napkin” what its plans will be, Nunn said.

Marissa Payne covers the Iowa Statehouse and politics for the Register. Reach her by email at mjpayne@registermedia.com. Follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter, at @marissajpayne. 



Source link

Iowa

Center for Intellectual Freedom advisory council passes bylaws after disagreements

Published

on

Center for Intellectual Freedom advisory council passes bylaws after disagreements


DES MOINES, Iowa (Gray Media Iowa Capitol Bureau) – The advisory council for the University of Iowa’s new Center for Intellectual Freedom voted 10-7 Tuesday to approve bylaws, including how to select the permanent director.

Republican legislators established the center to combat what they felt was too much liberal ideology on university campuses. The center aims to create college classes that promote what legislators consider intellectual diversity.

Interim director Luciano de Castro created the advisory council’s bylaws, which included who would decide the next director. The group would have consisted mainly of scholars from high research universities.

But Iowa’s Board of Regents felt that too many of those scholars would come from outside Iowa.

Advertisement

“The hiring of the permanent director is on the top of the list. So having a faculty balance at this point and as we’re moving forward, I think, is really important,” said Christine Hensley of the Iowa Board of Regents.

The center’s council considered those concerns at Tuesday’s meeting, but not without disagreement between members.

“Most of the academic side of you folks being willing to serve on there, which we truly appreciate, are from a different state and just not known by Iowans,” said Robert Cramer of the Iowa Board of Regents.

Thomas Gallanis, a professor at George Mason University, disagreed.

“This center is under Iowa control because it reports to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents is the governing body. The Advisory Council is not a governing body,” Gallanis said.

Advertisement

The council now needs the Board of Regents to sign off on the bylaws before the process can get underway to choose a leader for the center.



Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa attorney general pushes federal review as farmers warn refinery exemptions hurt corn market

Published

on

Iowa attorney general pushes federal review as farmers warn refinery exemptions hurt corn market



Johnson County farmers have expressed general disapproval of policy exemptions for facilities that turn crops into fuel across the state. Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird urged an investigation into these facilities across the state. 

Bird sent a letter to federal agencies alleging some of Iowa’s small biofuel refineries may be cutting production to qualify for ethanol exemptions, a tactic that farmers say is contributing to lower prices and lost income on their crops.

The Renewable Fuel Standard, or RFS, is a federal program requiring U.S. fuel suppliers to mix renewable fuels into gasoline and diesel with the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, with the 2025 target calling for renewable fuels to account for about 13 percent of the nation’s gasoline and diesel supply.

Small refineries — those unable to satisfy the 75,000-barrel-per-day threshold — can claim an exemption from this requirement by submitting an application that is then reviewed by the EPA.

Advertisement

According to the letter, which was sent on Oct. 29, these companies are claiming hardship while simultaneously telling investors they’re thriving.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Iowa produces over one-fourth of the nation’s ethanol, making Iowa particularly exposed to these kinds of exemptions. When small refineries bypass mixing requirements, it cuts directly into the demand for fuels.

George Swenka, a farmer and rancher in the Tiffin area, agreed with Bird and said he was unhappy with these exemptions, adding it does not make sense to avoid the 10 percent when it helps “everyone.”

“It gives them [refineries with exemptions] an unfair advantage in the marketplace,” Swenka said.” It’s a renewable resource. It helps the producers. It helps every state that’s involved. At the end of the day I just don’t think it’s achieving the goal that should be a common goal for all of us.”

RELATED: Iowa cattle farmer sentiment falls alongside beef futures following Trump’s beef import comments

Advertisement

Chad Hart, an agriculture and finance economics professor at Iowa State University, said this lack of demand has caused financial hardship for farmers.

“It’s a combination of them having ample supplies right now and not seeing as much demand as they would need to take prices higher again. So, if you have the sort of overwhelming supply combined with demand uncertainty, they’re feeling financially squeezed,” Hart said.

Swenka spoke personally about how the lack of demand has affected his farming and said it is especially difficult as farming prices continue to rise.

“Right now, the prices that we’re receiving are just at breakeven, and without an extra marketplace without another source to market our goods, it really makes it tough,” Swenka said.

He said the issue is a common conversation for farmers, calling it “coffee talk,” but he also worries that refinery issues will not be taken as seriously.

Advertisement

“Farmers make up less than 1 percent of the population, so we really feel sometimes that we’re a minority and we feel that we lack any kind of political clout,” he said. 

However, he hopes those outside of agriculture realize it affects the broader Iowa community.

“There’s such a high percentage of jobs, especially in Iowa, directly or indirectly touched by agriculture. So, when the attorney general does good, we all do good, especially in small rural Iowa,” Swenka said.

Great American Insurance Group’s Iowa’s 2025 Digital Yield Tour projects Iowa’s 2025 corn yield could hit 223.7 bushels per acre, which would be well above recent averages, with the average last year being 205 bushels per acre. Hart cited statistics like these as a potential reason why Bird decided to write to the federal government, as many farmers are looking for “usage of their bountiful harvest.”

Hart said the last time Trump was in office, a large number of exemptions were granted to these smaller refineries, and then later overturned in court cases, with Trump issuing 85 exemptions in his first term according to an EPA report.

Advertisement

“There’s also this idea that we may see a similar wave of that here during President Trump’s second term,” Hart said.

Timothy Hagle, a political science professor at the UI, said if changes aren’t made, people may see farms go out of business. According to a Bloomberg Law report released in April, farm bankruptcies grew 55 percent from 2023 to 2024 and are trending even higher in 2025, with Iowa leading all other states with 12 bankruptcies. 

“You’re going to have some farmers that would not be able to continue because of financial reasons, so they may go out of business. You may have some people that would switch crops to the extent they can do,” Hagle said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Iowa

Officiating Mistakes Cost Iowa Upset Against USC

Published

on

Officiating Mistakes Cost Iowa Upset Against USC


Iowa Hawkeyes’ 26-21 loss at USC turned on multiple controversial officiating decisions in the third quarter. A series of missed calls set up an interception that flipped momentum and ended the Hawkeyes’ upset bid.

CBS Sports’ Chris Hassel posted video of the most egregious play that sparked outrage across college football. Running back Kamari Moulton carried the ball six yards on second down when a USC defender grabbed and twisted his facemask to bring him down.

No flag came out despite the obvious violation. The call should have given Iowa a 15-yard penalty and automatic first down at USC’s 43-yard line with the Hawkeyes leading 21-19.

The missed facemask wasn’t an isolated incident. Moulton had his helmet turned more than 90 degrees sideways and vertically on multiple occasions throughout the game without drawing flags. Fans also pointed to numerous uncalled holding penalties against USC’s offensive line that extended Trojan drives.

The officiating failures proved costly on the very next play. Instead of having a first down in USC territory, Iowa faced third-and-4 from its own 44. Quarterback Mark Gronowski threw a pass that deflected off receiver Jacob Gill’s knee and into the hands of USC freshman defensive lineman Jahkeem Stewart for an interception.

USC capitalized on the short field, driving 40 yards in six plays for a go-ahead touchdown. Running back Bryan Jackson scored from one yard out to give the Trojans a 26-21 lead early in the fourth quarter.

Iowa head coach Kirk Ferentz addressed the officiating after the game: “I thought I saw a couple of things that maybe could’ve gone the other way. Apparently nobody thought it was flag worthy. You’ve got to play through those things. It doesn’t always work the way you want.”

The missed calls drew immediate backlash on social media. “Honestly – this along with all the obvious holds – there needs to be an investigation into the refs. Isn’t fun when they affect the game so bad – it’s like watching women’s basketball refs,” one fan wrote.

“Simply a game-changing missed facemask call that hurts the Iowa Hawkeyes. This is just inexcusable. You can’t miss this. His head turned. Embarrassing,” another stated.

“Officials miss a hold or hands to the face (take your pick) and then Iowa gets hit for the collision in the end zone. They’re not even looking for USC penalties now,” a third fan observed.

Advertisement

The controversy extended beyond the missed penalties. Iowa committed an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on their sideline with 1:25 remaining that gave USC a crucial first down and allowed the Trojans to run out the clock.

The loss dropped Iowa to 6-4 overall and 4-3 in Big Ten play after blowing a 21-10 halftime lead. The Hawkeyes managed just 108 total yards in the second half and failed to score after intermission.

Despite the officiating controversies, Iowa still had one final chance to pull off the upset. On fourth-and-6 with under two minutes remaining, Gronowski launched a deep pass to receiver Kaden Wetjen, who made a spectacular catch near the USC 10-yard line. However, replay showed his toe landed just out of bounds by mere inches, ending Iowa’s comeback attempt.

Advertisement

Iowa’s College Football Playoff hopes had already died in an 18-16 loss to Oregon on November 8. The USC defeat marked another painful near-miss in a season defined by close losses to ranked opponents.

The Hawkeyes have now lost four games this season by a combined 15 points, with three of those opponents potentially making the College Football Playoff. The defeat extended Iowa’s losing streak against ranked teams to 13 consecutive games.

Iowa has bowl eligibility secured with two regular season games remaining against Michigan State and Nebraska. The combination of questionable officiating and self-inflicted mistakes at USC captures the essence of Iowa’s frustrating 2025 campaign.

Don’t forget to bookmark Iowa Hawkeyes on SI for the latest news. exclusive interviews, recruiting coverage and more!





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending