Connect with us

Indiana

Indiana high school girls track and field sectional results 2022

Published

on

Indiana high school girls track and field sectional results 2022


IHSAA ladies monitor and subject sectionals had been Tuesday night time.

Right here are the outcomes from Central Indiana, with high three finishers listed for every occasion.

In-depth:Addy Wiley is Indiana’s quickest teen miler — and a most cancers survivor

IHSAA ladies monitor and subject:In Indiana’s hardest sectional, HSE emerges with title

Advertisement

AT ZIONSVILLE

Groups: 1. Zionsville, 131.5; 2. Brownsburg, 126; 3. Plainfield, 121; 4. Avon, 113; 5. Mooresville, 55; 6. Monrovia, 33; 7. Danville, 21; 8. Southmont, 11; 9. Cascade, 8.5; 10. Tri-West, 3.

100 sprint: 1. Sophie Yovanovich, Zionsville (11.92); 2. Alana Springer, Avon (12.06); 3. Darrelle Rice, Brownsburg (12.43).

200 sprint: 1. Alana Springer, Avon (26.91); 2. Alysha Bradford, Mooresville (25.65); 3. Izzy Neal, Brownsburg (26.29).

400 sprint: 1. Alysha Bradford, Mooresville (57.74); 2. Paige Kirtz, Brownsburg (58.00); 3. Ellie Stewart, Plainfield (59.16).

800 run: 1. Veronica Hargrave, Plainfield (2:20.75); 2. Eva Altschul, Brownsburg (2:34.45); 3. Mackinsey Heagy, Zionsville (2:26.26).

Advertisement

1600 run: 1. Veronica Hargrave, Plainfield (5:05.98); 2. Jessica Hegedus, Avon (5:15.09); 3. Katherine Bowen, Zionsville (5:27.91).

3200 run: 1. Jessica Hegedus, Avon (11:25.32); 2. Hannah Taylor, Avon (11:38.46); 3. Religion Allen, Southmont (11:42.77).

100 hurdles: 1. Brooke Joseph, Plainfield (15.41); 2. Morgan Hoard, Avon (15.70); 3. Kennedy Haffner, Zionsville (16.074).

300 hurdles: 1. Joslyn Younger, Monrovia (47.02); 2. Jordan Denagall, Avon (47.56); 3. Mary Raikos, Zionsville (48.58).

4×100 relay: 1. Brownsburg, 47.94; 2. Zionsville, 48.37; 3. Avon, 49.49.

Advertisement

4×400 relay: 1. Zionsville, 3:57.86; 2. Brownsburg, 3:59.72; 3. Plainfield, 4:02.80.

4×800 relay: 1. Zionsville, 9:48.82; 2. Brownsburg, 10:07.10; 3. Avon, 10:14.03.

Excessive leap: 1. Emily Ritenour, Brownsburg (5-04); 2. Alexis Decker, Plainfield (5-4); 3. Haven Hudson, Plainfield (5-3).

Lengthy leap: 1. Michelle Nazarov, Zionsville (18-8); 2. Sophie Yovanovich, Zionsville (17-0); 3. Brooke Joseph, Plainfield (16-9.5).

Discus: 1. Whitney Willett, Monrovia (111-3); 2. Ellie Wilkerson, Plainfield (110-9); 3. Jada Lane, Danville, 107-8.

Advertisement

Shot put: 1. Katelyn Makinde, Zionsville (41-3); 2. Rebecca Leitzman, Mooresville (37-7.25); 3. Loria Snowden, Brownsburg (37-3).

Pole vault: 1. Kennedy Merrell, Zionsville (12-3); 2. Mackenzie VanBibber, Plainfield (12-0); 3. Zoe Arvanitis, Plainfield (11-3).

AT NEW PALESTINE

Groups: 1. Warren Central, 149.5; 2. Franklin Central, 129; 3. New Palestine, 98.5; 4. Roncalli, 77.5; 5. Greenfield-Central, 72; 6. Shelbyville, 25; 7. Beech Grove, 16.5; 8. Triton Central, 16; 8. Morristown, 16; 10. Lutheran, 12; 11. Scecina, 7; 12. Christel Home, 1.

100 sprint: 1. Jila Vaden, Warren Central (12.55); 2. Savannah Lake, Greenfield-Central (12.88); 3. Rylee Hurst, New Palestine (12.93).

200 sprint: 1. Jila Vaden, Warren Central (25.77); 2. Kayana Maroska, Greenfield-Central (26.24); 3. Josie Origer, Roncalli (26.47).

Advertisement

400 sprint: 1. Kayana Maroska, Greenfield-Central (59.42); 2. Rylee Hurst, New Palestine (1:00.12); 3. Breece Bass, Franklin Central (1:00.62).

800 run: 1. Abigail Adams, Franklin Central (2:23.39); 2. Valeria Lara, Roncalli (2:26.35); 3. Savah Garnette, Warren Central (2:26.47).

1600 run: 1. Abigail Adams, Franklin Central (5:21.99); 2. Tylar Whitaker, New Palestine (5:30.71); 3. Courtney Research, New Palestine (5:48.80).

3200 run: 1. Savana Miller, Franklin Central (11:45.93); 2. Dakota Miller, Franklin Central (11:47.96); 3. Makayla Coburn, Warren Central (12:40.81).

100 hurdles: 1. Mary Porter, Warren Central (15.32); 2. Kayana Maroska, Greenfield-Central (15.73); 3. Kilikina Schultz, Shelbyville (16.33).

Advertisement

300 hurdles: 1. Mary Porter, Warren Central (46.83); 2. Kilikina Schultz, Shelbyville (47.57); 3. Reagan Crouch, Greenfield-Central (49.31).

4×100 relay: 1. Warren Central, 49.15; 2. Roncalli, 50.86; 3. Franklin Central, 51.28.

4×400 relay: 1. Warren Central, 4:10.08; 2. New Palestine, 4:16.68; 3. Roncalli, 4:18.04.

4×800 relay: 1. Roncalli, 9:58.27; 2. New Palestine, 10:06.98; 3. Franklin Central, 10:25.89.

Lengthy leap: 1. Nyomi Myers, Warren Central (16-5.5); 2. Breece Bass, Franklin Central (16-4); 3. Lindsey McCord, Greenfield-Central (15-11).

Advertisement

Excessive leap: 1. Mary Porter, Warren Central (4-10); 2. Madison Brown, Triton Central (4-10); 3. Dakota Miller, Franklin Central (4-8).

Discus: 1. Sydney Miller, New Palestine (131-8); 2. Lillian Towne, Franklin Central (110-11); 3. Nhaydia Watson, Warren Central (107-5).

Shot put: 1. Quin Lumbley, New Palestine (43-8); 2. Nhaydia Watson, Warren Central (36-7); 3. Chanel Webber, Franklin Central (35-11).

Pole vault: 1. Rebecca Uhlik, Franklin Central (10-3); 2. Lily Vaught, Roncalli (9-6); 3. Carli Service provider, Warren Central (9-0).

AT PENDLETON HEIGHTS

Group scores: 1. Lawrence North, 170; 2. Mt. Vernon, 117; 3. New Citadel, 90.5; 4. Japanese Hancock, 54.5; 5. Pendleton Heights, 51; 6. Daleville, 42; 7. Anderson, 31; 8. Blue River Valley, 30; 9. Lapel, 14; 10. Shenandoah, 7; 11. Knightstown, 3; 12. Anderson Prep, 2.

Advertisement

100 sprint: 1. Adrianna Woods, Lawrence North (12.57); 2. Talaya Broaders, Lawrence North (12.84); 3. Anyssa Corridor, New Citadel (12.88).

200 sprint: 1. Adrianna Woods, Lawrence North (26.61); 2. Anyssa Corridor, New Citadel (27.12); 3. Talaya Broaders, Lawrence North (27.76).

400 sprint: 1. Megan Barnum, Lawrence North (1:02.32); 2. Alecea Brown, Lawrence North (1:03.97); 3. Alexandra Overshiner, Mt. Vernon (1:04:01).

800 run: 1. Carol Ludington, Lawrence North (2:26.24); 2. Charlee Gibson, Blue River Valley (2:26.48); 3. Ava Jarrell, Pendleton Heights (2:28.26).

1600 run: 1. Morgan Tharp, Mt. Vernon (5:26.20); 2. Religion Norris, Daleville (5:31.06); 3. Lydia Harvey, New Citadel (5:31.41).

Advertisement

3200 run: 1. Lydia Harvey, New Citadel (12:00.08); 2. Lydia Carrell, Mt. Vernon (12:13.20); 3. Amaya Pittman, Lawrence North (12:43.53).

100 hurdles: 1. Zoe Allen, Anderson (16.17); 2. Sydney Springman, Japanese Hancock (16.92); 3. Anna Stanfield, Mt. Vernon (17.00).

300 hurdles: 1. Anna Stanfield, Mt. Vernon (49.70); 2. Sydney Springman, Japanese Hancock (50.50); 3. Shamari Riley, Lawrence North (52.85).

4×100 relay: 1. Lawrence North, 49.86; 2. Anderson, 52.25; 3. Mt. Vernon, 53.68.

4×400 relay: 1. Lawrence North, 4:10.07; 2. Mt. Vernon, 4:21.15; 3. Japanese Hancock, 4:28.48.

Advertisement

4×800 relay: 1. Mt. Vernon, 9:54.98; 2. Lawrence North, 9:59.07; 3. New Citadel, 10:45.60

Excessive leap: 1. Allyson Madden, Blue River Valley (5-0); 2. Leilani Jones, Lawrence North (4-10); 3. Ellie Meyer, Japanese Hancock (4-10).

Lengthy leap: 1. Adrianna Woods, Lawrence North (16-9.25); 2. London Helloms, Lawrence North (15-9); 3. Emma Gasiorek, Mt. Vernon (14-10).

Pole vault: 1. Margaret Lewis, New Citadel (8-6); 2. Maria Mil, New Citadel (8-0); 3. Sophia Amegnigan, Mt. Vernon (7-6).

Shot put: 1. Malena Higgins, Anderson (38-10.5); 2. Jamaya Thomas, Lawrence North (34-8.25); 3. Whitney Warfel, Pendleton Heights (34-7.5).

Advertisement

Discus: 1. Alaina Bowman, New Citadel (112.9.5); 2. Ashleigh Gelfius, Lawrence North (107-4); 3. Jayla Tremble, Mt. Vernon (105-6.5).

AT PIKE

Group scores: 1. Pike, 141; 2. Ben Davis, 118; 3. Perry Meridian, 108; 4. Southport, 100; 5. Decatur Central, 57; 6. Cardinal Ritter, 51; 7. Crispus Attucks, 19; 8. Indiana Math & Science, 8; 8. Speedway, 8; 10. Covenant Christian, 2.

100 sprint: 1. Nyla Jones, Ben Davis (12.17); 2. Catalla Jones, Pike (12.42); 3. Ariana Smith, Ben Davis (12.72).

200 sprint: 1. Kacyra Simmons, Ben Davis (24.59)*; 2. Modupe Awosanya, Southport (25.61); 3. Sydney Randolph, Pike (26.10).

400 sprint: Kacyra Simmons, Ben Davis (58.20)*; 2. Maya Mundy, Perry Meridian (58.94)*; 3. Gia Clay, Pike (59.49)*.

Advertisement

800 run: 1. Ava Campbell, Southport (2:30.90); 2. Vanessa Newhouse, Perry Meridian (2:35.46); 3. Lily Gross, Perry Meridian (2:36.58).

1600 run: 1. Katelin Schwab, Pike (5:28.33); 2. Ayva Schmalz, Decatur Central (5:32.94); 3. Cecilia Mitchell, Southport (5:36.05).

3200 run: 1. Evelynn Garcia, Southport (11:57.06); 2. Sarah Jacob, Cardinal Ritter (12:00.61); 3. Rachel Schwab, Pike (12:00.82).

100 hurdles: 1. Reane’e Hogan, Ben Davis (15.76); 2. Abi Villarias, Cardinal Ritter (15.98); 3. Caressa Addison, Pike (16.91).

300 hurdles: 1. Catalla Jones, Pike (46.78)*; 2. Abi Villarias, Cardinal Ritter (48.11); 3. Mariah Scott, Ben Davis (49.24).

Advertisement

4×100 relay: 1. Ben Davis, 48.86*; 2. Pike, 49.41*; 3. Southport, 51.94.

4×400 relay: 1. Pike, 4:04.95*; 2. Ben Davis, 4:10.95; 3. Southport, 4:15.36.

4×800 relay: 1. Southport, 10:23.59; 2. Pike, 10:41.43; 3. Ben Davis, 10:58.70.

Excessive leap: 1. Maryava LeMasters, Perry Meridian (5-2); 3. Isabel Egan, Perry Meridian (5-2); 3. Miranda Woodard, Decatur Central (4-10).

Lengthy leap: 1. Modupe Awosanya, Southport (17-8); 2. Trinity Williams, Pike (16-6); 3. Mariyah Fields, Ben Davis (16-6).

Advertisement

Discus: 1. Alexandra Sitzman, Perry Meridian (108-3); 2. Cheyenne Hodges, Pike (108-1); 3. Aliseonna Garnett, Decatur Central (106-3).

Shot put: 1. Lariah Wood, Crispus Attucks (42-2)*; 2. Aliseonna Garnett, Decatur Central (39-1); 3. Alexandra Sitzman, Perry Meridian, 36-9.

Pole vault: 1. Isabelle Potter, Perry Meridian (8-6); 2. Maya Shebeshi, Perry Meridian (8-6); 3. Madison Inexperienced, Cardinal Ritter (7-6).

*sectional document

AT FRANKLIN

Group scores: 1. Middle Grove, 177; 2. Columbus North, 123; 3. Whiteland, 107; 4. Franklin, 76; 5. Greenwood, 47; 6. Columbus East, 40; 7. Indian Creek, 30; 8. Southwestern, 18; 9. Waldron, 3; 10. Greenwood Christian, 1.

Advertisement

100 sprint: 1. Kristen Lavergne, Middle Grove (12.56); 2. Sydney Rodgers, Whiteland (12.59); 3. Olivia Nicoloff, Franklin (12.78).

200 sprint: 1. Madi Kramer, Middle Grove (25.56); 2. Kristen Lavergne, Middle Grove (26.58); 3. Sydney Rodgers, Whiteland (26.76).

400 sprint: 1. Kate Henselmeir, Middle Grove (57.93); 2. Makena Cruse, Greenwood (58.66); 3. Lauren Klem, Franklin (58.92).

800 run: 1. Lily Baker, Columbus North (2:15.31); 2. Julie Klaus, Columbus North (2:17.30); 3. Victoria Jackson, Whiteland (2:18.00).

1600 run: 1. Brianna Newell, Columbus North (5:11.53); 2. Abigail Jacobi, Columbus North (5:27.23); 3. Katia Olmstead, Whiteland (5:38.96).

Advertisement

3200 run: 1. Katherine Rumsey, Columbus North (11:08.44); 2. Julia Kiesler, Columbus North (11:12.13); 3. Bella Fuentes, Whiteland (12:11.10).

100 hurdles: 1. Madi Kramer, Middle Grove (14.87); 2. Alison Muck, Southwestern (15.55); 3. Aubrey Runyon, Franklin (15.65).

300 hurdles: 1. Emma Grey, Columbus East (47.32); 2. Skyler Sichting, Middle Grove (48.05); 3. Brooke Coffman, Franklin (48.10).

4×100 relay: 1. Middle Grove, 50.07; 2. Whiteland, 50.83; 3. Columbus North, 51.75.

4×400 relay: 1. Middle Grove, 4:07.99; 2. Franklin, 4:11.19; 3. Columbus North, 4:11.44.

Advertisement

4×800 relay: 1. Columbus North, 9:27.61; 2. Middle Grove, 9:55.46; 3. Indian Creek, 9:56.46.

Lengthy leap: 1. Lilly Rooks, Southwestern (16-10.5); 2. Kristen Lavergne, Middle Grove (16-10.5); 3. Sierra Newell, Columbus North (16-3.75).

Excessive leap: 1. Ellie Irwin, Greenwood (5-4); 2. Brooke Coffman, Franklin (5-3); 3. Melia Marlin, Whiteland (5-2).

Discus: 1. Shelby Wingler, Middle Grove (137-5); 2. Drew Mallory, Whiteland (134-3); 3. Brooklyn Taylor, Whiteland (120-6).

Shot put: 1. Shelby Wingler, Middle Grove (43-7.75); 2. Kylie Crum, Middle Grove (41-9.75); 3. Drew Mallory, Whiteland (39-9.75).

Advertisement

Pole vault: 1. Amy Luttrell, Greenwood (11-0); 2. Khloie Walker, Middle Grove (10-9); 3. Emilia Brown, Middle Grove (10-0).

AT HAMILTON SOUTHEASTERN

In a sectional that featured three of Indiana’s high 4 groups, third-ranked HSE scored factors in all 16 occasions to edge Noblesville and Carmel.

Click on right here to learn extra.

Group scores: 1. Hamilton Southeastern 141, 2. Noblesville 131, 3. Carmel 128, 4. Fishers 77, 5. Westfield 55, 6. Hamilton Heights 34, 7. Guerin Catholic 33, 8. Western Boone 13, 9. College 8, 10. Lebanon 4

100 sprint: 1. Ella Scally, Fishers (12.05); 2. Princess Campbell, Westfield (12.14); 3. Emily Norris, Carmel (12.42).

Advertisement

1,600 run: 1. Bridget Gallagher, Guerin Catholic (5:06.27), 2. Jamie Klavon, Carmel (5:06.87), 3. Olivia Mundt, Carmel (5:08.77).

200 sprint: 1. Ella Scally, Fishers (25.26); 2. Tobi Fapetu, Westfield (26.04), 3. Jocelyn Davis, HSE (26.17).

400 sprint: 1. Olivia Cebalo, Carmel (56.69), 2. Cambell Wamsley, Carmel (58.43); 3. Regan Wans, HSE (59.22).

800 run: 1. Summer season Rempe, Noblesville (2:14.49); 2. Brinkley Cooper, Noblesville (2:18.51); 3. Vera Schafer, Fishers (2:19.40).

3200 run: 1. Bridget Gallagher, Guerin Catholic (11:02.37); 2. Elizabeth Barrett (Fishers) (11:03.91); 3. Alivia Romaniuk, Carmel (11:04.28).

Advertisement

100 hurdles: 1. Allyson Elsbury, HSE (14.27); 2. Kiana Siefert, Noblesville (14.49); 3. Makenzie Loftin HSE (15.26).

300 hurdles: 1. Kiana Siefert, Noblesville (44.82); 2. Ella Blackmore, HSE (45.08); 3. Allyson Elsbury, HSE (45.49).

4×100 relay: 1. Carmel (Bailey, Belanger, Norris, Department) 48.66, 2. HSE (Davis, Mirro, Smith, Rios-Rojas) 48.68, 3. Westfield (Malin, Hauser, Campbell, Fapetu) 50.05

4×400 relay: 1. Carmel (Carlisle, Wamsley, Cebalo, Samms) 3:55.30, 2. Noblesville (Cooper, Rollins, Siefert, Rempe) 3:57.10, 3. Hamilton Southeastern (Mirro, Blackmore, Kepner, Wans) 3:57.56

4×800 relay: 1. Noblesville (Rempe, Cooper, Flynn, Hazelrigg) 9:23.29, 2. Carmel (Ricketts, Cebalo, Klopstad, Wenzler) 9:28.38, 3. Hamilton Southeastern (Newton, Latta, Kepner, Powers) 9:34.01.

Advertisement

Shot put: 1. Rosiebella Fiabema, HSE (39-4.25); 2. Hanna Alexander, Noblesville (37-9.25); 3. Taylor Reagor, Carmel (37-7).

Lengthy leap: 1. Ella Scally, Fishers (19-1); 2. Jehnea Mirro, HSE (18-10); 3. Allyson Elsbury, HSE (18-8.5).

Discus: 1. Hannah Alexander, Noblesville (141-6); 2. Taylor Reagor, Carmel (132-11); 3. Rosiebella Fiabema, HSE (125-1).

Excessive leap: 1. Kelsey Smith, Hamilton Heights (5-5); 2. Rylee Hassan, Noblesville (5-4); 3. Malina Miller, Noblesville (5-2).

Pole vault: 1. Laina Lillge, Noblesville (11-6); Ella Wilhelm, HSE (11-3); 3. Ashlyn Bauer, Westfield (10-6).

Advertisement

AT LAWRENCE CENTRAL

Outcomes and story to return.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Indiana

Warde Manuel reveals how College Football Playoff committee views outcome of Indiana vs Ohio State

Published

on

Warde Manuel reveals how College Football Playoff committee views outcome of Indiana vs Ohio State


A Top-5 showdown highlighted the Week 13 slate as Indiana and Ohio State squared off at The Horseshoe. Ultimately, the Buckeyes got a blowout victory over the Hoosiers, and all eyes turned toward Tuesday’s College Football Playoff rankings to see how the committee viewed that outcome.

Of course, Indiana wasn’t the only top-ranked team to fall last week. Multiple others did, as well, which likely helped the Hoosiers stay in the Top 10. According to committee chair Warde Manuel, IU has the resume to be the No. 10 team in the country.

Manuel pointed out it wasn’t all bad for Indiana in last week’s matchup. The Hoosiers had some good moments, notably the opening drive. Although they dropped five spots, Manuel said IU still did enough to be in the Top 10.

“We viewed Indiana – they played well at times against Ohio State,” Manuel said on the CFP rankings reveal show on ESPN. “And Ohio State pulled out a victory and really came on in the second half of that game. But we were impressed with some of the things that Indiana did. And they dropped five, but we still felt that their body of work was strong enough to remain in the Top 10.”

Advertisement

Indiana’s strength of schedule was a key point of conversation entering last week’s game. The Hoosiers’ schedule ranked No. 106 in the country through Week 12, according to ESPN, which was the second-weakest of the College Football Playoff Top 25. After the Ohio State game, though, IU’s schedule now ranks No. 51.

Of course, the numbers also back up Indiana’s case to be one of the top teams. The Hoosiers rank No. 9 in the nation in scoring defense and No. 2 in scoring offense. That’s why, after Saturday’s game, Curt Cignetti scoffed at a question about whether they should still be in the 12-team field before answering with a wink and smile.

“Is that a serious question?” Cignetti said in his postgame press conference, with a smirk. “I’m not even gonna answer that one. The answer’s so obvious.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Jack’s Take: Battle 4 Atlantis a Chance to Learn About Indiana, Pick Up Much-Needed Wins

Published

on

Jack’s Take: Battle 4 Atlantis a Chance to Learn About Indiana, Pick Up Much-Needed Wins


PARADISE ISLAND, The Bahamas – The slate of marquee nonconference games surrounding Thanksgiving has become known as Feast Week.

Tournaments in Maui, the Bahamas, Las Vegas and elsewhere generate top-25 matchups on a daily basis. Monday, Memphis upset back-to-back national champion No. 2 UConn. No. 4 Auburn erased a 16-point halftime deficit to take down No. 5 Iowa State. And No. 12 North Carolina came back from 21 points down to defeat Dayton.

That was just the start of a week that makes November feel a bit like March. No. 14 Indiana will compete in the eight-team Battle 4 Atlantis tournament in the Bahamas, along with No. 3 Gonzaga, No. 24 Arizona, West Virginia, Oklahoma, Providence and Davidson.

Indiana is off to a 4-0 start and rose two spots in the latest AP Top 25 poll. Three wins have come against mid-major foes Southern Illlinois-Edwardsville, Eastern Illinois and UNC Greensboro. Indiana also handled South Carolina in a 16-point win, but the Gamecocks have taken a step back from last year’s second-place SEC finish.

Advertisement

And with a nonconference slate that features just one high-major opponent outside its three opportunities in the Bahamas, the Hoosiers must eat up all the opportunities Feast Week offers. 

That starts with a matchup against Louisville, a team Indiana defeated 74-66 last year in the Empire Classic. But the new-look Cardinals are a completely different unit now, led by former College of Charleston head coach Pat Kelsey, 13 new transfers and one freshman. Louisville failed its biggest test of the season so far, a 77-55 home loss to Tennessee, but it’s shaping up to be a far more competitive team than those that went 12-52 in two years under former head coach Kenny Payne.

Analytics site Bart Torvik favors the Hoosiers by 3.6 points and ranks them 30th nationally, compared to the No. 57 Cardinals. With a win, Indiana would likely advance to face Gonzaga, which moved up to No. 3 in the latest AP Top 25 poll and is ranked No. 4 by Torvik.

That’s when the big challenge could come, one that Indiana vitally needs to meet as it builds an NCAA Tournament resume. Its best win so far is South Carolina, currently a bubble team at best. The Hoosiers may end up with wins against mid-major teams that reach the NCAA Tournament, but none that they can hang their hats on come Selection Sunday. 

And once they return to Bloomington, they won’t get another chance to pick up a quality win until Big Ten play. That’s part of the risk that came with Indiana scheduling lighter than normal in the nonconference and relying so much on what it can gain in the Bahamas.

Advertisement

The other factor is that beyond Louisville, Indiana doesn’t know exactly who it’ll play this week. Upsets happen in college basketball all the time, and Indiana could end up facing a lighter slate this week by no fault of its own. Or it could lose to a capable Louisville team Wednesday and head to the loser’s bracket, where wins over certain opponents may not significantly strengthen its profile. 

This Indiana team has enough talent that reaching the NCAA Tournament shouldn’t be in question, but its schedule lacks frequent opportunities at resume-boosting wins. 

The other question going into the Battle 4 Atlantis is, how much do we really know about the Hoosiers so far? In terms of its Big Ten and national title aspirations, almost nothing. We can speculate how Indiana might fare against premier programs, but this tournament in the Bahamas represents the first time we’ll actually see it.

Indiana’s 4-0 start has mostly provided optimism, as the Hoosiers have defeated each team by 11 points or more. But there have been several moments of concern, or ones that at least reveal a team with six transfers and one freshman still getting to know each other. That was expected going into the season, but Indiana can’t afford it to last much longer.

The clear difference between the 2024-25 Hoosiers and last year’s group that missed the NCAA Tournament is guard play. Point guard Myles Rice is averaging 14.8 points and shooting 46.2% from 3-point range so far, a dynamic Indiana simply didn’t have last season. Sophomore wing Mackenzie Mgbako appears to have taken another step in his game, leading Indiana with 18.8 points per game and connecting on 8-of-15 3-point attempts. 

Advertisement

Woodson also has much more capable depth to work with, with veterans like Trey Galloway and Luke Goode, along with budding freshman Bryson Tucker, coming off the bench. That’s all said without mentioning Malik Reneau and Oumar Ballo, who could comprise the Big Ten’s best front court.

So where does the hesitation come from? Woodson has been unhappy with several aspects of the Hoosiers’ play this season. After a 90-55 win over Eastern Illinois, which featured a 37-36 halftime deficit, Woodson called out his team’s readiness. 

“I thought we were still home in bed asleep,” Woodson said. “It was awful.”

Indiana jumped out to a 21-5 win over UNC Greensboro, only to be tied 40-40 with 15:57 left in the second half. Indiana shot just 41.7% from the field and 26.3% from 3-point range, allowed 13 offensive rebounds and committed 13 turnovers in the win. That left a lot to be desired from Woodson, and some of the frustration stems from knowing how much talent he has on this team.

“As a team we had 16 assists. That’s awful. I mean, it’s awful. With this team, we should average between 20 and 30 assists. So the play tonight, the way we played offensively tonight was selfish as hell to me,” Woodson said.

Advertisement

“That’s something that just can’t be because we have enough guys on this team that can make basketball plays,” Woodson continued. “We’ve just got to be unselfish and sacrifice the ball for the sake of the team and good things will happen.”

Woodson and the Hoosiers have a chance to ease those concerns and pick up several quality wins. Good, bad or somewhere in between, this week will reveal a lot about this Indiana team, which needs to return to Bloomington with something to show for this trip.



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Purdue vs Indiana Prediction: Odds, Expert Picks, QB Matchup, Betting Trends and Stats

Published

on

Purdue vs Indiana Prediction: Odds, Expert Picks, QB Matchup, Betting Trends and Stats


Indiana is coming off its first loss of the season and welcomes Purdue to town for Senior Day.

The Indiana Hoosiers are 10-1 with its first loss of the season coming at Ohio State (38-15). Indiana dropped to No. 10 in the AP Poll and will likely be on the backend of the teams in for the latest College Football Playoff rankings, but a convincing win here would help. Indiana has been one of the best against-the-spread (ATS) teams in the country and as a -29 point home favorite, all signs point to Curt Cignetti and company rolling.

Not much has gone right for the 1-10 Purdue Boilermakers. After the 49-0 win over FCS Indiana State, Purdue has lost 10 straight games with seven out of 10 losses coming by 17 or more points. Purdue lost to Michigan State 24-17 last week and has two OT losses this year, but this road game seems out of reach for the Boilermakers.

NBC Sports has all the latest info and analysis you need, including how to tune in for kickoff, odds from BetMGM, player news and updates, and of course our predictions and best bets for the game from our staff of experts.

Advertisement

Listen to the B1G Talk podcast with Todd Blackledge and Noah Eagle for the most compelling storylines across all ofcollege football, with the biggest teams on the rise and the latest rankings!

Game Details and How to watch Purdue @ Indiana

  • Date: Saturday, November 30, 2024
  • Time: 7:00 PM EST
  • Site: Indiana University Memorial Stadium
  • City: Bloomington, IN
  • TV/Streaming: Fox Sports 1

Want to check out the other games on the College Football schedule this week? We’ve got you covered right here on NBC Sports with all the matchup, venue, game-time and TV/streaming info so you won’t miss any of the action!

Game odds for Purdue @ Indiana

The latest odds as of Tuesday afternoon:

o Moneyline: Indiana (-6500), Purdue (+2000)

o Spread: Indiana -29 (-110)

o Total: 56.5 points

Advertisement

*odds courtesy of BetMGM

The spread opened at Indiana -25.5, so heavy money is pouring in on the Hoosiers. That is no surprise since Indiana is on the cusp of a College Football Playoff. The total has no movement.

NBC Sports Bet Best Bet

Vaughn Dalzell (@VmoneySports) has the following best bets between Purdue and Indiana:

“The Indiana Hoosiers suffered the first loss of the season last week at Ohio State (38-15) and need to bounce back dominantly to secure a College Football Playoff berth.

Indiana’s First Half Team Total is 23.5, which might seem mighty lofty, but it’s certainly within range and so is a 50-point game for the Hoosiers. At home, Indiana has scored 17, 17, 14, 31, and 21 first-half points versus DI opponents this season for 20.0 first-half points per game.

Advertisement

Purdue’s defense hasn’t taken any steps forward this season. In the last seven games, the Boilermakers have allowed 24, 21, 21, 17, 21, 24, and 21 first-half points, so this number is nothing Indiana cannot do.”

BetMGM College Football Insights: National Championship

Line movement (Last Week to Now)

  • Ohio State +320 to +275
  • Georgia +500 to +400
  • Texas +500 to +450

Highest Ticket%

  • Ohio State 13.4%
  • Texas 11.1%
  • Georgia 10.5%

Highest Handle%

  • Ohio State 15.9%
  • Georgia 14.9%
  • Alabama 12.1%

Biggest Liabilities

  • Colorado
  • Ohio State
  • Alabama

College Football talk is taking over Bet the Edge every Thursday throughout the season. Bet the EDGE is your source for all things sports betting. Get all of Vaughn Dalzell, Eric Froton, and Brad Thomas’ insights Thursdays at 6AM ET right here or wherever you get your favorite podcasts.

Quarterback matchup for Boilermakers @ Hoosiers

  • Purdue: Hudson Card threw for a season-high 342 passing yards against Michigan State last week on 26-of-47. Card has nine touchdowns to six interceptions on the year and 1,606 passing yards.
  • Indiana: Kurtis Rourke has had a phenomenal season that has begun to be derailed slightly by injury. Rourke has 274 combined passing yards in the past two games and had zero touchdowns to zero interceptions last week. On the season, Rourke has 21 touchdowns to four interceptions for 2,478 passing yards and a 69.6 completion percentage.

Boilermakers @ Hoosiers player news & recent stats

  • Purdue is 3-8 ATS this season, ranking tied for fifth-worst.
  • Indiana is 8-3 ATS this season, ranking tied for seventh-best.
  • Indiana is 8-3 to the Over this season, ranking third-best.
  • Indiana is 5-2 ATS this year at home and 4-3 to the Over.
  • Purdue is 2-3 ATS this season as the road team and 3-2 to the Over.
  • Kurtis Rouke threw for zero touchdowns and zero interceptions last week.
  • Hudson Card threw a season-high 342 passing yards last week.

Please bet responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline at 1-800-522-4700.

Follow our experts on socials to keep up with all the latest content from the staff:

  • Vaughn Dalzell (@VmoneySports)
  • Brad Thomas (@MrBradThomas)
  • Drew Dinsick (@whale_capper)
  • Jay Croucher (@croucherJD)
  • Eric Froton (@CFFroton)





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending