Connect with us

Indiana

Indiana Pacers use strong second half to take commanding 3-1 series lead over Milwaukee Bucks

Published

on

Indiana Pacers use strong second half to take commanding 3-1 series lead over Milwaukee Bucks


INDIANAPOLIS — The Indiana Pacers hosted the Milwaukee Bucks for Game 4 of their first-round series on Sunday night. Entering the day, the series was 2-1 in favor of the Pacers, and they had won two straight outings. WIth both Damian Lillard and Giannis Antetokounmpo out for the Bucks, it was an opportunity for Indiana to expand their series lead.

They needed to start strong. A dominant first quarter was critical in their Game 3 victory, and without two stars on the visiting side, they needed to do it again. The healthy Pacers couldn’t afford a slow first few minutes.

The Pacers scored first via a three-point shot from Andrew Nembhard, but the Bucks responded with an 8-2 run to take the lead. It wasn’t the opening minutes that the blue and gold hoped for — their offense wasn’t where it needed to be for the opening possessions.

Both teams traded baskets early in the game, and two technical fouls were called in the first five minutes — one on Pacers forward Pascal Siakam and another on Bucks guard Patrick Beverley. The crowd was tense and annoyed after Siakam was whistled for a tech, but that turned to excitement when Beverley was whistled for his. It was 12-11 in Milwaukee’s favor with 7:04 to go in the first quarter.

Advertisement

The game got chippy a few minutes later. Bobby Portis and Nembhard got tangled up under the Bucks basket, and Portis was hit with two hostile acts from the interaction. He shoved and slapped Nembhard, and he was ejected. Nembhard, meanwhile, was given one technical. Indiana was ahead 18-16 after the exchange.

Obi Toppin checked into the game soon after and changed the makeup of the battle. He raced ahead for some easy baskets and had six quick points. The Bucks were matching his scoring, but it was an impressive stretch from Toppin to keep his team in the game.

Milwaukee’s second unit continued to play well and found space to score. Indiana was struggling to slow them down, and they were giving up points in the paint constantly. Three-point shots were falling for Indiana, who were 7/12 from deep after one quarter, but the Bucks had 20 points in the paint. It was tied at 33 at the time.

The second quarter started with more good play from the Pacers, who jumped ahead 40-37 after a few minutes of play. Rookie guard Ben Sheppard was making shots and playing with energy, which Indiana needed. Their paint defense continued to struggle, though.

As the second quarter progressed, both groups began to trade baskets. But the Pacers were slightly better from the floor, and their starting five came in and got in gear. With 7:22 until halftime, Indiana led 49-44.

Advertisement

The Pacers continued to make threes, which was masking a lot of their mistakes. To the team’s credit, they were generating good looks, but their percentage was unusually high. Indiana’s starting five was finding space all over the floor, but they needed to get some stops.

Late in the half, Indiana’s lead climbed as high as six, but the Bucks answered and trimmed it again. Because the visitors were having so much success around the basket, it was difficult for the blue and gold to go on any sort of run.

Khris Middleton, who scored 42 points in Game 3, hit a shot just before the halftime buzzer. That cut the Pacers edge down to 67-64, and that’s what the score was at halftime. Indiana was 12/22 from deep at the time and had conceded 32 points in the paint. That style felt unsustainable, but the blue and gold had a halftime to adjust their approach.

To get the second half going, the Pacers came out firing. Star guard Tyrese Haliburton hit three outside shots in the first few minutes of the half, and it gave the Pacers a 10-point lead for the first time of the night. He was up to 24 points at the time, and it was 76-66 in favor of Indiana. Milwaukee needed a timeout. Haliburton was having an excellent quarter.

That stretch brought some energy into Gainbridge Fieldhouse, some needed life after the slower start to the action. The crowd was loving the double-digit advantage, but the Pacers needed to keep pushing. Their defense hadn’t been good enough all night to relax.

Advertisement

Halfway through the third period, the Pacers were up 81-76. The Bucks were never going to go away if the blue and gold didn’t find a way to string together stops. Brook Lopez reached 20 points for Milwaukee around that time — he was playing extremely well.

Myles Turner responded with two epic plays. He threw down the dunk of the series so far all over Lopez just after the midway point of the quarter, and with the crowd still celebrating the play, he buried a corner three. That put Indiana up by 12 at 88-76. It was their largest edge of the game to that point, and it prompted a Bucks timeout.

Their lead soon reached 17. Indiana was finally playing good defense, and their offense didn’t slow down in that stretch. It was one of their best sequences of the entire series — the Bucks needed to find answers.

After three quarters, the Pacers were ahead 98-85. Haliburton was up to 24 points for the blue and gold while Turner had 18. Indiana won the third quarter 31-21.

The fourth quarter started with a quick 7-0 run from the Bucks, and that cut the Pacers lead down to six. Pacers head coach Rick Carlise took a timeout at the time — his team needed to regroup. They were struggling.

Advertisement

The stoppage did wonders. The blue and gold were far better for the next few minutes and pushed their lead back to double digits. They were impressive in the second half, and that response did wonders for their confidence and energy.

It also got the crowd back into the game,a dn as the fans were chanting Myles Turner’s name, the big man hit a three that made the arena erupt. It put the Pacers up by 14 and forced a Bucks timeout. Turner was having another excellent game.

The Pacers speed had the Bucks on the back foot for much of the fourth frame. Indiana could get into the lane seemingly at will, and the consistent offense meant that Milwaukee couldn’t keep up. The hosts had the right effort and energy level.

With 3:30 to go, the Pacers were ahead 117-103. They were close to securing their third-straight win in the series, but they needed to make a few more plays down the stretch. One or two more stops and score would get it done.

They happened quickly, with the blue and gold getting a bucket and then a defensive stop in quick succession. That ballooned their lead to 16, which felt unsurmountable with just 2.5 minutes to go on the clock.

Advertisement

The final score was 126-113. The blue and gold took care of business at home to keep their control of the series. It was an impressive outing once again.

Haliburton finished with 24 points and four assists. Turner had 29 points and nine rebounds while Nembhard added 15 points and nine assists. The Pacers had several great performances in the victory.

Indiana now leads the series 3-1, and it shifts back to Milwaukee for Game 5 on Tuesday.

  • Pascal Siakam entered the playoffs wanting to be the Indiana Pacers leader. He left Milwaukee on top of the league. CLICK HERE.
  • Myles Turner has best career playoff game for Indiana Pacers as film time and maturity mesh.CLICK HERE.
  • Tyrese Haliburton and the Pacers delivered a moment fans waited five years to see. CLICK HERE.
  • Indiana Pacers survive massive Milwaukee Bucks comeback for overtime win in Game 3. CLICK HERE.
  • Follow AllPacers on Facebook: All Pacers SI
  • Follow AllPacers on Twitter: @SIPacers





Source link

Indiana

An Indiana district turned to voters to fund more preschool seats. Here’s what happened next.

Published

on

An Indiana district turned to voters to fund more preschool seats. Here’s what happened next.


(CHALKBEAT INDIANA) — When Pete Hinnefeld and his wife started looking for a preschool for their daughter, they hoped to send her to the same school her brother attended, which was just down the road from their house and offered Spanish-language immersion.

To do this for Lydia, then age 3, they were prepared to pay the $600 monthly cost.

But after voters approved a property tax referendum to fund early learning for children living within the Monroe County Community School Corporation, the family’s preschool bill was cut by more than half. Nearby preschool cut down time spent commuting to their parents’ house for babysitting, and helped Lydia build social skills.

The family are one of hundreds now benefitting from the 2023 referendum, which has more than doubled the number of children attending 3- and 4-year-old preschools in the district.

Advertisement

“For us, this is why you pay taxes,” Hinnefeld said. “It’s important for young kids to have access to school and if parents need to work, it’s an opportunity to let them work.”

The referendum put forward by the district, located in Bloomington, is a first in the state, offering all families tuition support on a sliding scale based on income, no matter whether children attend a district preschool or a partner provider.

It represents a local solution to problems with accessing and affording early learning that have left thousands of Indiana families waiting for help. Indiana in December 2024 froze its Child Care and Development Fund, or CCDF, and On My Way Pre-K dollars, which provide funding for early learning for income-eligible households.

A $200 million funding increase for CCDF approved by the State Budget Committee this week will allow Indiana to begin issuing vouchers againin May to around 14,000 more children, for a total enrollment of around 57,000. Those funds will last around one year.

Still, around 20,000 children will remain on the waitlist, and families may have fewer options for where to use their vouchers as hundreds of providers have closed since the freeze was announced, according to early learning advocates in the state. In a recent survey of early childhood educators in Indiana — which includes those working in a variety of settings — 90% of respondents said families are struggling to pay tuition.

Advertisement

A statewide universal preschool program is unlikely, Republican leaders have said. Instead, a legislative proposal this year would have let cities and counties — not just school districts — ask voters to fund preschool seats. It failed to get traction, but its advocates expect it to return.

The political climate isn’t especially promising for local tax increases: A new Indiana law has placed caps on property tax revenue that are already affecting local budgets. Lawmakers also recently restricted when schools can place referendums on the ballot.

Still, a new local revenue stream could be a boon in some Indiana communities, such as those with high demand for preschool, existing programs, and high social cohesion, said Sam Snideman, vice president of government relations for United Way of Central Indiana.

“There are going to be communities where this makes a ton of sense,” Snideman said. “The increasing challenge for an entity that goes before the public for a referendum is making a very clear value case. What is the common good and what is in the community interest is very important.”

School district’s pre-K enrollment doubles after referendum

Before Monroe schools brought the referendum request to voters, the district conducted a study that showed there were not enough early learning seats to serve children in the community, said Timothy Dowling, director of early learning and enrollment at Monroe schools. And families couldn’t always afford the seats that were available.

Advertisement

But the district also knew that research links quality early learning improved later academic outcomes, Dowling said.

“We wanted to do everything we can to help our students get the benefit of early learning, because we know it pays off in huge dividends,” Dowling said.

The referendum equated to around a $50 increase yearly for a home with an assessed value of $250,000, according to the district website, and also paid for instructional supplies for K-12 students. It passed with 55% of the vote; Dowling said the community study and transparency about how the referendum funds would be used were key to its success.

As a result of the successful referendum, all families in the district qualify for at least $4,000 in tuition assistance for preschool for 4-year-olds, whether their children attend a district school or at one of seven community providers.

Around 76% students in the district’s program attend for free based on their family’s income, Dowling said. Families in the lowest income tier who send their children to community providers receive $8,000 in tuition assistance.

Advertisement

The program also offers tuition assistance for 3-year-old preschool based on income and where the student attends school. For families making 225% or less of the federal poverty level, preschool is free at district programs. Often those families struggled the most to afford child care, even when state child care vouchers were available, Dowling said.

In 2024-25, the year after the referendum passed, the number of 4-year-olds attending preschool doubled from 184 to 378, with 64 of those children attending preschool at outside centers. This year, the district expanded preschool for 3-year-olds, based on the timeline laid out in the referendum. Enrollment jumped from 78 to 123, with another 33 students attending community child care centers, Dowling said.

With multiple types of providers, families have options, said Kelly Sipes, the executive director for Penny Lane Childcare Centers, which is a partner provider with the district. Those who need transportation might choose a district-run preschool, she said, but those who need year-round care during school holidays can choose a center like Penny Lane instead.

Her centers are usually at capacity, Sipes said, and child care needs in the community persist. When CCDF funding was cut, some of her families turned to the funding from the district instead.

“It’s awesome for the families,” Sipes said. “We should be all in this together as a community.”

Advertisement

Pitching child care: ‘We live in a society’

Replicating referendum-funded preschool might work well in communities where school-based providers already exist, and where there’s a sufficient tax base and steady demand for child care, Snideman said. It would also be an incentive to attract working families.

But it could be a harder sell in rural districts, where there are fewer families and less demand.

Generally, school referendums pass in districts that are wealthier, and in areas with less farmland, said Larry DeBoer, a Purdue University professor emeritus of agricultural economics, who has studied school referendums in depth.One of the biggest predictors of success is whether a school district has tried to pass a referendum before — even if they’ve failed, a second referendum is more likely to pass, DeBoer said.

Monroe schools had previously passed an operating referendum the year before its 2023 preschool referendum. As a county, Monroe has a slightly lower per-person income than Indiana as a whole, and has more students than the small and medium-sized districts most likely to propose successful ballot measures. It’s home to Indiana University, and tends to vote Democratic in a largely conservative state.

A legislative proposal this year, HB 1430, would have given the power to levy preschool referendums to counties and cities, potentially casting a wider net for both family demand and child care providers.

Advertisement

The bill did not receive a hearing, in part because Indiana legislative leaders are usually reluctant to consider bills with a fiscal impact in even-numbered years where they don’t pass a state budget. And the most recent state budget passed in 2025 was tight, with cuts to spending and programs due to a revenue shortfall.

The bill’s author, Rep. Blake Johnson, a Democrat, said that conversations about the bill have been fruitful, and that he expects the idea to return in a future session.

Given budget concerns, a locally funded solution that communities can tailor to their own needs may be more successful than a statewide one, said Patrick McAlister, who leads the Preschool Choice Alliance, a statewide group.

“This is an economic development need. Here’s the tool and the option to exercise it or not,” Johnson said.

A successful referendum would be a boon to working parents who struggle to afford the cost of early learning, said McAlister, who used to be the director of the Indianapolis Mayor’s Office of Education Innovation. But even for non-parents, a preschool referendum could have a positive impact on property values and in other ways, McAlister said.

Advertisement

Ultimately, it would be one part of an “all and above strategy” addressing care for children from birth to age 2.

“We live in a society,” McAlister said. “There are certain things we hold true and caring for children is a value many people share.”

Aleksandra Appleton covers Indiana education policy and writes about K-12 schools across the state. Contact her at aappleton@chalkbeat.org.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Ty Simpson tells why he believes Indiana dominated Alabama in Rose Bowl

Published

on

Ty Simpson tells why he believes Indiana dominated Alabama in Rose Bowl





© Grace Hollars/IndyStar / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Ty Simpson was a guest on the “Downs 2 Business” podcast with Caleb Downs and Josh Downs, and he discussed why he believed Indiana beat Alabama in the Rose Bowl.

The Crimson Tide’s offense was unable to score a touchdown against the Hoosiers in the 38-3 loss. Simpson shone a light on why he felt Indiana had so much success against Alabama on X.

“From my point of view, I was like they don’t much,” Simpson said. “I was like they do the same thing every down and so when I get the ball, I knew exactly what was going to happen. They just didn’t mess up, bro. They were in the exact same spot they were supposed to be, and they were so well coached. It was so much different than the SEC. In the SEC, they’ll play man, they’ll do these unorthodox coverages because kind of how it is. That game was crazy to me. Of course, I got hurt; that was a bummer. But I just knew what they were going to do, but we couldn’t really run the ball. We didn’t really throw it. It was so crazy to me how it happened.”

Advertisement

Indiana went on to beat Oregon in the semifinals of the College Football Playoff, and the Hoosiers defeated Miami in the National Championship after defeating the Crimson Tide.

Simpson and Caleb Downs are now both gearing up to be drafted this month.







Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

3 Big Takeaways From Indiana Basketball’s Transfer Portal Dominance

Published

on

3 Big Takeaways From Indiana Basketball’s Transfer Portal Dominance


Indiana may be one of the most decorated programs in college basketball history, but a brand name no longer has the recruiting pull it used to. In the past, the Hoosiers had a foolproof sell: it’s Indiana. Nowadays, in the NIL era, the playing field has been leveled. 

To win in the transfer portal and recruiting as a whole, a program like Indiana needs a premier recruiter – and it has one in Darian DeVries.

Heading into his second season as the Hoosiers head man, DeVries is on an absolute heater, as he just landed his sixth transfer (Villanova guard Bryce Lindsay) on Wednesday night. 

With the addition of Lindsay, the Hoosiers have arguably the No. 1 transfer class in the nation and certainly one of the top three. Here are three takeaways from Indiana’s offseason thus far:

Advertisement

Indiana Hoosiers head coach Darian Devries reacts in the first half of the NCAA game at Value City Arena on Saturday, March 7, 2026 in Columbus, Ohio. | Samantha Madar/Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Advertisement

Indiana won’t have a talent problem in 2026-27

On one hand, the expectations are high in Bloomington – especially after the turnaround Curt Cignetti engineered in just two quick years on the gridiron. And an NCAA Tournament appearance isn’t exactly the Herculean task a College Football Playoff berth, let alone a national title, is. 

Then again, DeVries didn’t have much time to craft his 2025-26 roster, and the end result wound up being less-than ideal from a talent perspective. All things considered, DeVries didn’t do a poor job given the roster he had. But it was also his roster. 

Advertisement

Coaching is a balance of roster-building, X’s and O’s and culture. It’s up to DeVries to tailor a roster fit to his coaching strengths. Here in the 2026 offseason, he’s sent a message: recruiting will not be a problem. As a result, talent won’t be a weakness – it’ll be a strength. 

The question now: can DeVries take advantage of an uber-skilled crew? Can he mesh the pieces and, ideally, create a product better than the sum of its parts? If the 2025-26 season was any sign, the answer is yes – which means a Big Dance appearance should be the bare minimum next year. 

Advertisement

How will the backcourt depth chart shake out?

Notre Dame guard Markus Burton celebrates during a NCAA men’s basketball game against Missouri at Purcell Pavilion on Tuesday, Dec. 2, 2025, in South Bend. | MICHAEL CLUBB/SOUTH BEND TRIBUNE / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Advertisement

The Hoosiers are going to have a loaded guard rotation, and DeVries has a variety of options in terms of a starting backcourt.

Advertisement

Markus Burton is a surefire starter at lead guard, but then DeVries can choose between Bryce Lindsay and Jaeden Mustaf at the two, or, potentially, he could run both together at shooting guard and small forward.

What about Duke transfer Darren Harris, though? He’s more of a wing, but it’s not exactly clear how he’ll fit in the fold. And incoming combo guard Prince-Alexander Moody can also compete for minutes. 

Fortunately, DeVries can’t exactly go wrong. A Burton-Lindsay starting backcourt would be undersized but loaded, chock-full of shooting and playmaking, while a Burton-Mustaf combo would be a slashing nightmare for opponents, strong defensively and tough on the boards. 

And if Moody shocks the college hoops world and manages to sneak in over both Lindsay and Mustaf, that means the Hoosiers have a bona fide star on their hands. 

With the addition of Lindsay, the Hoosiers have arguably the No. 1 transfer class in the nation and certainly one of the top three. Here are three takeaways from Indiana’s offseason thus far.

Advertisement

The Hoosiers should be much better on the glass

Indiana could have been a lot better on the boards a year ago. The Hoosiers were No. 296 in offensive rebounding rate and No. 122 in defensive rebounding rate, per Bart Torvik. As a squad, Indiana was often undersized – and sometimes by a huge margin. Naturally, the glass suffered, affecting both sides of the floor. 

Advertisement

Mar 20, 2026; Tampa, FL, USA; Alabama Crimson Tide forward Aiden Sherrell (22) shoots against Hofstra Pride forward Victory Onuetu (6) in the second half during a first round game of the men’s 2026 NCAA Tournament at Benchmark International Arena. Mandatory Credit: Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images | Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images

In 2026-27, the Hoosiers should flip the script in that department. With incoming big men Aiden Sherrell (Alabama) and Samet Yigitoglu (SMU) combining for 14.1 total rebounds per outing despite neither playing more than 30 minutes per game in this past campaign, Indiana should have a dominant glass-cleaning unit in the frontcourt in 2026-27.

Advertisement

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending