Connect with us

Indianapolis, IN

What potential new rules for holding back students means in Marion County

Published

on

What potential new rules for holding back students means in Marion County


Sign up for Chalkbeat Indiana’s free daily newsletter to keep up with Indianapolis Public Schools, Marion County’s township districts, and statewide education news.

This story was co-published with Mirror Indy and WFYI.

Grace Martin, a tutor at Vision Academy charter school in Indianapolis, teaches the alphabet.

‘A’ makes the sound for ‘apple.’ ‘I’ is for words like ‘important’ and ‘ice.’

Advertisement

It’s a lesson she uses with students in kindergarten — but to her surprise, she has to teach it to third graders as well.

“It’s like they … just paused at kindergarten or first grade, and now they’re in third grade,” Martin said. “I’m helping them pick up on basically two years of learning.”

It’s a challenge that existed before the COVID-19 pandemic but grew much worse after schools switched to remote learning for part of 2020. Third grade reading scores remain near the lowest point in a decade, and that means thousands of kids lack essential skills necessary to learn as they grow older, such as phonics and comprehension.

Now Marion County educators are preparing for the likely rollout of Senate Bill 1, which would require districts to hold back more students who fail the state’s elementary school reading exam. That bill emerged as one solution proposed by the Gov. Eric Holcomb administration and state lawmakers after seeing that nearly one in five Indiana students failed the reading test in each of the last three years.

Schools currently have the option to retain students yet few do. In 2023, of the 13,855 third graders who didn’t pass the state’s spring reading exam, according to state data, only about 400 were held back.

Advertisement

Reporters from Chalkbeat Indiana, Mirror Indy, and WFYI contacted educators across Marion County to learn how school administrators and teachers were preparing for the probable changes coming just a year after the state required schools to adopt new reading curriculum.

Become a Chalkbeat sponsor

Some support the legislation and see benefits in giving students another year to learn how to read. Others, though, worry about what would happen next: a wave of overcrowded classrooms beginning with a “bubble” in the third grade.

“Then we’re going to see that bubble go into our middle schools and into our high schools,” Wayne Township Superintendent Jeff Butts said.

Thousands could retake third grade

If enacted, the legislation could have an outsized impact in Marion County.

Advertisement

That’s because lawmakers are looking at how many third graders are passing the state standardized exam known as the Indiana Reading Evaluation and Determination, or IREAD-3. That test, given to all third graders, assesses whether the students are proficient in reading.

In Marion County’s public school districts, about 2,700 students were allowed to advance into fourth grade even though they failed IREAD, according to state data. That amounted to 28% of the districts’ third graders. Statewide, that promotion rate was about 17%.

To be clear, not all of those students would necessarily be held back under Senate Bill 1.

Under the legislation, kids would be given three opportunities by the end of third grade to pass IREAD. Students who don’t pass would become eligible for literacy-focused summer school and repeat a year of classroom instruction. But some students — including English language learners with less than two years of learning English, students with disabilities, and those who pass the math portion of state exams — would still move on to fourth grade.

Advertisement

It’s difficult to know how many students would be affected by the legislation. An online portal from the state Department of Education does not outline how many Marion County students would be exempt, and the state did not answer questions about how that number could be estimated.

Statewide, though, as many as 7,050 students would be held back in 2026, according to the Legislative Services Agency, which advises lawmakers on policymaking. That could cost the state an additional $57 million as the students age.

Indiana Secretary of Education Katie Jenner, however, says with multiple opportunities for students to take IREAD, retaining the estimated 7,050 students statewide is “a worst-case scenario.”

Become a Chalkbeat sponsor

“This number, we should never hit,” Jenner said. “It would be unacceptable if we do.”

Advertisement

Marion County schools less likely to hold back

State education officials set a goal in 2022 to ensure 95% of Hoosier students pass IREAD by 2027.

Some officials say meeting that goal will require a shift in how schools decide to hold back students.

At two Marion County public school corporations — Indianapolis Public Schools and Lawrence Township — roughly one in three students were sent to fourth grade without passing IREAD. Both districts declined to comment for this story.

At Pike Township, where 29% of third graders advanced to fourth grade without passing IREAD, Superintendent Larry Young noted the likely effect this legislation would have on urban schools during a January school board meeting. He said he’d like lawmakers to also consider students’ potential for growth.

“I would ask that they look at trajectory,” Young said. “We have children that … in the next year or two, not only will they catch up, they will potentially surpass where their age-same peers may potentially be.”

Advertisement

Butts, the Wayne Township superintendent, said there are valid concerns about holding back students. Studies have found that students who were retained dropped out of school and faced negative social-emotional outcomes. Overall, however, research is mixed on whether retention is ultimately beneficial.

“But we also understand the negative impact of children not being able to read at grade level,” he said. “And that gets exponentially more challenging for them as they get into more difficult content.”

That’s what Rachelle Fisher, a fourth grade teacher in Franklin Township, is seeing. An educator for nearly two decades, Fisher said she loves to teach reading, but by fourth grade, it’s about content.

“It is nearly impossible to teach Indiana history and Indiana state science standards to students that are not reading at grade level,” she said.

Become a Chalkbeat sponsor

Advertisement

Educators say retention isn’t the only answer

Some educators support the legislation but question whether it is happening too quickly.

Indiana lawmakers passed legislation last year requiring schools to adopt curricula aligned with the science of reading, an approach to teaching reading that focuses on phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. While some districts have already trained staff and introduced this teaching, others are doing so for the first time this school year.

Indianapolis Public Schools, for example, introduced a new reading curriculum this year and while 96% of kindergarten through second grade classrooms were using it as of December, only about half of teachers so far have mastered teaching the new material.

“We are three months into implementation of something that a year from now will be very well organized and articulated,” Brookside Elementary School 54 Principal Jeremy Baugh told IPS Board Commissioners during a Feb. 20 meeting.

Other educators stressed that a one-size-fits-all approach to retention may not be best for students.

Advertisement

Stephanie Cotter, principal at Beech Grove’s Central Elementary, said her colleagues consider more than test scores when making a decision about retention. A school committee evaluates what interventions have been tried in the past, how many questions were missed on reading exams and whether retention is socially appropriate for a student. They also consider a student’s size and birthday, and bring parents into the conversation.

A third-grader works through an exercise Thursday, Feb. 15, 2024, during a reading intervention class at Central Elementary School in Beech Grove. (Jenna Watson / Mirror Indy)

“What’s being proposed is even more constraining compared to what’s out there,” Cotter said. “We all want our students to be able to read. We want to hit that 95% target. We want them to have those early literacy skills, and we have to look at specific children and decide, ‘Is this what’s best for them at this time?’”

Cotter and others say retention alone only goes so far. Schools continue to grapple with attendance challenges as students settle into classroom learning after 2020′s pandemic-driven disruptions. About one in five Hoosier students were considered chronically absent last year, and additional legislation has been introduced this year in response.

Some educators say they hope the state will invest in greater literacy support for students before they reach third grade. That could mean universal preschool or mandatory kindergarten.

Barbara Wellnitz, a tutor with United Way’s ReadUP program, said she supports efforts to start students in school earlier.

Advertisement

“Fully funding pre-K for all children, paying teachers of those children decent wages, and requiring children to attend school by age five would all go a long way toward helping children up their reading skills,” Wellnitz said. “Fewer students would face the possibility of retention in all grades.”

What’s next

Parents of students who would have been held back have spoken out against the bill, saying they are concerned about the weight put on students taking a test.

Rachel Burke, president of the Indiana Parent Teacher Association, told lawmakers that she knew when her daughter was in first grade that she would struggle to pass the IREAD. But what she didn’t know until December of her third grade year was that her child had been having seizures at the rate of dozens per day, and likely missing instruction as a result.

Even after receiving medication, she didn’t have enough time between December and the March testing window to catch up, Burke said. She failed, and had to take summer school and repeat the test, but those results were lost.

Now that she’s at the top of her class, it’s clear that holding her back would not have been the right course, Burke said.

Advertisement

“She’s not unique. There are kids whose parents die who take the test the next day. There are kids whose houses burned down who have to take this test the next day,” Burke said. “Kids are people. They’re not statistics. There has to be some room.”

But at the Statehouse, the bill continues to advance. It passed out of the House on Tuesday and now returns to the Senate before heading to Holcomb’s desk.

That’s good news to Martin, the tutor, who said she agrees with the proposal. She said no parent wants to hear that their child needs to be held back, but it’s about making sure they have “that extra support that they need to set them up for success.”

“Where do you want your kids to be at? Do you want to pass your kid and then he’s gonna continue failing and then he’s gonna graduate and he actually didn’t retain anything?” Martin said. “No, you can’t do that. You got to put the kid first.”

Aleksandra Appleton, Amelia Pak-Harvey, and MJ Slaby from Chalkbeat Indiana contributed to this article. Chalkbeat is a nonprofit news organization covering public education. Contact the bureau at in.tips@chalkbeat.org

Advertisement

Carley Lanich and Emily Hopkins from Mirror Indy contributed to this article. Mirror Indy is a nonprofit news organization covering Indianapolis.

Eric Weddle from WFYI contributed to this article.



Source link

Indianapolis, IN

Slew of bills could tighten state’s grip on Indianapolis law enforcement

Published

on

Slew of bills could tighten state’s grip on Indianapolis law enforcement


play

  • While Republican lawmakers tighten their grip on local policing, critics say they could further erode trust between police and communities.
  • One proposal would give some National Guard members full authority to police cities and make arrests during emergencies.
  • Other bills target county prosecutors and hot-button issues like civilian-led police oversight boards and homelessness.

From granting some Indiana National Guard members full policing power to creating a state-appointed special prosecutor to oversee part of downtown Indianapolis, Republican lawmakers are proposing changes that would tighten the state’s grip on law enforcement in the capital city and beyond.

Multiple bills filed this legislative session aim to impose the Indiana General Assembly’s will on local governments like Indianapolis that Republicans perceive to be too lax on crime. Major changes would allow elected county prosecutors to be impeached and grant a governor-appointed special prosecutor authority over Indy’s Mile Square. Subtler proposals would strip power from some civilian-led police oversight boards — a George Floyd–era reform passed by many cities including Indianapolis to increase accountability — and criminalize street homelessness.

Advertisement

Republicans who back such state intervention say that Democrats who run cities like Indianapolis fail to take violent crime as seriously as they should, in favor of more progressive stances on criminal justice issues.

“Their ‘reform’ agenda has meant weaker enforcement, dangerous plea deals and fewer consequences for repeat offenders,” State Rep. Andrew Ireland, R-Indianapolis, said of Indianapolis elected officials ahead of the 2026 session. “The result is predictable: Indianapolis families live in fear while violent criminals walk free.”

Critics say that collectively, the bills align with a recurrent problem: state leaders trying to intervene in cities to score political wins rather than to improve communities. If passed, they say the policies could undermine law enforcement agencies that report to local elected officials and can be readily held accountable, unlike forces sent in by the governor.

“I don’t like the anti-democratic — and that’s with a small d — I don’t like the anti-democratic tendencies of this legislation,” Mark Russell, director of advocacy for the Indianapolis Urban League, told IndyStar.

Advertisement

Giving some National Guard members full police powers

One such proposal that’s moving forward, House Bill 1343, would give select National Guard members full authority to police cities and make arrests during emergencies declared by the Indiana governor. Indiana law currently limits guardsmen’s ability to make arrests to specific situations, like when participants in an “unlawful assembly” refuse to leave.

The goal is to ensure guardsmen are ready to support local law enforcement during extreme situations such as riots or terrorist attacks like the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, Indiana National Guard Adjutant General Larry Muennich said during a Jan. 8 hearing on the bill. Guard spokeswoman Lauren Houck previously told IndyStar that the legislation was partially inspired by periods of “civil unrest, similar to what occurred in Indianapolis and Louisville during the 2020 pandemic” in the wake of Floyd’s killing by Minneapolis police.

The enhanced policing power would apply to roughly 500 military police who make up less than 5% of the total force of Indiana’s guardsmen, Muennich said. Military police, who already do training on topics like managing civil disturbances and use of force, will be required to do an abridged version of Indiana law enforcement training as part of this change, he said.

“What this is is a tool in our toolkit,” Muennich told the House Veterans and Public Affairs Committee. “It allows us the capabilities when we need those capabilities the most, and it allows us to do it quickly and it allows us to do it responsibly. Because if I can do it now and I can set those authorities now … I don’t have to worry about it when I’m needed.”

Advertisement

The bill moved forward with a 9-3 committee vote, mostly along party lines, and must still be voted on by the full state House and Senate. Indiana Gov. Mike Braun supports the change because “law enforcement deserves every tool and partners they need to keep Hoosiers safe,” he previously told IndyStar.

But multiple Democrats objected to the broad authority this policy would grant the governor to decide when an emergency warrants military police’s involvement. Indiana law allows the governor to summon the guard to active duty for reasons including invasions, public disasters, breach of the peace and, most sweepingly, “any other time the governor considers necessary.”

Amid President Donald Trump’s controversial National Guard deployments nationwide, critics worry a governor could abuse this power in the name of being tough on crime, potentially setting off dangerous encounters with residents. In Tennessee, for instance, where the Republican governor deployed guardsmen to Democrat-ruled Memphis to fight crime, a judge later ruled that crime rates there did not warrant an emergency response under the state’s constitution.

“It’s so subjective: What does [the governor] find to be an emergency for which he could call up the Guard? Even though violent crime has fallen precipitously in Indianapolis, for political reasons, does he think the state of public safety in Indianapolis constitutes an emergency?” State Rep. Mitch Gore, an Indianapolis Democrat and captain at the Marion County Sheriff’s Office who voted against the bill, told IndyStar.

Gore and other critics also said that National Guard members haven’t worked to build community trust the way that local police departments have. In diverse cities like Indianapolis, residents are likely to feel safer interacting with the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department than guardsmen who may not share their experiences and don’t report to local elected officials.

Advertisement

“I think everybody wants to be safe, but there’s also just the respect for rights and individual liberties, even in a chaotic situation such as an emergency or a riot,” said Marshawn Wolley, policy director for the African American Coalition of Indianapolis, an advocacy organization made up of local civic groups. “I think the concern would be whether or not the National Guard would have that same level of both training and understanding of policing expectations in this community or any other community for that matter.”

Other bills target prosecutors, civilian-led police oversight

A handful of other bills aim to reshape aspects of criminal justice in Indianapolis more directly.

The most significant examples target Marion County Prosecutor Ryan Mears, whom Republican critics frequently decry as too lenient on crime. Ireland is pushing a constitutional amendment that would allow the General Assembly to impeach elected judges and prosecutors for “crime, incapacity or negligence.”

Another proposal, Senate Bill 145, would require the governor to appoint a special prosecutor who would have primary authority to prosecute crimes committed in the Mile Square area of downtown Indianapolis, starting in 2027. The bill would also force Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett to form a power-sharing agreement between state police and IMPD, or else cede all control over law enforcement in the special district come 2027.

Advertisement

The bill says the state must step in to combat public safety challenges that “negatively impact tourism and economic development” downtown. The author, State Sen. Michael Young, a Republican who represents parts of Marion and Hancock counties, was not made available for an interview.

Calling the proposal “extreme,” Hogsett spokeswoman Aliya Wishner said “the notion that the state would take over public safety responsibilities downtown is a step too far.” Overall, Indianapolis crime in 2025 fell significantly from the previous year, according to IMPD data, with murders and non-fatal shooting investigations both down about 20%.

Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers are also proposing tweaks on hot-button topics like police reform and homelessness.

Senate Bill 284 would weaken certain civilian-led police oversight boards like one in Indianapolis, making them strictly advisory and stripping away their power to pass binding rules. Senate Bill 285, which will be discussed in committee on Jan. 14, would make street homelessness a misdemeanor punishable with a $500 fine or up to 60 days in jail.

Critics like Wolley worry how such bills could further erode trust between police and vulnerable communities.

Advertisement

“The community has worked hard with IMPD to arrive at a consensus standard on what policing should be,” Wolley said. “I think that’s important for any community, so that they are not being policed but rather being served by the police and actually protected.”

Email Indianapolis City Hall Reporter Jordan Smith at JTSmith@usatodayco.com. Follow him on X @jordantsmith09 and Bluesky @jordanaccidentally.bsky.social.





Source link

Continue Reading

Indianapolis, IN

Car crash turns into water rescue in Indianapolis

Published

on

Car crash turns into water rescue in Indianapolis




Car crash turns into water rescue in Indianapolis – CBS Chicago

Advertisement














Advertisement



























Advertisement

Advertisement

Watch CBS News


A deadly crash in Indianapolis turned into a water rescue as first responders saved two children.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Indianapolis, IN

Father dies, 2 children injured after car plunges into Indianapolis pond

Published

on

Father dies, 2 children injured after car plunges into Indianapolis pond


INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) — A car went into a pond early Tuesday on the northeast side of Indianapolis, leaving a man dead and two children injured.

Investigators say the man drove his car into a pond off of Pendleton Way, near I-465 and Pendleton Pike, just after midnight.

Four Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department officers entered the water to rescue the man and the children, Indianapolis Fire Department Chief Rita Reith said.

The children are a 9-year-old boy and an 8-year-old girl, and the driver was their father, according to Reith.

Advertisement

Officers at the scene say the man and the girl were believed to be in cardiac arrest and that they started CPR.

The man was transported to a local hospital, where he died shortly after arrival. The children were taken to local hospitals, where both were said to be stable.

One IMPD officer was fully submerged in the pond during the rescue attempt. He was taken to Eskenazi Hospital for evaluation and is in good condition, according to Reith.

Reith says investigators don’t know why the father’s car went into the pond.

A police investigation is underway. No other information was immediately available.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending