Indiana
What Teams Could Be Good NBA Draft Trade Partners For Indiana Pacers?
PARIS, FRANCE – JANUARY 25: Blake Wesley #14 of the San Antonio Spurs drives to the basket between RayJ Dennis #10 and Johnny Furphy #12 of the Indiana Pacers during the fourth quarter at The Accor Arena on January 25, 2025 in Paris, France. (Photo by Dean Mouhtaropoulos/Getty Images)
Getty Images
INDIANAPOLIS – With the NBA Draft approaching tonight, the Indiana Pacers are on the outside looking in. On Tuesday, the first round will take place as 30 rookies join the NBA.
The Pacers aren’t currently involved. They don’t have a selection among the first 30. In fact, they don’t have one at all. Their top pick is owned by the Los Angeles Clippers and their second rounder is in the hands of the Memphis Grizzlies. Indiana and Portland are the only two franchises without a selection in this week’s proceedings.
Even without a pick in either round, the Pacers did their homework ahead of the draft. Dozens of prospects came into their practice facility to work out in front of front office members, scouts, coaches, and more. That on-court prep matters for Indiana’s decision makers, and the face-to-face meetings with prospects are sometimes more valuable at this stage of the process.
And just because the Pacers don’t own a 2026 draft pick right now doesn’t mean they won’t make one by the end of Wednesday night. They have plenty of future picks to trade and have frequently made moves early in the second round. Indiana has been active with picks in the 31-38 range during the 2020s.
There are good reasons to do so again, though as contenders acquiring young talent is not a necessity for the Pacers. If they do decide to trade for a 2026 NBA Draft selection, who might be a good trade partner for the blue and gold?
In 2024, the Pacers and San Antonio Spurs agreed to a trade involving second round picks. That deal put Johnny Furphy in Indianapolis. In 2025, Indiana and San Antonio linked up again – this time, the Spurs swapped the 38th pick for a future second-round selection.
These teams have a history of draft-related transactions. And they could be good fits for one another again. While the Spurs have several roster spots to fill this summer and have the wiggle room to bring in a few rookies, they are contenders. They need to add proven veterans in free agency. Yet as of this writing, they own four picks in the 2026 NBA Draft.
Those four are 20th, 35th, 42nd, and 44th overall. Could the Pacers grab one of those picks and send San Antonio a future asset that may be more helpful down the line? The Grizzlies appear to be entering a rebuild and would thus value draft selections. But Memphis has 14 players under contract – a full roster – before making a single pick in the coming draft.
There are a few players the Grizzlies could easily part with. But their roster crunch makes them a trade candidate this week, especially as they hold picks No. 3, 16, and 32. That early-second round pick seems like a particularly good fit for the Pacers if these teams agree to a trade.
The Nets find themselves in a similar position to the Grizzlies. Entering the offseason, they could have as many as 13 players under contract after agreeing to acquire Julius Randle from the Minnesota Timberwolves on Monday. They also possess multiple picks in the coming draft.
Brooklyn is slated to select sixth, 28th, and 43rd. Could 28 or 43 be in play for Indiana if the Nets need to keep their roster spots open in anticipation of other moves?
The Cavaliers and Pacers made a trade involving draft picks earlier this decade when Caris LeVert went to Cleveland and Ricky Rubio to Indiana. Multiple second-round picks and a first-round selection were exchanged in the deal. This week, the Cavaliers could be a trade candidate with their only draft pick. Cleveland holds pick 29 overall, which comes with a starting salary just under $3 million (pending rookie scale usage). But right now, the Cavs are over the salary cap’s second apron.
That means adding more contracts would make it harder for the team to be flexible or add other talent in the offseason. Cleveland makes sense as a team that would move their late first-round pick for multiple future assets, or even move back into the second round. Indiana could be a good trade partner if that is the case.
CLEVELAND, OHIO – APRIL 13: Andrew Nembhard #2 of the Indiana Pacers guards Craig Porter Jr. #9 of the Cleveland Cavaliers during the first quarter at Rocket Arena on April 13, 2025 in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images)
Getty Images The Thunder, like the Cavaliers, project to be an expensive team in 2026-27. So much so that they already agreed to a trade that will send forward Aaron Wiggins to the Atlanta Hawks in exchange for second-round draft capital.
While the money is the headliner for the Thunder, they fit the same boxes as every team listed so far. Like the Spurs, they are contenders and perhaps more interested in upgrades than young talent. Like the Cavaliers, they have a pricey roster. And like the Grizzlies and Nets, they have several draft picks and a more filled roster. Oklahoma City owns picks 12, 17, and 37 entering the draft. Pick 37, in particular, feels like one that could be moved.
Atlanta has been mentioned in multiple reports as a team looking for upgrades in the offseason. They were the only team able to beat the champion New York Knicks more than once in the most recent NBA playoffs, so improving their roster is a natural next step.
The Hawks own the eighth overall pick, which would be challenging for the Pacers to obtain. But the Hawks, who have 12 players under contract, also own picks 23 and 57. Is there a world in which Atlanta’s later selections become available in bigger deals? They don’t have the perfect asset for the Pacers to chase like some other teams but seem like a team to watch in general during the two-night draft.
The Clippers and Pacers already made a trade involving a 2026 draft pick. Could they do so again?
Los Angeles has 13 players under contract and owns picks five, 36, and 52. They could easily use all three selections and spend a two-way contract on their 52nd pick. But the Clippers have shaken up their team quite a bit in the last few months and are a team worth watching this week. New York just won a title. Keeping their core together seems like a prudent move. And maybe the Knicks do exactly that – they’ve already reportedly agreed to terms with Mohamed Diawara and have agreed to change a contract detail for Jose Alvarado.
But like a few teams on this list, the Knicks are expensive. They are approaching the second apron, and crossing that team spending threshold has been a topic of discussion surrounding the franchise since their championship parade.
“There’s certain things in the NBA that you’d have to be suicidal to do. One of them is the second apron,” Knicks owner James Dolan said in a recent radio interview.
New York holds the 24th, 31st, and 55th overall picks. Could the Pacers move into the late first or early second round via a trade with New York?
Count the Nuggets, who possess picks 26 and 49, in the expensive teams group. They are approaching the second apron and have many roster spots to fill out to complete their team. As Denver looks to contend around Nikola Jokic, would they be willing to move their pick late in the first-round to make their salary cap sheet make better sense? If so, the Pacers could be a good trade partner.
While the Bulls don’t have a filled roster or financial crunch, they have other noteworthy factors to keep an eye on.
One is that the team switched its front office leader, bringing in Bryson Graham as their new Executive Vice President of Basketball Operations. His draft strategy isn’t clear as a team’s top dog.
The Bulls also join the Spurs as the only two teams with four picks in the 2026 NBA Draft. That volume makes a move more likely, though Chicago doesn’t have a strong need to deal a pick.
The Pacers have multiple attractive future second-round picks they could move in trades, and they have some recent draftees in Jarace Walker, Ben Sheppard, and Kam Jones that are still developing but could be moved. In their draft pick and salary cap reality, a trade seems possible, and the above teams would all be natural candidates for a variety of reasons.Could the Spurs and Pacers make another deal?
Memphis Grizzlies
Brooklyn Nets
Another Pacers trade with the Cleveland Cavaliers?
Oklahoma City Thunder
Atlanta Hawks
A Los Angeles Clippers and Indiana Pacers draft trade again?
New York Knicks
Denver Nuggets
Chicago Bulls
Indiana
ACLU of Indiana sues over conditions at Monroe County Jail
MONROE COUNTY, Ind. – The ACLU of Indiana filed a lawsuit over what it calls “unconstitutional conditions” at the Monroe County Jail.
This comes after the advocacy group previously suggested it would take legal action to resolve a lengthy dispute over the facility’s safety.
The federal lawsuit was filed on behalf of two individuals currently incarcerated at the jail. It cites chronic overcrowding, deteriorating infrastructure, unsafe living conditions and the county’s inability to remedy the problems.
The dispute originally flared in 2008, when the ACLU of Indiana filed a lawsuit challenging conditions at the jail. That led to a 2009 settlement in which county officials promised a long-term solution. Over the years, the deadline for improvements has been extended multiple times.
While the county appeared to embrace a brand-new justice complex near I-69 and State Road 46, those plans stalled when the county council voted down the project due to cost concerns.
The ACLU said the settlement has expired and the original lawsuit has been dismissed, necessitating the filing of a new one. The lawsuit claims conditions at the jail violate the 14th Amendment rights of people awaiting trial and 8th Amendment rights of people held after conviction.
The lawsuit names the Monroe County Council, Monroe County commissioners and Monroe County sheriff as defendants.
In a news release, the ACLU cited several problems at the jail, ranging from overcrowding to “extreme temperatures, broken plumbing, mold, crumbling walls, limited disability access, and failures to safely separate people with different medical and security needs.”
Ken Falk, legal director for the ACLU of Indiana, said officials have had long enough to fix the numerous issues.
“They have had nearly two decades to find a lasting solution, yet people are still being held in unconstitutional conditions that threaten their health and safety,” Falk said in a statement. “Studies have documented that the jail is dangerous and inadequate, and the sheriff has been candid about its many problems. However, the sheriff’s role under Indiana law is limited, and the county officials who could solve this problem have not listened.”
The ACLU is asking the court to certify the case as a class action and seeks a permanent injunction “requiring defendants to take all steps necessary to ensure that the conditions of confinement at the Monroe County Jail comply with the United States Constitution,” among other relief.
FOX59/CBS4 reached out to the Monroe County Sheriff’s Office regarding this lawsuit. Officials with the office stated that they are “declining to comment on pending litigation.”
Read the full complaint here.
Indiana
Indiana seeks coal ash program as feds move to rollback regulations
Coal ash pollution in the Town of Pines Part 2
Town of pines residents Cathi Murray and Retired EPA Scientist Larry Jensen take us on a tour of pollution in the Town of Pines Ind.
Indiana has more than 100 coal ash sites − more than any other state − and state officials are looking to create a permitting program for the hazardous waste just as the federal government is proposing to roll back cleanup requirements.
The program would be one of the few in the country mandating utilities apply for a permit to dispose of and manage coal combustion residuals in what are known as impoundments or ponds.
The Indiana Department of Environmental Management on June 26 applied to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, asking for approval to oversee disposal and management of the waste power plants create after they burn coal to produce electricity.
Coal ash contains pollutants such as arsenic, chromium, lead, mercury and other heavy metals linked to cancer, heart disease and reproductive failure. These hazardous substances can contaminate groundwater and blow around as dust if utilities do not properly dispose of them.
Since 2015, the EPA has set federal requirements for proper disposal and management of coal ash, adding regulations in 2024. IDEM’s application would shift oversight responsibility for coal ash dumps from the federal government to the state.
But as the request wends its way through the approval process, questions remain about how protective a program would be as the Trump administration rolls back safeguards for human health and the environment near coal ash disposal sites.
Indiana to be early adopter of coal ash permits
Gov. Mike Braun said in a news release dated June 30 that Indiana is taking early and decisive action to create the permitting program.
Only five other states (Georgia, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas and Wyoming) have created coal ash permit programs of their own. Two others (Virginia and Louisiana) have similar applications pending with the EPA.
Brian Wolff, the assistant commissioner for IDEM’s Office of Land Quality, said he and others at the state agency have worked with staff at EPA to help ensure the application’s success.
“We are not flying blind,” Wolff said, “we are fairly confident within three months we will at least have a notification the application is complete and accepted and put up for public comment.”
The program, if accepted, would be the largest in the country due to the sheer number of coal ash sites in Indiana, Wolff said.
“We have a lot of coal facilities but then a lot of them have multiple impoundments. And each one has to get its own permit issuance for closure,” Wolff said.
If the application proves successful, the permitting program will have nine full-time employees with support from other branches within the department. Fees for the coal ash site permits and other certifications will fund the program, according to IDEM’s application.
Federal changes concern local advocates
The process to get the application completed began with a 2021 bill requiring IDEM to make rules around coal ash permitting in the state. IDEM’s Environmental Rules Board gave the green light in December 2025 and the department sent its application at the end of June 2026.
Indra Frank, coal ash advisor with the Hoosier Environmental Council, has been following the process from the beginning and has some concerns.
Frank said she is keeping an eye on the federal changes EPA is proposing to coal ash requirements that could affect Indiana’s program.
Indiana law says IDEM cannot create rules for coal ash that are more stringent than federal rules. Federal law doesn’t allow states to create rules less stringent than federal regulations, so the potential state-run program will follow EPA’s guidance.
“Right now, the federal rule is in good shape: it has provisions in place that protect human health and environment,” Frank said. “The problem will come as EPA has proposed some really lousy provisions to the rule and if they go ahead and move forward, then Indiana will also have those provisions.”
The specifics of how federal changes might affect a state program are still unclear.
Federal change could create a weird patchwork of regulations for a while before the situation solidifies, which may frustrate residents near these coal ash sites who are eager for intervention, said Gavin Kearney, an attorney with the national advocacy group Earthjustice.
“Imagine a concerned community trying to figure out what a permit is actually trying to do and who is responsible for it,” Kearney said. “It adds up to a lot of confusion and makes it hard for folks to understand if their water is being protected and what to do to address those concerns.”
IDEM’s Wolff said if EPA approves the state program, the permits will offer some stability even if federal rules change once more in the future.
“Once we issue permits for closures (of a coal ash site), it’s kind of locked in to conform to the requirements within the permit,” Wolff said. “That kind of takes you away from the shifting winds of politics however it swings.”
IDEM would likely have to adopt a rule change if certain federal proposals do move forward, said agency spokesperson Allen Carter. That would be a routine process and would not interrupt the permitting program while changes are under review.
Public still has opportunity to provide input
The EPA has up to 180 days to review IDEM’s application. If approved, it will go through a hearing process with public comment.
Earthjustice’s Kearney said the EPA has shown an interest in expediting state-run coal ash permitting programs and the process is likely to move quickly.
IDEM’s Wolff also was optimistic EPA would turnaround the application quickly, estimating a decision could come early next year since the state agency worked closely with EPA to provide all the necessary information.
Karl Schneider is an IndyStar environment reporter. You can reach him at karl.schneider@indystar.com. Follow him on BlueSky or Twitter @karlstartswithk
IndyStar’s environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.
Indiana
Twyla Jo Sprunger Obituary July 12, 2026 – Zwick and Jahn Funeral Homes
Twyla Jo Sprunger, 76, of Berne, Indiana, passed away Sunday morning, July 12, 2026, at Swiss Village in Berne, Indiana.
She was born on February 12, 1950, in Decatur, Indiana, to the late David W. and Verna Louise (Nussbaum) Sprunger.
Twyla was a member of the First Mennonite Church in Berne, Indiana, where she helped in the Children’s Church and in the Chancel Choir.
Twyla was a 1969 graduate of South Adams High School. She began her working career with Adams Wells Training Center in Vera Cruz, then Berco in Berne, EP Graphics for 23 years, DRG for 5 years, and the Edelweiss Flower Shop for 15 years.
In her spare time, she loved reading and completing cross-stitching. Twyla truly cherished spending time with family and friends.
Survivors include her sister, Ruth (Von) Bixler of Decatur, Indiana; sister, Judie (Terry) Fralick of Convoy, Ohio; sister, Jean Sprunger of Berne, Indiana; brother, Rick (Sue) Sprunger of Berne, Indiana; seven nieces and nephews, Bobbi (Robert) Reichhart, Kristina (Phil) Kunes, Nathan Sprunger, Amanda (Andrew) Caffee, Loree (Kyle) Sprunger, Tim (Katie) Fralick, and Jon (Amanda) Fralick; and twelve great-nieces and nephews.
She was preceded in death by an infant brother, Wayne Sprunger.
A funeral service will be held at 10:30 a.m. Thursday, July 16, 2026, in the chapel at the First Mennonite Church in Berne, Indiana, with Pastor Jim Schwartz officiating. Burial will follow in M.R.E. Cemetery in Berne.
Family and friends will be received one hour prior to service at the church.
Preferred memorials may be given to The Hope Clinic or Stillwater Hospice.
Arrangements by Zwick & Jahn Funeral Homes, Yager-Kirchhofer Chapel of Berne, Indiana
-
Missouri1 minute ago
Missouri Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 winning numbers for July 13, 2026
-
Montana7 minutes agoMissoula and Western Montana neighbors: Obituaries for July 14
-
Nebraska13 minutes agoCyclospora outbreak reaches Nebraska as health officials investigate source
-
New Hampshire25 minutes agoThousands Of Sunflowers Hit Peak Bloom For Limited Time At Coppal House Farm In Lee
-
New Jersey31 minutes agoNJ fines Sen. Wimberly $24K after use of donations for hotels, airfare
-
New Mexico37 minutes agoNew Mexico wants to get orphaned wells plugged — but did contractors get the word?
-
North Carolina43 minutes agoNorth Carolina attempted murder suspect arrested in Myrtle Beach
-
North Dakota49 minutes agoFamilies allege babies were switched at Grafton hospital