Connect with us

Illinois

Washington Men’s Basketball vs. #22 Illinois: Game Preview & How to Watch

Published

on

Washington Men’s Basketball vs. #22 Illinois: Game Preview & How to Watch


How to Watch (and bet)

Date: Sunday, 1/5/25

Tip-Off Time: 1:00 pm PT

TV: Big Ten Network

Radio: Huskies Gameday App, Sports Radio KJR

Advertisement

Location: Seattle, Washington

Betting Line: Washington Huskies +10

Illinois Fighting Illini 2024-25 Statistics:

Record: 10-3 (2-1)

Points For per Game: 88.2 ppg (5th)

Points Against per Game: 66.5 ppg (55th)

Advertisement

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency: 119.5 (15th)

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency: 93.5 (7th)

Strength of Schedule: 44th

Illinois Key Players:

G- Kylan Boswell, Jr. 6’2, 205: 11.5 ppg, 4.7 rpg, 4.1 apg, 36.1% FG, 27.6% 3pt, 76.7% FT

Husky fans are familiar with Boswell as he spent the last 2 seasons at Arizona. He hasn’t quite lived up to the billing he had as a former 5-star recruit and is shooting a career worst on 3-pointers by far. Although he hit 4/5 against Oregon on Thursday. Boswell is a good passer but has been Illinois’ secondary ball handler for the most part despite career bests in both assist and turnover rate so far.

Advertisement

G- Kasparas Jakucionis, Fr. 6’6, 205: 16.3 ppg, 5.6 rpg, 5.4 apg, 49.2% FG, 42.9% 3pt, 86.8% FT

The Lithuanian freshman superstar is the big reason for Illinois not skipping a beat despite almost entirely flipping their roster from last year. He’s a jumbo point guard who is efficient shooting from everywhere on the court. If there’s one nitpick it’s that he commits way too many turnovers with 3.7 per game but despite that he is still a well above average offensive player given he does everything else well.

G- Tre White, Sr. 6’7, 210: 10.2 ppg, 5.4 rpg, 1.1 apg, 56.4% FG, 34.8% 3pt, 90.2% FT

White had a great freshman season at USC, transferred to a bad Louisville team last year, and now is thriving again on Illinois. He has been unstoppable inside the arc in Big Ten play so far shooting 82.4% on 2’s and 92.9% from the FT line in their 3 conference games. That includes a 20 pts, 11 reb, 4 ast, 2 blk game against Oregon this week. He doesn’t take a lot of him but it certainly doesn’t hurt that he also is shooting a career best on 3’s. Look at just about any rate stat and it’s a career high for White so far.

F- Ben Humirichous, Sr. 6’9, 225: 8.2 ppg, 2.8 rpg, 1.0 apg, 41.1% FG, 36.5% 3pt, 60.0% FT

Advertisement

You could argue that Humirichous is maybe the only disappointment on this Illinois roster so far. He shot 42.1% from deep last year at Evansville and that is down a little bit to 36.5% and just 28.6% in B1G play. Although like the rest of the team he broke out with 4/7 from deep against Oregon and a season-best 18 points. The other thing that has backslid is his rebounding. Looking at his statistical profile it’s about what you’d expect for a 6’2 SG who does nothing but take 3-pointers.

C- Tomislav Ivisic, Fr. 7’1, 255: 14.2 ppg, 9.2 rpg, 1.2 bpg, 53.0% FG, 37.9% 3pt, 73.3% FT

Technically, Ivisic is a sophomore in terms of eligibility as that was the NCAA compromise after the Croatian spent some time playing professionally in Europe. His brother plays at Arkansas but this Ivisic has come in and been dominant right away. He’s top-ten in the Big Ten in both offensive and defensive rebounding and is shooting 65% on 2’s and 38% on 3’s while also almost never turning over the ball. In Big Ten play so far he has actually taken more 3-pointers than 2-pointers despite being 7’1 so he sometimes is prone to settling for outside shots.

The Outlook

It’s fair to say that both teams are coming off of their best wins of the season on Thursday night. Washington was able to beat a top-25 Maryland team at home by 6 points. Good. Illinois meanwhile set an NCAA record for the biggest margin of victory over an AP Top-Ten team on the road with a 109-77 win. Yikes.

Before the Oregon game it would’ve been fair to question Illinois’ ability to win on the road. They lost by 13 to Alabama in a semi-away game and lost in OT to Northwestern at the beginning of December. But then they crushed Oregon into a fine powder by shooting 26/44 (59.1%) inside the arc and 16/29 (55.2%) beyond it.

Advertisement

It seems unlikely to think that Illinois can have that kind of performance again. Illinois has now scored at least 109 points in back-to-back games but even with that taken into consideration they still shoot just 34.9% on 3’s for the season. Of their 7 leaders in 3-point attempts this season, 4 of them shoot between 35% and 38%. It’s a team of guys who are good from deep but not quite lights out status.

Washington’s last 3 opponents have combined to shoot 9/46 (19.6%) from deep and on the season the Huskies rank in the top-20 nationally in both 3-point% defense and preventing opponents from attempting 3-point shot. Illinois doesn’t make a crazy percentage overall but they take 50% of their shots on the season from deep. It will be up to Washington to make them uncomfortable and force them to drive the ball as Illinois is 350th nationally in percentage of their points coming on 2-pointers.

There’s no reason though to think that Washington will light it up from deep. The Huskies have crawled out of their early shooting hole and are now merely bad rather than horrendous from deep at 32.2%. Illinois is also elite at preventing 3’s and rank 6th in opponent 3-pt% at 27.2% and 30th in preventing 3-point shots. It will be a struggle for Washington to even reach average although the Huskies still beat Maryland without doing so on Thursday.

It’s an interesting defensive strategy for Illinois but one that clearly works. The Illini are 12th or better in opponent shooting percentage on 2’s, 3’s and FTs. Almost no one is efficient shooting on them. They also rank 9th in defensive rebounding rate so they don’t allow second chance points.

There only 2 reasons anyone scores on Illinois. The first is that they are 333rd nationally in opponent turnover rate. They will guard the hell out of you but they aren’t going to gamble in the passing lanes or get overaggressive with their hands. The Huskies absolutely can’t throw the ball away and help Illinois in that regard. The Illini also play with the 18th fastest pace in the country so they want to run up and down and increase the number of total possessions. We’ll see if that helps or hurts the Huskies.

Advertisement

There will be opportunities inside for Great Osobor. Illinois has only one true shot blocker and it’s their backup center who plays about 14 minutes per game. Washington will need to repeatedly get the ball inside and score at the basket particularly in transition rather than settle for three-point shots. They’ll also need to aggressively chase Illinois off the three-point line and hope that they experience some regression to the mean with their outside shooting.

Thursday night’s game kicked off a stretch of 7 straight games against teams that rank in the top-27 at KenPom and 11 of 12 against top-45 teams. That’s absolutely brutal and even clawing out a 3-4 record in those first 7 contests would be a clear sign of progress for Washington. A good but not great Northwestern team held Illinois to 56 points in regulation and beat them in overtime last month. It’s possible. But it’s certainly not the most likely outcome.

Prediction

Washington Huskies– 75, Illinois Fighting Illini- 84



Source link

Advertisement

Illinois

Illinois vs Iowa prediction, analysis, Elite Eight expert picks for men’s March Madness

Published

on

Illinois vs Iowa prediction, analysis, Elite Eight expert picks for men’s March Madness


The men’s 2026 NCAA Tournament continues with Elite Eight action Saturday with No. 3 Illinois vs. No. 9 Iowa on the two-game schedule.

USA TODAY Sports’ college basketball experts have analyzed all the angles and determined a path to victory for each side. Here’s everything you need to know before the Elite Eight matchup tips off.

USA TODAY has a team of journalists covering the men’s NCAA Tournament to keep you up to date with every point scored, rebound grabbed and game won in the 68-team tournament.

Advertisement

Illinois will win Elite Eight game vs Iowa if…

  • John Leuzzi: It replicates what it did defensively against Houston.
  • Jordan Mendoza: It controls the interior.
  • Ehsan Kassim: Wagler can win the matchup against Stirtz.
  • Austin Curtright: If its defense plays like it did against Houston.

Iowa will win Elite Eight game vs Illinois  if…

  • John Leuzzi: It limits Illinois on offensive rebounds, and second chance opportunities.
  • Jordan Mendoza: it’s knocking down 3-pointers.
  • Ehsan Kassim: Hawkeyes can make the game slower paced and Illinois misses shots.
  • Austin Curtright: Its bench contributors of Alvaro Folgueiras, Tate Sage and others continue their strong play.

Illinois vs Iowa: 1 Stat to watch

  • John Leuzzi: Bennett Stirtz vs. Keaton Wagler at the point guard battle.
  • Jordan Mendoza: 3-point shot.
  • Ehsan Kassim: Illinois 3-point shooting.
  • Austin Curtright: Illinois’ defense has been outstanding in the NCAA Tournament, despite ranking outside the top 20 in KenPom’s adjusted defensive efficiency.

Illinois vs Iowa Elite Eight prediction

  • John Leuzzi: Iowa
  • Jordan Mendoza: Illinois
  • Ehsan Kassim: Illinois
  • Austin Curtright: Illinois

3 Illinois vs 9 Iowa

  • Opening Moneyline: Illinois (-275), Iowa (+227)
  • Opening Spread: Illinois (-6.5)
  • Opening Total: 139.5

How to Watch Illinois vs Iowa in the Elite Eight

No. 3 Illinois takes on No. 9 Iowa at Toyota Center on March 28 at 6:09 PM The game is airing on TBS.

Stream March Madness on Sling

2026 Men’s March Madness full schedule

See the schedule, live scores and results for all of the NCAA Tournament action here.

  • March 17-18: First Four
  • March 19-20: First Round
  • March 21-22: Second Round
  • March 26-27: Sweet 16
  • March 28-29: Elite 8
  • April 4: Final Four
  • April 6: National Championship



Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

Bears stadium deal should not include lawmaker perks or raise property taxes

Published

on

Bears stadium deal should not include lawmaker perks or raise property taxes



Publicly funded stadium deals can involve questionable incentives for politicians. The megaprojects bill in Illinois would drive up neighbors’ property taxes.

Any deal between Illinois and the Chicago Bears for a new stadium must avoid giveaways to lawmakers and property tax increases for others.

The Bears own the former Arlington Park Racecourse in Arlington Heights and have said they’re also considering Northwest Indiana for a stadium development. A bill in the Illinois General Assembly would offer property tax breaks to such “megaprojects.”

Agreements for publicly funded stadiums in other cities often have included luxury suites and free tickets for lawmakers. Local officials in Kansas City have been criticized for getting access to tickets and suites during ongoing stadium negotiations. Officials in Arizona have repeatedly used free access to publicly funded stadiums to host guests.

Advertisement

A bill in Ohio would prohibit state lawmakers from knowingly accepting free or discounted tickets to pro sports events. The proposal comes amid negotiations with the Cleveland Browns over public funding for a new stadium.

Offering free admission and luxury suites to lawmakers who make decisions about publicly funding stadiums creates a clear conflict of interest.

From a taxpayer perspective, such perks can divert public resources if lawmakers have an incentive to offer a team or other megaproject a tax break when that revenue could go toward broadly shared public benefits. From a free-market standpoint, these arrangements distort competition by subsidizing select teams and projects rather than encouraging municipalities to make themselves attractive for private investment.

Illinois legislators should ensure that any stadium agreement with the Bears does not include free tickets or luxury accommodations for lawmakers.

Perks for politicians are only half the story. The proposed incentive package in Springfield, HB 910 House Amendment 1, would be devastating for taxpayers.

Advertisement

Much of the current discussion revolves around the massive property tax reductions the bill would provide for so-called megaprojects as an attempt to spur economic development.

While negotiating targeted tax incentives is bad policy to begin with, the legislation would make Illinois’ property tax crisis even worse for other taxpayers. Although approved megaprojects would pay steeply discounted property taxes, a clause in the bill allows a taxing body to count the cash value of the megaproject in its total assessed value.

In other words, taxing bodies can still increase taxes as if the project were paying normal tax rates, generating increased revenue, but the project would not pay those higher taxes. Neighboring businesses, homeowners and renters would pay more to make up for the team’s discount.

Here is some of what’s in the bill, which has passed out of committee and could be called for a full House vote any time:

  • To qualify, a project must have at least $500 million in eligible costs, which can include the property purchase and can be retroactive up to five years before the megaproject certificate is issued. The project must be completed within seven to 10 years, but that can be extended by five years. The site must be operated for at least 20 years; the tax incentive would last at least 23 years and up to 40 years.
  • The megaproject’s assessment would be frozen so that its property tax bill is calculated on the “base year” of the project, meaning the value of the property before any improvements, such as a stadium.
  • However, for purposes of issuing bonds and property tax extension limitation calculations, the taxing body could use the current fair cash value of the property. In other words, new development, which is generally exempt from Property Tax Extension Limitation Laws, would allow for the levy to grow beyond the limited rate, which other taxpayers will have to cover.

The bill’s “incentive agreement” allows for separate payments from the megaproject entity, such as the Bears, or an alternative source, to affected taxing bodies in addition to property taxes bill. The payment amount would be negotiated with taxing bodies.

Illinoisans already pay the highest property taxes in the nation. Homeowners in Arlington Heights pay average annual property taxes of more than $8,000. HB910 would make it even worse. One simple solution is to strike this language from the bill:

Advertisement

Projects to be valued at fair cash value for purposes of bonded indebtedness and limitations on property tax extensions. Projects to which an assessment freeze applies pursuant to this Division shall be valued at their fair cash value for purposes of calculating a municipality’s general obligation bond limits and a taxing district’s limitation on tax extensions.

Removing that language would ensure that businesses, homeowners and renters in the megaproject area would not face higher property taxes because of an incentive agreement.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

Obituary for Tessie Lee Woods at Carl E. Ponds Funeral Home Inc.

Published

on

Obituary for Tessie Lee Woods at Carl E. Ponds Funeral Home Inc.


Tessie Lee Woods, age 91, departed this earths life surrounded by her loved ones. She was Born on October 25, 1934, in Arkansas to the late Connie and Deanner Holliman. Tessie attended school in Arkansas and, later in life, moved to Rockford, Illinois, where she met and married Robert B.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending