DC BLOX, the company building a data center near Irvington, says it expects to create 600 jobs at peak construction and has signed a project labor agreement to employ union workers. Sabey Data Centers, whose hyperscale campus was approved on the south side, and Metrobloks, which got the green light to build in Martindale-Brightwood, have each pledged to create hundreds of construction jobs and work with local unions.

Data center critics note that promises of massive local investments don’t always turn out as hoped, however. A major union representing operating engineers has accused Google of relying heavily on out-of-state and foreign workers to build an $832 million data center in Michigan City.

Several unions also criticized a planned $65 billion development in Sullivan County for holding out on labor contracts. A project representative told local media Aug. 6 that local unions had signed nearly $600 million in labor contracts to date.

The Indy Chamber also opposes the data center moratorium, saying city leaders should not close the door to billions of dollars in private investment and miss out on much-needed tax revenue. Rather, local leaders should take advantage of Big Tech’s rush to build out computing power and negotiate major community benefits.

Chamber leaders say local governments that face reduced property tax revenue forecasts under the 2025 Senate Enrolled Act 1 need the boost from data centers. The facilities offer a chance to garner millions to fund schools and roads, at a time when Indianapolis is weighing higher taxes on local residents to fund both.

“Right now those conversations are about asking our current residents and taxpayers to increase the share of their contribution, rather than having new companies come in, contribute to the tax base and help those assets and amenities pencil out,” Indy Chamber Chief Strategy Officer Taylor Hughes told IndyStar.

‘Very unsustainable’: Data center critics say slowdown is needed

Those who support a moratorium say governments need more time to develop strong regulations to limit data centers’ enormous impact on the environment, electricity demand and quality of life.

Marion County could join more than 20 other Indiana counties that have either approved data center moratoriums or outright banned the facilities, according to Citizens Action Coalition, a consumer watchdog group. If approved by the City-County Council, the final vote on a moratorium falls to the Metropolitan Development Commission, a body made up of real estate experts appointed by the mayor and the council that has approved three data centers in 2026.

Announcing Indy’s proposed moratorium, Council President Maggie Lewis, a Democrat, said the city needs to pause new data centers to create stronger regulations with the help of industry experts, the mayor’s administration and community members. The temporary ban replaced draft rules developed by city staffers that critics called too lenient on environmental issues and proximity to neighborhoods.

With the moratorium set to expire at the end of 2027, councilors will examine issues like maximum building footprints, sound levels, utility usage and building decommissioning plans. Lewis said the proposal was not about slowing economic progress, but about limiting harm to local neighborhoods.

“This isn’t about grandstanding or slowing down economic development,” Lewis said at a July 13 committee meeting. “This is not a cop-out … It’s about being humble enough to acknowledge that when something isn’t working, we should hit pause.”

What’s more, data center critics say governments need time to reevaluate the hefty tax breaks on offer to wealthy tech companies.

Data centers can qualify for decades-long sales and use tax exemptions thanks to state legislation passed in 2019 to attract technology investment. State exemptions saved data center developers, primarily Amazon, more than $655 million through 2025, a WTHR investigation found.

Local governments can also pass tax breaks. Indianapolis leaders are vouching for an incentive package for Metrobloks that could save the company and its future tenants nearly $400 million in tax payments over 15 years.