Connect with us

Illinois

Bears again expand stadium search, including outside Illinois

Published

on

Bears again expand stadium search, including outside Illinois


CHICAGO — Three days before hosting their biggest game at Soldier Field in years, the Chicago Bears are exploring moving outside the city for which they are named.

In an open letter to fans Wednesday evening, team president and CEO Kevin Warren said the Bears will explore other locations — including outside of Cook County, where the team owns a 326-acre property in Arlington Heights, Illinois — to build a domed stadium.

That includes moving the Bears out of Illinois altogether.

“In addition to Arlington Park, we need to expand our search and critically evaluate opportunities throughout the wider Chicagoland region, including Northwest Indiana,” Warren said. “This is not about leverage. We spent years trying to build a new home in Cook County. We invested significant time and resources evaluating multiple sites and rationally decided on Arlington Heights.

Advertisement

“Our fans deserve a world-class stadium. Our players and coaches deserve a venue that matches the championship standard they strive for every day. With that in mind, our organization must keep every credible pathway open to deliver that future.”

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker pushed back against a potential move of the team out of the state.

“Suggesting the Bears would move to Indiana is a startling slap in the face to all the beloved and loyal fans who have been rallying around the team during this strong season,”Pritzker spokesperson Matt Hill said in a statement. “The Governor’s a Bears fan who has always wanted them to stay in Chicago. He has also said that ultimately they are a private business.”

The Bears purchased the Arlington Park property that formerly housed the Arlington International Racecourse for $197 million in 2023, shortly before Warren replaced Ted Phillips as team president and CEO. The Bears proposed building a 60,000-seat fixed-roof stadium within a $5 billion mixed-use development.

Not long after closing on the land in Arlington Heights, the team began exploring options for a new stadium site when it announced its plans to build at the Arlington Park site were “at risk” as negotiations over property taxes reached a $100 million impasse.

Advertisement

Shortly before the 2024 draft, the Bears shifted their focus to building their new stadium on the lakefront south of Soldier Field and announced they would invest more than $2 billion in private money into the construction and development of the stadium and surrounding areas.

Although the team has maintained that the construction of a new stadium will be privately funded, concerns over the burden placed on taxpayers to fund the infrastructure around the stadium led to an impasse. That led the Bears to explore Arlington Heights once again as an option, which Warren announced during league meetings in April. Ahead of the Bears’ home opener against theMinnesota Vikingson Sept. 8, Warren released a letter to fans, saying the team’s sights were set on building in Arlington Heights. He has said throughout the year that the goal was to break ground before the end of 2025.

However, the Bears have been in a battle with lawmakers over tax breaks and securing $855 million in public funding for costs related to building the new stadium.

“We have not asked for state taxpayer dollars to build the stadium at Arlington Park,” Warren said. “We asked only for a commitment to essential local infrastructure [roads, utilities, and site improvements], which is more than typical for projects of this size. Additionally, we sought reasonable property tax certainty to secure financing. We listened to state leadership and relied on their direction and guidance, yet our efforts have been met with no legislative partnership.”

The Bears’ current lease at Soldier Field runs through 2033. On Saturday night, the 10-4 Bears will host the Green Bay Packers in a high-stakes meeting that will heavily determine Chicago’s path to the postseason.br/]

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 ESPN Internet Ventures. All rights reserved.



Source link

Illinois

OCC moves to block Illinois ban on swipe fees on taxes, tips

Published

on

OCC moves to block Illinois ban on swipe fees on taxes, tips


Processing Content

  • Key insight: The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is moving to preempt Illinois’ tax-and-tip swipe fee ban before it takes effect July 1, 2026.
  • Supporting data: The draft interim final rule was sent to the Office of Management and Budget for approval and would take effect immediately once OMB has greenlighted the rule.
  • Forward look: The rule could be issued within weeks and could potentially add a new wrinkle into ongoing litigation over the state law.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency this week sent a draft rule to the Office of Management and Budget that would preempt an Illinois state law banning the collection of interchange fees on taxes and tips.
A notice announcing the rule‘s consideration appeared on OMB’s website, though the contents of the draft rule were not disclosed. Because it is an interim final rule, the rule would immediately go into effect at the outset of the public comment period, but could be updated to incorporate feedback. 

Jaret Seiberg, policy analyst at TD Cowen said the rule’s consideration could take time. 

“OMB reviews can vary significantly with some taking days and others months,” Seiberg wrote. “In this case, we expect an expedited review with the agency able to issue the interim final rule within a few weeks.”

Banks charge interchange fees — also known as swipe fees — every time a credit card is used, and those fees are justified as necessary to pay for fraud prevention, the cost of processing the transaction and offsetting the costs of credit card rewards. The fees are set by the card networks like Visa or Mastercard and often are around 2-3% of a transaction. Merchants paid nearly $200 billion in such fees last year.

Advertisement

Critics of interchange fees, such as Eric Cohen, founder & CEO of Merchant Advocate, say payment systems are opaque, making it impossible to know what interchange fees they’re charged on any given transaction. He argued in a recent piece for American Banker that interchange fees no longer fit the system they were originally designed for.

The Illinois Interchange Fee Prohibition Act, signed into law by Governor J.B. Pritzker in 2024, would bar banks and their affiliated card networks from levying such fees on the state sales tax and gratuity portions of transactions, with state officials saying merchants should not be charged for processing non-revenue. 

Shortly after the law’s passage in 2024, the American Bankers Association, America’s Credit Unions, Illinois Bankers Association and Illinois Credit Union League sued Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul to block the measure, saying the rule is technically unworkable, acts as a price control and could cost issuers millions. The state has subsequently moved to delay the law’s implementation for a year. A federal judge ruled in February to uphold the law; plaintiffs have appealed the district court’s ruling, and a ruling on that appeal is expected by mid-June. 

The OCC has also filed amicus briefs backing the plaintiffs’ case, arguing the law should be blocked because it conflicts with federal banking law and would significantly interfere with national banks’ ability to earn money from card transactions. Ten former OCC officials also filed a brief supporting the plaintiffs.

The Illinois Retail Merchants Association responded to the OCC’s notice of the draft interim final rule with concern, saying the move prioritizes banks’ bottom lines over bringing down costs from merchants and consumers.

Advertisement

 

“This rushed announcement by the federal government to usurp Illinois law is unprecedented, prioritizing the bottom line of banks and credit card companies over meaningful relief for businesses and consumers. While the office has failed to explain their reasoning or allow public review, it’s clear the goal is an end-run around the legal process after a judge recently upheld the law,” said Rob Karr, president and CEO of the Illinois Retail Merchants Association. “Banks, credit card companies and credit card processors are doing all they can to preserve an uncompetitive and unfair system, including spending millions of dollars on ads spreading falsehoods and threatening to cause chaos for consumers. It’s time to end their reign over our pocketbooks.”

Seiberg says he expects more litigation in the future, but that preemption cases often go the agency’s way. The entrance of the OCC rulemaking could lead the appeals court currently reviewing banks’ challenge to the Illinois law to send the case back to the lower court to reconsider the impact of the rule on the overall case. 

“We expect Illinois will challenge the OCC’s preemption order in court,” Seiberg wrote in a research note. “If the Illinois law survives legal challenge, then it is only a matter of time before most other states adopt similar policies. It also likely encourages states to seek other limits on interchange fees using the same legal reasoning that these fees are set by networks rather than banks.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

Illinois law could change credit card transactions at restaurants and stores

Published

on

Illinois law could change credit card transactions at restaurants and stores


CHICAGO (WGN) — Charging your credit card at a restaurant or grocery store could change this summer if one swipe won’t cover the tax or tip.

It’s the first law of its kind in the country. While some feel it will save businesses money, banks aren’t happy about the change. 

“In the restaurant business, we operate on very thin margins. Every decision matters. Even small disruptions can have a huge impact on our bottom line,” said Tremaine Branch, a Peoria restaurant owner concerned about the Interchange Fee Prohibition Act, which becomes law in Illinois on July 1.

As it stands now, when you swipe your credit or debit card for a purchase, the retailer’s bank pays an “interchange fee” to the consumer’s bank, typically around 2-3%. The Interchange Fee Prohibition Act would eliminate those fees on the tip and tax portions of the transaction. 

Advertisement

The legislation was proposed to address concerns that businesses incur costs on money that isn’t part of their revenue for goods and services. After the bill passed, a group of financial institutions filed a lawsuit in 2024, and in March, a federal judge upheld the law. 

Sam Toia, with the Illinois Restaurant Association, believes the legislation could benefit business owners. 

“I have every faith banks can flip the software, we’re in 2026, to figure this out,” he said. “We’re out here fighting for our small independent restaurants throughout the state of Illinois that will save no swipe fees to our independent restaurants on taxes and tips. That will save them quite a bit of money.”

Businesses that don’t comply would face a $1,000-per-transaction penalty, however.

“There’s no workable technology in place right now that can actually do what this law requires,” said Ben Jackson, an executive vice president of government relations at Illinois Bankers Association. “It’s completely unknown whether Illinois businesses with that July 1 implementation date could put this law into practice.”

Advertisement

Businesses should check with their payment processor to update software and learn how to adjust their systems before July 1.



Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

2 Chicago suburbs named in new list of ‘Best Places to Live in U.S.’ in 2026

Published

on

2 Chicago suburbs named in new list of ‘Best Places to Live in U.S.’ in 2026


Two Chicago suburbs were named on a new list of the best places to live in the U.S. in 2026.

In the annual “best places to live” report from ranking website Livability, a northern suburb and a western suburb were both named among the top 20 places to live in the U.S.

“Our 2026 list highlights the small- to mid-sized cities where your paycheck goes further, your commute is shorter and your quality of life comes first,” the publication wrote.

The ranking looked at more than 100 factors across more than 2,000 cities when compiling its list, including things like housing and affordability, amenities and environment, safety, health, education and transportation. Extra weight was given to the category of housing and cost of living as the publication said “we recognize that Americans face a higher cost of living than ever before.”

Advertisement

Cities included in the list had median home values under $500,000 and populations between 75,000 and 500,000 people.

“If it isn’t attainable, it isn’t on our list,” Livability wrote.

While no Illinois city took the top spot on the list, Naperville ranked in the top five, coming in at No. 4. Evanston followed at No. 13.

It marks the second list to name Naperville among the “best places to live in the U.S.,” with a recent ranking from Niche also dubbing the suburb among the top.

Other Midwest cities also made the cut, including Carmel, Indiana, at No. 2; Troy, Michigan, at No. 7; and Bloomington, Minnesota, at No. 18.

Advertisement

The top spot on the list was Huntsville, Alabama.

See the full ranking here.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending